Efficacy and Safety of Everolimus Plus Octreotide LAR in Patients With Colorectal Neuroendocrine Tumors (NET): Subgroup Analysis of the Phase III RADIANT-2 Trial

194 Background: Currently, there are limited therapeutic options for patients with advanced midgut neuroendocrine tumors progressing on first-line somatostatin analog therapy. Methods: NETTER-1 is the first Phase III multicentric, randomized, controlled trial evaluating 177Lu-DOTA0-Tyr3-Octreotate (Lutathera) in patients with inoperable, progressive, somatostatin receptor positive midgut NETs. 230 patients with Grade 1-2 metastatic midgut NETs were randomized to receive Lutathera 7.4 GBq every 8 weeks (x4 administrations) versus Octreotide LAR 60 mg every 4-weeks. The primary endpoint was PFS per RECIST 1.1 criteria, with objective tumor assessment performed by an independent reading center every 12 weeks. Secondary objectives included objective response rate, overall survival, toxicity, and health-related quality of life. Results: Enrolment was completed in February 2015, with a target of 230 patients randomized (1:1) in 36 European and 15 sites in the United States. At the time of statistical analysis, the number of centrally confirmed disease progressions or deaths was 23 in the Lutathera group and 67 in the Octreotide LAR 60 mg group. The median PFS was not reached for Lutathera and was 8.4 months with 60 mg Octreotide LAR [95% CI: 5.8-11.0 months], p < 0.0001, with a hazard ratio of 0.21 [95% CI: 0.13-0.34]. Within the current evaluable patient dataset for tumor responses (n = 201), the number of CR+PR was 19 (18.8%) in the Lutathera group and 3 (3.0%) in the Octreotide LAR 60 mg group (p < 0.0004). Although the OS data were not mature enough for a definitive analysis, the number of deaths was 13 in the Lutathera group and 22 in the Octreotide LAR 60 mg group (p < 0.019 at interim analysis) which suggests an improvement in overall survival. Conclusions: The Phase III NETTER-1 trial provides evidence for a clinically meaningful and statistically significant increase in PFS and ORR, and also suggests a survival benefit in patients with advanced midgut NETs treated with Lutathera. Clinical trial information: NCT01578239.

Download Full-text

The Four-Arm Cooperative Study (FACS) for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): A subgroup analysis in elderly patients (pts)

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2006.24.18_suppl.7115 ◽

2006 ◽

Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽

pp. 7115-7115

Author(s):

K. Goto ◽

Y. Nishiwaki ◽

N. Saijo ◽

K. Takeda ◽

N. Katakami ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Subgroup Analysis ◽

Survival Rates ◽

Sensory Neuropathy ◽

Patient Characteristics ◽

Response Rates ◽

The Elderly ◽

Phase Iii ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽

Grade 3

7115 Background: Efficacy and safety in fit, elderly NSCLC pts receiving platinum-based treatment have been reported to be similar to those in younger pts. However, there is controversy about which platinum-based regimens are suitable for the elderly. To compare efficacy and safety of platinum-based chemotherapy regimens in the elderly, we conducted an age specific subgroup analysis on FACS, a phase III randomized trial comparing four platinum-based regimens for advanced NSCLC. Methods: FACS was designed to compare three platinum-based combination regimens to cisplatin (80 mg/m2, day 1) plus irinotecan (60 mg/m2, days 1, 8, 15) (IP) as the reference arm. The experimental regimens were: carboplatin (AUC 6, day 1) plus paclitaxel (200 mg/m2, day 1) (TC); cisplatin (80 mg/m2, day 1) plus gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2, days 1, 8) (GP); cisplatin (80 mg/m2, day 1) plus vinorelbine (25 mg/m2, days 1,8) (NP). Results: Of the 105 pts ≥ 70 years (17% of 602 enrolled pts), 27 were on the IP arm, 27 on TC, 28 on GP, and 22 on NP. Patient characteristics were similar in each arm. Response rates were 26% in IP, 20% in TC, 32% in GP, 50% in NP. Frequency of grade 3 or greater leukocytopenia (IP/TC/GP/NP: 52%/33%/36%/86%) was higher in NP, and thrombocytopenia (IP/TC/GP/NP: 11%/19%/43%/0%) was higher in GP, however anemia (IP/TC/GP/NP: 56%/19%/29%/55%) was lower in TC and GP. Frequency of grade 2 or greater vomiting (IP/TC/GP/NP: 52%/22%/39%/41%) was lower in TC, and diarrhea (IP/TC/GP/NP: 48%/7%/4%/14%) was lower in TC, GP and NP, however, grade 2 or greater sensory neuropathy (IP/TC/GP/NP: 0%/22%/0%/0%) was higher in TC. One year survival rates were 48% for the IP arm, 48% for TC, 61% for GP, and 46% for NP. There were no significant survival differences between IP and each experimental regimen. In addition, no significant differences between ≥ 70 and < 70 years were observed in each treatment regimen regarding hematological and non-hematological toxicities, response rates, and survival, except that grade 3 or greater anemia was significantly higher in ≥ 70 years pts in IP and NP arms. Conclusions: These platinum-based four regimens were similarly active and tolerable for fit, elderly NSCLC pts, and their efficacy and toxicity in the elderly were similar to those in younger pts. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Download Full-text

Effect of everolimus plus octreotide LAR treatment on chromogranin A and 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid levels in patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumors: Phase III RADIANT-2 study results.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2011.29.15_suppl.10527 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 29 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. 10527-10527 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

E. Baudin ◽

E. M. Wolin ◽

D. E. Castellano ◽

G. Kaltsas ◽

J. Lebrec ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽

Chromogranin A ◽

Phase Iii ◽

Octreotide Lar ◽

Study Results ◽

Hydroxyindoleacetic Acid

Download Full-text

Everolimus versus placebo in Japanese patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNET): Japanese subgroup analysis of RADIANT-3.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2011.29.4_suppl.289 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽

pp. 289-289 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

T. Ito ◽

T. Okusaka ◽

M. Ikeda ◽

T. Tajima ◽

A. Kasuga ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Subgroup Analysis ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Japanese Patients ◽

Placebo Treatment ◽

Phase Iii ◽

Rank Test ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Meaningful Improvement ◽

Significant Prolongation ◽

Grade 3

289 Background: Everolimus demonstrated a statistically and clinically significant improvement in PFS over placebo in a multi-national, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase III trial in patients with advanced low- or intermediate-grade pNET with disease progression within the prior 12 months (RADIANT-3) (Ann Oncol [2010] 21[suppl 6]: NP doi:10.1093/annonc/mdq340). Forty patients were enrolled from Japanese sites and randomized (n=23: everolimus; n=17: placebo) in that study. The purpose of this report is to investigate the efficacy and safety in the Japanese subgroup. Methods: Subgroup analysis for the Japanese patients was performed comparing the efficacy and safety between everolimus 10mg/d orally plus best supportive care (BSC) and matching placebo plus BSC. The primary efficacy endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The safety was evaluated based on the incidence of adverse events (AEs). Results: Treatment with everolimus resulted in a significant prolongation by 16.62 months in median PFS (19.45 months for everolimus, 2.83 months for placebo), with 81% reduction in the hazard ratio of progression/death (HR 0.19 [95% CI: 0.08, 0.48]; one-sided unstratified log-rank test: p<.001). The most common AE was stomatitis (73.9% everolimus vs 23.5% placebo); mostly grade 1/2. Grade 3/4 AEs occurred in 69.5% of the everolimus arm and 29.4% of the placebo arm, and amongst the most frequent included (% in everolimus vs % in placebo): neutropenia (17.4% vs 3%); anemia (8.7% vs 0%); pneumonitis (8.7% vs 0%); leukopenia (8.7% vs 0%). The remainder of grade 3/4 AEs was less than 3%. Median duration of exposure to everolimus was 57 weeks vs 47 weeks on placebo. Treatment discontinuation for AEs was 17% in the everolimus arm vs 0% in the placebo arm. Conclusions: Everolimus demonstrated a clinically meaningful improvement in PFS over placebo in Japanese patients. Everolimus was well tolerated in Japanese patients, and no new safety concerns were noted. This result suggests that everolimus can be a standard treatment for Japanese patients with advanced pNET. [Table: see text]

Download Full-text

Impact of concomitant prostate cancer therapy on efficacy and safety of relugolix versus leuprolide in men with advanced prostate cancer: Subgroup analysis from the phase III HERO study.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2021.39.6_suppl.106 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽

pp. 106-106

Author(s):

Daniel J. George ◽

Neal D. Shore ◽

Fred Saad ◽

Michael Cookson ◽

Daniel Saltzstein ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Prostate Cancer ◽

Sensitivity Analysis ◽

Primary Endpoint ◽

Subgroup Analysis ◽

Advanced Prostate Cancer ◽

Phase Iii ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Concomitant Therapy ◽

Testosterone Levels ◽

The Impact

106 Background: In the phase 3 HERO study, the oral GnRH receptor antagonist, relugolix, demonstrated suppression of testosterone to castrate levels in 96.7% of patients, which was superior to leuprolide, and a 54% lower risk of major adverse cardiovascular events relative to leuprolide. To characterize the impact of concomitant prostate cancer treatments with the use of relugolix in advanced prostate cancer from the HERO study, a subgroup analysis for patients receiving various therapies was undertaken. Methods: The HERO study was designed to evaluate relugolix in men with advanced prostate cancer. Overall, 934 patients were randomized 2:1 to receive relugolix 120 mg orally once daily or leuprolide injections every 12 weeks for 48 weeks. In the setting of rising PSA, patients could receive enzalutamide (ENZ) or docetaxel (DOC) 2 months after study initiation. Assessments included sustained testosterone suppression to castrate levels (<50 ng/dL) through 48 weeks and safety parameters. Subgroups analyzed included patients with or without concomitant ENZ, DOC, and any radiation therapy (RT). A sensitivity analysis of the primary endpoint was performed excluding patients who received concomitant therapies that may affect testosterone. Results: Overall, 125 patients (13.4%) took at least one concomitant therapy that could impact testosterone levels. RT was received by 15.9% and 18.8% of patients in the relugolix and leuprolide groups, respectively. ENZ was the most frequently used therapy in the relugolix group (2.7%), with similar use in the leuprolide group (1.9%). DOC was used by 1.3% and 1.6% of patients in the relugolix and leuprolide groups, respectively. All other relevant concomitant therapy were used in <1% of population. The sensitivity analysis results indicated that use of these concomitant therapy that could affect testosterone levels did not impact the primary endpoint. Castration rates were similar with and without concomitant use of ENZ and DOC, or RT (table). No clinically relevant differences in adverse events were observed between patients with or without concomitant use of ENZ, DOC, or RT in either treatment group. Conclusions: While the numbers are small, treatment with relugolix was associated with a similar efficacy and safety profiles in patients who received concomitant administration of ENZ, DOC, or RT to that observed in patients not receiving those concomitant treatments. Clinical trial information: NCT03085095. [Table: see text]

Download Full-text