scholarly journals Genomic Prediction from Multiple-Trait Bayesian Regression Methods Using Mixture Priors

Genetics ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 209 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hao Cheng ◽  
Kadir Kizilkaya ◽  
Jian Zeng ◽  
Dorian Garrick ◽  
Rohan Fernando
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 4439-4448
Author(s):  
Zigui Wang ◽  
Deborah Chapman ◽  
Gota Morota ◽  
Hao Cheng

Bayesian regression methods that incorporate different mixture priors for marker effects are used in multi-trait genomic prediction. These methods can also be extended to genome-wide association studies (GWAS). In multiple-trait GWAS, incorporating the underlying causal structures among traits is essential for comprehensively understanding the relationship between genotypes and traits of interest. Therefore, we develop a GWAS methodology, SEM-Bayesian alphabet, which, by applying the structural equation model (SEM), can be used to incorporate causal structures into multi-trait Bayesian regression methods. SEM-Bayesian alphabet provides a more comprehensive understanding of the genotype-phenotype mapping than multi-trait GWAS by performing GWAS based on indirect, direct and overall marker effects. The superior performance of SEM-Bayesian alphabet was demonstrated by comparing its GWAS results with other similar multi-trait GWAS methods on real and simulated data. The software tool JWAS offers open-source routines to perform these analyses.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hao Cheng ◽  
Kadir Kizilkaya ◽  
Jian Zeng ◽  
Dorian Garrick ◽  
Rohan Fernando

ABSTRACTBayesian multiple-regression methods incorporating different mixture priors for marker effects are widely used in genomic prediction. Improvement in prediction accuracies from using those methods, such as BayesB, BayesC and BayesCπ, have been shown in single-trait analyses with both simulated data and real data. These methods have been extended to multi-trait analyses, but only under a specific limited circumstance that assumes a locus affects all the traits or none of them. In this paper, we develop and implement the most general multi-trait BayesCΠ and BayesB methods allowing a broader range of mixture priors. Further, we compare them to single-trait methods and the “restricted” multi-trait formulation using real data. In those data analyses, significant higher prediction accuracies were sometimes observed from these new broad-based multi-trait Bayesian multiple-regression methods. The software tool JWAS offers routines to perform the analyses.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zigui Wang ◽  
Hao Cheng

Genomic prediction has been widely used in multiple areas and various genomic prediction methods have been developed. The majority of these methods, however, focus on statistical properties and ignore the abundant useful biological information like genome annotation or previously discovered causal variants. Therefore, to improve prediction performance, several methods have been developed to incorporate biological information into genomic prediction, mostly in single-trait analysis. A commonly used method to incorporate biological information is allocating molecular markers into different classes based on the biological information and assigning separate priors to molecular markers in different classes. It has been shown that such methods can achieve higher prediction accuracy than conventional methods in some circumstances. However, these methods mainly focus on single-trait analysis, and available priors of these methods are limited. Thus, in both single-trait and multiple-trait analysis, we propose the multi-class Bayesian Alphabet methods, in which multiple Bayesian Alphabet priors, including RR-BLUP, BayesA, BayesB, BayesCΠ, and Bayesian LASSO, can be used for markers allocated to different classes. The superior performance of the multi-class Bayesian Alphabet in genomic prediction is demonstrated using both real and simulated data. The software tool JWAS offers open-source routines to perform these analyses.


Aquaculture ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 737069
Author(s):  
Sila Sukhavachana ◽  
Wansuk Senanan ◽  
Naruechon Pattarapanyawong ◽  
Chumpol Srithong ◽  
Weerakit Joerakate ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
J.A. da Costa ◽  
C.F. Azevedo ◽  
M. Nascimento ◽  
F.F. e Silva ◽  
M.D.V. de Resende ◽  
...  

Heredity ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 124 (2) ◽  
pp. 274-287 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emre Karaman ◽  
Mogens S. Lund ◽  
Guosheng Su

Abstract Widely used genomic prediction models may not properly account for heterogeneous (co)variance structure across the genome. Models such as BayesA and BayesB assume locus-specific variance, which are highly influenced by the prior for (co)variance of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) effect, regardless of the size of data. Models such as BayesC or GBLUP assume a common (co)variance for a proportion (BayesC) or all (GBLUP) of the SNP effects. In this study, we propose a multi-trait Bayesian whole genome regression method (BayesN0), which is based on grouping a number of predefined SNPs to account for heterogeneous (co)variance structure across the genome. This model was also implemented in single-step Bayesian regression (ssBayesN0). For practical implementation, we considered multi-trait single-step SNPBLUP models, using (co)variance estimates from BayesN0 or ssBayesN0. Genotype data were simulated using haplotypes on first five chromosomes of 2200 Danish Holstein cattle, and phenotypes were simulated for two traits with heritabilities 0.1 or 0.4, assuming 200 quantitative trait loci (QTL). We compared prediction accuracy from different prediction models and different region sizes (one SNP, 100 SNPs, one chromosome or whole genome). In general, highest accuracies were obtained when 100 adjacent SNPs were grouped together. The ssBayesN0 improved accuracies over BayesN0, and using (co)variance estimates from ssBayesN0 generally yielded higher accuracies than using (co)variance estimates from BayesN0, for the 100 SNPs region size. Our results suggest that it could be a good strategy to estimate (co)variance components from ssBayesN0, and then to use those estimates in genomic prediction using multi-trait single-step SNPBLUP, in routine genomic evaluations.


animal ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 1111-1117 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Song ◽  
L. Li ◽  
Q. Zhang ◽  
S. Zhang ◽  
X. Ding

Heredity ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abelardo Montesinos-López ◽  
Osval Antonio Montesinos-López ◽  
José Cricelio Montesinos-López ◽  
Carlos Alberto Flores-Cortes ◽  
Roberto de la Rosa ◽  
...  

AbstractThe primary objective of this paper is to provide a guide on implementing Bayesian generalized kernel regression methods for genomic prediction in the statistical software R. Such methods are quite efficient for capturing complex non-linear patterns that conventional linear regression models cannot. Furthermore, these methods are also powerful for leveraging environmental covariates, such as genotype × environment (G×E) prediction, among others. In this study we provide the building process of seven kernel methods: linear, polynomial, sigmoid, Gaussian, Exponential, Arc-cosine 1 and Arc-cosine L. Additionally, we highlight illustrative examples for implementing exact kernel methods for genomic prediction under a single-environment, a multi-environment and multi-trait framework, as well as for the implementation of sparse kernel methods under a multi-environment framework. These examples are followed by a discussion on the strengths and limitations of kernel methods and, subsequently by conclusions about the main contributions of this paper.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document