THE STATUS OF NON-STATE BOOK PUBLISHING IN THE RUSSIAN REGIONS AS AN OBSTACLE ON THE WAY TO THE INFORMATION SOCIETY (BASED ON MATERIALS FROM SIBERIA AND THE RUSSIAN FAR EAST AT THE END OF THE XX - EARLY XXI CENTURIES)

2018 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Information Society ◽  
Russian Far East ◽  
Far East ◽  
Book Publishing ◽  
Russian Regions ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Russian Far East ◽  
The Way

scholarly journals THE STATUS AND CHALLENGES OF SINO-RUSSIAN FAR EAST COOPERATION

ASJ. ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (43) ◽  
pp. 12-15
Author(s):  
W. Ying
Keyword(s):  
Bilateral Trade ◽  
Russian Far East ◽  
National Level ◽  
Far East ◽  
Business Environment ◽  
Trade Volume ◽  
Protection Mechanism ◽  
Energy Trade ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Russian Far East

The legal basis for Sino-Russian cooperation in the Russian Far East is gradually being improved. The transition from the national level to the regional level has made cooperation more targeted. The main areas of cooperation between China and Russia in the Far East are mineral resource development, forests, energy, trade, and transportation. In 2018, the bilateral trade volume reached 107.06 billion U.S. dollars, of which the trade volume between Russia and Northeast China exceeded 23.5 billion U.S. dollars, accounting for 21% of ChinaRussia bilateral trade, an increase of 4% compared with 2017. The main challenges facing both China and Russia are the need to improve the business environment in Russia, the need to improve the protection mechanism of foreign investors’ rights and interests in Russia, and the need to change the alertness of Russia. The challenge for China is that there is a large gap in investment strength with Russia. Before cooperation The local laws of Russia should be studied carefully, and the state should gradually improve the protection mechanism for investors.

scholarly journals Registration of the Legal Status of Korean Migrants in Russia in the 80s 19th Century

2021 ◽  
Vol 38 ◽  
pp. 95-101
Author(s):  
E.S. Burdin ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Legal Status ◽  
Russian Far East ◽  
Far East ◽  
Korean Immigrants ◽  
Diplomatic Relations ◽  
Territorial Unit ◽  
The Status ◽  
Russian Law ◽  
Far Eastern ◽  
The Russian Far East

After the start of Korean migration to Russia in 1864, the Russian authorities began to make attempts to formalize the legal status of the arrived migrants in order to protect them from persecution by the Korean government and its patron China. Areas of compact residence of Korean immigrants were separated into a separate administrative-territorial unit – Suifun District, where the post of “head of Koreans” was established. Separate elements of local self-government were introduced in the Korean settlements. After the establishment of official diplomatic relations with Korea in 1884, the problem of the legal status of Korean migrants in Russia became one of the important topics on the agenda of Russian-Korean negotiations. Due to its decision, Petersburg wanted to stop the uncontrolled transfer of the population from Korea to the Russian Far East and prevent the unauthorized seizure of state lands by Korean settlers. In 1888, the Russian authorities managed to partially resolve the issue of citizenship of the Korean settlers who settled in Russia. From now on, measures to formalize their legal status were carried out on the basis of the norms of the Russian-Korean convention on border relations of 1888, as well as an oral (gentleman's) agreement between K.I. Weber and Kim Yun Sik. An agreement was reached that the Koreans who settled in Russia before the establishment of Russian-Korean diplomatic relations were recognized as equal with Russian subjects. Migrants who settled in the region after the conclusion of this agreement were to liquidate their farms and return to their homeland. The issue of the status of Korean immigrants was finally settled only in 1900. Russian citizenship was granted to all migrants, including those who resettled after 1884. The author comes to the conclusion that the Far Eastern authorities initially perceived the Korean settlers who settled in the South Ussuriysk Territory as subjects of Russia, but could not provide them with all the benefits in accordance with Russian law, since such a step could cause protests from Korea and China.

First Archivists in the Russian Far East

2018 ◽  
pp. 331-342
Author(s):  
Natalia V. Khisamutdinova ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Civil War ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Public Involvement ◽  
Russian Far East ◽  
Far East ◽  
Archival Studies ◽  
Eastern State ◽  
The Far East ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Russian Far East

The article studies the creation of the first archival organization in Primorye, the Primorye Regional Archival Committee. It was due to the efforts of professors of the history and philology faculty (later, part of the Far Eastern State University), one of the first higher education institutions in the Russian Far East, established in Vladivostok in 1918 by the inteligentsia escaping the Civil War. The article attempts to identify and systematize the scattered papers of departmental archives in order to promote the development of the archiving and the study of the region. The research has revealed several factors that contributed to the emergence of archiving in the Far East, one of them large-scale migration during the Civil War with predominance of educated and enterprising people. After receiving the status of scientific institution, the Primorye Regional Archival Committee (later, the Primorye Province Archival Bureau) reviewed, collected, and described documents in major departmental archives of the region, thus laying the foundation of archiving in the Russian Far East, and, moreover, identified historical artifacts, thus providing a headstart for archaeologists and ethnographers. The first archivists laid down professional foundations for archival studies in the Far East. Their methodological recommendations published in the Bulletin of the Primorie Regional Archival Committee (Izvestiya Primorskoi oblastnoi arkhivnoi komissii) or separately haven’t yet lost their significance. Promulgation of archiving and public involvement in the search for valuable historical records and objects provide an example of skill and efficacy. These activities were all the more significant since they started on a voluntary basis, with no official support or funding. The article draws on publications and materials from the personal archive of A. P. Georgievsky (1888–1955), archivist and educator. New materials help to clarify the first archivists’ biographical data and to assess the significance of their activities in identifying and collecting data about the history of the Far East and for further development of its archives.

Socio-economic functions of priority development areas and their implementation in the ecosystem of the Russian Far East

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 495-528
Author(s):  
Vilena A. YAKIMOVA ◽  
Sergei V. KHMURA
Keyword(s):  
Russian Far East ◽  
Far East ◽  
Amur Oblast ◽  
Primorsky Krai ◽  
Khabarovsk Krai ◽  
Fixed Assets ◽  
Development Regime ◽  
The Status ◽  
Labor Resources ◽  
The Russian Far East

Subject. We investigate the functions of priority development areas created in the subjects of the Russian Far East. Objectives. The study aims to determine the functional purpose of such areas and assess how they fulfill their socio-economic functions. Methods. We employ methods of generalization, systematization, sampling and grouping of socio-economic indicators of organizations and sole proprietors that have been granted the status of residents of priority development areas, methods of statistical, economic, correlation, and regression analysis. Results. The analysis shows that the regions of the Russian Far East have been intensively developing over the recent years. This leads to changes in the volume of investment, GRP and its structure, fixed assets, and created jobs. The paper identifies the main functions of priority development areas and includes findings on their implementation. Conclusions. At the initial stage of advanced development regime, there have been positive trends associated with a growth in investment inflows (Amur Oblast, Primorsky Krai), increased labor resources and employment expansion (Primorsky Krai, Republic of Sakha (Yakutia), export orientation of projects (Amur Oblast, Khabarovsk Krai), production ramp-up in manufacturing (Primorsky and Khabarovsk Krai, Amur Oblast), modernization and renewal of fixed assets (Sakhalin Oblast, Republic of Sakha (Yakutia).

Iya Mikhailovna Levanidova, the famous Russian hydrobiologist and investigator of the East Russian Trichoptera (1 March 1914–11 November 2005)

Zoosymposia ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-63
Author(s):  
TATYANA S. VSHIVKOVA
Keyword(s):  
Russian Far East ◽  
Far East ◽  
Freshwater Invertebrates ◽  
Full List ◽  
Scientific Papers ◽  
East Russia ◽  
Eastern Russia ◽  
Scientific Life ◽  
The Russian Far East ◽  
The Way

Iya Mikhailovna Levanidova (1914–2005) is the outstanding Russian hydrobiologist and hydroentomologist who devoted her life to study biodiversity, biogeography and ecology of the Russian Far East freshwater invertebrates. She laid the foundation of the aquatic entomology school in Eastern Russia, having continued the way of her teachers, Drs. A.V. Martynov and S.G. Lepneva. The article provides a brief description of Dr. Levanidova’s private and scientific life and her contributions to development of rhithrobiology and trichopterology in East Russia. It presents as well a list of the species described by I.M. Levanidova and patronyms described in her honor. A full list of her scientific papers, totalling 78 publications, is provided.

Exceptional Subjects: Koreans, Settler Colonialism, and Imperial Subjecthood in the Russian Far East, 1860s–1917

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-17
Author(s):  
Sergey Glebov
Keyword(s):  
Settler Colonialism ◽  
Russian Far East ◽  
Far East ◽  
Russian Empire ◽  
Russian Revolution ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Russian Empire ◽  
The Right ◽  
Far Eastern ◽  
The Russian Far East

Abstract This article traces debates and policies of the Russian imperial administrators toward the Korean population in the Far Eastern provinces of the Russian Empire. Koreans were initially treated as de facto members of the peasant estate, and in the 1890s many were granted the status of Russian subjects. Yet the rise of settler colonialism and a nationalizing empire from the 1880s, and especially after the Russian revolution of 1905, complicated the issue of Korean subjecthood and led to policies that excluded Koreans from the regulations normally applicable to peasants, such as the right to increased land allotments. At the same time, the neotraditionalist approach to the management of difference in the empire was still present in the 1910s, albeit never clearly articulated to compete with the nationalizing idiom.

scholarly journals Incidence of louse flies on birds from the Russian Far East (Diptera: Hippoboscidae) and investigation of the status of some taxa by DNA barcoding

rej ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 327-335
Author(s):  
B. R. Meißner ◽  
F. Rodríguez-Vera ◽  
O. Hawlitschek ◽  
W. Heim ◽  
M. Jentzsch
Keyword(s):  
Dna Barcoding ◽  
Russian Far East ◽  
Far East ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Russian Far East

scholarly journals Evaluation of fishing industry clusterization in the russian far east within the context of integration with Asian-Pacific markets

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (27) ◽  
pp. 518-535
Author(s):  
Maxim Alexandrovich Saltykov ◽  
Victor Victorovich Stetsyuk ◽  
Oleg Vladimirovich Pravikov
Keyword(s):  
Russian Far East ◽  
Far East ◽  
Synergetic Effect ◽  
Fish Farming ◽  
Fishing Industry ◽  
Russian Regions ◽  
Industry Clusters ◽  
Density Ratios ◽  
Far Eastern ◽  
The Russian Far East

The study’s aim is to assess the potential and processes of formation of sectoral clusters in the Far Eastern regions fishing industry. The paper suggests the strategy for forming the fishing industry clusters in the Russian Far East, analyzes trends, taking place in the fishing industry, from the perspective of its clusterization, interprets locatization and density ratios of capture fisheries and fish-farming businesses in the Far Eastern territories. The research first describes methods used to evaluate localization and geographical density of fishing-industry companies in the Far Eastern regions, and offers methodological recommendations for investigating fishing industry clusters. The second stage outlines trends of the industry such as increasing harvest level, changing proportion of capture fisheries and fish breeding, growing export, emerging exporting clusters, forming fishing industry associations. The third stage analyzes density ratios and specialization of fishing and fish-farming businesses by regions, compares the calculated ratios’ values to other Russian regions’ ones. On the basis of integral ratio we estimate the potential for clusterization of the fishing industry in Russian regions as well as on the territories of the Far Eastern Federal District. The research comes to conclusion that a set of state support measures and effective investment projects, concerned with the fishing industry cluster, can produce an additional synergetic effect for the whole gross regional product.

Tax debt as a threat to the economic security of the Russian Far East

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 216-242
Author(s):  
V.A. Yakimova ◽  
A.A. Orekhova
Keyword(s):  
Russian Far East ◽  
Consumer Price Index ◽  
Far East ◽  
Federal District ◽  
Economic Security ◽  
Factors Affecting ◽  
Correlation And Regression Analysis ◽  
Debt Collection ◽  
Far Eastern ◽  
The Russian Far East

Subject. The article addresses the tax liabilities of taxpayers registered in the subjects of the Far Eastern Federal District, which should be paid to the consolidated budget of the Russian Federation, as well as the factors of the said debt growth. Objectives. Our aim is to assess the level of tax debt of regions of the Russian Far East and identify the correlation between the factors and the amount of tax debt. Methods. The study rests on methods of analysis, generalization, grouping, systematization, and the correlation and regression analysis. Results. We analyzed the level of tax debt for the entire Far Eastern Federal District and by region, identified factors affecting the growth of tax debt therein. The paper assesses the structure of tax debt by type of taxes and activity of debtors. The unveiled factors may help control changes in the size of tax debt in the Russian Far East and develop effective measures to improve the debt collection. Conclusions. The study shows that there is an increase in the tax debt in the regions of the Russian Far East, in the VAT in particular. The factor analysis revealed that the volume of sales of wholesale enterprises, investment in fixed capital, the consumer price index have the largest impact on the amount of tax debt.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document