scholarly journals Comparison of the Efficacy of Piperacillin/Tazobactam and Meropenem, with or without Intravenous Immunoglobulin, as Second-Line Therapy for Febrile Neutropenia: A Prospective, Randomized Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 75-83
Author(s):  
Hirozumi Sano ◽  
Ryoji Kobayashi ◽  
Satoru Matsushima ◽  
Daiki Hori ◽  
Masato Yanagi ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 473-477 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryoji Kobayashi ◽  
Daiki Hori ◽  
Hirozumi Sano ◽  
Daisuke Suzuki ◽  
Kenji Kishimoto ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 125 (21) ◽  
pp. 3223-3229 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daan Dierickx ◽  
Alain Kentos ◽  
André Delannoy

Abstract Warm antibody hemolytic anemia is the most common form of autoimmune hemolytic anemia. When therapy is needed, corticosteroids remain the cornerstone of initial treatment but are able to cure only a minority of patients (<20%). Splenectomy is usually proposed when a second-line therapy is needed. This classical approach is now challenged by the use of rituximab both as second-line and as first-line therapy. Second-line treatment with rituximab leads to response rates similar to splenectomy (∼70%), but rituximab-induced responses seem less sustained. However, additional courses of rituximab are most often followed by responses, at the price of reasonable toxicity. In some major European centers, rituximab is now the preferred second-line therapy of warm antibody hemolytic anemia in adults, although no prospective study convincingly supports this attitude. A recent randomized study strongly suggests that in first-line treatment, rituximab combined with steroids is superior to monotherapy with steroids. If this finding is confirmed, rituximab will emerge as a major component of the management of warm antibody hemolytic anemia not only after relapse but as soon as treatment is needed.


2021 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 1615-1620
Author(s):  
YUKINA SATO ◽  
HIROTOSHI IIHARA ◽  
MOTOHIKO KINOMURA ◽  
CHIEMI HIROSE ◽  
HIRONORI FUJII ◽  
...  

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daehun Kwag ◽  
Jae-Ho Yoon ◽  
Gi June Min ◽  
Sung-Soo Park ◽  
Silvia Park ◽  
...  

Introduction: Although splenectomy has long been second-line option for immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) patients, an indicator that reliably predicts the efficacy of splenectomy is still being explored. We investigated the treatment outcomes of splenectomy as a second-line therapy for relapsed/refractory ITP according to first-line intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) responses. Methods: Fifty-two adult patients treated with splenectomy as second-line therapy for ITP between 2009 and 2019 were included, and they were classified according to first-line IVIG responses (no response to IVIG: non-responders; only transient IVIG response shorter than 4 weeks: poor responders; IVIG response for a longer period; stable responders). The efficacy of splenectomy was analyzed in the three subgroups. Results: Of the 52 patients, 10 were IVIG non-responders, 34 were poor responders, and the remaining eight were stable responders. Response to splenectomy was observed in 50.0% of IVIG non-responders, 94.1% of poor responders, and 100% of stable responders (p = 0.0030). Among the 45 patients who responded to splenectomy, 51.1% relapsed subsequently, and a significantly lower relapse rate was noted in the stable IVIG responders (12.5%, p = 0.0220) than in non-responders (60.0%) and poor responders (59.4%). Conclusions: First-line IVIG response is indicated as a useful predictive factor for response to splenectomy.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. CRA8007-CRA8007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suresh S. Ramalingam ◽  
Glenwood D. Goss ◽  
Zoran Gojko Andric ◽  
Igor Bondarenko ◽  
Bojan Zaric ◽  
...  

CRA8007 The full, final text of this abstract will be available at abstract.asco.org at 7:30 AM (EDT) on Monday, June, 3, 2013, and in the Annual Meeting Proceedings online supplement to the June 20, 2013, issue of Journal of Clinical Oncology. Onsite at the Meeting, this abstract will be printed in the Monday edition of ASCO Daily News.


2014 ◽  
Vol 56 (4) ◽  
pp. 526-529 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryoji Kobayashi ◽  
Daisuke Suzuki ◽  
Hirozumi Sano ◽  
Kenji Kishimoto ◽  
Kazue Yasuda ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document