scholarly journals Nomothetic EORTC IN-PATSAT 32 and idiographic GAS questionnaires in the assessment of surgical treatment in patients with endometrial cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. e1-e7
Author(s):  
Joanna Trawińska ◽  
◽  
Joanna Skręt-Magierło ◽  
Renata Raś ◽  
Bogusław Gawlik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Hospital Care ◽  
Goal Attainment ◽  
Technical Skills ◽  
Satisfaction With Care ◽  
Goal Attainment Scaling ◽  
Personalized Care ◽  
Average Value ◽  
Level Of Satisfaction ◽  
Very High

Introduction: Identification and attainment of the goals of cancer patients is an important aspect of personalized treatment. Aim of the study: The study aimed to assess the following aspects in patients treated surgically for endometrial cancer: 1) level of satisfaction with hospitalization using the EORTC IN-PATSAT32 nomothetic questionnaire; 2) degree of goals attainment using the Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) idiographic questionnaire; 3) correlation between these evaluation methods. Material and method: The study included 123 patients with endometrial cancer (FIGO I–II) treated surgically at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology in Rzeszów in 2012–2014. EORTC IN-PATSAT32 and GAS questionnaires were used. The collected material was analyzed using the Statistica 10.0 software. Results: The overall level of satisfaction measured with the IN-PATSAT32 scale was 72.2 ± 20.5. The technical skills were rated the highest in nurses (74.5 ± 17.6) and doctors (69.3 ± 17.8), while the lowest score was awarded for hospital assess (54.7 ± 23.3). The overall satisfaction with care was 72.2 ± 20.5. In the personalized GAS scale, the patients listed individual expectations before the surgery, assigning ranks to their importance. For most of them, it was a very high (A) or high (B) rank. The patients assigned the highest ranks to quick mobilization, success of the operation, and willingness to be healthy. The average value of the level of goal attainment on the discharge date was 63.7 ± 9.4 points. Statistically significant correlations between the questionnaires were found for the level of goal attainment and the assessment of various aspects of hospital care. Conclusions: The study proved that the EORTC IN-PATSAT32 questionnaire was correlated with GAS questionnaire, and additionally provided knowledge about individual goals of care and the degree of their attainment. The use of nomothetic and idiographic tools gives wider possibilities in the planning and implementation of personalized care.

LRS-Elterngruppenprogramm: Teilnehmerzufriedenheit und subjektive Effektivität

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-57
Author(s):  
Anke Buschmann ◽  
Bettina Multhauf
Keyword(s):  
Goal Attainment ◽  
Goal Attainment Scaling ◽  
Eine Hohe ◽  
Post Test

Zusammenfassung. Das Ziel vorliegender Studie bestand in einer Überprüfung der Akzeptanz und Teilnehmerzufriedenheit eines Gruppentrainings für Eltern von Kindern mit Lese- und/oder Rechtschreibschwierigkeiten. Zudem sollten erste Indikatoren bezüglich der Wirksamkeit des Programmes untersucht werden. Dazu wurden Daten von 25 Müttern zu 2 Messzeitpunkten (Post-Test, 3-Monats-Follow-up) analysiert. Die Probandinnen nahmen über einen Zeitraum von 3 Monaten an 5 Sitzungen des Programms «Mein Kind mit Lese- und Rechtschreibschwierigkeiten verstehen, stärken und unterstützen: Heidelberger Elterntraining zum Umgang mit LRS» teil. Ein Paper-Pencil-Fragebogen diente zum Post-Test der Erhebung von Teilnahmeparametern, der Zufriedenheit mit dem Training, der Relevanz einzelner Themen und der wahrgenommenen Veränderungen in wichtigen Zielbereichen. Zusätzlich kam eine für das Gruppensetting adaptierte Form des Goal Attainment Scaling zum Einsatz, um das Erreichen persönlich relevanter Ziele unmittelbar nach dem Training sowie 3 Monate später zu erfassen. Die Analyse des Fragebogens zeigte eine hohe Partizipationsbereitschaft der Mütter. Die Rahmenbedingungen des Trainings (Gruppengröße, Dauer des Trainings und der Sitzungen) sowie die didaktischen Methoden wurden als ideal und die Themen als relevant eingeschätzt. Die Mütter sahen sich in der Lage, die Inhalte im Alltag anzuwenden und nahmen positive Veränderungen hinsichtlich Einfühlungsvermögen, Unterstützung des Kindes, Hausaufgabensituation und Beziehung zum Kind wahr. Das Ausmaß des Erreichens individueller Ziele zum Post-Test variierte je nach Zielbereich: Einfühlen und Verstehen (75 %), Optimierung der Hausaufgabensituation (76 %), Unterstützung psychosozialer Entwicklung (86 %), Lese-Rechtschreibförderung (60 %) und war auch 3 Monate später noch vergleichbar hoch. Die Überprüfung der Wirksamkeit hinsichtlich einer Belastungsreduktion und Kompetenzstärkung seitens der Eltern erfolgt aktuell im Vergleich zu einer unbehandelten Kontrollgruppe.

scholarly journals Family involvement and patient-experienced improvement and satisfaction with care: a nationwide cross-sectional study in Danish psychiatric hospitals

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie Louise Svendsen ◽  
Trine Ellegaard ◽  
Karoline Agerbo Jeppesen ◽  
Erik Riiskjær ◽  
Berit Kjærside Nielsen
Keyword(s):  
Psychiatric Hospital ◽  
Hospital Care ◽  
Psychiatric Hospitals ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Satisfaction With Care ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Caregiver Relationship ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Caregiver Involvement

Abstract Background Randomised controlled trials suggest that family therapy has a positive effect on the course of depression, schizophrenia and anorexia nervosa. However, it is largely unknown whether a positive link also exists between caregiver involvement and patient outcome in everyday psychiatric hospital care, using information reported directly from patients, i.e. patient-reported experience measures (PREM), and their caregivers. The objective of this study is to examine whether caregiver-reported involvement is associated with PREM regarding patient improvement and overall satisfaction with care. Methods Using data from the National Survey of Psychiatric Patient Experiences 2018, we conducted a nationwide cross-sectional study in Danish psychiatric hospitals including patients and their caregivers who had been in contact with the hospital (n = 940 patients, n = 1008 caregivers). A unique patient identifier on the two distinct questionnaires for the patient and their caregiver enabled unambiguous linkage of data. In relation to PREM, five aspects of caregiver involvement were analysed using logistic regression with adjustment for patient age, sex and diagnosis. Results We consistently find that high caregiver-reported involvement is statistically significantly associated with high patient-reported improvement and overall satisfaction with care with odds ratios (OR) ranging from 1.69 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.95–2.99) to 4.09 (95% CI 2.48–6.76). This applies to the following aspects of caregiver-reported involvement: support for the patient-caregiver relationship, caregiver information, consideration for caregiver experiences and the involvement of caregivers in decision making. No statistically significant association is observed regarding whether caregivers talk to the staff about their expectations for the hospital contact. Conclusion This nationwide study implies that caregiver involvement focusing on the patient-caregiver relationship is positively associated with patient improvement and overall satisfaction with care in everyday psychiatric hospital care.

Treatment of Older Women With Endometrial Cancer: Improving Outcomes With Personalized Care

2016 ◽  
pp. 164-174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda Duska ◽  
Armin Shahrokni ◽  
Melanie Powell
Keyword(s):  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Older Women ◽  
Practical Implication ◽  
Gynecologic Cancer ◽  
Tumor Biology ◽  
Multidisciplinary Care ◽  
Technical Aspect ◽  
Older Patient ◽  
Personalized Care ◽  
Care Surgery

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic cancer, and with a median age of 62 at diagnosis, it affects a significant number of older women. With increasing age and obesity rates in the world’s population, there is an anticipated concomitant increase in older women with endometrial cancer. Older women are more likely to die of endometrial cancer compared with younger patients. Reasons for this include more aggressive tumor biology, less favorable clinicopathologic features, and more advanced disease. Other factors, however, such as reluctance to offer surgical treatment to the older patient and increased complications of treatment are likely to be important. Management of endometrial cancer requires multidisciplinary care (surgery, radiation therapy, and systemic therapy). For each treatment, the feasibility (related to technical aspect of the procedure/treatment), side effects and safety (related to older-patient factors), and the overall benefit as it pertains to older women with endometrial cancer should be assessed carefully with a multidisciplinary approach. Despite the importance of these issues, the data are limited to answer these issues with clarity. In this article, we will review each treatment modality for older women with endometrial cancer. We will introduce the components of comprehensive geriatric assessment and their practical implication for older women with cancer in general and older women with endometrial cancer specifically.

The Research on Computation of Researchers Certainty Factor of Bridge's Durability Evaluation Based on the Indeterminate AHP

2014 ◽  
Vol 578-579 ◽  
pp. 1469-1472
Author(s):  
Xiao Zhen Chen ◽  
Xue Jun Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Lower Bound ◽  
Similarity Theory ◽  
Research Result ◽  
Weight Coefficient ◽  
Practical Experience ◽  
Relative Importance ◽  
Certainty Factor ◽  
Average Value ◽  
Judgment Matrix ◽  
Very High

Because of fuzziness, uncertainty of structure and researchers practical experience, it is more practical to express the relative importance of indexes with interval number. Firstly, according to researchers indeterminate judgment matrix, the upper and lower bound matrixes are formed; secondly, the similarity and the differences of the upper and lower bound matrixes of the relative importance matrix from different experts is studied by using the similarity theory of vector; lastly, certainty factor of researchers according to the upper and lower bound matrixes can be calculated, and the average value is regarded as the researchers certainty factor. The certainty factors of researchers upper and lower bound matrixes are consider together, the researchers experience is fully considered and the error from indeterminate judgment matrix to indeterminate judgment matrix is avoided. The result affords basis to calculate the weight coefficient, the research result comparing with the other method showed that the computation accuracy in this paper was very high.

Feasibility of Goal Attainment Scaling in Chronic Low Back Pain: Protocol for Training & Implementation in an Outpatient Physical Therapy Setting (Preprint)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas Haladay ◽  
Rebecca Edgeworth Ditwiler ◽  
Aimee Klein ◽  
Rebecca Miro ◽  
Matthew Lazinski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Therapy ◽  
Clinical Setting ◽  
Goal Attainment ◽  
Physical Therapists ◽  
The United States ◽  
Goal Attainment Scaling ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Qualitative Phase

BACKGROUND Patient engagement in decisions regarding their healthcare may lead to improved outcomes and improved adherence to treatment plans. While there are several options for involving patients in their healthcare, goal setting is a readily accessible method for physical therapists to increase the involvement of patients in healthcare decisions. Physical therapy goals are often provider-generated and based on subjective information or standardized fixed-item patient-reported outcome measures. However, these outcome measures may provide a limited scope of activity and participation limitations which may not capture the needs of individual patients. Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) is a patient-centered approach to involving patients in setting meaningful goals. While GAS has been shown to be reliable, valid, and sensitive to change in various population, there is limited evidence in the United States about utilizing GAS in the physical therapist management of patients with low back pain (LBP). OBJECTIVE The purpose of this report is to describe the protocol for a study to a) develop an application of GAS procedures to be used by physical therapists treating patients with chronic LBP in the United States and b) to test the feasibility of applying GAS procedures in chronic LBP in an outpatient physical therapy setting. METHODS This study will use a mixed-methods design with two (2) phases (Phase 1: Qualitative, Phase 2: Quantitative). The qualitative phase of the study will employ focus groups of patients with chronic LBP to identify an inventory of goals that are important and measurable. This inventory will be used to develop a series of leading questions that will allow physical therapists to assist patients in establishing goals in the clinical setting. The quantitative phase of the study will pilot-test the inventory developed in the qualitative arm in patients with chronic LBP to determine feasibility, reliability, validity, and responsiveness. We will also compare how well GAS captures change over time as compared to traditional fixed-item patient-reported measures. RESULTS We anticipate that this study will demonstrate that GAS can be implemented successfully by outpatient physical therapists, and it will demonstrate clinically important changes that are important to patients with chronic LBP. CONCLUSIONS GAS represents an opportunity for patient-centered care in the physical therapy management of chronic LBP. While GAS is not new, it has never been studied in a real-world clinical setting for the physical therapy management of chronic LBP which have unique time and productivity constraints. For GAS to be successfully implemented in this environment, we must demonstrate that clinicians can be trained efficiently and reliably, that GAS can be implemented in the clinical setting in under 15 minutes, and that GAS is able to detect clinically meaningful change in patient outcomes. CLINICALTRIAL N/A

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document