scholarly journals Temporal deposition of copper and zinc in the sediments of metal removal constructed wetlands

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (8) ◽  
pp. e0255527
Author(s):  
Zeinah Elhaj Baddar ◽  
Erin Peck ◽  
Xiaoyu Xu
Keyword(s):  
Linear Regression ◽  
Regression Model ◽  
Constructed Wetland ◽  
Linear Regression Model ◽  
Surface Sediments ◽  
Metal Removal ◽  
Generalized Least Squares ◽  
Total Carbon ◽  
Unequal Variance ◽  
Cu And Zn

The objective of this study was to explore the effects of time, seasons, and total carbon (TC) on Copper (Cu) and Zinc (Zn) deposition in the surface sediments. This study was performed at the H-02 constructed wetland on the Savannah River Site (Aiken, SC, USA). Covering both warm (April-September) and cool (October-March) seasons, several sediment cores were collected twice a year from the H-02 constructed wetland cells from 2007 to 2013. Total concentrations of Cu and Zn were measured in the sediments. Concentrations of Cu and Zn (mean ± standard deviation) in the surface sediments over 7 years of operation increased from 6.0 ± 2.8 and 14.6 ± 4.5 mg kg-1 to 139.6 ± 87.7 and 279.3 ± 202.9 mg kg-1 dry weight, respectively. The linear regression model explained the behavior and the variability of Cu deposition in the sediments. On the other hand, using the generalized least squares extension with the linear regression model allowed for unequal variance and thus produced a model that explained the variance properly, and as a result, was more successful in explaining the pattern of Zn deposition. Total carbon significantly affected both Cu (p = 0.047) and Zn (p < 0.001). Time effect on Cu deposition was statistically significant (p = 0.013), whereas Zn was significantly affected by the season (p = 0.009).

Confidence Sets for the Coefficients Vector of a Linear Regression Model with Nonspherical Disturbances

1997 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 406-429 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anoop Chaturvedi ◽  
Hikaru Hasegawa ◽  
Ajit Chaturvedi ◽  
Govind Shukla
Keyword(s):  
Linear Regression ◽  
Regression Model ◽  
Least Squares ◽  
Linear Regression Model ◽  
Generalized Least Squares ◽  
Least Squares Estimator ◽  
Regression Coefficients ◽  
Confidence Sets ◽  
Generalized Least Squares Estimator ◽  
Coverage Probabilities

In this present paper, considering a linear regression model with nonspherical disturbances, improved confidence sets for the regression coefficients vector are developed using the Stein rule estimators. We derive the large-sample approximations for the coverage probabilities and the expected volumes of the confidence sets based on the feasible generalized least-squares estimator and the Stein rule estimator and discuss their ranking.

scholarly journals Extreme return, extreme volatility and investor sentiment

Filomat ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 30 (15) ◽  
pp. 3949-3961 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xu Gong ◽  
Fenghua Wen ◽  
Zhifang He ◽  
Jia Yang ◽  
Xiaoguang Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Linear Regression ◽  
Quantile Regression ◽  
Regression Model ◽  
Least Squares ◽  
Linear Regression Model ◽  
Investor Sentiment ◽  
Generalized Least Squares ◽  
Regression Methods ◽  
Leading Role ◽  
The Impact

The extreme return and extreme volatility have great influences on the investor sentiment in stock market. However, few researchers have taken the phenomenon into consideration. In this paper, we first distinguish the extreme situations from non-extreme situations. Then we use the ordinary generalized least squares and quantile regression methods to estimate a linear regression model by applying the standardized AAII, the return and volatility of SP 500. The results indicate that, except for extremely negative return, other return sequences can cause great changes in investor sentiment, and non-extreme return plays a leading role in affecting the overall American investor sentiment. Extremely positive (negative) return can rapidly improve (further reduce) the level of investor sentiment when investors encounter extremely pessimistic situations. The impact gradually decreases with improvement of the sentiment until the situation turns optimistic. In addition, we find that extreme and non-extreme volatility cannot a_ect the overall investor sentiment.

Wouldn't It Be Nice …? The Automatic Unbiasedness of OLS (and GLS)

2008 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 345-349 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert C. Luskin
Keyword(s):  
Linear Regression ◽  
Regression Model ◽  
Least Squares ◽  
Linear Regression Model ◽  
Generalized Least Squares ◽  
Ordinary Least Squares ◽  
Recent Issue ◽  
The Face ◽  
Best Linear Unbiased

In a recent issue of this journal, Larocca (2005) makes two notable claims about the best linear unbiasedness of ordinary least squares (OLS) estimation of the linear regression model. The first, drawn from McElroy (1967), is that OLS remains best linear unbiased in the face of a particular kind of autocorrelation (constant for all pairs of observations). The second, much larger and more heterodox, is that the disturbance need not be assumed uncorrelated with the regressors for OLS to be best linear unbiased. The assumption is unnecessary, Larocca says, because “orthogonality [of disturbance and regressors] is a property of all OLS estimates” (p. 192). Of course OLS's being best linear unbiased still requires that the disturbance be homoskedastic and (McElroy's loophole aside) nonautocorrelated, but Larocca also adds that the same automatic orthogonality obtains for generalized least squares (GLS), which is also therefore best linear unbiased, when the disturbance is heteroskedastic or autocorrelated.

scholarly journals Variation Comparison of OLS and GLS Estimators using Monte Carlo Simulation of Linear Regression Model with Autoregressive Scheme

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sajid Ali Khan ◽  
Sayyad Khurshid ◽  
Tooba Akhtar ◽  
Kashmala Khurshid
Keyword(s):  
Monte Carlo ◽  
Linear Regression ◽  
Regression Model ◽  
Sample Size ◽  
Least Squares ◽  
Linear Regression Model ◽  
Generalized Least Squares ◽  
Ordinary Least Squares ◽  
Small Samples ◽  
Sample Sizes

In this research we discusses to Ordinary Least Squares and Generalized Least Squares techniques and estimate with First Order Autoregressive scheme from different correlation levels by using simple linear regression model. A comparison has been made between these two methods on the basis of variances results. For the purpose of comparison, we use simulation of Monte Carlo study and the experiment is repeated 5000 times. We use sample sizes 50, 100, 200, 300 and 500, and observe the influence of different sample sizes on the estimators. By comparing variances of OLS and GLS at different values of sample sizes and correlation levels with , we found that variance of ( ) at sample size 500, OLS and GLS gives similar results but at sample size 50 variance of GLS ( ) has minimum values as compared to OLS. So it is clear that variance of GLS ( ) is best. Similarly variance of ( ) from OLS and GLS at sample size 500 and correlation -0.05 with , GLS give minimum value as compared to all other sample sizes and correlations. By comparing overall results of Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) and Generalized Least Squares (GLS), we conclude that in large samples both are gives similar results but small samples GLS is best fitted as compared to OLS.

Physico-Chemical Analysis of Groundwater and Effect of Climatic Change in Angul-Talcher Area

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (12) ◽  
pp. 26
Author(s):  
Aliva Bera ◽  
D.P. Satapathy
Keyword(s):  
Water Resources ◽  
Linear Regression ◽  
Regression Model ◽  
Climatic Change ◽  
Linear Regression Model ◽  
Ann Model ◽  
Quality Of Water ◽  
Physico Chemical ◽  
Simulation Based

In this paper, the linear regression model using ANN and the linear regression model using MS Excel were developed to estimate the physico-chemical concentrations in groundwater using pH, EC, TDS, TH, HCO3 as input parameters and Ca, Mg and K as output parameters. A comparison was made which indicated that ANN model had the better ability to estimate the physic-chemical concentrations in groundwater. An analytical survey along with simulation based tests for finding the climatic change and its effect on agriculture and water bodies in Angul-Talcher area is done. The various seasonal parameters such as pH, BOD, COD, TDS,TSS along with heavy elements like Pb, Cd, Zn, Cu, Fe, Mn concentration in water resources has been analyzed. For past 30 years rainfall data has been analyzed and water quality index values has been studied to find normal and abnormal quality of water resources and matlab based simulation has been done for performance analysis. All results has been analyzed and it is found that the condition is stable. 

Prediction of Surface Roughness and Optimization of Cutting Parameters in CNC Turning of Rotational Features

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (8A) ◽  
pp. 1143-1153
Author(s):  
Yousif K. Shounia ◽  
Tahseen F. Abbas ◽  
Raed R. Shwaish
Keyword(s):  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Linear Regression ◽  
Regression Model ◽  
Linear Regression Model ◽  
Feed Rate ◽  
Cutting Parameters ◽  
Spindle Speed ◽  
Depth Of Cut ◽  
Non Linear ◽  
Optimization Of Cutting Parameters

This research presents a model for prediction surface roughness in terms of process parameters in turning aluminum alloy 1200. The geometry to be machined has four rotational features: straight, taper, convex and concave, while a design of experiments was created through the Taguchi L25 orthogonal array experiments in minitab17 three factors with five Levels depth of cut (0.04, 0.06, 0.08, 0.10 and 0.12) mm, spindle speed (1200, 1400, 1600, 1800 and 2000) r.p.m and feed rate (60, 70, 80, 90 and 100) mm/min. A multiple non-linear regression model has been used which is a set of statistical extrapolation processes to estimate the relationships input variables and output which the surface roughness which prediction outside the range of the data. According to the non-linear regression model, the optimum surface roughness can be obtained at 1800 rpm of spindle speed, feed-rate of 80 mm/min and depth of cut 0.04 mm then the best surface roughness comes out to be 0.04 μm at tapper feature at depth of cut 0.01 mm and same spindle speed and feed rate pervious which gives the error of 3.23% at evolution equation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document