scholarly journals Growth hormone treatment of osteoporotic postmenopausal women - a one-year placebo-controlled study

1999 ◽  
pp. 390-399 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Saaf ◽  
A Hilding ◽  
M Thoren ◽  
S Troell ◽  
K Hall

OBJECTIVES: To study the effect of 12 months of growth hormone (GH) treatment on bone markers, bone mineral density (BMD), lean body mass (LBM) and body fat mass (BF) in postmenopausal osteoporotic women. DESIGN: Sixteen patients were randomised to a double-blind randomised placebo-controlled one-year study with daily s.c. injections of GH or placebo. After the first year 14 patients (8 placebo treated, 6 GH treated) were recruited to GH treatment during the second year. All patients were also supplemented with 0.5 g calcium per oral. METHODS: Bone mineral density and body composition were assessed by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Biochemical bone markers were analysed by RIA or HPLC techniques. Diurnal GH profiles were performed with continuous venous blood sampling. RESULTS: Sixteen patients started in the placebo-controlled study. In all, twelve patients completed one year and only four patients completed two years of GH treatment. At baseline 3 patients had serum insulin-like growth factor-I (S-IGF-I) levels below -2 S.D. for age. Maximal diurnal GH levels tended to correlate negatively with S-IGF-I (P=0.076). S-IGF-I was unrelated to BMD. Serum IGF-binding protein-1 (S-IGFBP-1) correlated negatively with femoral neck BMD (r=-0.61, P=0.012). The intended GH dose of 0.05U/kg/day or a maximum of 3U/day s.c. was reduced to 0.024+/-0.004U/kg/day, equal to 0.5-2.7U/day due to frequent side effects, and four patients were excluded. After one year of GH treatment BF increased slightly, LBM and BMD in total body and lumbar spine were unchanged but femoral neck BMD had decreased 3.4+/-1.6% (P<0.05). The mean S-IGF-I increase was 32% (range -38-138%). Mean levels of the bone formation markers S-osteocalcin and S-procollagen type I propeptide increased maximally by 88 and 36% respectively after 9-12 months while the bone resorption markers were unchanged. In the placebo-treated group there were no significant alterations. CONCLUSIONS: The effects on S-IGF-I, bone markers and LBM were small although GH-related side effects were common. The reason for this apparent partial resistance to the anabolic effects of GH is not clear but nutritional deficits may be involved. Assessment of the effects of GH on bone mass and fracture rate requires longer study periods than one year.

2000 ◽  
Vol 85 (11) ◽  
pp. 4104-4112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rita Fernholm ◽  
Margareta Bramnert ◽  
Erik Hägg ◽  
Agneta Hilding ◽  
David J. Baylink ◽  
...  

Although a specific GH deficiency (GHD) syndrome in the adult and the response to GH replacement therapy are well recognized, there are few data available on the effect of GH replacement therapy in elderly GH-deficient patients. We studied the effect of GH therapy on body composition and bone mineral density measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, markers for bone metabolism, insulin-like growth factors (IGFs), and IGF-binding proteins (IGFBPs) in 31 patients (6 women and 25 men; aged 60–79 yr; mean, 68 yr) with multiple pituitary hormone deficiencies. The GH response to arginine or insulin was below 3 μg/L (9 mU/L) in all subjects. They were randomized to GH (Humatrope, Eli Lilly & Co.) or placebo for 6 months, followed by 12 months of open treatment. The dose was 0.05 IU/kg·week for 1 month, and after that it was 0.1 IU/kg·week divided into daily sc injections (0.75–1.25 IU/day). There were no changes in any of the measured variables during placebo treatment. GH treatment normalized serum IGF-I in a majority of the patients and increased IGFBP-3 and -5 as well as IGFBP-4 and IGF-II to values within normal range. Lean body mass was increased, and the increase at 6 and 12 months correlated with the increase in IGF-I (r = 0.46; P = 0.010 and r = 0.54, respectively; P = 0.003). GH treatment caused a modest, but highly significant, reduction of total body fat. Mean bone mineral density was not different from that in healthy subjects of the same age and did not change during the observation period. Markers for bone formation (bone-specific alkaline phosphatase activity, osteocalcin, and procollagen I carboxyl-terminal peptide in serum) increased within the normal range, and levels were sustained throughout the study. The bone resorption marker (pyridinoline in urine) was significantly elevated for 12 months. Side-effects were mild, mostly attributed to fluid retention. In two patients with normal glucose tolerance at the start of the study, pathological glucose tolerance occurred in one patient and was impaired in one. In conclusion, elderly patients with GHD respond to replacement therapy in a similar manner as younger subjects, with an improvement in body composition and an increase in markers for bone metabolism. Side-effects are few, and elderly GHD patients can be offered treatment. As long-term risks are unknown, GH doses should be titrated to keep IGF-I within the age-related physiological range.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Layla Damen ◽  
Lionne N. Grootjen ◽  
Stephany H. Donze ◽  
Laura C.g. de Graaff ◽  
Janielle A.e.m. van der Velden ◽  
...  

Objective: In children with Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS), growth hormone (GH) treatment has positive effects on bone mineral density (BMD). Two one-year studies did not show a difference between GH or placebo on BMD in young adults with PWS. However, there are no studies investigating BMD during longer-term GH treatment in young adults with PWS. Design: Open-label, prospective study in 43 young adults with PWS. Methods: BMD of the total body (BMDTBSDS) and lumbar spine (BMADLSSDS) measured by DXA. Results: In the total group, estimated mean (95% CI) BMDTB remained similar during 3 years of GH, being -0.76 (-1.11 to -0.41) SDS at start and -0.90 (-1.27 to -0.54) SDS after 3 years (p=0.11), as did BMADLS, being -0.36 (-0.72 to 0.01) SDS and -0.46 (-0.77 to -0.16) SDS resp. (p=0.16). In men, there was a significant decrease in BMDTBSDS during 3 years of GH, while BMADLSSDS remained similar. In women, both BMDTBSDS and BMADLSSDS remained similar. BMDTBSDS was associated with female sex, lean body mass and age. The majority of patients received sex steroid replacement therapy (SSRT). Conclusions: During 3 years of combined GH and SSRT treatment, BMD remained stable in the normal range in young adults with PWS. However, men showed a decline in BMDTBSDS, probably due to insufficient SSRT. We recommend to continue GH treatment in young adults with PWS and to start SSRT during adolescence unless puberty progresses normally.


1999 ◽  
pp. 545-554 ◽  
Author(s):  
MJ Valimaki ◽  
PI Salmela ◽  
J Salmi ◽  
J Viikari ◽  
M Kataja ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVE: To study the effects of GH treatment for up to 42 months on bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover. DESIGN AND METHODS: BMD with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry, serum type I procollagen carboxy-terminal propeptide (PICP), serum type I collagen carboxy-terminal telopeptide (ICTP) and serum IGF-I were assessed in 71 adults with GH deficiency. There were 44 men and 27 women, aged 20 to 59 (median 43) years. Thirty-two patients completed 36 months and 20 patients 42 months of treatment. RESULTS: The BMD increased for up to 30-36 months and plateaued thereafter. In the whole study group, the maximum increase of BMD was 5.0% in the lumbar spine (P<0. 001), 5.9% (P<0.01) in the femoral neck, 4.9% (NS, P>0.05) in the Ward's triangle and 8.2% (P<0.001) in the trochanter area. The serum concentrations of PICP (202.6+/-11.5 vs 116.3+/-5.4 microg/l; mean+/-s.e.m.) and ICTP (10.5+/-0.6 vs 4.4+/-0.3 microg/l) doubled (P<0.001) during the first 6 months of GH treatment but returned to baseline by the end of the study (130.0+/-10.4 and 5.6+/-0.7 microg/l respectively), despite constantly elevated serum IGF-I levels (39. 6+/-4.1 nmol/l at 42 months vs 11.9+/-0.9 nmol/l at baseline; P<0.001). The responses to GH treatment of serum IGF-I, PICP, ICTP (P<0.001 for all; ANOVA) and of the BMD in the lumbar spine (P<0.05), in the femoral neck and the trochanter (P<0.001 for both) were more marked in men than in women. At the end of the study the BMD had increased at the four measurement sites by 5.7-10.6% (P<0.01-0.001) in patients with at least osteopenia at baseline and by 0.1-5.3% (NS P<0.05) in those with normal bone status (P<0.001 for differences between groups; ANOVA). Among patients who completed 36-42 months of treatment, the number of those with at least osteopenia was reduced to more than a half. The response of BMD to GH treatment was more marked in young than in old patients at three measurement sites (P<0. 05-<0.001; ANOVA). In the multiple regression analysis the gender and the pretreatment bone mass appeared to be independent predictors of three measurement sites, whereas the age independently determined only the vertebral BMD. CONCLUSIONS: GH treatment in GH-deficient adults increased BMD for up to 30-36 months, with a plateau thereafter. Concurrently with the plateau in BMD the bone turnover rate normalized. From the skeletal point of view GH-deficient patients exhibiting osteopenia or osteoporosis should be considered as candidates for GH supplementation of at least 3-4 years.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A192-A192
Author(s):  
Mona Al Mukaddam ◽  
Christopher Hvisdas ◽  
Anisa Sulaj ◽  
Kruti Patel ◽  
Richie Tran

Abstract Background: Romosozumab is a sclerostin inhibitor indicated for treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Sclerostin inhibits Wnt/Beta-catenin signaling pathway. When sclerostin is inhibited, stimulation of this pathway leads to increased bone formation and production of osteoprotegerin, which also decreases bone resorption. Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) demonstrate increased levels of sclerostin that negatively correlates with the rate of bone formation; however, data is lacking for use of romosozumab in this patient population. The report herein details the experience of use of romosozumab in a patient with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on hemodialysis (HD). Clinical Case: A 37-year-old old African American male was referred after multiple rib fractures and severe non-traumatic T8 compression fracture with nerve compression. His past medical history includes lupus nephritis and cerebritis, ESRD on HD since age 22 status post (s/p) failed renal transplant, and tertiary hyperparathyroidism complicated with fracture in iliac brown tumor and mediastinal parathyromatosis s/p three parathyroid surgeries. Bone mineral density by DXA (g/cm2, Z-score) were as follows: lumbar spine (0.700, -4.0) femoral neck (0.676, -3.8), total hip (0.628,-4.0), 1/3 radius(0.443,-6.2). No prior exposure to antiresorptive or osteoanabolic agents. Pertinent labs included serum calcium 8.5 mg/dL (nl 8.9–10.3 mg/dl), albumin 4.2 g/dL, alkaline phosphatase 319 U/L (nl 38–126), Phosphorus 3.1 mg/dL (2.4–4.7), Creatinine 5.62 mg/dl, 25-OH Vitamin D 31 ng/mL (nl 25 - 80), intact parathyroid hormone 17.9 pmol/L (nl 1.6–6.9). Patient was in excruciating pain and not a surgical candidate due to poor bone quality. Osteoanabolic therapy was recommended given the severity of osteoporosis; however, teriparatide and abaloparaitde were contraindicated given comorbidities. The patient was offered off-label use of Romosozumab with clear understanding that the drug is not approved for this indication and safety/efficacy data in ESRD is not known. The boxed warning regarding increased risk of stroke, myocardial infarction and death were discussed and patient was willing to proceed. Repeat DXA after eleven monthly doses of Romosozumab resulted in a remarkable improvement in bone mineral density at all sites: lumbar spine (+47%), femoral neck (+41%), total hip (+28%), 1/3 radius (+20%). Patient tolerated medication with no side effects or fractures. Serum calcium was monitored prior to initiation and before every dose. No doses were held due to abnormal laboratory values or side effects. Conclusion: This case report summarizes successful experience with the use of Romosozumab in one patient with ESRD on HD with favorable outcomes.


2009 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 1352-1358 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harold N. Rosen ◽  
Vicki Chen ◽  
Antonio Cittadini ◽  
Susan L. Greenspan ◽  
Pamela S. Douglas ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Yuji Oto ◽  
Nobuyuki Murakami ◽  
Takeshi Inoue ◽  
Keiko Matsubara ◽  
Sohei Saima ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives Previous reports indicate that growth hormone (GH) treatment for Prader–Willi syndrome (PWS) improves bone mineral density (BMD) only when initiated at a young age and not when initiated in adulthood. However, there are no data on BMD during long-term GH treatment of Japanese children and adolescents with PWS. Thus, this study aimed to investigate BMD changes among patients with PWS, who were undergoing GH treatment from childhood to adolescence. Methods Sixty-seven pediatric patients with PWS who had GH treatment initiated during childhood between January 2003 and June 2020 were evaluated. To avoid underestimation, we used total body BMD, which was evaluated using dual-X-ray absorptiometry adjusted for the BMD z-score using patient height, sex, and age. Results In both sexes, age was negatively correlated with the BMD-standard deviation score (SDS) (male: r=−0.156 [p=0.042]; female: r=−0.197 [p=0.043]), which started to decrease in childhood. Conclusions The BMD-SDS of patients with PWS decreases gradually despite GH treatment. As there are no clear recommendations about monitoring of bone health in patients with PWS, further studies are needed to improve the guidelines for screening of BMD and treatment of patients with PWS.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document