scholarly journals Exploring Effectiveness of Computer-Aided Planning in Implant Positioning for a Single Immediate Implant Placement

2016 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 233-239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander R. Edelmann ◽  
Bashir Hosseini ◽  
Warren C. Byrd ◽  
John S. Preisser ◽  
Donald A. Tyndall ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Small Volume ◽  
Implant Position ◽  
Box Plots ◽  
Implant Positioning ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Computer Aided ◽  
Immediate Implants ◽  
Immediate Implant ◽  
Cone Beam Computerized Tomography ◽  
Computer Aided Planning

The value of computer-aided implant planning using cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) for single immediate implants was explored. Eighteen patients requiring extraction of a tooth followed by a single immediate implant were enrolled. Small volume preoperative CBCT scans were used to plan the position of the implant. A taper screwed–type implant was immediately placed into a fresh socket using only the final 1 or 2 drills for osteotomy. Postoperative CBCTs were used for the analysis of actual implant placement positioning. Measurements of the planned and the actual implant position were made with respect to their position relative to the adjacent teeth. Mesio-distal displacements and the facial-lingual deviation of the implant from the planned position were determined. Changes in the angulation of the planned and actual implant position in relation to the clinical crown were also measured. To statistically summarize the results, box plots and 95% CIs for means of paired differences were used. The analysis showed no statistical difference between the planned position and final implant placement position in any measurement. The CBCT scans coupled with the computer-aided implant planning program along with a final 1-to-2 drill protocol may improve the accuracy of single immediate implant placement for taper screwed–type implants.

scholarly journals Diagnosis and treatment of extraction sockets in preparation for implant placement: report of three cases

2008 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 159-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Márcio José Rodrigues Barcelos ◽  
Arthur Belém Novaes Júnior ◽  
Marcio Baltazar Conz ◽  
Nassin David Harari ◽  
Guaracilei Maciel Vidigal Júnior
Keyword(s):  
Bone Defect ◽  
Root Resorption ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Receptor Site ◽  
Wall Defect ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Immediate Implants ◽  
Immediate Implant ◽  
Defect Morphology ◽  
Subsequent Intervention

This article addresses diagnostic parameters that should be assessed in the treatment of extraction sockets with dental implant placement by presenting three case reports that emphasize the relevance of the amount of remaining bone walls. Diagnosis was based on the analysis of clinical and radiographic parameters (e.g.: bone defect morphology, remaining bone volume, presence of infections on the receptor site). Case 1 presents a 5-wall defect in the maxillary right central incisor region with severe root resorption, which was treated with immediate implant placement. Cases 2 and 3 present, respectively, two- and three-wall bone defects that did not have indication for immediate implants. These cases were first submitted to a guided bone regeneration (GBR) procedure with bone graft biomaterial and membrane barriers, and the implants were installed in a second surgical procedure. The analysis of the preoperative periodontal condition of the adjacent teeth and bone defect morphology is extremely important because these factors determine the choice between immediate implant or GBR treatment followed by implant installation in a subsequent intervention.

scholarly journals Immediate Implant Placement by Interradicular Bone Drilling before Molar Extraction: Clinical Case Report with One-Year Follow-Up

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stuardo Valenzuela ◽  
José M. Olivares ◽  
Nicolás Weiss ◽  
Dafna Benadof
Keyword(s):  
Survival Rates ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Primary Stability ◽  
Bone Drilling ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Immediate Implants ◽  
Immediate Implant ◽  
One Year ◽  
Molar Extraction

The placement of immediate implants in the posterior sector is a widespread procedure where the success and survival rates are similar to those of traditional protocols. It has several anatomical challenges, such as the presence of interradicular bone septa that hinder a correct three-dimensional positioning of the implant and may compromise primary stability and/or cause damage of neighboring structures. The aim of this article is to present the treatment and the one-year clinical follow-up of a patient who received immediate implant placement using an interradicular bone-drilling technique before the molar extraction.

scholarly journals Errors in Implant Positioning Due to Lack of Planning: A Clinical Case Report of New Prosthetic Materials and Solutions

Materials ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
pp. 1883 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Tallarico ◽  
Roberto Scrascia ◽  
Marco Annucci ◽  
Silvio Mario Meloni ◽  
Aurea Immacolata Lumbau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Treatment Plan ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Primary Treatment ◽  
High Survival ◽  
Adequate Treatment ◽  
Implant Position ◽  
Implant Positioning ◽  
Implant Placement

The achievement of the optimal implant position is a critical consideration in implant surgery, as it can facilitate the ideal prosthesis design and allow adequate oral hygiene maintenance. The switch from bone-driven to prosthetic-driven implant placement, through a comprehensive diagnosis and adequate treatment plan, is a prerequisite for long-term successful implant-based therapy. The aim of the present case report is to describe a step-by-step prosthetic retreatment of a patient with primary treatment failure due to incorrect dental implant placement. Although dental implants achieve high survival rates, the success of implant prosthetic therapy significantly relies on an appropriate implant position. Malpositioned implants can cause damage to vital structures, like nerves or vessels. Moreover, improper implant positioning can result in esthetic, biological, and technical complications and can, in extreme situations, render the desired prosthetic rehabilitation impossible to achieve.

scholarly journals Implant Therapy in the Esthetic Zone-Surgical Considerations

2016 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 83-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aleksa Marković ◽  
T. Mišić
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Time ◽  
Implant Positioning ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Individual Assessment ◽  
Complex Procedure ◽  
Immediate Implant ◽  
Implant Therapy ◽  
And Function ◽  
Selection Of

Summary Implant placement in the esthetic zone is a complex procedure and requires a restoration-driven approach. Proper selection of patients and implant together with individual assessment of the risk of esthetic complications are very important. Correct 3D-implant positioning and sufficient bone volume should provide long-term esthetic and function. Esthetic region is a zone in which expectations and possibilities collide. Clinician should bring the important decision on the appropriate time of implant placement. Immediate implant placement is particularly challenging in the esthetic zone. Patient desire for reduced treatment time should be weighed against the possible risk factors. Protocol of immediate implant placement in conditions of unfavourable gingival biotypes, the lack of bone or soft tissue in patients with a high smile line lead to esthetic failure which is very important in the esthetic region.

scholarly journals Immediate Implant Placement: Report of Case Series

2015 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 113-115
Author(s):  
M. Koray ◽  
I. Ozcan ◽  
B. Alkan ◽  
O. Kesmez ◽  
H. Tanyeri
Keyword(s):  
Tooth Extraction ◽  
Alveolar Bone ◽  
Treatment Time ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Surgical Interventions ◽  
3 Dimensional ◽  
Implant Positioning ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Immediate Placement ◽  
Immediate Implant

SUMMARYObjective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of immediate postextraction implant placement. Immediate placement of dental implants have been claimed of the potential advantages such as reductions in the number of surgical interventions, a shorter treatment time, an ideal 3-dimensional implant positioning, the presumptive preservation of alveolar bone at the site of the tooth extraction and soft tissue aesthetics.Method: In this case series we reported to extract 15 teeth in 12 patients (8 males; 4 females, mean age: 46.08 years) and replace the teeth with implants immediately.Results: There were no signs of inflammation or infection and none of the patients had complaints subsequently. All implants were osseointegrated at the time of abutment connection. Postoperative healing was uneventful in all of the patients. No complications were observed.Conclusion: Within the limits of the present study, immediate implant placement was a predictable treatment.

scholarly journals Contribution of the PDL to Osteotomy Repair and Implant Osseointegration

2017 ◽  
Vol 96 (8) ◽  
pp. 909-916 ◽  
Author(s):  
X. Pei ◽  
L. Wang ◽  
C. Chen ◽  
X. Yuan ◽  
Q. Wan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Formation ◽  
Titanium Implants ◽  
Multiple Time ◽  
New Bone Formation ◽  
Extraction Socket ◽  
Minimally Invasive Surgical ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Extraction Site ◽  
Immediate Implants ◽  
Immediate Implant

Our objective was to clarify the fate of the periodontal ligament (PDL) retained in the socket after tooth extraction, then determine if this tissue contributed to the osseointegration of “immediate” implants placed in these fresh extraction sockets. Mice underwent maxillary first molar extraction, the residual PDL was removed by an osteotomy, and titanium implants were placed. The osteotomy was created in such a way that the palatal surface was devoid of PDL remnants while the buccal, mesial, and distal surfaces retained PDL fibers. At multiple time points after surgery, tissues were analyzed using a battery of molecular, cellular, and histomorphometrical assays. We found that PDL remnants mineralized and directly contributed to new bone formation in the extraction site. Compared with regions of an extraction site where the PDL was removed by osteotomy, regions that retained PDL fibers had produced significantly more new bone. Around immediate implants, the retained PDL remnants directly contributed to new bone formation and osseointegration. Thus, we conclude that PDL remnants are inherently osteogenic, and if the tissue is healthy, it is reasonable to conclude that curetting out an extraction socket prior to immediate implant placement should be avoided. This recommendation aligns with contemporary trends toward minimally invasive surgical manipulations of the extraction socket prior to immediate implant placement.

scholarly journals Five-Year Follow-up of an Immediate Implant Placement in the Aesthetic Zone

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 76-79
Author(s):  
Bhageshwar Dhami ◽  
Priti Shrestha
Keyword(s):  
Alveolar Bone ◽  
Treatment Time ◽  
Maxillary Central Incisor ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Surgical Extraction ◽  
Immediate Implants ◽  
Tissue Changes ◽  
Immediate Implant ◽  
The Aesthetic

Immediate implants are placed in the site of surgical extraction of the tooth to be replaced. The percentage success of such procedures varies among authors from 94-100%. Immediate implant placement is most commonly indicated when tooth extraction is done with pathologies not amenable to treatment. The advantages include reduced post-extraction alveolar bone resorption, shortened treatment time, and the avoidance of a second surgical intervention with regard to delayed implantation. This report describes a case of immediate implant placed in a maxillary central incisor followed by evaluation of soft and hard tissue changes occurring during post-operative period with a follow-up at five years.

scholarly journals Molar Septum Expansion with Osseodensification for Immediate Implant Placement, Retrospective Multicenter Study with Up-to-5-Year Follow-Up, Introducing a New Molar Socket Classification

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 66
Author(s):  
Samvel Bleyan ◽  
João Gaspar ◽  
Salah Huwais ◽  
Charles Schwimer ◽  
Ziv Mazor ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Survival Rate ◽  
Site Preparation ◽  
Insertion Torque ◽  
Implant Survival ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Implant Survival Rate ◽  
Immediate Implants ◽  
Immediate Implant ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Molar Extraction

The ideal positioning of immediate implants in molar extraction sockets often requires the osteotomy to be in the interradicular septum, which can be challenging in some cases, with traditional site preparation techniques. Patients who had undergone molar tooth extraction and immediate implant placement at five different centers, and followed up between August 2015 and September 2020, were evaluated. Inclusion criteria were use of the osseodensification technique for implant site preparation. The primary outcome was septum width measurement pre-instrumentation and osteotomy diameter post expansion. Clinical outcomes, such as implant insertion torque (ISQ) and implant survival rate, were also collected. A total of 131 patients, who received 145 immediate implants, were included. The mean overall septum width at baseline was 3.3 mm and the mean osteotomy diameter post instrumentation was 4.65 mm. A total of ten implants failed: seven within the healing period and three after loading; resulting in a cumulative implant survival rate of 93.1%. This retrospective study showed that osseodensification is a predictable method for immediate implant placement with interradicular septum expansion in molar extraction sockets. Furthermore, it allowed the introduction of a new molar socket classification. In the future, well-designed controlled clinical studies are needed to confirm these results and further explore the potential advantages of this technique.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document