Transapical versus Conventional Aortic Valve Replacement�A Propensity-Matched Comparison

2012 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 4 ◽  
Author(s):  
David M. Holzhey ◽  
William Shi ◽  
A. Rastan ◽  
Michael A. Borger ◽  
Martin H�nsig ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Short And Long Term ◽  
Good Treatment Option ◽  
Matched Comparison

<p><b>Introduction:</b> The goal of this study was to compare the short- and long-term outcomes after aortic valve (AV) surgery carried out via standard sternotomy/partial sternotomy versus transapical transcatheter AV implantation (taTAVI).</p><p><b>Patients and Methods:</b> All 336 patients who underwent taTAVI between 2006 and 2010 were compared with 4533 patients who underwent conventional AV replacement (AVR) operations between 2001 and 2010. Using propensity score matching, we identified and consecutively compared 2 very similar groups of 167 patients each. The focus was on periprocedural complications and long-term survival.</p><p><b>Results:</b> The 30-day mortality rate was 10.8% and 8.4% (<i>P</i> = .56) for the conventional AVR patients and the TAVI patients, respectively. The percentages of postoperative pacemaker implantations (15.0% versus 6.0%, <i>P</i> = .017) and cases of renal failure requiring dialysis (25.7% versus 12.6%, <i>P</i> = .004) were higher in the TAVI group. Kaplan-Meier curves diverged after half a year in favor of conventional surgery. The estimated 3-year survival rates were 53.5% � 5.7% (TAVI) and 66.7% � 0.2% (conventional AVR).</p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> Our study shows that even with all the latest successes in catheter-based AV implantation, the conventional surgical approach is still a very good treatment option with excellent long-term results, even for older, high-risk patients.</p>

Long-term Results after Carpentier-Edwards Pericardial Aortic Valve Implantation, with Attention to the Impact of Age

2011 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karl F. Welke ◽  
YingXing Wu ◽  
Gary L. Grunkemeier ◽  
Aftab Ahmad ◽  
Albert Starr
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Younger Patients ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Valve Implantation ◽  
The Impact

<p><b>Background:</b> The purpose of this study was to determine long-term patient survival and valve durability for Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valves (Edwards Lifesciences) implanted in the aortic position, with specific attention to the impact of patient age.</p><p><b>Methods:</b> We performed a retrospective cohort study of 2168 patients who underwent implantation of a Carpentier-Edwards pericardial aortic valve between 1991 and 2008. The mean follow-up time was 4.5 years. Primary outcomes of interest were mortality and valve explantation. Survival curves and event-free curves were obtained with the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test.</p><p><b>Results:</b> Survival was 92% at 1 year, 73% at 5 years, 38% at 10 years, and 18% at 15 years. Although the mortality rate of younger patients was worse than in the general population, older patients had significantly better survival than their contemporaries. Age was the independent variable most significantly associated with explantation. There was an early hazard phase for patients between 21 and 49 years of age, such that the freedom from explantation was 89% at 3 years. By 10 years, the freedom from explantation was 58% for patients 21 to 49 years of age, compared with 68% for patients 50 to 64 years, 93% for patients 65 to 74 years, and 99% for patients 75 years of age and older.</p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> We found good long-term survival and durability. Older patients had excellent freedom from explantation, whereas younger patients fared worse. As our population ages, this information becomes increasingly important. Assessing the durability of this pericardial aortic valve may aid in predicting the durability of the transcatheter aortic valves that share the same leaflets.</p>

Abstract 2840: An Impedance Threshold Device Improves 24 Hour Survival in a Spontaneously Breathing Pediatric Porcine Model of Hemorrhagic Shock

Circulation ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 116 (suppl_16) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anja Metzger ◽  
Brad Marino ◽  
Tim Matsuura ◽  
Carly Alexander ◽  
Margot Herman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hemorrhagic Shock ◽  
Sham Group ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Threshold Device ◽  
Short And Long Term ◽  
Spontaneously Breathing ◽  
Impedance Threshold Device

Introduction: Traumatic injury and hypovolemic shock are leading causes of death in children worldwide. We previously demonstrated that augmentation of negative intrathoracic pressure generated by spontaneously breathing through an impedance threshold device (ITD) improves blood pressure and cardiac output in a pediatric porcine model of hemorrhagic shock. However, the optimal method to restore intravascular volume, prevent secondary organ damage, and prevent progression of reversible shock to irreversible circulatory collapse after severe blood loss in children is not known. Hypothesis: Breathing through an ITD for 90 min prior to fluid resuscitation will safely increase short and long-term survival rates. Methods: Seventeen spontaneously breathing female piglets (12.4 ± 0.1 kg), anesthetized with propofol, were subjected to a 40% bleed and randomized in a prospective, blinded manner to either a sham or active ITD (cracking pressure of -7 cmH2O, Advanced Circulatory Systems, Minneapolis, MN) for 90 min. Shed blood was then reinfused. Work of breathing (WOB), 90 minute and 24 hour survival were evaluated. Survival analysis was performed using the Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test, Fischer’s Exact Test, and Kaplan-Meier Methods. Results: Baseline and post-bleed heart rate, blood pressure, lactate levels, and arterial blood gas parameters were similar between groups. Piglets treated with the active ITD had significantly improved survival compared to the piglets treated with the sham ITD at 90 min (8/9 vs. 3/8, p=0.04). At 24 hours, Kaplan-Meier curve analysis revealed improved survival with the active ITD (6/9 vs. 2/8, p=0.04). The 3 animals in the active ITD group that did not survive died at a median time of 280 minutes (82–580), and the 6 animals in the sham group that did not survive, died at a median time of 69 minutes (24 –101) after bleed (p=0.11). The WOB at 45 min (J/L) was 73% higher in the active ITD group than the sham group (1.18 ± 0.07 vs. 0.68 ± 0.07, p= 0.001). The piglets safely tolerated the active ITD therapy. Conclusion: In this spontaneously breathing, anesthetized piglet model of hemorrhagic shock, treatment with an active ITD for 90 min without supplemental fluid resuscitation significantly improved short and long-term survival rates.

Pulmonary Homografts for Aortic Valve Replacement: Long-term Comparison with Aortic Grafts

2011 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ferdinand Vogt ◽  
Anke Kowert ◽  
Andres Beiras-Fernandez ◽  
Martin Oberhoffer ◽  
Ingo Kaczmarek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Aortic Graft ◽  
Valve Prostheses ◽  
Retrospective Comparative Study

<p><b>Objective:</b> The use of homografts for aortic valve replacement (AVR) is an alternative to mechanical or biological valve prostheses, especially in younger patients. This retrospective comparative study evaluated our single-center long-term results, with a focus on the different origins of the homografts.</p><p><b>Methods:</b> Since 1992, 366 adult patients have undergone AVR with homografts at our center. We compared 320 homografts of aortic origin and 46 homografts of pulmonary origin. The grafts were implanted via either a subcoronary technique or the root replacement technique. We performed a multivariate analysis to identify independent factors that influence survival. Freedom from reintervention and survival rates were calculated as cumulative events according to the Kaplan-Meier method, and differences were tested with the log-rank test.</p><p><b>Results:</b> Overall mortality within 1 year was 6.5% (21/320) in the aortic graft group and 17.4% (8/46) in the pulmonary graft group. In the pulmonary graft group, 4 patients died from valve-related complications, 1 patient died after additional heterotopic heart transplantation, and 1 patient who entered with a primary higher risk died from a prosthesis infection. Two patients died from non-valve-related causes. During the long-term follow-up, the 15-year survival rate was 79.9% for patients in the aortic graft group and 68.7% for patients in the pulmonary graft group (<i>P</i> = .049). The rate of freedom from reoperation was 77.7% in the aortic graft group and 57.4% in the pulmonary graft group (<i>P</i> < .001). The reasons for homograft explantation were graft infections (aortic graft group, 5.0%; pulmonary graft group, 6.5%) and degeneration (aortic graft group, 7.5%; pulmonary graft group, 32.6%).</p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> Our study demonstrated superior rates of survival and freedom from reintervention after AVR with aortic homografts. Implantation with a pulmonary graft was associated with a higher risk of redo surgery, owing to earlier degenerative alterations.</p>

Short and Long-term Results of Open Heart Surgery in Aortic Valve Disease

1998 ◽  
Vol 28 (9) ◽  
pp. 1509 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyun-Sook Kim ◽  
Jae-Kwan Song ◽  
Jae-Hwan Lee ◽  
Young-Hak Kim ◽  
Min-Kyu Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Valve Disease ◽  
Heart Surgery ◽  
Open Heart Surgery ◽  
Valve Disease ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Open Heart ◽  
Short And Long Term

scholarly journals A New Aortic Arch Dissection Classification: The Fuwai Classification

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juntao Qiu ◽  
Xinjin Luo ◽  
Jinlin Wu ◽  
Wei Pan ◽  
Qian Chang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Aortic Arch ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Innominate Artery ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Surgical Mortality ◽  
Left Carotid Artery ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival

Aims: We describe a new aortic arch dissection (AcD) classification, which we have called the Fuwai classification. We then compare the clinical characteristics and long-term prognoses of different classifications.Methods: All AcD patients who underwent surgical procedures at Fuwai Hospital from 2010 to 2015 were included in the study. AcD procedures are divided into three types: Fuwai type Cp, Ct, and Cd. Type Cp is defined as the innominate artery or combined with the left carotid artery involved. Type Cd is defined as the left subclavian artery or combined with the left carotid artery involved. All other AcD surgeries are defined as type Ct. The Chi-square test was adopted for the pairwise comparison among the three types. Kaplan-Meier was used for the analysis of long-term survival and survival free of reoperation.Results: In total, 1,063 AcD patients were enrolled from 2010 to 2015: 54 patients were type Cp, 832 were type Ct, and 177 were type Cd. The highest operation proportion of Cp, Ct and Cd were partial arch replacement, total arch replacement, and TEVAR. The surgical mortality in type Ct was higher compared to type Cd (Ct vs. Cd = 9.38 vs. 1.69%, p &lt; 0.01) and type Cp (Ct vs. Cp = 9.38 vs. 1.85%, p = 0.06). There was no difference in surgical mortality of type Cp and Cd (p = 0.93). There were no significant differences in the long-term survival rates (p = 0.38) and free of aorta-related re-operations (p = 0.19).Conclusion: The Fuwai classification is used to distinguish different AcDs. Different AcDs have different surgical mortality and use different operation methods, but they have similar long-term results.

scholarly journals Genetic Alterations in Patients With Esophageal Cancer With Short- and Long-Term Survival Rates After Curative Esophagectomy

1997 ◽  
Vol 226 (2) ◽  
pp. 162-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yutaka Shimada ◽  
Masayuki Imamura ◽  
Ichio Shibagaki ◽  
Hisashi Tanaka ◽  
Tokiharu Miyahara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Genetic Alterations ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival ◽  
Short And Long Term ◽  
Curative Esophagectomy

scholarly journals Lymphadenectomy in the Treatment of Colon Cancer: A Survival Nalysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Romualdo Silva Corrêa ◽  
Luciana Ayres de Oliveira Lima ◽  
Isa Maryana Araújo Bezerra de Macedo ◽  
Amália Cinhtia Meneses Rêgo ◽  
Irami Araújo-Filho
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Medical Records ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Primary Treatment ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Radiotherapy Treatment

Colon cancer is a curable disease when restricted to the bowel and colectomy, the primary treatment. However, the presence and number of resected lymph nodes influence the therapeutic approach and prognosis of the patient. To evaluate the impact of the number of resected lymph nodes on the overall survival of patients treated for colon cancer at the League of Cancer Hospital - Natal - State of Rio Grande do Norte (RN) - Northeast Brazil. A retrospective observational study of 80 patients with colon cancer from Dr. Luiz Antônio Hospital (Natal-RN / Brazil), considering the period 2007-2014. Data were collected through medical records review. Survival rates were calculated and compared using the non-parametric Kaplan-Meier and Wilcoxon tests, respectively. All patients underwent radical surgical treatment associated or not with chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy treatment. The median survival time for the group of patients who had 12 or more resected lymph nodes was 9.4 years, in contrast to the 3.3 years of those who had less than 12 lymph nodes. Conclusion: It was concluded that a total of 12 or more resected lymph nodes confirmed by histopathology is associated with increased long-term survival in patients with colon cancer undergoing radical colectomy with or without chemotherapy and radiotherapy.

Extended ray resection for sarcoma of the hand: long-term survival and functional results

2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 160-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Farhad Farzaliyev ◽  
Hans-Ulrich Steinau ◽  
Halil-Ibrahim Karadag ◽  
Alexander Touma ◽  
Lars Erik Podleska
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcomas ◽  
Functional Results ◽  
Contralateral Side ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Kaplan Meier

In this retrospective study, we analysed the long-term oncological and functional results after extended ray resection for sarcoma of the hand. Recurrence-free and overall survivals were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method. The function of the operated hand was assessed with the Michigan Hand Questionnaire and compared with the contralateral side. Extended ray resection was performed in 25 out of 168 consecutive patients with soft-tissue and bony sarcomas of the hand. The overall 5- and 10-year, disease-specific survival rates were 86% and 81%, respectively. Local recurrences were observed in two patients. The Michigan Hand Questionnaire score for the affected hand at follow-up in nine patients was 82 points versus 95 for the healthy contralateral hands. We conclude that extended ray resection of osseous sarcomas breaking through the bone into the soft tissue or for soft tissue sarcomas invading bone is a preferable alternative to hand ablation when excision can be achieved with tumour-free margins. Level of evidence: III

scholarly journals Life expectancy of patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement compared with that of the general population

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 394-399
Author(s):  
Daniel Hernandez-Vaquero ◽  
Rocio Diaz ◽  
Alberto Alperi ◽  
Marcel G Almendarez ◽  
Alain Escalera ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
General Population ◽  
Life Expectancy ◽  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Severe Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Term Survival

Abstract OBJECTIVES Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) changes the natural history of severe aortic stenosis. However, whether the life expectancy of patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing this surgical procedure is fully restored is unknown. The objective of this study was to assess if the life expectancy of patients aged &gt;75 years is fully restored after undergoing surgery for severe aortic stenosis. METHODS We compared long-term survival of a group of patients aged &gt;75 years, who underwent SAVR at our institution with the long-term survival of the general population. We matched each patient with 100 simulated individuals (control group) of the same age, sex and geographical region who died as indicated by the National Institute of Statistics. We compared survival curves and calculated hazard ratio (HR) or incidence rate ratio. Statistical significance existed if confidence intervals (CIs) did not overlap or did not include the value 1, as appropriate. RESULTS Average life expectancy of surgical patients who survived the postoperative period was 90.91 months (95% CI 82.99–97.22), compared to 92.94 months (95% CI 92.39–93.55) in the control group. One-, 5- and 8-year survival rates for SAVR patients who were discharged from the hospital were 94.9% (95% CI 92.74–96.43%), 71.66% (95% CI 67.37–75.5%) and 44.48% (95% CI 38.14–50.61%), respectively, compared to that of the general population: 95.8% (95% CI 95.64–95.95%), 70.64% (95% CI 70.28%–71%) and 47.91% (95% CI 47.52–48.31%), respectively (HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.94–1.22). CONCLUSION For patients over the age of 75 years who underwent SAVR and survived the postoperative period, life expectancy and survival rates were similar to that of the general population.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document