TRENDS IN HEALTH LEGISLATION AND ADMINISTRATION

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1949 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 362-364
Author(s):  
JOSEPH S. WALL

AS GENERALLY expected, the proponents of national compulsory health insurance lost no time after the opening of the 81st Congress. In his State of the Union Address delivered to Congress on January 5, 1949, President Truman called again for legislation for a national health program—a request he made in his first health message to Congress November 19, 1945. At that time, three years ago, he said: "In the past, the benefits of modern medical science have not been enjoyed by our citizens with any degree of equality. Nor are they today. Nor will they be in the future unless Government is bold enough to do something about it. "People with low or moderate incomes do not get the same medical attention as those with high incomes. The poor have more sickness, but they get less medical care. People who live in rural areas do not get the same amount or quality of medical attention as those who live in our cities. "Our new economic bill of rights should mean health security for all, regardless of residence, station, or race—everywhere in the United States." On the same day (November 19, 1945) the Wagner-Murray-Dingell Bill was introduced as S. 1606. After extensive hearings and some modifications, a similar bill (S. 1320) was introduced in the 80th Congress by Senator Murray with the additional sponsorship of Senators Pepper, Chavez, Taylor and McGrath, all Democrats. In his message to the Democratic 81st Congress President Truman said: "We must spare no effort to raise the general level of health in this country. In a nation as rich as ours, it is a shocking fact that tens of millions lack adequate medical care. We are short of doctors, hospitals, and nurses. We must remedy these shortages. Moreover, we need—and we must have without further delay—a system of prepaid medical insurance which will enable every American to afford good medical care." On the same day Senator Murray introduced for himself, and senators Wagner, Pepper, Chavez, Taylor and McGrath a bill 5.5, "to provide a national health insurance and public health program." Two identical bills had already been introduced in the House, HR. 345 by Representative Celler and HR. 783 by Representative Dingell. All three bills are exact copies of last year's bill, S. 1320. (Copies of these bills may be obtained from the Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office, Washington 25, D.C., or from the committees to which they have been referred.)

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1951 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 430-445

THE first communication is a statement by the American Board of Pediatrics on the importance of better training in the care of the well child during its period of growth and development. The second communication is by Dr. Frederick D. Mott, Acting Deputy Minister of the Department of Public Health in the Province of Saskatchewan. Dr. Mott is an authority on medical care in rural areas and is senior author of Rural Health and Medical Care (McGraw-Hill, 1948), an outstanding source of information on health conditions and medical services in the rural areas of the United States. This communication requires reference to an earlier statement in the Journal of Pediatrics (31:228, August, 1947) by the Canadian Medical Association in which that association approved the principle of health insurance and maintained the opinion that health insurance programs should be developed by the various provinces in accordance with their local needs. Dr. Mott's paper describes what has been done in Saskatchewan.


1986 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 339-354 ◽  
Author(s):  
David U. Himmelstein ◽  
Steffie Woolhandler

Despite growing concern with cost containment, most health policy analysts have ignored vast potential savings on medically irrelevant spending for excess administration, profits, high physician incomes, marketing, and legal involvement in medicine. Indeed, many recent reforms encourage administrative hypertrophy, entrepreneurialism and litigation. A universal national health program could abolish billing and consequently the need for much of the administrative apparatus of health care, and decrease spending for profits and marketing. In this article we analyze the administrative savings that could be realized from instituting a Canadian-style national health insurance program or a national health service similar to that in Britain, and the potential savings from additional reforms to curtail profits, marketing and litigation. Our calculations based on 1983 data suggest that national health insurance would save $42.6 billion annually: $29.2 billion on health administration and insurance overhead, $4.9 billion on profits, $3.9 billion on marketing, and $4.6 billion on physician's incomes. A national health service would save $65.8 billion: $38.4 billion on health administration and insurance overhead, $4.9 billion on profits, $3.9 billion on marketing, and $18.6 billion on physician's incomes. Complete nationalization of all health related industries and reform of the malpractice system would save at least $87.2 billion per year. We conclude that a national health program, in addition to improving access to health care for the oppressed, could achieve cost containment without rationing of care.


Sci ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 25
Author(s):  
Jesse Patrick ◽  
Philip Q. Yang

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) is at the crossroads. It is important to evaluate the effectiveness of the ACA in order to make rational decisions about the ongoing healthcare reform, but existing research into its effect on health insurance status in the United States is insufficient and descriptive. Using data from the National Health Interview Surveys from 2009 to 2015, this study examines changes in health insurance status and its determinants before the ACA in 2009, during its partial implementation in 2010–2013, and after its full implementation in 2014 and 2015. The results of trend analysis indicate a significant increase in national health insurance rate from 82.2% in 2009 to 89.4% in 2015. Logistic regression analyses confirm the similar impact of age, gender, race, marital status, nativity, citizenship, education, and poverty on health insurance status before and after the ACA. Despite similar effects across years, controlling for other variables, youth aged 26 or below, the foreign-born, Asians, and other races had a greater probability of gaining health insurance after the ACA than before the ACA; however, the odds of obtaining health insurance for Hispanics and the impoverished rose slightly during the partial implementation of the ACA, but somewhat declined after the full implementation of the ACA starting in 2014. These findings should be taken into account by the U.S. Government in deciding the fate of the ACA.


1988 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 179-189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vicente Navarro

This article provides empirical information that questions some of the major arguments put forward against the establishment of a comprehensive and universal health program in the United States. The positions that (1) “Americans do not want a further expansion of government roles in their lives,” (2) “a National Health Program would further increase the rate of growth of health expenditures,” (3) “the federal deficit is too large and needs to be reduced before establishing a National Health Program,” and (4) “people do not want to pay higher taxes,” are shown to be ideological rather than scientific. The author presents evidence that questions each of these assumptions.


2002 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Y. Chen ◽  
W. C. Chie ◽  
C. Lan ◽  
M. C. Lin ◽  
J. S. Lai ◽  
...  

This study aims to describe the national incidence rate and characteristics of lower limb amputations (LLA) in 1997 from an island-wide database of the national health insurance programme in Taiwan. Some 117,647 discharge records from a sampled database (1 in 20) of the National Health Insurance Research Database were analysed. This study included records (n=171) containing LLA procedures. The LLA procedure rates were obtained by multiplying the number of identified procedures by 20 as the numerator and mid-year total population of Taiwan in 1997 as the denominator. Each procedure was further analysed according to the demographic characteristics of the patients, cause and level of amputation. Summarised gender ratios of LLA procedure rates were obtained by Poisson regression analysis. The crude LLA procedure rate was 18.1 per 100,000 population per year and the crude major LLA procedure rate was 8.8 per 100,000 population per year in Taiwan in 1997. The major cause of LLA procedures was peripheral vascular disease (72%), and the toe was most frequently amputated (48%). The LLA procedure rates, which increased logarithmically with age of patients, were significantly higher in men with a summarised male to female rate ratio of 1.65. The age-standardised LLA procedure rate in Taiwan was lower than that reported in the United States, Finland, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom (Leeds, Middlesborough, and Newcastle), but higher than Spain, Italy, and Japan. The trend of an increasing proportion of PVD-related LLA procedures will prompt the health professionals to develop strategies for LLA prevention.


1992 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 619-644 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy Young

The Common Cause study presents data on medical-industry PAC contributions to Members of Congress during the period January 1, 1981, through June 30, 1991. Included are listings of the top 25 congressional recipients, the top 25 Senate recipients, and the top 50 House recipients of contributions from medical-industry PACs; medical-industry PAC contributions to members of the four key congressional committees and to the congressional leadership; top congressional recipients of contributions from medical professionals' PACs, including the American Medical Association, from health insurance PACs, from pharmaceutical PACs, and from hospitals and care-provider PACs; and the top medical-industry PACs. State-by-state lists of medical-industry PAC contributions to Senators and to Representatives, including breakdowns of insurance, AMA, and pharmaceutical contributions, are given in the appendixes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document