Pediatrics

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1978 ◽  
Vol 62 (4s) ◽  
pp. 627-665

Pediatrics, as practiced by practitioners, is and will remain a primary care specialty even though the composition of pediatric practice is changing. Pediatric services presently are equitably provided to children of all economic strata, but there remain unmet needs that may reasonably be expected to be fulfilled in the future with the removal of financial and access barriers as well as increased public education. Pediatricians will be able to meet the projected increase in demand. The increasing trend of pediatricians to practice in groups will continue. More and more of them will develop areas of special interest, but the percentage in purely subspecialty practice is not likely to increase. An arrangement of a group of pediatricians, all with some areas of special interest, working in conjunction with pediatric nurse practitioners or associates and with increased delegation of patient care activities, is likely to become the dominant practice pattern of the future. Pediatricians make substantial contributions to the betterment of society through unpaid community services and perceive a social responsibility, as evidenced by the large extent to which they care for Medicaid patients. There should not be an expansion in the number of subspecialty boards because this would decrease pediatrics' commitment to primary care. There must be a continuation of society's support of medical education that will not alter the supply and therefore the function of pediatricians. It is important for the American Academy of Pediatrics to reassess its members' functions periodically so it can continue to be a dominant force in the planning of future child health care and better fulfill its goal of enhancing the welfare of the children of the nation.

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1979 ◽  
Vol 64 (1) ◽  
pp. 113-114
Author(s):  
Loretta C. Ford

Kahn's article, "The Influence of Funding on the Future of Nurse Practitioner Programs" (p 106) presents the thesis that despite the effectiveness of and the need for nurse prcb actitioners, future programs are in jeopardy because funding sources are inadequate and, further, that the trend to prepare nurse practitioners at the master's level will discourage physician participation to the detriment of the program. I share some of Kahn's concerns on the former issue and challenge him on the latter. My response to Kahn's work, focusing first on the latter issue, offers information and opinion on historic, academic, and professional dimensions of the discussion; clarifies some misconceptions of the nurse practitioner movement and nursing education; and raises questions about the future.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1966 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 136-136
Author(s):  
JAMES G HUGUES

Dr. Towsley, Fellow Members of the Academy and Guests: I should like to express my deep appreciation to all of you for the high honor you have conferred upon me in selecting me as your new President. I assure you that in the year to come I shall do my best to justify your confidence and to serve the Academy to the best of my ability. As Dr. Towsley indicated in his very scholarly analysis of current and future problems associated with the delivery of high quality pediatric care to the vast numbers of children in our present and future populations, this is an exciting era for pediatrics and pediatricians. There are enormous problems to be solved, but it is well to realize that the Academy has enormous strength—strength through its strong organizational pattern at the national and state levels—strength through its numerous committees of experts—and the strength that is associated with solidarity of purpose. With all these advantages, and with the full support of all of you, I face the future confident that we shall find solutions to our problems, and that the American Academy of Pediatrics will continue to play a leading role in affording proper pediatric services for the nation's children. In conclusion, and in the name of the entire membership of the Academy, I should like to express our great affection for you, Harry, and our deep appreciation of your devotion to the work of the Academy, not only during your term as President but also through the many years before. We will be needing your help and guidance in the future, and you should look forward to only a brief rest—after which you will again be in action for the Academy.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1978 ◽  
Vol 61 (6) ◽  
pp. 928-929
Author(s):  
Patricia R. McAtee ◽  
Paul S. Goldstein ◽  
Louis Hochheiser

Through the collaborative efforts of nursing and medicine, a national entry-level certification for pediatric nurse practitioners and associates has been developed and offered. This marked the culmination of a decade of effort in which the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) joined with pediatric nurse practitioners and associates and the faculty of nurse practitioners programs to develop a means of recognizing and accrediting the special skills and competencies of pediatric nurse practitioners and associates. In May of 1977 the National Board of Pediatric Nurse Practitioners and Associates (which includes representation from the AAP, the National Association of Pediatric Nurse Associates and Practitioners [NAPNAP], and the Association of Faculties of Nurse Practitioner and Associate Programs [AFNPP]) announced the certification of 823 pediatric nurse practitioners and associates.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1975 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 568-568
Author(s):  
Morris A. Wessel

The discussions of Patricia McAfee, Henry Silver, and Abraham Bergman in the November issue suggest that some individuals believe that clinical pediatrics as a practitioner's primary role is about to disappear and be replaced by subspecialty colleagues serving hospitalized patients and pediatric nurse practitioners caring for most of the children currently being seen by doctors in private offices, university clinics, and health maintenance organizations. The primary care pediatrician working with or without a pediatric nurse practitioner has many advantages when compared to his counterpart a few decades ago.


2003 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 489-524
Author(s):  
Brent Pollitt

Mental illness is a serious problem in the United States. Based on “current epidemiological estimates, at least one in five people has a diagnosable mental disorder during the course of a year.” Fortunately, many of these disorders respond positively to psychotropic medications. While psychiatrists write some of the prescriptions for psychotropic medications, primary care physicians write more of them. State legislatures, seeking to expand patient access to pharmacological treatment, granted physician assistants and nurse practitioners prescriptive authority for psychotropic medications. Over the past decade other groups have gained some form of prescriptive authority. Currently, psychologists comprise the primary group seeking prescriptive authority for psychotropic medications.The American Society for the Advancement of Pharmacotherapy (“ASAP”), a division of the American Psychological Association (“APA”), spearheads the drive for psychologists to gain prescriptive authority. The American Psychological Association offers five main reasons why legislatures should grant psychologists this privilege: 1) psychologists’ education and clinical training better qualify them to diagnose and treat mental illness in comparison with primary care physicians; 2) the Department of Defense Psychopharmacology Demonstration Project (“PDP”) demonstrated non-physician psychologists can prescribe psychotropic medications safely; 3) the recommended post-doctoral training requirements adequately prepare psychologists to prescribe safely psychotropic medications; 4) this privilege will increase availability of mental healthcare services, especially in rural areas; and 5) this privilege will result in an overall reduction in medical expenses, because patients will visit only one healthcare provider instead of two–one for psychotherapy and one for medication.


PsycCRITIQUES ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 58 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick H. DeLeon ◽  
Michaela Shafer

2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 1890901
Author(s):  
Corry McDonald ◽  
Austin Henderson ◽  
Patrick Barlow ◽  
Jerrod Keith

Author(s):  
Cilgy M. Abraham ◽  
Katherine Zheng ◽  
Allison A. Norful ◽  
Affan Ghaffari ◽  
Jianfang Liu ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document