scholarly journals Risk assessment of fall‐related occupational accidents in the workplace

2016 ◽  
Vol 58 (6) ◽  
pp. 612-621 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tsukimi Tsukada ◽  
Hisataka Sakakibara
2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takeshi Shinoda ◽  
Takashi Tanaka

It is a challenge to prevent an occupational accident in any industrial activities. The aim of this study is to improve the safety and reduce the risk of occupational accidents at shipyard through developing a risk assessment. This paper describes the concept and methodology of risk assessment for occupational safety and its application. The methodology introduces an effective and useful assessment procedure to construct the database based on the past occupational accidents occurred at shipyards. Quantitative methodology is developed to understand the unsafe working conditions and environment at the shipyard by the convenient handheld to collect the data with Information Technology. Some examples of effective hazard countermeasures are suggested and a feasibility study is conducted to improve a walking environment at shipyards.


Author(s):  
Kazem Sarvestani ◽  
Mohammad Salem

Introduction: Considering application of multiple electrical equipment, numerous occupational accidents occur in hospitals each year. Electrical accidents are severe and impose high costs on the individuals and organizations. The aim of this study was to assess the risk of electrical systems in one of the oldest hospitals under supervision of Baqiyatallah University using energy trace and barrier analysis method (ETBA). Methods and Materials: All wall plugs, switches, stationary and portable equipment, and stationary and portable electrical panel were evaluated in terms of earthing and appearance. This was done using a simple voltmeter and a 100-watt bulb. All equipment and electrical panel were examined for the presence of Residual Current Device. The ETBA worksheets were completed for each equipment and workstation. The existing barriers were identified and initial risk reduction numbers were calculated. Barriers and solutions were suggested for the equipment or workstation that was at higher risk. Controlled risk was calculated by considering new barriers. Results: The ETBA worksheets were completed for 71 devices and workstations. The initial and controlled risk was calculated. Surveys revealed that all sections of the main building and the departmental structures did not have a good status regarding the earth condition. Risk assessment of the equipment and stations by ETBA method indicated that 97% of the equipment were not at an acceptable level of risk, 52% were at the unacceptable risk level, 45% were at undesirable risk level, and only 3% were at the acceptable risk. Conclusion: The results of this study can be used to prioritize resource allocation to eliminate hospital defects and reduce the risk of accidents up to an acceptable level.


2011 ◽  
Vol 83 (3) ◽  
pp. 1131-1146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan C. Conte ◽  
Emilio A. Rubio ◽  
Ana I. García ◽  
Francisco J. Cano

We present a new generalized model for the diagnosis and prediction of accidents among the Spanish workforce. Based on observational data of the accident rate in all Spanish companies over eleven years (7,519,732 accidents), we classified them in a new risk-injury contingency table (19×19). Through correspondence analysis, we obtained a structure composed of three axes whose combination identifies three separate risk and injury groups, which we used as a general Spanish pattern. The most likely or frequent relationships between the risk and injuries identified in the pattern facilitated the decision-making process in companies at an early stage of risk assessment. Each risk-injury group has its own characteristics, which are understandable within the phenomenological framework of the accident. The main advantages of this model are its potential application to any other country and the feasibility of contrasting different country results. One limiting factor, however, is the need to set a common classification framework for risks and injuries to enhance comparison, a framework that does not exist today. The model aims to manage work-related accidents automatically at any level.


IKESMA ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Reny Indrayani

The construction sector played an important role in development and was the biggest contributor of work accident rate in Indonesia. The aim of the research were to analyze human, methods, machines, materials, and environment element as cause of occupational accidents. This was a cross-sectional observational research conducted in October 2012 to March 2013. This research was carried out with several integrates stages which include risk identification, risk assessment and priorities formulation, root cause analysis, and ended by recommendations for controlling risk and hazard. Risk identificationshowed that there were 100 risks that couldthreaten the workers. The following categories were: 4% low risk categories, 48% moderate risk, 39% high risk, and 9% extreme risk. Through the Q sort technique obtained five priority safety issues: workers falling from height, electric shock, workers stung by material lifted, fires or explosions, and the scaffolding collapsed. Based on root cause analysis, it showed that the most likely root cause of the problems was dominated by the human factor such as: fatigue due to overtime work, lack of experience and understanding of the procedure, lack of awareness of the importance of the ocupational safety and health. Keywords: construstion,risk assessment, root cause.


2019 ◽  
Vol 276 ◽  
pp. 02016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anik Ratnaningsih ◽  
Syamsul Arifin ◽  
Hernu Suyoso ◽  
Anita Trisiana ◽  
Nizam Azkha Yusuf

The apartment is a vertical building used for residential purposes. It is included in a high rise building category with high occupational risk accident level due to its work complexity, or high elevation factors. This research discussed the risk assessment of occupational accident at one of the apartment constructions in Surabaya in order to determine its dominant risk factors and mitigation. Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) method was applied to this research. It is a risk assessment method based on severity, occurrence, and detection. Following the relevant assessment, it resulted in 3 types of occupational accidents with the highest Risk Priority Number, namely height work accident, falling material from tower crane, and risk of landslide excavation.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-68
Author(s):  
Tayyebeh Jaddi Madarsara ◽  
Saeed Yari ◽  
Hamzeh Saeidabadi

Background: Occupational accidents cause three to four times as many deaths in developing countries as industrialized countries. There are about 14,000 accidents in Iran every year, most of them involving workers in industries, To reduce these accidents, it is necessary to use risk assessment, which is a rational approach to hazard assessment and to identify hazards and potential consequences, on individuals, materials, equipment and the environment to reduce the risks of workplace accidents and consequently work-related accidents. Methods: This study was carried out in 1998 as an analytical-applied study in a manufacturing company. The Risk Assessment process, first with the formation of the relevant team, is selected from technical and production specialists who are more familiar with the concept of safety and risk assessment and again how to perform the Risk Assessment and Identify the risks involved, using the JSA Integrated Method for the analysis of business components and associated risks and FMEA method was trained and targeted to determine system failure states as well as assign risk priority number (RPN). Results: Risk assessment was carried out in 4 aspects, locations, equipment, main and sub-units and activities leading to the preparation of tables related to the risk assessment guide of locations, equipment, activities, RPN calculation, risk level classification and identification forms. Conclusions: In this study, 166 hazards were identified and, through follow-up and collaboration with senior management of the organization from 38 risks of fluids production hall, 22 corrective action (57.89%), from 46 risks of solids production hall, 37 corrective action (80.43%), from 33 risks of product warehouse, 28 corrective actions (84.84%), from 30 risks of raw materials warehouse, 21 corrective actions (70%), from 19 risk of incendiary materials, 10 corrective actions (52.63%) were performed. The overall results of the study showed that the major risk in the studied units was related to the dangers of inadequate cabling and placement of people in these work situations. key words: Safety and Health Risk Assessment, FMEA, JSA, AHA, JHA, THA, Executive Procedure, Guidelines.


Risk Analysis ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-23
Author(s):  
Guizhen Zhang ◽  
Vinh V. Thai ◽  
Adrian Wing‐Keung Law ◽  
Kum Fai Yuen ◽  
Hui Shan Loh ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document