COMMITTEE ON NUTRITION

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1967 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. 916-922
Author(s):  
CHARLES U. LOWE ◽  
DAVID BAIRD COURSIN ◽  
FELIX P. HEALD ◽  
MALCOLM A. HOLLIDAY ◽  
DONOUGH O'BRIEN ◽  
...  

This memorandum presents suggested safe minimal levels for vitamin and mineral content of formulas designed to provide total nutrition for infants. These levels must not be equated with recommended daily allowances; rather, they represent levels below which distinct hazards may be encountered. In addition, maximal and minimal values for vitamin and mineral supplements are suggested. The maximal levels will provide intakes close to ideal. A supplement containing less than the stipulated minimal levels will probably serve no useful purpose.

2005 ◽  
Vol 75 (3) ◽  
pp. 201-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Touvier ◽  
Boutron-Ruault ◽  
Volatier ◽  
Martin

This study investigated the prevalence of inadequate micronutrient intake and the proportion of subjects who exceed Tolerable Upper Intake Levels a) with food only, and b) with food+supplements, in a population of French regular supplement users (n = 259). Assessment tools were seven-day records for supplements, three-day records for food intake, and a questionnaire about supplement use. Most subjects were recruited in retail outlets that sold supplements. They were recent users of vitamin/mineral supplements, aged over 15 years, and normo-energy reporters. The prevalence (%) of inadequate intake decreased with the inclusion of mean annual supplements, from 68.0 to 54.8 for magnesium, 55.9 to 40.7 for vitamin C, 53.4 to 43.9 for folic acid, 37.5 to 27.5 for iron, and 40.1 to 29.7 for pantothenic acid. Few subjects exceeded upper intake levels when mean annual intake of supplements was considered. When supplement consumption was considered during the studied week only, the proportion of subjects who were in excess of the upper intake levels was higher (maximum: 9.6% for magnesium). Supplement use brought a nutritional benefit for some targeted nutrients. It was not associated with excessive intake in this study, but could become hazardous if the annual frequency of use were to increase.


2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
N Hangartner Thomas ◽  
F Short David ◽  
Gilsanz Vicente ◽  
J Kalkwarf Heidi ◽  
M Lappe Joan ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saara Valkama ◽  
Heli Viljakainen ◽  
Elisa Holmlund-Suila ◽  
Jenni Rosendahl ◽  
Helena Hauta-alus ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julian A Waung ◽  
J H Duncan Bassett ◽  
Graham R Williams

1955 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 153-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles F. Chappel ◽  
Robert J. Sirny ◽  
C. K. Whitehair ◽  
Robert MacVicar
Keyword(s):  

2007 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 342-347
Author(s):  
Satoko Tanaka ◽  
Toshiko Morisita ◽  
Kenji Chayama

Author(s):  
A., C. Prasetyo

Overpressure existence represents a geological hazard; therefore, an accurate pore pressure prediction is critical for well planning and drilling procedures, etc. Overpressure is a geological phenomenon usually generated by two mechanisms, loading (disequilibrium compaction) and unloading mechanisms (diagenesis and hydrocarbon generation) and they are all geological processes. This research was conducted based on analytical and descriptive methods integrated with well data including wireline log, laboratory test and well test data. This research was conducted based on quantitative estimate of pore pressures using the Eaton Method. The stages are determining shale intervals with GR logs, calculating vertical stress/overburden stress values, determining normal compaction trends, making cross plots of sonic logs against density logs, calculating geothermal gradients, analyzing hydrocarbon maturity, and calculating sedimentation rates with burial history. The research conducted an analysis method on the distribution of clay mineral composition to determine depositional environment and its relationship to overpressure. The wells include GAP-01, GAP-02, GAP-03, and GAP-04 which has an overpressure zone range at depth 8501-10988 ft. The pressure value within the 4 wells has a range between 4358-7451 Psi. Overpressure mechanism in the GAP field is caused by non-loading mechanism (clay mineral diagenesis and hydrocarbon maturation). Overpressure distribution is controlled by its stratigraphy. Therefore, it is possible overpressure is spread quite broadly, especially in the low morphology of the “GAP” Field. This relates to the delta depositional environment with thick shale. Based on clay minerals distribution, the northern part (GAP 02 & 03) has more clay mineral content compared to the south and this can be interpreted increasingly towards sea (low energy regime) and facies turned into pro-delta. Overpressure might be found shallower in the north than the south due to higher clay mineral content present to the north.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document