scholarly journals Keabsahan Perjanjian dan Tanggung Jawab Badan Hukum Virtual Office terhadap Konsumen yang Melakukan Perbuatan Melawan Hukum

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Arsyilla Destriana ◽  
Ali Hanafiah

This research aims to know and explain the validity of the lease agreement on the Virtual office because the agreement has violated article 18 of the Republic of Indonesia Law number 1999 about consumer protection because it contains the raw clause and the responsibility of Virtual office to the consumer who performs the act against the law. The type of research used is empirical research on Empiris. Using case studies in the form of legal behavior products. The subject matter is the implementation or implementation of positive legal provisions and contracts factually on any particular legal event that occurs in the community in order to reach the objectives that are determined. The results of this thesis show that the agreement in the Virtual office is equal to the provisions stipulated in article 1320 of the civil law, which must be fulfilled subjective and objective terms. The accountability of Virtual office business entities to consumers who do against the law is to provide all data and information about the customer who performs the act against the law with the record of the party Virtual office has no fault and can prove that he is innocent.

2021 ◽  
pp. 119-138
Author(s):  
Vladimir Vrhovšek ◽  
Vladimir Kozar

This article discusses a concept of legally permitted and limited offsetting in bankruptcy according to the law of the Republic of Serbia, with comparison to earlier regulations where the offsetting occurred by the force of law, as the legal consequence of initiating bankruptcy proceedings. Legal provisions, legal practice, opinion of the jurisprudence on general and special terms about the right to offset the claims in bankruptcy in the Republic of Serbia, as well as in the countries in the region, have been presented. Relevant legal solutions from laws on bankruptcy of Montenegro, Republic of Srpska, Republic of Croatia, and the Republic of Slovenia have been reviewed. Offsetting claims in bankruptcy proceedings are in principle allowed in regional countries as well. Regarding the effect of bankruptcy on the right to offset the claims, there is a great similarity among the legal solutions in regulations of above mentioned countries, except for the Republic of Slovenia. The Republic of Slovenia retained the broadest concept of legal compensation as a legal consequence of initiating bankruptcy proceedings, which constitutes an important difference compared to restrictive solutions of the Serbian bankruptcy law and regional legislation. This article aims to show to the business entities operating in the region, through comparative legal analysis, different conditions and procedure of offsetting in bankruptcy in national legislation, bearing in mind the importance of this legal institution, which allows the creditors to fully collect their claims outside the bankruptcy payment lines, and regardless of the number of available funds in the bankruptcy estate.


2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 195
Author(s):  
Anna Korpysz

<p>The gloss was devoted to the problem of the subjective side of the crime of misappropriation and assessment of criminal law refusal to return the subject of the lease after the expiry of the lease agreement and cessation of payment of the leasing installments. The Court of Appeal in Warsaw took the position that the intention to keep things for themselves under Article 284 § 2 of the Penal Code is evidenced by the fact that the accused did not contact the lessor for more than two years, unlawfully using the car as his own. The author thoroughly analyzes the applicable legal provisions, not only in the field of criminal law, but also civil law, indicating what criteria should be taken into account in assigning the perpetrator of the intention <em>animus rem sibi habendi</em>. Due to the frequency of similar facts to the underlying judgement, it deserves special attention.</p>


2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 2155-2160
Author(s):  
Emilija Gjorgjioska ◽  
Zorica Stoileva ◽  
Dijana Gorgieva

In the arbitration, just like in civil litigation, it may be necessary before the final merit award is rendered by the arbitral tribunal, the relations between the parties to be temporarily settled. The need for ordering interim measures before or during an arbitration may arise in order to create conditions for maintaining the existing situation untilthe arbitration settlement of the dispute, facilitating the enforcement of the potential condemnatory arbitration award or faster conduct of the arbitration.Due to these advantages of the interimmeasures, the problem of interim measures in the modern arbitration process theory and practice gets more and more important. In the context of this, the questions arise what types of interim measures and under what conditions can be ordered in the arbitration?Who has the authority to order inerim measures: the state court or arbitrator of the arbitration tribunal or arbitrator for emergencies, and etc. Regarding the types of interim measures that can be ordered before or during the arbitration, there are: conservation, temporary, procedural-facilitating, record-keeping and execution-enforcement measures. The conditions for ordering each of these measures are specific and depend on the purpose and function of the interim measure itself. Regarding the dilemma who is auhtorized to order interim measures in the arbitration, it must be emphasized that the older arbitration theory and practice that has been created around state protectionist legal politics accepts the position that only the state court can order inerim measures while the contemporary arbitration theory and practice proves that the arbitrator of the arbitration court (more often) or an emergency arbitrator (less often) should order the imerim measures in the arbitration. It is precisely because of these problems and dilemmas that still baffle the science of the arbitration procedural law the subject of this paper will be the legal regulation of the subject matter of the interim measures in the Macedonian arbitration legislation. For this purpose, an analysis will be made of the positive legal provisions of the Law on Litigation Procedure of the Republic of Macedonia which regulates the domestic arbitration, the Law on International Commercial Arbitration of the Republic of Macedonia, which regulates the international arbitration and the Rules of The Permanent court of Arbitration attached to the Economic Chamber of Republic of Macedonia that apply to resolve arbitration disputes with and without a foreign element and will be analyzed whether they regulate and to what extent they regulate the issue of ordering of inrim measures in the arbitration. This will be done in order to conclude whether there is a need for amendments of the Macedonian Arbitration Legislation in order for the Macedonian arbitration procedural right to be in line with the modern arbitration tendencies for ordering interim measures in the arbitration, primarily the UNCITRAL Model Law.


Author(s):  
Michał Mistygacz

The issue analysed by the author is that of the institution of Presidential immunity pertaining to the President of the Republic of Poland, and operating in such a way that a sitting President cannot be held criminally liable before a common court for acts tantamount to offences. Inclining towards the essence of this solution and its consequences when it comes to respect for constitutional principles of legalism and equality before the law, the author at the same time seeks to assess the completeness of the provisions in effect in Poland, in so doing identifying a lack of clear directives as to how a former President (i.e. one who has left office) is to be held criminally liable. The conclusion reached by the author can be said to boil down to a recognition that the liability of a former President before Poland’s Tribunal of State for offences or crimes committed is of an accessory nature where common courts are concerned, with the condition underpinning recognition of the Tribunal’s primacy in matters of jurisdiction being the National Assembly’s adoption of a Resolution holding a former President liable constitutionally, and potentially at the same time initiating action in respect of given offences. Any lack of such a National Assembly Resolution must give rise to a particular kind of reactivation – in respect of the former President – of jurisdiction in the dispensing of justice by common courts, given the fact that one of the negative procedural premises has ceased to be non-applicable. Thus, unlike in the case of a President still holding office, the cognition of the Tribunal of State in relation to a former President is neither exclusive nor automatic. Such observations have also stimulated work by the author to develop de lege ferenda postulates regarding the subject matter, as set against the wider background of Poland’s political and constitutional system.


Author(s):  
Allars Apsītis

Rakstā atspoguļoti autora veiktās romiešu tiesību pirmavotu, galvenokārt romiešu sabiedrības līguma (societa – lat. val.), tiesiskā regulējuma izpētes rezultāti par minētā regulējuma un modernās Latvijas likumdošanas aktu idejiskajām kopsakarībām. Tajā uzsvērta romiešu legālo principu ietekme uz tādu darījumu, kuru priekšmets ir neatļauta un nepieklājīga darbība ar reliģijai, likumiem vai labiem tikumiem pretēju mērķi, spēkā neesamības tiesiskajā reglamentācijā, kā arī uz Latvijas Republikas Civillikumā ietverto “maldības”, “viltus”, “nosacījumu”, “termiņu” un “tiesiska darījuma formas” koncepciju romiskajiem pamatiem. Latvijas pētnieki minēto tematiku šādā skatupunktā īpaši nav aplūkojuši, ar publikācijām latviešu valodā autoram saskarties nav nācies, tāpēc šis pētījums varētu dot ieguldījumu nacionālās tiesību zinātnes attīstībā. The article deals with the results of the author’s research performed on the original sources of the legal regulation of Roman Law, mainly, Roman partnership agreement (societa – Latin) in relation to the principles of interconnections between the above mentioned regulation and the legislative acts of modern Latvia. The influence of Roman legal principles in relation to the regulation of an impermissible or indecent action has been pointed out, the purpose of which is contrary to religion, laws or moral principles – it may not be the subject-matter of a lawful transaction; such a transaction is void; there have also been emphasised such concepts as “mistake”, “fraud”, “conditions”, “terms” and “form of lawful transaction”, which are based on the Roman Law and included into the Civil Law of the Republic of Latvia. Latvian researchers have not studied the above mentioned problems in relation to these aspects; the author has not found any publication in Latvian concerning these issues. Thus, the research might be a particular contribution to the development of national jurisprudence.


2021 ◽  
pp. 433-444
Author(s):  
Jovana Vasiljković ◽  
Dalibor Krstinić

A testament is a unilateral legal act as it is made by a declaration of will of one person and is distinguished from other legal acts by its characteristics. By means of testament the testators may dispose of their rights and create an obligation for themselves and the obligations of the testament do not come into effect until after the death of the testator. A testament can be made in one of the forms prescribed by the law. The primary goal of this paper is to demonstrate and analyse different forms of testaments in the legislature of the Republic of Serbia and the chosen European legislatures of France, Germany, Italy and England. The following methods will be used in the paper: comparative analysis of the forms of testaments in the said legislatures, to be completed by the normative method, while by analysing the content in a systematic way we shall approach the subject matter, and the historical method, which will help us review the origin of certain forms of testaments.


2017 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 77-86
Author(s):  
Miłosz Kościelniak-Marszał

Under art. 33 it. 6 of Hunting law cases of different nature are heard before a regional court. It is the subject matter of specific proceedings that is decisive in determining which procedural regulations will apply as the above provision refers to different legal relations. The first one refers to the membership in the Polish Hunting Association, which is granted in a way that allows us to recognize it as a civil law occurrence, and therefore the request before a common court for the protection of the membership may be considered a civil action. The second one is related to disciplinary liability which due to repressive nature of sanctions falls within penal liability in its broad sense. In this case, the proceedings before a common court exercised as a result of making an appeal against the decision ending disciplinary proceedings within the structures of the Polish Hunting Association constitute continuation of the disciplinary procedure. The nature of this liability calls for the court appeal control to be conducted on the basis of the same rules pertaining to the law of criminal procedure, on which disciplinary proceedings within the organization were based, and for the procedure ensuring the defendant as far-reaching proceedings security as possible to be applied.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-17
Author(s):  
Maen Mohammad al-Qassaymeh ◽  
Nayel Musa Shaker al-Omran

Abstract Option of defect is an important theory regulated in Omani Civil Law. It gives the injured party in bilateral contracts an option to rescind the contract if they find a defect in the subject matter of the contract. This theory is deemed a legal basis to refuse objects of sale by tender. In particular, it is useful when a guarantee that is given to the governmental body is insufficient to cover damages, due to bad performance of the contract. This article discusses how the option of defect is applied to sale by tender in Omani law.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yara Olena ◽  
◽  
Kravchuk O.V. ◽  

The article examines the grounds and conditions of securing a claim in administrative proceedings. By analyzing the legal provisions, law enforcement (judicial) practice in connection with the acquisitions of legal science, the grounds and conditions of securing a claim in administrative proceedings are highlighted. Attention is focused on problematic issues that arise when courts check the grounds for securing a claim and compliance with the terms of securing a claim. In particular, attention is drawn to the fact that securing an administrative claim on the grounds of obvious signs of illegality of the decision, action or inaction of the subject of power is virtually inapplicable due to reservations about the inadmissibility of resolving the dispute on the merits. It is concluded that an administrative lawsuit can be secured if there is at least one of the grounds specified in part one of Article 150 of the Code of Administrative Procedure of Ukraine and compliance with the conditions of proportionality, adequacy of measures to ensure administrative lawsuit, direct connection with the subject matter and legal the defendant's conduct in the dispute. Emphasis is placed on the fact that the freedom of discretion (discretion) of the court in the application of measures to ensure an administrative claim is unconditional, but not unlimited and controlled by the requirement to properly justify the relevant procedural action. Keywords: administrative court, administrative claim, administrative proceedings, securing the claim, principles of administrative proceedings, protection of individual rights and freedoms, grounds for securing the claim, conditions for securing the claim


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document