scholarly journals Locked intramedullary nailing technique of the femur without brilliance amplifier at the trauma and orthopedics department of the university hospital of peace series on 35 cases during 1 year

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 95-97
Author(s):  
Augustin Delange Hendrick ◽  
Almenord Pharol ◽  
Khawly Clifford PG ◽  
Augustin Delange ◽  
Pierre Marie Woolley
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Intramedullary Nailing ◽  
Femoral Fractures ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Patient Morbidity ◽  
Duration Of Hospitalization ◽  
The Cost ◽  
The University

Femoral fractures increase the length of hospital stay for our patients for several reasons such as lack of blood, economic resources, and lack of infrastructure. The use of a C-arm has been shown to reduce patient morbidity due to early functional recovery and reduced hospital stay. Objective: To develop an intramedullary nailing technique without c-arm with a closed focus to reduce the duration of hospitalization of its patients as well as the cost related to the equipment used for follow-up. Methodology: prospective study on 35 patients for 1 year August 2020 to August 2021 Results: We followed 35 patients in which the mean age was 37.83 years with extremes of 18 and 78 years. The male sex predominates 21 against 14 women or 60% against 40% respectively. The sex ratio is 1.5. A total of 19 diaphyseal fractures (54.3%) were nailed, 9 supracondylar (25.7%) and 7 subtrochanteric (20%). Twenty-seven were closed fractures (71.1%), and 8 were open fractures (22.9%). The length of hospitalization was less than 3 days for 30 patients (85.7%), and more than 3 days for 5 patients (14.3%). Conclusion: We recommend that we promote this closed-hearth technique because it improves the postoperative follow-up of patients. Additionally, it would reduce exposure to radiation from c-arm in hospitals that have this equipment.

Evaluation and Monitoring of the Clinical Pathway for Thyroidectomy

2008 ◽  
Vol 74 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
VÍCtor Soria-Aledo ◽  
Benito Flores-Pastor ◽  
Mari Fe Candel-Arenas ◽  
AndrÉS Carrillo-Alcaraz ◽  
ÁLvaro Campillo-Soto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Clinical Pathway ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Clinical Variation ◽  
Evaluation And Monitoring ◽  
Surgery Department ◽  
Mean Cost

The aim of this study is to present the evaluation and monitoring of a clinical pathway for thyroidectomy 1 year after its implementation and after 4 years’ follow up. We compare the results of an evaluation and monitoring indicators series before and after the establishment of the clinical pathway for thyroidectomy in the Surgery Department of Morales Meseguer Hospital, a general university hospital in Murcia, Spain. Implementation of the clinical pathway led to a reduction in length of hospital stay for all the surgery patients (4.8 ± 2.1 and 3.6 ± 1.9 days before and after pathway implementation, respectively; P < 0.001). Implementation of the clinical pathway led to a reduction in cost in all the operated patients (3357 ± 966 and 2695 ± 970 US$ before and after implementing the clinical pathway, respectively; P < 0.001). Evolution of the mean hospital cost according to year of study shows a reduction from 2000 (3400 ± 1056 US$) to 2004 (2404 ± 666 US$) with a slight increase during 2005 (2721 ± 1335 US$) (P < 0.001). Implementation of the clinical pathway for thyroidectomy has successfully reduced clinical variation and therefore the length of hospital stay and mean cost of the process. In subsequent years, no such major improvements have been made with regard to hospital stay, although they are still clearly better than those before pathway implementation.

scholarly journals Duration of Hospital Stay in Alcohol/Substance Addictions and Psychiatric Disorders: A 12-Year Retrospective Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-9
Author(s):  
Bahadir Geniş ◽  
Behcet Cosar
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Psychiatric Disorders ◽  
Disease Burden ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Inpatient Service ◽  
Substance Addiction ◽  
Duration Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Hospitalization Period ◽  
Duration Of Hospitalization

Background: Mental disorders are generally a significant reason for increased morbidity. They constitute a serious disease burden. One of the main reasons for this disease burden is long hospitalization periods. Objective: The current study investigated the length of hospital stay and the variables affecting it in patients treated in the Gazi University Hospital Psychiatry Department between 2005-2016. Methods: Patient diagnoses were analyzed according to the International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision (ICD-10). Data was obtained for 7027 hospitalizations over a 12-year period. Records of repeated hospitalizations, non-psychiatric primary diagnoses, and missing data were not included in the analysis. As a result, data from 5129 hospitalizations were included in the analysis. Results: Mean age of the sample was 45.27±14.69, and 62.5% (n=3204) of the patients were male. Mean hospitalization period was 28.66±17.25 days. Schizophrenia and depressive disorder significantly prolonged hospital stay, while substance addiction shortened the duration of hospitalization (P<0.001). It was found that the duration of hospitalization decreased significantly over the years (P<0.001). Advanced age (P<0.001), recurrent admission (P<0.001), and female gender (P=0.029) were other variables affecting this period. Conclusion: Schizophrenia and depression are the most common psychiatric disorders in the inpatient service, and these disorders prolong hospitalization periods. The duration of hospital stay is considerably less in substance addiction than in other psychiatric disorders. Non-clinical variables, such as year of hospitalization, may affect the length of hospital stay.

Pilonidal Sinus: How to Choose Between Excision and Open Granulation Versus Excision and Primary Closure?

Swiss Surgery ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 255-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Perruchoud ◽  
Vuilleumier ◽  
Givel
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Pilonidal Sinus ◽  
Primary Closure ◽  
Average Length ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Healing Time ◽  
Incision And Drainage ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Primary Healing

Aims: The purpose of this study was to evaluate excision and open granulation versus excision and primary closure as treatments for pilonidal sinus. Subjects and methods: We evaluated a group of 141 patients operated on for a pilonidal sinus between 1991 and 1995. Ninety patients were treated by excision and open granulation, 34 patients by excision and primary closure and 17 patients by incision and drainage, as a unique treatment of an infected pilonidal sinus. Results: The first group, receiving treatment of excision and open granulation, experienced the following outcomes: average length of hospital stay, four days; average healing time; 72 days; average number of post-operative ambulatory visits, 40; average off-work delay, 38 days; and average follow-up time, 43 months. There were five recurrences (6%) in this group during the follow-up period. For the second group treated by excision and primary closure, the corresponding outcome measurements were as follows: average length of hospital stay, four days; average healing time, 23 days; primary healing failure rate, 9%; average number of post-operative ambulatory visits, 6; average off-work delay, 21 days. The average follow-up time was 34 months, and two recurrences (6%) were observed during the follow-up period. In the third group, seventeen patients benefited from an incision and drainage as unique treatment. The mean follow-up was 37 months. Five recurrences (29%) were noticed, requiring a new operation in all the cases. Discussion and conclusion: This series of 141 patients is too limited to permit final conclusions to be drawn concerning significant advantages of one form of treatment compared to the other. Nevertheless, primary closure offers the advantages of quicker healing time, fewer post-operative visits and shorter time off work. When a primary closure can be carried out, it should be routinely considered for socio-economical and comfort reasons.

Prospective evaluation for gastrointestinal bleedings at the University Hospital St. Pölten – one year of follow-up

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Stättermayer ◽  
F Riedl ◽  
S Bernhofer ◽  
A Stättermayer ◽  
A Mayer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
University Hospital ◽  
Prospective Evaluation ◽  
One Year ◽  
The University

EVALUATION OF LONGO’S HEMORRHOIDECTOMY AT HUE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL

2012 ◽  
pp. 79-85
Author(s):  
Van Lieu Nguyen ◽  
Doan Van Phu Nguyen ◽  
Thanh Phuc Nguyen
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Perioperative Complications ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Anal Pain ◽  
Stapled Hemorrhoidectomy ◽  
Fourth Degree ◽  
Duration Of Hospital Stay ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Good For

Introduction: Since Longo First described it in 1998, Stapled Hemorrhoidectomy has been emerging as the procedure of choice for symtomatic hemorrhoid. Several studies have shown it to be a safe, effective and relative complication free procedure. The aim of this study was to determine the suitability of (SH) as a day cas procedure at Hue University Hospital. Methods: From Decembre 2009 to April 2012, 384 patients with third- degree and fourth-degree hemorrhoids who underwent Stapled Hemorrhoidectomy were included in this study. Parameters recorded included postoperative complications, analegic requirements, duration of hospital stay and patient satisfaction. Follow-up was performed at 1 month and 3 months post-operative. Results: Of the 384 patients that underwent a Stapled Hemorrhoidectomy 252 (65,7%) were male and 132 (34,3%) were female. The mean age was 47,5 years (range 17-76 years. Duration of hospital stay: The mean day was 2,82 ± 1,15 days (range 1-6 days). There were no perioperative complications. There was one case postoperative complication: hemorrhage; Follow-up after surgery: 286 (74,4%) patients had less anal pain, 78 (20,3%) patients had moderate anal pain, 3 (0,8%) patients had urinary retention; Follow-up after one month: good for 325 (84,6%) patients, average for 59 (15,4%) patients; Follow-up after three months: good for 362 (94,3%) patients, average for 22 (5,7%) patients. Conclusion: Our present study shows that Stapled Hemorrhoidectomy is a safe, reduced postoperative pain, shorter hospital stay and a faster return to unrestricted daily activity

Ultra-resistant schizophrenia and potentiation strategies

2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s834-s834 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Khouadja ◽  
R. Ben Soussia ◽  
S. Younes ◽  
A. Bouallagui ◽  
I. Marrag ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Resistance ◽  
Cost Benefit ◽  
Clinical Excellence ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Dsm Iv ◽  
Competing Interest ◽  
A Prospective Study ◽  
Psychiatric Department ◽  
The Cost ◽  
The University

IntroductionTreatment resistance to clozapine is estimated at 40–70% of the treated population. Several clozapine potentiation strategies have come into clinical practice although often without evidence-based support.ObjectiveThe aim of our work was to identify the potentiation strategies in ultra-resistant schizophrenia depending on the subtype of schizophrenia.MethodologyThis is a prospective study conducted on patients with the diagnosis of schizophrenia, based on DSM-IV-TR criteria, and hospitalized in the psychiatric department of the university hospital in Mahdia, Tunisia. The study sample consisted of patients meeting the resistant schizophrenia criteria as defined by national institute for clinical excellence (NICE), and the prescription of clozapine for 6 to 8 weeks was shown without significant improvement.Resultswe have collected 10 patients. The mean serum level of clozapine was 462.25 mg/L. The potentiation strategies were different depending on the subtype of schizophrenia. For the undifferentiated schizophrenia, we have chosen ECT sessions. For the disorganized schizophrenia, we opted for amisulpiride and aripiprazole. For the paranoid forms, we have chosen the association of risperidone and ECT. A psychometric improvement was noted in BPRS ranging from 34 to 40%.ConclusionEvery potentiation strategy entails a cost, whether it is an additional monetary cost, adverse effects or greater stress to caregivers. The cost/benefit equation should be thoroughly evaluated and discussed before commencing a strategy.Disclosure of interestThe authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.

Behandeling van lumbale discushernia: open versus endoscopische discectomie?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. SYS ◽  
A. VERVAECKE
Keyword(s):  
Cost Benefit Analysis ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Cost Benefit ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Patient Morbidity ◽  
Endoscopic Discectomy ◽  
Theoretical Advantage ◽  
Open Versus ◽  
The Cost

Open (micro) discectomie is a routine treatment for patients with a lumbar disc hernia and incapacitating sciatica, resistant to conservative treatment. Alternatively, the full-endoscopic discectomy has been increasingly performed over the past years. While the surgical instrumentation for this approach has improved and the necessary specialized training is widely available, the technique remains challenging for the surgeon and the assumed/theoretical advantage regarding patient morbidity is still unproven. When compared to open (micro) discectomie, the existing literature fails to attribute significant decreases in length of hospital stay or complication rates to the full-endoscopic approach, therefore making the cost-benefit analysis uninteresting due to the higher associated cost. The structural lack of financing of Belgian hospitals leads to intrinsic budgetary limitations which are emphasized if the hospitals have to carry the extra costs related to endoscopic disc surgery themselves.

Abdominal sacrohysteropexy UV prolapse and preservation of reproduction.

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (05) ◽  
pp. 652-655
Author(s):  
Robina Ali ◽  
Riffat Ehsan ◽  
Ghazala Niaz ◽  
Fatima Abid
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Uterovaginal Prolapse ◽  
Prolapse Recurrence ◽  
Gynecology And Obstetrics ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
Operative Complications ◽  
Operative Recovery ◽  
Post Operative Complications

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess the safety of sacrohystcopxy by determining intraoperative and post-operative complications and its effectiveness by pelvic organ prolapse recurrence on follow up. Study Design: Prospective study. Setting: Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics Unit-II DHQ Hospital PMC, Faisalabad. Period: Jan-2014 to Jan-2017. Material & Methods: Patients with uterovaginal prolapse, admitted through OPD were selected for abdominal sacrohysteropexy. Variables of study including duration of surgery, any intra-operative and post operative complications, need of intra operative blood transfusion, post operative hospital stay; recurrence of POP, number of pregnancies in 06 moths follow up were recorded. Results: During this study period, 319 patients were admitted with uterovaginal prolapse. 32 (10.03%) cases were selected for abdominal sacrohysteropexy. In these 32 patients, 03 (9.37%) were <30years of age, 21(65.62%) were between 30-35 years and 8 (25%) were between 35-40 years of age. About 2(6.25%) were unmarried, while 30(93.7%) were married. In these married women 14(43.75%) were multiparas, another 14(43.75%) were para 1 or 2, while 4(12.5%) were para 3 or more. Duration of surgery was 40-45 minutes in 31(96.87%) patients. In 28(87.5%) cases per operative blood loss was <150ml while in 4(12.5%) it was estimated to be >150ml but less than 300ml. Post operatively only 1(3.12%) case developed wound sepsis and it was the only one (3.12%) who was discharged on 7th post operative day, while rest 31(96.87%) were discharged on 3rd post operative day. No recurrence was noticed in 06 moths follow up, while 2(6.25%) patients became pregnant. Conclusion: Abdominal sacrohysteropexy is a safe and an effective treatment in terms of overall anatomical and functional outcome, complications, post operative recovery, length of hospital stay and sexual functioning, in women who desire uterine and hence fertility preservation.

scholarly journals 992. Rethinking the 28-day HIV nPEP Dispensing Practice: A Pediatric ID Clinic Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S524-S525
Author(s):  
David Zhang ◽  
Julia Rosebush ◽  
Palak Bhagat ◽  
Allison Nelson ◽  
Veena Ramaiah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Wholesale Price ◽  
Cost Savings ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Post Exposure Prophylaxis ◽  
Exposure Prophylaxis ◽  
The Cost ◽  
The University ◽  
Lost To Follow Up

Abstract Background In July 2017, The University of Chicago Comer Children’s Hospital Emergency Department (ED) transitioned from a 5-day to a 28-day HIV nPEP (non-occupational post-exposure prophylaxis) dispensation model in an effort to increase adherence. Anecdotal reports of patients lost to follow-up after ED discharge called into question the utility and cost-effectiveness of this practice. We analyzed HIV nPEP follow-up rates in our clinic, explored reasons for nonadherence, and performed basic cost-savings analyses to inform potential changes to our dispensation model. Methods A retrospective review of both electronic health and pharmacy records was conducted for patients prescribed 28-days of HIV nPEP in the ED and scheduled for outpatient follow-up in Pediatric ID clinic from July 2017-June 2019. Clinic provider documentation of nPEP adherence and reasons for nonadherence were examined. Patients were given an initial dose of nPEP regimen in the ED and provided all subsequent doses to complete at home. Using average wholesale price (AWP), we calculated the total cost of each regimen and potential savings if a shorter duration of HIV nPEP supply was dispensed. Results 50 patients received a 28-day supply of HIV nPEP. Please refer to Table 1 regarding baseline patient characteristics. Of these, only 19 (38%) patients had documented outpatient follow-up after nPEP initiation. Median time to follow-up was 6 days (IQR: 3.0-9.0 days). Of the 19 patients with follow-up, 3 admitted to medication non-adherence. Although side effects were elicited in a total of 9 patients (18%), only 1 cited medication intolerance as the reason for discontinuing their nPEP. Given the relatively short time to follow-up, a potential savings of $1720-2211/patient could be achieved if a 10-14 day supply was dispensed. Conclusion Outpatient follow-up after 28-day HIV nPEP dispensation in our ED was &lt; 40%, calling into question the cost-effectiveness of this dispensation model. While our current practice alleviates nPEP interruption due to potential insurance issues and pick-up delays, follow-up and adherence are not assured. The significant cost-savings with a shorter supply at the outset may encourage more robust follow-up and adherence. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document