scholarly journals Usher syndrome—the most common reason for deaf-blindness

2021 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
pp. 11
Author(s):  
Catherina Bommert ◽  
Elitsa Hristova ◽  
Christina Grupcheva
Keyword(s):  
Usher Syndrome ◽  
Common Reason

Ground-Based Medical Services for In-Flight Emergencies

2020 ◽  
Vol 91 (4) ◽  
pp. 348-351
Author(s):  
Jung Ha Kim ◽  
Smi Choi-Kwon
Keyword(s):  
Common Reason ◽  
Medical Services ◽  
Prescription Medications ◽  
Team Leaders ◽  
Cabin Crew ◽  
Medication Prescription ◽  
South Korean ◽  
Cardiac Symptoms ◽  
Actual Use ◽  
Specific Symptoms

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of ground-based medical services (GBMS) by the cabin crew of a major South Korean airline for in-flight medical incidents involving passengers.METHODS: We conducted a survey of cabin crew to identify the anticipated use of GBMS in 2017. We compared the anticipated use to actual use as reported in cabin crew records submitted to the GBMS team and cabin crew logs from May 2013 to April 2016.RESULTS: Among 766 team leaders and assistant leaders, 211 individuals answered the questionnaire. A total of 915 instances of GBMS use were reported during the study period. There were no significant differences between anticipated and actual use in terms of the reasons for needing GBMS, with medication prescription being the most common reason. However, there were significant differences in the specific symptoms that triggered contact with GBMS. Pediatric and digestive symptoms were under-predicted, while neuropsychiatric and cardiac symptoms were over-predicted.DISCUSSION: Cabin crew tended to require GBMS to assist with pediatric and digestive conditions more often than anticipated. Furthermore, digestive and pediatric symptoms often require prescription medications.Kim JH, Choi-Kwon S. Ground-based medical services for in-flight emergencies. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2020; 91(4):348–351.

Genetics, pathogenesis and therapeutic developments for Usher syndrome type 2

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Stemerdink ◽  
B. García-Bohórquez ◽  
R. Schellens ◽  
G. Garcia-Garcia ◽  
E. Van Wijk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Usher Syndrome ◽  
Syndrome Type ◽  
Usher Syndrome Type

389 General Surgery Operative Cancellations Within Aberdeen Royal Infirmary 2019

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
S McIntosh ◽  
R Jardine ◽  
M Ghazanfar
Keyword(s):  
Median Time ◽  
General Surgery ◽  
Retrospective Review ◽  
Common Reason ◽  
Patient Treatment ◽  
Royal Infirmary ◽  
Emergency Operations ◽  
Elective Operation ◽  
Theatre Management ◽  
Aberdeen Royal Infirmary

Abstract Introduction Operative cancellation rates can be up to 17.6%, resulting in delays to patient treatment and management. This audit was conducted to assess underlying reasons for operative cancellations with the aim to minimise cancellations in the future. Method A retrospective review of General surgery operative cancellations during 2019 at Aberdeen Royal Infirmary was undertaken. Data was obtained from Theatre Management. Results 28548 operations were performed across all surgical specialities during 2019 with 2664 operations cancelled. Within General Surgery, 447 were cancelled (182 emergency (40.7%), 265 electives (59.3%)). The most common reason was lack of theatre time for elective cases and procedure no longer needed for emergency cases. For cancelled elective surgeries, there was a median time of 29 days before being operated. Conclusions We highlight that both elective and emergency operations are susceptible to cancellation. There are clear differences in the reason of cancellation between elective and emergency. Going forward, it is worth discussing booking emergency operations with the on-call consultant to ensure they are necessary. Regarding elective operation cancellations due to lack of theatre time it would be imperative to assess the exact cause of this as to minimise operative cancellations. We plan re-audit once a departmental discussion has been made.

Utilization of P16 in Head and Neck Cytology and Surgical Specimens After the Release of CAP Guidelines

2020 ◽  
Vol 154 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S22-S22
Author(s):  
H Laharwani ◽  
V Manucha ◽  
G Jefferson ◽  
L Jackson
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Squamous Cell Carcinomas ◽  
Common Reason ◽  
Unknown Primary ◽  
Hpv Testing ◽  
Neck Masses ◽  
P16 Immunohistochemistry ◽  
Hpv Status ◽  
Wrong Site

Abstract Introduction/Objective HPV-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma is biologically and clinically unique and has a survival advantage over other head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. In December 2017 College of American Pathologist published guidelines for testing HPV status in head and neck cancer. It was recommended that pathologists perform HR-HPV testing on head and neck squamous cell carcinomas from all patients with known oropharyngeal SCC not previously tested for HR-HPV, with suspected oropharyngeal SCC, or with metastatic SCC of unknown primary. The aim of this study was to determine the compliance of pathologists following the CAP guidelines. Methods Cases that underwent HPV testing using p16 immunohistochemistry for the years 2017 and 2019 were retrieved. Based on the guidelines, p16 testing was designated as “indicated” or “not indicated”. Results There were 196 cases in which p16 testing was performed in a period of 3 consecutive years. Of these, 175 were FNA/ biopsies and 21 were surgical resections. In 69 cases (56 FNAs and 13 biopsies) the biopsy was performed on neck masses with unknown primary. The compliance for p16 testing in OPC and Lymph nodes with metastatic SCC of unknown primary was 100%. In 34 (17.3%) cases p16 testing was not indicated, the most common reason being wrong site (85%) including the larynx, oral tongue, the floor of the mouth, buccal mucosa, and nasal mass. Of the unindicated p16s, 20 (58%) were received in consultation for continuity of care. Conclusion Not being clear about the site of the tumor is the most common reason for unindicated p16 testing. A clear designation of biopsy site and proper communication between pathologist and surgeon can improve utilization of p16 testing in head and neck carcinomas.

scholarly journals 114. Implementation of an Empiric Organism Specific Guidelines for Gram-negative Bacteremia in conjunction with Rapid Diagnostic Testing

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S71-S71
Author(s):  
Fidelia Bernice ◽  
Edina Avdic ◽  
Kathryn Dzintars ◽  
Aliyah Cruz
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Status ◽  
Compliance Rate ◽  
Diagnostic Testing ◽  
Specific Treatment ◽  
Resistance Mechanisms ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Blood Cultures ◽  
Common Reason ◽  
Empiric Antibiotic Therapy ◽  
Gram Negative

Abstract Background The objective of this study was to confirm the validity of institution specific treatment recommendations targeting organisms identified by GenMark Dx® ePlex® blood cultures identification (BCID) Gram-negative panel prior to susceptibility results. Methods We developed and implemented institution specific guidelines for empiric antibiotic therapy for Gram-negative organisms targeted by GenMark Dx® ePlex® BCID. We utilized blood culture antibiograms, existing evidence for the most optimal agent for each pathogen, probable resistance mechanisms and patient clinical status to create these guidelines. From December 16, 2019 through May 31, 2020, infectious diseases pharmacists reviewed all positive blood cultures; assessed compliance with guidelines and intervened as needed. The primary objective was to determine how frequently guideline recommend agents would be ineffective against targeted pathogens based on susceptibilities. Secondary objectives were compliance with guidelines and frequency of therapy escalation or de-escalation. Results GenMark® testing was completed on 222 cultures positive for Gram-negative rods with target organisms identification in 195 (88%) blood cultures. Two hundred and five organisms were identified; most commonly E. coli (40%) and K. pneumoniae (21%).Resistance markers were detected in 30 aerobic blood cultures; 28 CTX-M, and 2 KPC. Our institutional guideline provided appropriate empiric coverage in 93% of bacteremia episodes. The most common reason for ineffective therapy was the presence of resistance mechanisms not detected by GenMark® test (e.g. non-CTX-M extended spectrum beta-lactamases). The compliance rate with the guidelines was 55%; the most common reason for non-compliance was the use of an anti-pseudmonal beta-lactams in neutropenic patients.. The system failed to identify panel organisms in only 5 (2%) of blood cultures. Conclusion The institution-specific guidelines providing empiric coverage for each organism identified by rapid diagnostic tests can aid antimicrobial stewardship efforts to de-escalate therapy while still providing effective coverage in >90% of cases. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures.

Usher syndrome in four Norwegian counties

2008 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Grøndahl ◽  
Svein Mjøen
Keyword(s):  
Usher Syndrome

scholarly journals The Reported Use of Tongue-Ties and Nosebands in Thoroughbred and Standardbred Horse Racing—A Pilot Study

Animals ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 622
Author(s):  
Dominic Weller ◽  
Samantha Franklin ◽  
Peter White ◽  
Glenn Shea ◽  
Kate Fenner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factor ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Airway Obstruction ◽  
Positive Association ◽  
Common Reason ◽  
Horse Racing ◽  
Equal Importance ◽  
Potential Risks ◽  
Equine Industry ◽  
Insight Into

This article reports on the results of a survey of racehorse trainers (n = 112) outlining the reasons for tongue-tie (TT) and noseband (NB) use by Thoroughbred trainers (TBTs) (n = 72) and Standardbred trainers (SBTs) (n = 40). The study also investigated the reported effectiveness of TTs and possible complications arising from their use. Tongue-tie use was reported by 62.5% (n = 70) of racehorse trainers. The reasons for TT use varied between TBTs and SBTs. For TBTs, the most common reason for TT use was to prevent or reduce airway obstruction (72.3%, n = 34), followed closely by to prevent or reduce airway noise (55.3%, n = 16). Standardbred trainers assigned equal importance for TT use [to prevent or reduce airway obstruction (69.6%, n = 16) and to prevent the horse from moving its tongue over the bit (69.6%, n = 16)]. Tongue-ties were considered significantly less effective at improving performance than at reducing airway obstruction and preventing the tongue from moving over the bit (t = −2.700, p = 0.0007). For respondents who used both TTs and NBs, there was a mild to moderate positive association between the reasons for using TTs and NBs. Of the 70 TT-using respondents, 51.4% (n = 36) recorded having encountered either a physical or behavioural complication due to TT use, with redness/bruising of the tongue (20.0%, n = 14) being the most common physical complication reported. Duration of use influenced the risk of observing complications. The likelihood of a respondent reporting a behavioural complication due to TT use increased with every minute of reported application and a nine-minute increment in application period doubled the odds of a respondent reporting a complication. Tightness was a risk factor for physical complications: Checking TT tightness by noting the tongue as not moving was associated with increased reporting of physical complications (OR = 6.59; CI 1.1–67.5). This pilot study provides some insight into how and why TTs are applied by some racehorse trainers, and the potential risks associated with their use. A further study of a larger cohort is recommended because these results are valid for only the 112 trainers who responded and cannot be generalized to the equine industry.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document