scholarly journals Reliability and Validity of Turkish Version of the Brief Pain Inventory Short Form in Patients with Chronic Nonmalignant Pain

Author(s):  
yasemin yıldırım
2006 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 353-353 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tito Mendoza ◽  
Tracy Mayne ◽  
Dale Rublee ◽  
Charles Cleeland

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Büşra Aydın Erkılıç ◽  
Canan Günay Yazıcı ◽  
Mehmet Armağan ◽  
Ömer Ötegen ◽  
Zübeyir Sarı

Abstract Background: This study aims to investigate the reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Brunel Lifestyle Physical Activity Questionnaire (BLPAQ) and examine the cultural adaptation of the questionnaire.Methods: After the translation process, the test-retest reliability of the Turkish version of the questionnaire was analyzed with 24 (31.20±5.0 years old; 50% female) participants (2nd test was done 15 days after the first test). In addition, the validity of the scale was evaluated by the correlation between the BLPAQ and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form (IPAQ-SF) completed by 113 (30.59±5.40 years old; 63.7% Female) participants.Results: A powerful positive and significant correlation was found between the correlation coefficients of the BLPAQ's PPA and UPA subscales between both tests (respectively r=0.96, p<0.01; r=0.87, p<0.01). The Cronbach's alpha coefficient was found to be 0.77 (quite reliable). The PPA subscale of the BLPAQ was positive with the IPAQ-SF's high-intensity physical activity subscale (r=0.47 p=0.00) and total IPAQ-SF excluding sitting (r=0.50 p=0.00) medium in the direction and low positive correlation with the walking activity subscale (r=0.25 p=0.024). No significant correlation was found between the UPA subdivision of BLPAQ and IPAQ-SF (p>0.05).Conclusion: BLPAQ, adapted into Turkish, is a valid and reliable tool that can be used to determine lifestyle according to physical activity level.


2004 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 133-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriel Tan ◽  
Mark P. Jensen ◽  
John I. Thornby ◽  
Bilal F. Shanti

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 56-56
Author(s):  
Sadie Swift ◽  
Jane Vitin ◽  
Hillary Prime ◽  
Robert Topp ◽  
Paul Dato ◽  
...  

56 Background: Closely monitored and managed patient reported outcomes (PROs) can impact survival of cancer patients. However, the reliability and validity of patients’ self-reported symptoms are somewhat open to question, as past studies have shown that patients may underreport health information to their physicians. Identifying where the discrepancy between PROs and actual symptomology lies may be important in improving providers’ grasp of a patients’ disease state. The purpose of this study is to compare prostate cancer patients’ reports of their symptoms and functioning with the patients’ caregivers’ perception of the same factors. Methods: 50 patients with metastatic prostate cancer on Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) and their caregivers were asked to independently complete the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy- Prostate (FACT-P), Brief Pain Inventory- Short Form (BPI-SF), and EQ-5D-3L questionnaires in relation to the patient’s condition. Patient and caregiver dyad responses to these instruments were then compared by t-tests for continuous measures and Chi-Square for discrete measures. Results: Not all patient and caregiver dyads completed all of the data collection instruments. Patients are more likely than caregivers to rate themselves as having fewer limitations on mobility (n=47, p≤0.001), less pain and/or discomfort (n=46, p≤0.001), and less limitations with self-care (n=46, p≤0.001). Furthermore, caregivers were more likely to rate patients as having more anxiety (n=47, p≤0.001), more severe pain (n=20, p<0.05), and lower overall physical wellbeing scores (n=40, p<0.005). Ratings for emotional and social functioning were not significantly different between the patient and their caregiver. Conclusions: Overall a high degree of agreement was reported between patient and caregiver ratings of the patient’s symptoms and functioning; however, when differences were present the caregivers consistently rated the patients’ conditions as more severe, particularly in relation to physical symptoms. This may indicate that patients are minimizing their symptoms when reporting to their physicians.


2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 151-158
Author(s):  
Senem Demirdel ◽  
Kezban Bayramlar

In our country, outcome measures are needed to evaluate the results of occupational therapy in amputees. This study aimed to cross-culturally adapt the Reintegration to Normal Living Index (RNLI) and to evaluate the reliability and validity of a Turkish version of the RNLI. The Turkish version of the RNLI was applied to 120 amputees. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were used to determine internal consistency and test–retest reliability, respectively. Criterion validity was assessed using Short Form 36 (SF-36). The Turkish version of the RNLI presented reliable results in repeated assessments (ICC = .88), and the internal consistency of the RNLI was high (Cronbach’s α coefficient = .89). A statistically significant relationship was found between RNLI and SF-36 ( p < .05). The Turkish RNLI is a reliable and valid tool to evaluate the level of reintegration to normal living for amputees.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document