scholarly journals The presentational flow chart “unwell adult” of the Manchester Triage System—Curse or blessing?

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. e0252730
Author(s):  
Vanessa Brutschin ◽  
Monika Kogej ◽  
Sylvia Schacher ◽  
Moritz Berger ◽  
Ingo Gräff

Background The presentational flow chart “unwell adult” of the Manchester Triage System (MTS) occupies a special role in this triage system, defined as the nonspecific presentation of an emergency patient. Current scientific studies show that a considerable proportion of emergency room patients present with so-called "nonspecific complaints". The aim of the present study is to investigate in detail the initial assessment of emergency patients triaged according to the presentational flow chart "unwell adult". Methods Monocentric, retrospective observational study. Results Data on 14,636 emergency department visits between March 12th and August 12th, 2019 were included. During the observation period, the presentational flow chart "unwell adult" was used 1,143 times and it was the third most frequently used presentational flow chart. Patients triaged with this flow chart often had unspecific complaints upon admission to the emergency department. Patients triaged with the “unwell adult” chart were often classified with a lower triage level. Notably, patients who died in hospital during the observation period frequently received low triage levels. The AUC for the MTS flow chart “unwell adult” and hospitalization in general for older patients (age ≥ 65 years) was 0.639 (95% CI 0.578–0.701), and 0.730 (95% CI 0.714–0.746) in patients triaged with more specific charts. The AUC for the MTS flow chart “unwell adult” and admission to ICU for older patients (age ≥65 years) was 0.631 (95% CI 0.547–0.715) and 0.807 (95% CI 0.790–0.824) for patients triaged with more specific flow charts. Comparison of the predictive ability of the MTS for in-hospital mortality in the group triaged with the presentational flow chart “unwell adult” revealed an AUC of 0.682 (95% CI 0.595–0.769) vs. 0.834 (95% CI 0.799–0.869) in the other presentational flow charts. Conclusion The presentational flow chart "unwell adult" is frequently used by triage nurses for initial assessment of patients. Patient characteristics assessed with the presentational flow chart "unwell adult" differ significantly from those assessed with MTS presentational flow charts for more specific symptoms. The quality of the initial assessment in terms of a well-functioning triage priority assessment tool is less accurate than the performance of the MTS described in the literature.

2018 ◽  
Vol 56 (05) ◽  
pp. 479-487 ◽  
Author(s):  
Constantin Cornelius ◽  
Arthur Hoffman ◽  
Achim Tresch ◽  
Joerg Krey ◽  
Ralf Kiesslich ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Suspected gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is a common initial diagnosis in emergency departments. Despite existing endoscopic scores to estimate the risk of GI bleeding, the primary clinical assessment of urgency can remain challenging. The 5-step Manchester Triage System (MTS) is a validated score that is often applied for the initial assessment of patients presenting in emergency departments. Methods All computer-based records of patients who were admitted between January 2014 and December 2014 to our emergency department in a tertiary referral hospital were analyzed retrospectively. The aim of our retrospective analysis was to determine if patient triage using the MTS is associated with rates of endoscopy and with presence of active GI bleeding. Results In summary, 5689 patients with a GI condition were treated at our emergency department. Two hundred eighty-four patients (4.9 %) presented with suspected GI bleeding, and 165 patients (58 %) received endoscopic diagnostic. Endoscopic intervention for hemostasis was needed in 34 patients (21 %). In patients who underwent emergency endoscopy, triage into MTS categories with higher urgency was associated with higher rates of endoscopic confirmation of suspected GI bleeding (79 % of patients with MTS priority levels 1 or 2, 53 % in level 3 patients, and 40 % in levels 4 or 5 patients; p = 0.024). Conclusions The MTS is an established tool for triage in emergency departments and could have a potential to guide early clinical decision-making with regards to urgency of endoscopic evaluation in patients with suspected GI bleeding.


2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Steffie H. A. Brouns ◽  
Lisette Mignot-Evers ◽  
Floor Derkx ◽  
Suze L. Lambooij ◽  
Jeanne P. Dieleman ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Luís Leite ◽  
Rui Baptista ◽  
Jorge Leitão ◽  
Joana Cochicho ◽  
Filipe Breda ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 177 ◽  
pp. 232-237.e1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joany M. Zachariasse ◽  
Jan Willem Kuiper ◽  
Matthijs de Hoog ◽  
Henriëtte A. Moll ◽  
Mirjam van Veen

Author(s):  
Emilia A. Cicolo ◽  
Fernanda Ayache Nishi ◽  
Heloísa H. Ciqueto Peres ◽  
Diná de Almeida Lopes Monteiro da Cruz

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. e024896 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Slagman ◽  
Felix Greiner ◽  
Julia Searle ◽  
Linton Harriss ◽  
Fintan Thompson ◽  
...  

ObjectivesTo investigate the suitability of the German version of the Manchester Triage System (MTS) as a potential tool to redirect emergency department (ED) patients to general practitioner care. Such tools are currently being discussed in the context of reorganisation of emergency care in Germany.DesignProspective cohort study.SettingSingle centre University Hospital Emergency Department.ParticipantsAdult, non-surgical ED patients.ExposureA non-urgent triage category was defined as a green or blue triage category according to the German version of the MTS.Primary and secondary outcome measuresSurrogate parameters for short-term risk (admission rate, diagnoses, length of hospital stay, admission to the intensive care unit, in-hospital and 30-day mortality) and long-term risk (1-year mortality).ResultsA total of 1122 people presenting to the ED participated in the study. Of these, 31.9% (n=358) received a non-urgent triage category and 68.1% (n=764) were urgent. Compared with non-urgent ED presentations, those with an urgent triage category were older (median age 60 vs 56 years, p=0.001), were more likely to require hospital admission (47.8% vs 29.6%) and had higher in-hospital mortality (1.6% vs 0.8%). There was no significant difference observed between non-urgent and urgent triage categories for 30-day mortality (1.2% [n=4] vs 2.2% [n=15]; p=0.285) or for 1-year mortality (7.9% [n=26] vs 10.5% [n=72]; p=0.190). Urgency was not a significant predictor of 1-year mortality in univariate (HR=1.35; 95% CI 0.87 to 2.12; p=0.185) and multivariate regression analyses (HR=1.20; 95% CI 0.77 to 1.89; p=0.420).ConclusionsThe results of this study suggest the German MTS is unsuitable to safely identify patients for redirection to non-ED based GP care.Trial registration numberU1111-1119-7564; Post-results


Author(s):  
Emilia Aparecida Cicolo ◽  
Fernanda Ayache Nishi ◽  
Heloísa Helena Ciqueto Peres ◽  
Diná de Almeida Lopes Monteiro da Cruz

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikolas Beck ◽  
Miriam Michel ◽  
Elisabeth Binder ◽  
Klaus Kapelari ◽  
Michael Maurer ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document