Group decision making through nominal group technique: an empirical study

2010 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rafikul Islam
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Empirical Study ◽  
Group Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision ◽  
Nominal Group Technique ◽  
Nominal Group ◽  
Group Technique

scholarly journals Teknik-teknik dalam Pengambilan Keputusan

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Putri Diana ◽  
Rusdinal ◽  
Hade Afriansyah
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Group Decision Making ◽  
Systematic Literature Review ◽  
Group Decision ◽  
Nominal Group Technique ◽  
Nominal Group ◽  
New Information ◽  
The Right ◽  
Group Technique

This article aims to describe how the technique should be used in decision making to get the right results and in accordance with the objectives to be achieved. The methodology used to arrange this article is Systematic Literature Review (SLR). First, researcher find relevant theories, and then make a conclusion about it, then analyzing, and finally make a new information based researcher analyzing. The result of this article base on the researcher analyzing is generally there are three techniques that can be used in decision making, such participatory technique, group decision making technique, and nominal group technique.

Structuring group decision making in a web-based environment by using the nominal group technique

2007 ◽  
Vol 52 (2) ◽  
pp. 277-295 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pilar Pazos Lago ◽  
Mario G. Beruvides ◽  
Jiun-Yin Jian ◽  
Ana Maria Canto ◽  
Angela Sandoval ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision ◽  
Nominal Group Technique ◽  
Nominal Group ◽  
Web Based ◽  
Group Technique

EP.TH.602Exploring decision-making of healthcare professionals in patients with benign large non-pedunculated colonic polyps (BLNPCP) virtually using combined focus group and nominal group technique

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
L Wheldon ◽  
J Morgan ◽  
MJ Lee ◽  
S Riley ◽  
SR Brown ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Healthcare Professional ◽  
Patient Preference ◽  
Healthcare Professionals ◽  
Nominal Group Technique ◽  
Colonic Polyps ◽  
Nominal Group ◽  
Shared Decision ◽  
Patient Factors ◽  
Group Technique

Abstract Aim We aimed to elicit key factors that influence healthcare professional decision-making when deciding treatment for BLNPCP. Background Benign large non-pedunculated colonic polyps (BLNPCP) may harbour covert malignancy and opinions differ about the optimal treatment modality. There are several options available, including endoscopic mucosal resection, endoscopic submucosal resection, combined endoscopic laparoscopic surgery and surgical resection. Despite widespread availability of endoscopic resection techniques, there are high rates of surgery in the UK. Methods Three focus groups of healthcare professionals, comprised of either consultant colorectal surgeons, nurse endoscopists and consultant gastroenterologists, were conducted virtually utilising the Nominal Group Technique. Meetings were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Themes were devolved using the framework approach for qualitative analysis. A priority-ranked list of factors influencing healthcare professional decision-making in this setting was generated. Results Five main themes were identified as influencing decision-making: Shared decision making (patient preference, informed consent); Patient factors (co-morbidity, age, life-expectancy); Polyp factors (Location, size, morphology, risk of cancer); Healthcare professionals (skill-set, personal preference); System factors (techniques availability locally, regional referral networks). Nominal Group Technique generated 55 items across the three focus groups. Nurses and gastroentologists ranked patient factors (particularly drug history and tolerance of procedure) and shared decision making (patient preference) more highly then surgeons. Surgeons placed greater emphasis on polyp factors particularly location and the risk of submucosal invasive carcinoma. Conclusion Decision making is complex and multifactorial. These results support the benefits of complex polyp MDTs and patient involvement in the decision-making. The complexity of decision-making may underpin wide variation in practice.

THE SPECIAL FEATURES OF DECISION-MAKING IN ADVERTISING IN CONTINENTAL TOURISM

2003 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-34
Author(s):  
Igor Brajdić
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Empirical Study ◽  
Group Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision ◽  
Management Structure ◽  
Marketing Function ◽  
General Orientation ◽  
Food And Beverage ◽  
Predominant Orientation

One of the primary functions of a tourist enterprise is advertising, as a component of the broader marketing function. Each function has its specific traits which are manifested in the various processes of the enterprise, one of the more important being decision-making. It is assumed that in continental tourism, due to its predominant orientation in providing more food and beverage services and less hotel services, special features in decision-making can be found within the advertising function. The empirical study carried out in part of continental tourism involving the region of the Croatia Zagorje was aimed at a range of typical characteristics of decision-making such as types of decisions, the methods of decision-making, the outcome of alternatives, the monitoring of effects and the measures of improving decision-making. Regarding types of decisions, the majority of managers and executives feel that, to a very large extent, satisfactory decisions are being taken, as well as routine decisions, which are in accordance with the predominant orientation of providing the fundamental catering services. Due to a general orientation towards group decision-making, it follows that, when choosing advertising media, the management structure contacts the executive personnel only randomly. From the latter group of questions, it can be concluded that in the enterprises surveyed anything that has to do with science is applied to the least possible measure.

Burstiness in Quasi-Group Decision Making in Business Settings

2018 ◽  
pp. 97-131
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Empirical Study ◽  
Business Process ◽  
Group Decision Making ◽  
Mirror Neurons ◽  
Group Decision ◽  
Research Question ◽  
The Novel ◽  
Key Concepts ◽  
New Research

Business advances its business process in order to adapt to a constantly changing situation in economy and society. Analysis of buyers' burstiness assists in optimization of flow of business process in order to increase the profit. However, burstiness in quasi-group decision making in business settings has not attracted a lot of research efforts. The aim of the chapter is to explore the nature, origins, and impact of burstiness in quasi-group decision making in business settings underpinning implementation of an empirical study and elaboration of a new research question for further studies. The meaning of such key concepts as burstiness, mirror neurons, quasi-group, and decision making is studied. Moreover, the study demonstrates how the key concepts are related to the idea of business settings. The novel contribution of this manuscript is the newly defined research question on burstiness in quasi-group decision making in business settings. Directions of further research are proposed.

Self-Esteem and Group Decision Making: An Empirical Study

1980 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 951-956
Author(s):  
T. M. Schwartz ◽  
V. J. Wullwick ◽  
H. J. Shapiro
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Problem Solving ◽  
Empirical Study ◽  
Group Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision ◽  
Self Esteem ◽  
Self Concept ◽  
Numerical Ability ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Common Target

To assess the impact of self-esteem on group decision making 270 students in business were assigned to groups of 3 by sex, numerical ability, and self-esteem on the Tennessee Self-concept Scale. For scores on a ‘common-target’ game there was no correlation between sex and problem-solving ability, which however showed low rs with self-concept. Medium self-concept was associated with greater success than high or low self-concept.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document