Evaluation of the Functional Movement Screen and a Novel Basketball Mobility Test as an Injury Prediction Tool for Collegiate Basketball Players

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 1589-1600 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colin W. Bond ◽  
Jason C. Dorman ◽  
Tryg O. Odney ◽  
Scott J. Roggenbuck ◽  
Steven W. Young ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Functional Movement Screen ◽  
Prediction Tool ◽  
Basketball Players ◽  
Functional Movement ◽  
Injury Prediction ◽  
Mobility Test ◽  
Collegiate Basketball

scholarly journals Evaluation of the Functional Movement Screen as an Injury Prediction Tool Among Active Adult Populations

2015 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 532-537 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bryan S. Dorrel ◽  
Terry Long ◽  
Scott Shaffer ◽  
Gregory D. Myer
Keyword(s):  
Functional Movement Screen ◽  
Prediction Tool ◽  
Functional Movement ◽  
Injury Prediction

The Functional Movement Screen as a predictor of injury in professional basketball players

2015 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 619-623 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael G. Azzam ◽  
Thomas W. Throckmorton ◽  
Richard A. Smith ◽  
Drew Graham ◽  
Jim Scholler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Functional Movement Screen ◽  
Basketball Players ◽  
Functional Movement ◽  
Professional Basketball

Relationship between functional movement screen results and physical performance parameters in basketball players: preliminary results

2021 ◽  
Vol 74 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe FRANCAVILLA ◽  
Valerio BONAVOLONTÀ ◽  
Stefania CATALDI ◽  
Vito F. FASANO ◽  
Giuseppe MESSINA ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Performance ◽  
Functional Movement Screen ◽  
Performance Parameters ◽  
Basketball Players ◽  
Functional Movement ◽  
Preliminary Results

Prospective Injury Prediction Using The Functional Movement Screen In Division I Runners

2014 ◽  
Vol 46 ◽  
pp. 945-946
Author(s):  
Scott K. Lynn ◽  
Ricardo A. Padilla ◽  
Kavin KW Tsang ◽  
Guillermo J. Noffal
Keyword(s):  
Division I ◽  
Functional Movement Screen ◽  
Functional Movement ◽  
Injury Prediction

Injury prediction in veteran football players using the Functional Movement Screen™

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (14) ◽  
pp. 1371-1379 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Hammes ◽  
Karen aus der Fünten ◽  
Mario Bizzini ◽  
Tim Meyer
Keyword(s):  
Football Players ◽  
Functional Movement Screen ◽  
Functional Movement ◽  
Injury Prediction

scholarly journals The effect of corrective exercises on functional movement screen test and motor skills

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 390-399
Author(s):  
Şeyda Nur Usluer ◽  
Zait Burak Aktuğ ◽  
Serkan İbiş ◽  
Hasan Aka
Keyword(s):  
Motor Skills ◽  
Screen Test ◽  
Exercise Group ◽  
English Summary ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Functional Movement Screen ◽  
Basketball Players ◽  
Functional Movement ◽  
Motor Test ◽  
Significant Difference

The aim of this study is to examine the effect of 8-week corrective exercises applied to 12-15 age group basketball players on Functional Movement Screen Test (FMS) and motor skill (MS) score. 65 volunteer children between the ages of 12-15 participated in the study. The children were the control group (CG) (N = 25) who did not do any exercise, the basketball group that only trained basketball (BG) (N = 20), and the corrective exercise group (CEG) (N = 20) that did corrective exercises in addition to basketball training. It is divided into 3 groups. Basketball training was applied to children on BG 3 days a week. In addition to basketball training, an 8-week corrective exercise protocol was applied to the children in CEG. Functional movement patterns of children were determined with FMS test and MSs with Deutscher Motor Test (DMT). Kruskal-Wallis H Test was used to determine the differences children's pre-tests and post-tests after corrective exercises. As a result of the statistical analysis, a statistically significant difference was found between the pre-test and post-tests of FMS total scores and DMT scores in CEG (p<0.05). As a result, it has been shown that corrective exercises contribute to FMS total scores and the MS development of children. It is thought that the placement of corrective exercises in the training contents can increase the MSs of children. ​Extended English summary is in the end of Full Text PDF (TURKISH) file. Özet   Bu çalışmasının amacı, 12-15 yaş grubu basketbolculara uygulanan 8 haftalık düzeltici egzersizlerin fonksiyonel hareket tarama testi (FHT) ve motor beceri (MB) puanı üzerine etkisinin incelenmesidir. Çalışmaya 12-15 yaş arası 65 gönüllü çocuk katılmıştır. Çocuklar herhangi bir egzersiz yapmayan kontrol grubu (KG) (N=25), sadece basketbol antrenmanı yapan basketbol grubu (BG) (N=20) ve basketbol antrenmanına ilaveten düzeltici egzersiz yapan düzeltici egzersiz grubu (DEG) (N=20) olmak üzere 3 gruba ayrılmıştır. BG’da bulunan çocuklara haftada 3 gün sadece basketbol antrenmanı, DEG’da bulunan çocuklara basketbol antrenmanlarına ilaveten 8 haftalık düzeltici egzersiz protokolü uygulanmıştır. Çocukların fonksiyonel hareket kalıpları FHT testi ile MB’leri Deutscher Motor Testi (DMT) ile belirlenmiştir. Çocukların FHT skorları ve DMT skorlarının ön testleri ile düzeltici egzersizler sonrası son testleri arasındaki farkı belirlemede Wilcoxon İşaretli Sıralar Testi kullanılmıştır. İstatiksel analizler sonucunda, DEG’da FHT toplam skorları ve DMT skorları ön test ile son testleri arasında istatiksel olarak anlamlı bir farklılık bulunmuştur (p<0,05). Sonuç olarak düzeltici egzersizlerin FHT toplam skorlarına ve çocukların MB gelişimine katkı sağladığı gösterilmiştir. Düzeltici egzersizlerin antrenman içeriklerine yerleştirilmesinin çocukların MB’lerini artırabileceği düşünülmektedir.

The Functional Movement Screen as an injury prediction tool for German physical education and exercise science students: a prospective cohort-study

physioscience ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simone Schweda ◽  
Daniel Leyhr ◽  
Inga Krauß
Keyword(s):  
College Students ◽  
Gender Differences ◽  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Screening Tool ◽  
Functional Movement Screen ◽  
Science Students ◽  
Exercise Science ◽  
Functional Movement ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Injury Prediction

Abstract Background Several studies have evaluated the applicability of the Functional Movement Screen (FMS) as a screening tool for injury prediction. However, only few studies investigate gender differences for FMS as a screening tool for female and male college students. Objective To evaluate gender differences in FMS single items and the overall score. In addition, the applicability of FMS as a diagnostic tool for injury prevention of German exercise students will be investigated. Method N = 99 college students performed an FMS at the beginning of the semester. Injuries were recorded for the entire term. Gender differences of FMS single items were assessed using the Mann-Whitney-U-Test. Differences in injury prediction were calculated using logistic regression. If the model was statistically significant, diagnostic accuracy was calculated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and the area under the curve (AUC). The Youden index was used to identify a cut-off score. 2 × 2 contingency tables, sensitivity and specifity, positive/negative predictive values, and likelihood ratios were assessed. Results There were significant gender differences for Deep Squat, Shoulder Mobility, Trunk Stability Push Up, and Active Straight Leg Raise. The logistic regression showed that the composite score was statistically significant in clarifying the model for females (p = 0.005, RN 2 = 0.14), but not for males (p = 0.18, RN 2 = 0.04). The ROC curve indicated acceptable injury prediction in females (AUC: 0.66, p = 0.02) and poor injury prediction in males (AUC: 0.40, p = 0.19). The cut-off score of ≤ 16 for females resulted in a sensitivity of 63 % and specificity of 54 %. No cut-off score was calculated for males. Conclusion Females performed better on flexibility items, while males scored higher on strength exercises. Results of the study indicate low predictive accuracy. Therefore, no solid recommendation can be made for the use of the FMS as an injury screening tool for either female or male German exercise science students.

scholarly journals RISK OF SPORTS-RELATED MUSCULOSKELETAL INJURIES AMONG ELITE WOMEN BASKETBALL PLAYERS ACCORDING TO POSITION ON THE COURT AND SPORT RESULTS

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (100) ◽  
pp. 47-54
Author(s):  
Saulė Salatkaitė ◽  
Toma Garbenytė Apolinskienė ◽  
Laimonas Šiupšinskas ◽  
Alma Kajėnienė ◽  
Rimtautas Gudas
Keyword(s):  
Physical Examination ◽  
Dynamic Stability ◽  
Musculoskeletal Injuries ◽  
The Body ◽  
Functional Movement Screen ◽  
Physical Fatigue ◽  
Basketball Players ◽  
Balance Test ◽  
Functional Movement ◽  
The Right

Background. Basketball is a popular sport around the world, the number of players is growing, the probability to experience trauma is increasing, too. Studies have shown that women sustain 60% more injuries than men do. Pre- season physical examination helps to establish sports specific changes in the body of the athlete and to determine risk factors for training, competition, which cause injury to the players. Research aim was to analyse risk of non-contact musculoskeletal injuries in elite women basketball players according to the position on the court. Methods. The study involved 100 players in Lithuanian women basketball league who completed the questionnaire about the level of physical fatigue, performed Lower Quarter Y Balance Test™ and Functional Movement Screen ™ tests during pre-season physical examination in 2014. Data were analysed and compared according to player’s position on the court (guards and forwards). Results. The level of physical fatigue during pre-season period was low in both groups. Dynamic stability of the right leg was better in guards (composite score – 105.2 to 101.8 in forwards) while dynamic stability of the left leg remained the same in both groups. Guards had higher total scores in Functional Movement Screen™ tests pointing to the better quality of basic functional movement patterns. Conclusions. The guard’s playing efficiency during the season was higher than that of forwards and it was associated with better dynamic stability and higher level of physical fatigue at pre-season. Indirect indicators of non-contact musculoskeletal sport injuries showed that guards should have lower risk of non-contact sport-related injuries in women basketball.

scholarly journals An investigation into the use of the Functional Movement Screen as a predictor of injury in CrossFit athletes in the eThekwini municipality

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Michelle Richardson
Keyword(s):  
Training Programme ◽  
Mean Value ◽  
Normative Values ◽  
Functional Movement Screen ◽  
Functional Movement ◽  
Trunk Stability ◽  
Mobility Test ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Fundamental Movement Patterns ◽  
Push Up

Background: CrossFit is a popular and unique exercise training programme and competition. Despite the popularity of this training programme there is a high incidence of injury amongst the athletes. The Functional Movement Screen™ (FMS™) is a pre-participation assessment which grades seven tests which screen fundamental movement patterns of athletes to possibly predict future injury. No studies have successfully looked at the use of the FMS™ to predict injury in CrossFit athletes. Aims: The aim of this study is to establish the normative values of the FMS™, which have yet to be determined for CrossFit athletes, and to determine the use of these values as a predictor for future injury. Methods: The methodology included scoring 61 CrossFit athletes using the FMS™ one month prior the “United We Stand (UWS) Games 2017”. Additionally, the athletes were required to fill out a questionnaire which was used to assess for additional risk factors for injury. The athletes were thereafter tracked documenting CrossFit specific injury over the course of the one month training period that lead up to and included participation in the “UWS Games 2017” in order to compile a injury profile. The mean FMS™ was then compared to the injuries sustained. Results: The research sample revealed that the mean FMS™ score for CrossFit athletes was 17.73 out of 21. There was no significant link between the mean value when compared to the injury rates and this was therefore not a predictor of injury. There were significant findings that showed that using components of the FMS™ as a method of injury prediction in CrossFit athletes was possible; specifically, a low trunk stability push-up test score increased the likelihood of sustaining injury and previous injury negatively impacted the shoulder mobility test. Further findings suggested that Body Mass Index (BMI) negatively impacted the performance of the FMS™, and the boxes with which the athletes were affiliated, influenced the total FMS™ scores. The most common types of injuries recorded were joint dysfunction and muscle strain and the most common locations of injury were the shoulder, knee and lower back. Conclusions: Aspects of the FMS™ were a statistically significant predictor of injury in CrossFit athletes, specifically that of the shoulder mobility test and the trunk stability push-up test. Other findings concluded that factors such as the BMI and the box that athletes trained under influenced the FMS™ outcome. The normative value of 17.73 out of 21 for the FMS™ was provided as reference values for CrossFit athletes in order to assist with the interpretation of future scores when screening athletes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document