Chapter Two. Agents of the State: A Century of Delegation in International Environmental Law

2013 ◽  
pp. 54-77
2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 189-209
Author(s):  
Annisah Dian Utami Panjaitan ◽  
Novianti Novianti ◽  
Mochammad Farisi

This research is aimed to analyze and determine the 16th provision principle of the declaration on environment and development, namely the polluter pays principle, as one of the state’s form of accountability towards the polluting across borders between PTTEP Australia and Indonesia. This is a juridical research, which analyzes the issue discussed through the use of many realted sources. The Polluter Pyas Principle, as a form of State responsibility in environmental pollution, has some advantages and disadvantages when applied as a recommendation by the OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development). From a legal perspective, this principle can be applied as a civil liability law, whereas from an economic perspective, it can be viewed as effort to control pollution by means which the polluter has an obligation to pay for the environmental pollution that he/she caused. Even so this principle also has its weakness, in an economic approach this principle is difficult to determine the determination of the cost of loss. In some countries themselves have applied this principle in handling cases of environmental pollution. In the case of cross-border environmental pollution, the principle of good neighborliness and the principle of state responsibility in dealing with pollution cases as a sign of State’s goodwill to comply with existing international law. The case of environmental pollution itself is not only the State that can sue, but a group of people or the community can also sue, if they feel harmed by the pollution that occurs. One of them is by carrying out Class Action in holding accountable for the consequences of pollution that has occurred, and is detrimental to a group or large number of people. Even though international environmental law is a soft law, it can become hard law depending on the pollution case that occurs. Even so, International Environmental Law contained in the Stockholm Declaration, Rio de Jeneiro, Civil Liability Convention and other related international arrangements have been very good in their regulatory fields. Only the state which ratifies the convention applies according to the pollution case that occurs.


Author(s):  
Marauhn Thilo

This chapter assesses the role of the state in international environmental law. The starting point is the Westphalian notion of states' unimpaired freedom of action, increasingly revealed as a ‘myth’. The chapter then considers ideas of contemporary statehood—an element of a global system of environmental governance. Contemporary statehood and its relevance for international environmental law can best be illuminated by focusing on the roles assumed by states as authors, addressees, and guardians of international law. Finally, the chapter discusses the changing role of states in light of ongoing transformations in the international legal system, including the growing plurality of actors, norms, and institutions, as well as the growth of inter-linked networks of states and other actors.


2009 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 384-388

This case concerns a claim for damages by the State of Rosmarus following an accidental explosion and leak at an offshore oil rig operated by the State of Urusus and the seizure of an Urusus-flagged fishing vessel by the State of Rosmarus. It involves issues of public international law, including the law of the sea, the law of treaties, and international environmental law.


Yuridika ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 475
Author(s):  
Suparto Wijoyo ◽  
Wilda Prihatiningtyas

Dynamic of commitment of International Community in the issue of control upon global warming has been developed since 1919 up to present. From available list of international treaties, it can be seen how strong the commitment of global community in the issues of environment, global warming as well as climate change. Unfortunately, it can be concluded, that those international treaties is so fragmented and therefore, is difficult to be implemented comparing with instrument of international environmental law in general. However, political will of national state is the essence to create international agenda. It is because olitical will of the state national is the core to make international agenda .It was because good reasons of a government can bring a good thing for the country and its people , especially again in control global warming So that in this case the state also has a role in realizing environmental sustainability for its people, it is also indirectly a part of the obligation of the state to maintain the stability and survival of the people and the preservation of natural resources in the country, for the welfare and prosperity of all the people .


2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 84
Author(s):  
Dieudonne Mevono Mvogo

This paper analyses the contribution of treaty or specialised judicial bodies to striking problems such as fragmentation and inconsistency within International Environmental Law (IEL) as they fill the gaps in IEL, taking advantage of the absence of an overarching International Environmental Court (IEC) and the indolence of the International Court of Justice (ICJ). It argues that by helping improve the ICJ, they will help resolve IEL's jurisprudential inconsistency and fragmentation. The paper therefore first explains the sense in which jurisprudential fragmentation and inconsistency underline IEL's compliance mechanisms, and shows the limits of the state-centripetal approach of the ICJ as a solution to such a problem. Finally, it proposes a state-centrifugal paradigm that stresses how international specialised judicial bodies may help strengthen the ICJ's fragmentation and inconsistency management functions. To propose this novel approach, this paper employs legal critical methods to expose current gaps in the state-centripetal approach.


Author(s):  
Pierre-Marie Dupuy ◽  
Jorge E. Viñuales

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document