scholarly journals Gene expression profiling reveals insights into infant immunological and febrile responses to group B meningococcal vaccine

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel O’Connor ◽  
Marta Valente Pinto ◽  
Dylan Sheerin ◽  
Adriana Tomic ◽  
Ruth E Drury ◽  
...  
2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7011-7011 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Paschka ◽  
M. D. Radmacher ◽  
G. Marcucci ◽  
A. S. Ruppert ◽  
T. Vukosavljevic ◽  
...  

7011 Background: In CBF AML with t(8;21)(q22;q22) or inv(16)(p13q22)/t(16;16)(p13;q22) [abbreviated inv(16)], KIT mutations (mutKIT) and, in inv(16), trisomy 22 predict outcome and may guide the development of novel risk-adapted therapies. However, prognosis of patients (pts) lacking the aforementioned markers is less clear. Therefore, we profiled gene expression in t(8;21) (n=22) or sole inv(16) (n=25) pts who lacked mutKIT to identify signatures predictive of outcome. All pts were treated on CALGB trials incorporating consolidation therapy with multiple courses of higher dose cytarabine. Methods: Gene expression profiling was performed using Affymetrix U133 plus 2.0 arrays on diagnostic samples. As differences in gene expression distinguished all t(8;21) pts from all inv(16) pts, indicating two different biological entities, we pursued outcome prediction separately for each cytogenetic group. Gene expression-based outcome predictors for event-free survival (EFS) were constructed using a cross-validated prediction algorithm. Results: Among t(8;21) pts, EFS for predicted good (n=13) and poor (n=9) outcome groups differed strikingly (P=0.005; estimated 3-year EFS rates: 69% v 11%). Prediction was correct for 77% of pts. Among sole inv(16) pts, EFS for predicted good (n=18) and poor (n=7) outcome groups also differed (P=0.08; 3-year EFS rates: 78% v 29%). Prediction was correct for 76% of pts. FLT3 mutations appeared not to account for differences in EFS between the predicted groups; only the predicted outcome groups were associated with EFS (all baseline clinical characteristics at P>0.10). Pts with predicted poor outcome had higher expression of genes with leukemogenic potential such as WT1 [t(8;21) and inv(16)], CCNA1 [t(8;21)] and the oncogene MYCN [inv(16)]. Conclusions: Gene expression profiling improves outcome prediction in CBF AML pts lacking the known prognostic markers. Future studies should explore the clinical usefulness of targeting products of over- expressed genes, such as WT1 encoding a potential target for immunotherapy in AML. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 195-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wolfgang Kern ◽  
Claudia Schoch ◽  
Alexander Kohlmann ◽  
Martin Dugas ◽  
Sylvia Merk ◽  
...  

Abstract Genetic aberrations substantially contribute to the pathogenesis of acute myeloid leukemias (AML) and have significant prognostic impact. In most cases with AML and normal karyotypes (AML-NK), however, the respective genetic lesions have not yet been identified and patients are assigned an intermediate and thus largely unknown prognosis. To clarify the genetic background and to improve prognostication in AML-NK we analyzed gene expression profiles in 205 patients with untreated and newly diagnosed AML-NK. Samples were comprehensively characterized by cytomorphology, immunophenotyping, cytogenetics, and molecular genetics. For expression profiling, samples were hybridized to both U133A and U133B microarrays (Affymetrix). To identify genetically defined subgroups we performed an unsupervised principal component analysis (PCA) applying all 34023 probe sets from both arrays that were expressed in at least one of the analyzed samples. While the majority of cases (n=162, 79%; group A) clustered together, a subgroup comprizing 43 (21%) cases was identified (group B) which formed a distinct cluster. The analysis of known genetic markers (length mutations and point mutations of FLT3, partial tandem duplications of MLL, mutations of CEBPA, NRAS, or CKIT) did not reveal differences between groups A and B. Significant differences were found, however, in their phenotypes. There were more cases with monocytic leukemias in group B (84% vs. 20%, p<0.001) and the expression levels of CD4, CD56, CD65, CD15, CD14, CD64, CD11b, CD36, CD135, CD87, and CD116 were higher while those of MPO, CD34, and CD117 were lower (p<0.05 for all). To identify the genetic background of differences, samples from groups A and B were supervised compared. Using the top 100 differentially expressed genes and applying SVM with a 10-fold cross validation approach samples could be classified to groups A and B with an accuracy of 97.6% which was confirmed applying 100 runs of SVM with 2/3 of samples being randomly selected as training set and 1/3 as test set (median accuracy, 97.1%, range, 93.4% to 100%). Ingenuity software was used to identify genetic pathways differentially regulated between both groups. Most strikingly, CD14 was higher expressed (fold-change (fc), 10.6) and WT1 and MYCN were lower expressed (fc, 3.7 and 4.4) in group B. Also higher expressed was HCK (fc, 4.3) encoding a protein-tyrosine kinase which phosphorylates STAT3. Since phosphorylated STAT3 stimulates proliferation this may confer higher chemosensitivity and result in a better prognosis. The lower expression of HCK in group A cases may be due to the higher expression of SPTBN1 (fc, 3.4) which also has been shown to increase the transcription of C-FOS and to possibly reveal antiapoptotic effects. To prove the clinical importance of the newly identified subgroups of AML-NK event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared. All patients were uniformly treated within the German AMLCG trials. Group B had a significantly better median EFS (13.3 vs. 7.0 months, p=0.0143) which was independent of the impact of age. In addition, there was a trend for a better OS in group B (13.3 vs. 9.5 months, n.s.). In conclusion, the identification of a biologically defined and clinically relevant subgroup of AML-NK has been accomplished by use of gene expression profiling based on differences in regulations of genetic pathways involving proliferation and apoptosis.


2002 ◽  
Vol 69 ◽  
pp. 135-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena M. Comelli ◽  
Margarida Amado ◽  
Steven R. Head ◽  
James C. Paulson

The development of microarray technology offers the unprecedented possibility of studying the expression of thousands of genes in one experiment. Its exploitation in the glycobiology field will eventually allow the parallel investigation of the expression of many glycosyltransferases, which will ultimately lead to an understanding of the regulation of glycoconjugate synthesis. While numerous gene arrays are available on the market, e.g. the Affymetrix GeneChip® arrays, glycosyltransferases are not adequately represented, which makes comprehensive surveys of their gene expression difficult. This chapter describes the main issues related to the establishment of a custom glycogenes array.


2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 93-93
Author(s):  
Toshiyuki Tsunoda ◽  
Junichi Inocuchi ◽  
Darren Tyson ◽  
Seiji Naito ◽  
David K. Ornstein

2004 ◽  
Vol 171 (4S) ◽  
pp. 198-199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ximing J. Yang ◽  
Jun Sugimura ◽  
Maria S. Tretiakova ◽  
Bin T. Teh

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document