scholarly journals Gaussian Process Regression Based Robust Optimization with Observer Uncertainty for Reconfigurable Self-x Sensory Electronics for Industry 4.0

2021 ◽  
Vol 88 (s1) ◽  
pp. s83-s88
Author(s):  
Qummar Zaman ◽  
Senan Alraho ◽  
Andreas König
Keyword(s):  
Robust Optimization ◽  
Gaussian Process ◽  
Industry 4.0 ◽  
Performance Metrics ◽  
Optimization Technique ◽  
Gaussian Process Regression ◽  
Search Space ◽  
Instrumentation Amplifier ◽  
Statistical Regression ◽  
Current Feedback

Abstract This paper presents a robust optimization technique for the reconfigurable measurement of sensory electronics for industry 4.0 to obtain a robust solution even in the presence of observer uncertainty using a cost-effective performance measurement method. The extrinsic evaluation of the proposed methodology is performed on an indirect current-feedback instrumentation amplifier (CFIA), which is a fundamental part of sensory systems. To reduce the CFIA device performance evaluation set-up cost, a low-cost test stimulus is applied to the circuit under test, and the output response of the circuit is examined to correlate with the device’s performance parameters. Due to the complexity of the smart sensory electronics search space, the meta-heuristic optimization algorithm is being selected as an optimizer. For objective space or observer uncertainty, the Gaussian process regression from the Bayesian statistical regression process is used to estimate the uncertainty level efficiently. Six different classical metrics have been used to evaluate the regression model accuracy. The highest achieved average expected error metrics value is 0.313, and the minimum value of correlation performance metrics is 0.908. The device is implemented using 0.35 μm austriamicrosystems technology.

Low-cost Indirect Measurement Methods for Self-x Integrated Sensory Electronics for Industry 4.0

2020 ◽  
Vol 87 (s1) ◽  
pp. s79-s84
Author(s):  
Qummar Zaman ◽  
Senan Alraho ◽  
Andreas König
Keyword(s):  
Industry 4.0 ◽  
Degrees Of Freedom ◽  
Performance Metrics ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Indirect Measurement ◽  
Measurement Methods ◽  
Instrumentation Amplifier ◽  
Performance Parameters ◽  
Current Feedback ◽  
Indirect Measurements

AbstractThe conventional method for testing the performance of reconfigurable sensory electronics of industry 4.0 relies on the direct measurement methods. This approach gives higher accuracy but at the price of extremely high testing cost and does not utilize the new degrees of freedom for measurement methods enabled by industry 4.0. In order to reduce the test cost and use available resources more efficiently, a primary approach, called indirect measurements or alternative testing has been proposed using a non-intrusive sensor. Its basic principle consists in using the indirect measurements, in order to estimate the sensory electronics performance parameters without measuring directly. The non-intrusive property of the proposed method offers better performance of the sensing electronics and virtually applicable to any sensing electronics. Efficiency is evaluated in terms of model accuracy by using six different classical metrics. It uses an indirect current-feedback instrumentation amplifier (InAmp) as a test vehicle to evaluate the performance parameters of the circuit. The device is implemented using CMOS 0.35 μm technology. The achieved maximum value of average expected error metrics is 0.24, and the lowest value of correlation performance metrics is 0.91, which represent an excellent efficiency of InAmp performance predictor.

scholarly journals Efficient transient testing procedure using a novel experience replay particle swarm optimizer for THD-based robust design and optimization of self-X sensory electronics in industry 4.0

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 193-206
Author(s):  
Qummar Zaman ◽  
Senan Alraho ◽  
Andreas König
Keyword(s):  
Industry 4.0 ◽  
Particle Swarm ◽  
Optimization Procedure ◽  
Calibration Method ◽  
Testing Procedure ◽  
Instrumentation Amplifier ◽  
Self Healing ◽  
Particle Swarm Optimizer ◽  
Current Feedback ◽  
Experience Replay

Abstract. This paper aims to improve the traditional calibration method for reconfigurable self-X (self-calibration, self-healing, self-optimize, etc.) sensor interface readout circuit for industry 4.0. A cost-effective test stimulus is applied to the device under test, and the transient response of the system is analyzed to correlate the circuit's characteristics parameters. Due to complexity in the search and objective space of the smart sensory electronics, a novel experience replay particle swarm optimization (ERPSO) algorithm is being proposed and proved a better-searching capability than some currently well-known PSO algorithms. The newly proposed ERPSO expanded the selection producer of the classical PSO by introducing an experience replay buffer (ERB) intending to reduce the probability of trapping into the local minima. The ERB reflects the archive of previously visited global best particles, while its selection is based upon an adaptive epsilon greedy method in the velocity updating model. The performance of the proposed ERPSO algorithm is verified by using eight different popular benchmarking functions. Furthermore, an extrinsic evaluation of the ERPSO algorithm is also examined on a reconfigurable wide swing indirect current-feedback instrumentation amplifier (CFIA). For the later test, we proposed an efficient optimization procedure by using total harmonic distortion analyses of CFIA output to reduce the total number of measurements and save considerable optimization time and cost. The proposed optimization methodology is roughly 3 times faster than the classical optimization process. The circuit is implemented by using Cadence design tools and CMOS 0.35 µm technology from Austria Microsystems (AMS). The efficiency and robustness are the key features of the proposed methodology toward implementing reliable sensory electronic systems for industry 4.0 applications.

Exchange Spin Coupling from Gaussian Process Regression

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc Philipp Bahlke ◽  
Natnael Mogos ◽  
Jonny Proppe ◽  
Carmen Herrmann
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Gaussian Process ◽  
Gaussian Process Regression ◽  
Molecular Magnets ◽  
Molecular Structures ◽  
Spin Coupling ◽  
Structure Property ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Uncertainty Estimates

Heisenberg exchange spin coupling between metal centers is essential for describing and understanding the electronic structure of many molecular catalysts, metalloenzymes, and molecular magnets for potential application in information technology. We explore the machine-learnability of exchange spin coupling, which has not been studied yet. We employ Gaussian process regression since it can potentially deal with small training sets (as likely associated with the rather complex molecular structures required for exploring spin coupling) and since it provides uncertainty estimates (“error bars”) along with predicted values. We compare a range of descriptors and kernels for 257 small dicopper complexes and find that a simple descriptor based on chemical intuition, consisting only of copper-bridge angles and copper-copper distances, clearly outperforms several more sophisticated descriptors when it comes to extrapolating towards larger experimentally relevant complexes. Exchange spin coupling is similarly easy to learn as the polarizability, while learning dipole moments is much harder. The strength of the sophisticated descriptors lies in their ability to linearize structure-property relationships, to the point that a simple linear ridge regression performs just as well as the kernel-based machine-learning model for our small dicopper data set. The superior extrapolation performance of the simple descriptor is unique to exchange spin coupling, reinforcing the crucial role of choosing a suitable descriptor, and highlighting the interesting question of the role of chemical intuition vs. systematic or automated selection of features for machine learning in chemistry and material science.

SAMPL6 Challenge Results from pKa Predictions Based on a General Gaussian Process Model

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caitlin C. Bannan ◽  
David Mobley ◽  
A. Geoff Skillman
Keyword(s):  
Gaussian Process ◽  
Process Model ◽  
Molecular Graph ◽  
Gaussian Process Regression ◽  
Ionization State ◽  
Training Set ◽  
Physiochemical Properties ◽  
Quantile Plots ◽  
Physical And Chemical ◽  
Good Agreement

<div>A variety of fields would benefit from accurate pK<sub>a</sub> predictions, especially drug design due to the affect a change in ionization state can have on a molecules physiochemical properties.</div><div>Participants in the recent SAMPL6 blind challenge were asked to submit predictions for microscopic and macroscopic pK<sub>a</sub>s of 24 drug like small molecules.</div><div>We recently built a general model for predicting pK<sub>a</sub>s using a Gaussian process regression trained using physical and chemical features of each ionizable group.</div><div>Our pipeline takes a molecular graph and uses the OpenEye Toolkits to calculate features describing the removal of a proton.</div><div>These features are fed into a Scikit-learn Gaussian process to predict microscopic pK<sub>a</sub>s which are then used to analytically determine macroscopic pK<sub>a</sub>s.</div><div>Our Gaussian process is trained on a set of 2,700 macroscopic pK<sub>a</sub>s from monoprotic and select diprotic molecules.</div><div>Here, we share our results for microscopic and macroscopic predictions in the SAMPL6 challenge.</div><div>Overall, we ranked in the middle of the pack compared to other participants, but our fairly good agreement with experiment is still promising considering the challenge molecules are chemically diverse and often polyprotic while our training set is predominately monoprotic.</div><div>Of particular importance to us when building this model was to include an uncertainty estimate based on the chemistry of the molecule that would reflect the likely accuracy of our prediction. </div><div>Our model reports large uncertainties for the molecules that appear to have chemistry outside our domain of applicability, along with good agreement in quantile-quantile plots, indicating it can predict its own accuracy.</div><div>The challenge highlighted a variety of means to improve our model, including adding more polyprotic molecules to our training set and more carefully considering what functional groups we do or do not identify as ionizable. </div>

scholarly journals Direct quantum dynamics using variational Gaussian wavepackets and Gaussian process regression

2019 ◽  
Vol 150 (4) ◽  
pp. 041101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iakov Polyak ◽  
Gareth W. Richings ◽  
Scott Habershon ◽  
Peter J. Knowles
Keyword(s):  
Gaussian Process ◽  
Quantum Dynamics ◽  
Gaussian Process Regression

scholarly journals Predicting Bridge Elements Deterioration, using Collaborative Gaussian Process Regression

2020 ◽  
Vol 53 (3) ◽  
pp. 348-353
Author(s):  
Maharshi Dhada ◽  
Georgios M. Hadjidemetriou ◽  
Ajith K. Parlikad
Keyword(s):  
Gaussian Process ◽  
Gaussian Process Regression

scholarly journals Modeling of Cutting Force in the Turning of AISI 4340 Using Gaussian Process Regression Algorithm

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 4055
Author(s):  
Mahdi S. Alajmi ◽  
Abdullah M. Almeshal
Keyword(s):  
Gaussian Process ◽  
Cutting Force ◽  
Predictive Accuracy ◽  
Gaussian Process Regression ◽  
Machining Process ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Process Data ◽  
Cutting Force Prediction ◽  
Artificial Neural Network Ann ◽  
Aisi 4340

Machining process data can be utilized to predict cutting force and optimize process parameters. Cutting force is an essential parameter that has a significant impact on the metal turning process. In this study, a cutting force prediction model for turning AISI 4340 alloy steel was developed using Gaussian process regression (GPR), support vector machines (SVM), and artificial neural network (ANN) methods. The GPR simulations demonstrated a reliable prediction of surface roughness for the dry turning method with R2 = 0.9843, MAPE = 5.12%, and RMSE = 1.86%. Performance comparisons between GPR, SVM, and ANN show that GPR is an effective method that can ensure high predictive accuracy of the cutting force in the turning of AISI 4340.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document