Laboratory Evaluation of Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma

Abstract BACKGROUND Pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PPGLs) are potentially lethal yet usually surgically curable causes of endocrine hypertension; therefore, once clinical suspicion is aroused it is imperative that clinicians choose the most appropriate laboratory tests to identify the tumors. CONTENT Compelling evidence now indicates that initial screening for PPGLs should include measurements of plasma free metanephrines or urine fractionated metanephrines. LC-MS/MS offers numerous advantages over other analytical methods and is the method of choice when measurements include methoxytyramine, the O-methylated metabolite of dopamine. The plasma test offers advantages over the urine test, although it is rarely implemented correctly, rendering the urine test preferable for mainstream use. To ensure optimum diagnostic sensitivity for the plasma test, reference intervals must be established for blood samples collected after 30 min of supine rest and after an overnight fast when measurements include methoxytyramine. Similarly collected blood samples during screening, together with use of age-adjusted reference intervals, further minimize false-positive results. Extents and patterns of increases in plasma normetanephrine, metanephrine, and methoxytyramine can additionally help predict size and adrenal vs extraadrenal locations of tumors, as well as presence of metastases and underlying germline mutations of tumor susceptibility genes. SUMMARY Carried out correctly at specialist endocrine centers, collection of blood for measurements of plasma normetanephrine, metanephrine, and methoxytyramine not only provides high accuracy for diagnosis of PPGLs, but can also guide clinical decision-making about follow-up imaging strategies, genetic testing, and therapeutic options. At other centers, measurements of urine fractionated metanephrines will identify most PPGLs.

Download Full-text

Subclinical hypothyroidism: a ‘laboratory-induced’ condition?

Acta Endocrinologica ◽

10.1530/eje-15-0684 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 173 (4) ◽

pp. 499-505 ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

Karlien L M Coene ◽

Ayse Y Demir ◽

Maarten A C Broeren ◽

Pauline Verschuure ◽

Eef G W M Lentjes ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Reference Values ◽

Subclinical Hypothyroidism ◽

Analytical Method ◽

Clinical Decision Making ◽

Clinical Decision ◽

Reference Intervals ◽

Reference Ranges ◽

Thyroid Pathology ◽

Design And Methods

ObjectiveIn current literature and guidelines, there is a tendency to define absolute TSH concentrations at which patient follow-up or even pharmaceutical intervention should be initiated. As TSH concentrations depend on the analytical method/platform used for TSH quantification, absolute cut-off values may pose threats for uniform clinical decision-making. In this study we therefore set out to clarify to what extent the method/platform and the reference values applied for TSH influence the clinical interpretation of thyroid parameters.Design and methodsWe retrospectively analyzed anonymous TSH results from the Dutch external quality assessment program (EQAS) in relation to reference values advised by different manufacturers. We also examined TSH/free thyroxin (fT4) reference ranges and prevalence of thyroid pathology among different Dutch laboratories, including four cases in which a switch in the measuring platform was made.ResultsOur data show that interpretation of thyroid parameters is not only influenced by between-method/platform variation, but is also substantially affected by the variation in TSH/fT4 reference intervals applied in individual laboratories. Additionally, we show that the transition to a novel analytical method/platform can result in a shift in the prevalence of thyroid pathology, especially for subclinical hypothyroidism.ConclusionsSubclinical hypothyroidism can be a ‘laboratory-induced’ condition. This is an undesirable situation in regard to the clinical implications such a diagnosis can have for patients.

Download Full-text

Coagulation parameters in the newborn and infant – the Copenhagen Baby Heart and COMPARE studies

Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) ◽

10.1515/cclm-2021-0967 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 0 (0) ◽

Author(s):

Sofie Taageby Nielsen ◽

Nina Strandkjær ◽

Ida Juul Rasmussen ◽

Malene Kongsgaard Hansen ◽

Rikke Mohr Lytsen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Decision Making ◽

Cord Blood ◽

Clinical Decision Making ◽

Venous Blood ◽

Clinical Decision ◽

Reference Intervals ◽

Coagulation System ◽

Blood Samples ◽

Thrombocyte Count ◽

Coagulation Parameters

Abstract Objectives The coagulation system is not fully developed at birth and matures during the first months of infancy, complicating clinical decision making within hemostasis. This study evaluates coagulation parameters at birth and two months after birth, and tests whether cord blood can be used as a proxy for neonatal venous blood measurements. Methods The Copenhagen Baby Heart Study (CBHS) and the COMPARE study comprise 13,237 cord blood samples and 444 parallel neonatal venous blood samples, with a two month follow-up in 362 children. Results Because coagulation parameters differed according to gestational age (GA), all analyses were stratified by GA. For neonatal venous blood, reference intervals for activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and prothrombin time (PT) were 28–43 s and 33–61% for GA 37–39 and 24–38 s and 30–65% for GA 40–42. Reference intervals for international normalized ratio (INR) and thrombocyte count were 1.1–1.7 and 194–409 × 109/L for GA 37–39 and 1.2–1.8 and 188–433 × 109/L for GA 40–42. Correlation coefficients between umbilical cord and neonatal venous blood for APTT, PT, INR, and thrombocyte count were 0.68, 0.72, 0.69, and 0.77 respectively, and the distributions of the parameters did not differ between the two types of blood (all p-values>0.05). Conclusions This study describes new GA dependent reference intervals for common coagulation parameters in newborns and suggests that cord blood may serve as a proxy for neonatal venous blood for these traits. Such data will likely improve clinical decision making within hemostasis among newborn and infant children.

Download Full-text

Intracoronary Ultrasound Guided Clinical Decision Making in Indeterminate Left Main Disease: 18 Month Follow-up Study

Journal of the American College of Cardiology ◽

10.1016/s0735-1097(97)84678-5 ◽

1998 ◽

Vol 31 (2) ◽

pp. 224A

Author(s):

S Higano

Keyword(s):

Decision Making ◽

Clinical Decision Making ◽

Clinical Decision ◽

Ultrasound Guided ◽

Left Main ◽

Left Main Disease ◽

Intracoronary Ultrasound ◽

Follow Up Study

Download Full-text

Impact of Grade Groups on Prostate Cancer-Specific and Other-Cause Mortality: Competing Risk Analysis from a Large Single Institution Series

Cancers ◽

10.3390/cancers13081963 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 13 (8) ◽

pp. 1963

Author(s):

Daimantas Milonas ◽

Tomas Ruzgas ◽

Zilvinas Venclovas ◽

Mindaugas Jievaltas ◽

Steven Joniau

Keyword(s):

Clinical Decision Making ◽

Area Under The Curve ◽

Clinical Decision ◽

Competing Risk ◽

Grade Group ◽

Tertiary Center ◽

Stable Performance ◽

Cancer Specific Mortality ◽

Risk Of Cancer

Objective: To assess the risk of cancer-specific mortality (CSM) and other-cause mortality (OCM) using post-operative International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Group (GG) model in patients after radical prostatectomy (RP). Patients and Methods: Overall 1921 consecutive men who underwent RP during 2001 to 2017 in a single tertiary center were included in the study. Multivariate competing risk regression analysis was used to identify significant predictors and quantify cumulative incidence of CSM and OCM. Time-depending area under the curve (AUC) depicted the performance of GG model on prediction of CSM. Results: Over a median follow-up of 7.9-year (IQR 4.4-11.7) after RP, 235 (12.2%) deaths were registered, and 52 (2.7%) of them were related to PCa. GG model showed high and stable performance (time-dependent AUC 0.88) on prediction of CSM. Cumulative 10-year CSM in GGs 1 to 5 was 0.9%, 2.3%, 7.6%, 14.7%, and 48.6%, respectively; 10-year OCM in GGs was 15.5%, 16.1%, 12.6%, 17.7% and 6.5%, respectively. The ratio between 10-year CSM/OCM in GGs 1 to 5 was 1:17, 1:7, 1:2, 1:1, and 7:1, respectively. Conclusions: Cancer-specific and other-cause mortality differed widely between GGs. Presented findings could aid in personalized clinical decision making for active treatment.

Download Full-text

Choice of faecal immunochemical test matters: comparison of OC-Sensor and HM-JACKarc, in the assessment of patients at high risk of colorectal cancer

Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) ◽

10.1515/cclm-2020-1170 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 0 (0) ◽

Author(s):

Caroline J. Chapman ◽

Ayan Banerjea ◽

David J Humes ◽

Jaren Allen ◽

Simon Oliver ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Colorectal Cancer ◽

Clinical Decision Making ◽

Full Range ◽

Clinical Decision ◽

Detection Rates ◽

Faecal Immunochemical Test ◽

Specimen Collection ◽

Increased Risk ◽

Immunochemical Test

AbstractObjectivesCurrently, NICE recommends the use of faecal immunochemical test (FIT) at faecal haemoglobin concentrations (f-Hb) of 10 μg Hb/g faeces to stratify for colorectal cancer (CRC) risk in symptomatic populations. This f-Hb cut-off is advised across all analysers, despite the fact that a direct comparison of analyser performance, in a clinical setting, has not been performed.MethodsTwo specimen collection devices (OC-Sensor, OC-S; HM-JACKarc, HM-J) were sent to 914 consecutive individuals referred for follow up due to their increased risk of CRC. Agreement of f-Hb around cut-offs of 4, 10 and 150 µg Hb/g faeces and CRC detection rates were assessed. Two OC-S devices were sent to a further 114 individuals, for within test comparisons.ResultsA total of 732 (80.1%) individuals correctly completed and returned two different FIT devices, with 38 (5.2%) CRCs detected. Median f-Hb for individuals diagnosed with and without CRC were 258.5 and 1.8 µg Hb/g faeces for OC-S and 318.1 and 1.0 µg Hb/g faeces for HM-J respectively. Correlation of f-Hb results between OC-S/HM-J over the full range was rho=0.74, p<0.001. Using a f-Hb of 4 µg Hb/g faeces for both tests found an agreement of 88.1%, at 10 µg Hb/g faeces 91.7% and at 150 µg Hb/g faeces 96.3%. A total of 114 individuals completed and returned two OC-S devices; correlation across the full range was rho=0.98, p<0.001.ConclusionsWe found large variations in f-Hb when different FIT devices were used, but a smaller variation when the same FIT device was used. Our data suggest that analyser-specific f-Hb cut-offs are applied with regard to clinical decision making, especially at lower f-Hb.

Download Full-text

Between a logic of disruption and a logic of continuation: Negotiating the legitimacy of algorithms used in automated clinical decision-making

Health An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health Illness and Medicine ◽

10.1177/1363459321996741 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 136345932199674

Author(s):

Rikke Torenholt ◽

Henriette Langstrup

Keyword(s):

Decision Making ◽

Clinical Practice ◽

Patient Reported Outcomes ◽

Patient Involvement ◽

Clinical Decision Making ◽

Diagnostic Procedures ◽

Clinical Decision ◽

Patient Reported ◽

Pro Tools

In both popular and academic discussions of the use of algorithms in clinical practice, narratives often draw on the decisive potentialities of algorithms and come with the belief that algorithms will substantially transform healthcare. We suggest that this approach is associated with a logic of disruption. However, we argue that in clinical practice alongside this logic, another and less recognised logic exists, namely that of continuation: here the use of algorithms constitutes part of an established practice. Applying these logics as our analytical framing, we set out to explore how algorithms for clinical decision-making are enacted by political stakeholders, healthcare professionals, and patients, and in doing so, study how the legitimacy of delegating to an algorithm is negotiated and obtained. Empirically we draw on ethnographic fieldwork carried out in relation to attempts in Denmark to develop and implement Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO) tools – involving algorithmic sorting – in clinical practice. We follow the work within two disease areas: heart rehabilitation and breast cancer follow-up care. We show how at the political level, algorithms constitute tools for disrupting inefficient work and unsystematic patient involvement, whereas closer to the clinical practice, algorithms constitute a continuation of standardised and evidence-based diagnostic procedures and a continuation of the physicians’ expertise and authority. We argue that the co-existence of the two logics have implications as both provide a push towards the use of algorithms and how a logic of continuation may divert attention away from new issues introduced with automated digital decision-support systems.

Download Full-text

Pediatric reference interval verification for endocrine and fertility hormone assays on the Abbott Alinity system

Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) ◽

10.1515/cclm-2021-0337 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 0 (0) ◽

Author(s):

Mary Kathryn Bohn ◽

Siobhan Wilson ◽

Alexandra Hall ◽

Khosrow Adeli

Keyword(s):

Clinical Decision Making ◽

De Novo ◽

Reference Interval ◽

Clinical Decision ◽

Reference Intervals ◽

Healthy Children ◽

Confidence Limits ◽

Test Results ◽

Serum Samples ◽

Abbott Architect

Abstract Objectives The Canadian Laboratory Initiative on Pediatric Reference Intervals (CALIPER) has developed an extensive database of reference intervals (RIs) for several biomarkers on various analytical systems. In this study, pediatric RIs were verified for key immunoassays on the Abbott Alinity system based on the analysis of healthy children samples and comparison to comprehensive RIs previously established for Abbott ARCHITECT assays. Methods Analytical performance of Alinity immunoassays was first assessed. Subsequently, 100 serum samples from healthy children recruited with informed consent were analyzed for 16 Alinity immunoassays. The percentage of test results falling within published CALIPER ARCHITECT reference and confidence limits was determined. If ≥ 90% of test results fell within the confidence limits, they were considered verified based on CLSI guidelines. If <90% of test results fell within the confidence limits, additional samples were analyzed and new Alinity RIs were established. Results Of the 16 immunoassays assessed, 13 met the criteria for verification with test results from ≥ 90% of healthy serum samples falling within the published ARCHITECT confidence limits. New CALIPER RIs were established for free thyroxine and prolactin on the Alinity system. Estradiol required special considerations in early life. Conclusions Our data demonstrate excellent concordance between ARCHITECT and Alinity immunoassays, as well as the robustness of previously established CALIPER RIs for most immunoassays, eliminating the need for de novo RI studies for most parameters. Availability of pediatric RIs for immunoassays on the Alinity system will assist clinical laboratories using this new platform and contribute to improved clinical decision-making.

Download Full-text

Challenges in treatment of renal echinococcosis with gross hydatiduria and unsalvageable kidney: a case report

Journal of Medical Case Reports ◽

10.1186/s13256-021-02992-2 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 15 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Sameera Shuaibi ◽

Abdelrahman AlAshqar ◽

Munirah Alabdulhadi ◽

Wasl Al-Adsani

Keyword(s):

Clinical Decision Making ◽

Scientific Evidence ◽

Renal Involvement ◽

Clinical Decision ◽

Response To Treatment ◽

Standards Of Care ◽

Future Research ◽

Positive Serology ◽

Grape Skin

Abstract Introduction Renal echinococcosis is of rare occurrence, and although often asymptomatic, it can present with various mild to drastic presentations, of which hydatiduria is pathognomonic. Diagnosis can be preliminarily established by imaging, and treatment is primarily surgical. We present a patient with renal echinococcosis treated successfully with exclusive antiparasitic pharmacotherapy after refusing surgery despite extensive renal involvement. We hope through this report to help establish future solid guidelines regarding this uncommon therapeutic approach. Case presentation This is a case of a 49-year-old Syrian shepherd presenting with flank pain and passage of grape-skin-like structures in urine. A diagnosis of renal echinococcosis with hydatiduria and significant parenchymal destruction was established based on exposure history, positive serology, imaging findings, and renal scintigraphy. After proper counseling, the patient refused nephrectomy and was therefore started on dual pharmacotherapy (albendazole and praziquantel) and is having an uneventful follow-up and a satisfactory response to treatment. Conclusion This case embodies the daily challenges physicians navigate as they uphold the ethical principles of their practice and support their patients’ autonomy while delivering the best standards of care and consulting the scientific evidence. Although surgery is the cornerstone of renal echinococcosis treatment, treating physicians should be prepared to tackle situations where surgery cannot be done and offer the best next available option for patients who refuse surgery. As data on exclusive pharmacotherapy are limited, future research should thoroughly investigate the efficacy of this uncommon approach and outline reliable recommendations, facilitating future clinical decision-making in this avenue.

Download Full-text