scholarly journals Efficiency and safety of transfer of type 2 diabetes patients inadequately controlled on metformin alone to combined therapy with metformin and diabeton MB

2009 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 68-71
Author(s):  
Alexander Sergeevich Ametov ◽  
Lyudmila Nikolaevna Bogdanova

Aim. To evaluate efficiency and tolerability of diabeton MB/metformin combination in patients failing to achieve optimal glycemic control when onmetformin monotherapy and prove advantages of this combination over combined low-dose therapy with glibenclamide and metformin. Materials and methods. The study included 464 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who poorly responded to metformin monotherapy. It was supplementedby diabeton MB. Efficiency and tolerability of combined treatment was evaluated from dynamics of glycemia and frequency of side-effects.40 patients were included in detailed comparative assessment (laboratory and instrumental, CGMS) of this monotherapy and fixed low-dose combinationof glibenclamide with metformin. Results. Results of comparison show that diabeton MB/metformin combination ensured most optimal glycemic control with a minimal risk of side effects. Conclusion. Diabeton MB/metformin combination is convenient, efficient and safe.

2010 ◽  
Vol 63 (9-10) ◽  
pp. 611-615 ◽  
Author(s):  
Branka Koprivica ◽  
Teodora Beljic-Zivkovic ◽  
Tatjana Ille

Introduction. Insulin resistance is a well-known leading factor in the development of metabolic syndrome. The aim of this study was to evaluate metabolic effects of metformin added to sulfonylurea in unsuccessfully treated type 2 diabetic patients with metabolic syndrome. Material and methods. A group of thirty subjects, with type 2 diabetes, secondary sulfonylurea failure and metabolic syndrome were administered the combined therapy of sulfonylurea plus metformin for six months. Metformin 2000 mg/d was added to previously used sulfonylurea agent in maximum daily dose. Antihypertensive and hypolipemic therapy was not changed. The following parameters were assessed at the beginning and after six months of therapy: glycemic control, body mass index, waist circumference, blood pressure, triglycerides, total cholesterol and its fractions, homeostatic models for evaluation of insulin resistance and secretion (HOMA R, HOMA B) and C- peptide. Results. Glycemic control was significantly improved after six months of the combined therapy: (fasting 7.89 vs. 10.61 mmol/l. p<0.01; postprandial 11.12 vs. 12.61 mmol/l. p<0.01, p<0.01; glycosylated hemoglobin 6.81 vs. 8.83%. p<0.01). the body mass index and waist circumference were significantly lower (26.7 vs. 27.8 kg/m2, p<0.01 and 99.7 vs. 101.4 cm for men, p<0.01; 87.2 vs. 88.5 for women, p<0.01). Fasting plasma triglycerides decreased from 3.37 to 2.45 mmol/l (p<0.001) and HOMA R from 7.04 to 5.23 (p<0.001). No treatment effects were observed on blood pressure, cholesterol, and residual insulin secretion. Conclusion. Administration of metformin in type 2 diabetes with metabolic syndrome decreased cardiovascular risk factors by reducing glycemia, triglycerides, BMI, central obesity and insulin resistance.


2010 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. CMT.S3489
Author(s):  
Aashish G. Samat ◽  
Amit Bhargava ◽  
Vasantha Reddy

Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is a chronic disease, with a rapidly increasing worldwide incidence and prevalence. Diabetes accounts for 8% of the US population, according to the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. In terms of individuals, this number comes to a staggering 24 million. 1 In 2007, the total direct medical cost of treating diabetes and its associated complications was $116 billion. More than half of this is spent in treating its complications, both micro and macrovasular. Indirect costs in terms of disability, loss of work or premature mortality amounted to an additional $58 billion. 2 Several trials have shown the benefits of improved glycemic control on microvasular complications 3 – 7 and a propensity to reduce macrovasular disease. Furthermore tight glycemic control early in the disease, so called the legacy effect, has shown to reduce mortality. 5 However, these and several other trials have shown the progressive and unrelenting nature of the disease. Reduced efficacies of existing medications over prolonged periods, and continued beta cell dysfunction have lead to unmet glycemic targets. In addition, current antidiabetic medications have significant side effects most of which include hypoglycemia and weight gain. All the above points are rasion d'être that new additional therapies are needed. Recently, new classes of agents targeting the incretin system have become available. These can be divided into two broad categories; glucagon like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists/analogs (exenatide, liraglutide), and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors (sitagliptin, vildagliptin, and Saxagliptin (undergoing phase 3 trials)). Exenatide, a 39-amino acid peptide produced in the salivary gland of the Gila monster lizard, is a GLP-1 agonist. It is the first of its class approved for use as adjunctive therapy, in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Current data suggests that exenatide, in combination with metformin, glyburide, or a glitazone, results in significant reductions in fasting and postprandial plasma glucose and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c). Apart form gastrointestinal side effects, exenatide is relatively well tolerated and does not cause hypoglycemia when used alone. Additionally, the drug serves to promote moderate weight loss. The authors aim to provide a comprehensive overview of exenatide, detail its mechanism of action, and discuss its role in the present day treatment of patients with T2DM.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document