scholarly journals Nurses' performance on hospital discharge: patients' point of view

2007 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 345-350 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniele Alcalá Pompeo ◽  
Maria Helena Pinto ◽  
Claudia Bernardi Cesarino ◽  
Renilda Rosa Dias Ferreira de Araújo ◽  
Nadia Antonia Aparecida Poletti
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Hospital Discharge ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Educational Process ◽  
Discharge Process ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Discharge Instructions ◽  
Effective Discharge ◽  
Number Of Patients

OBJECTIVE: To know the hospital discharge process in place and the nurses' performance in preparing patients for discharge. METHODS: A descriptive study using semi-structured interviews was used to collect data from 43 patients of medical-surgical units of a major teaching hospital in the state of São Paulo, Brazil. RESULTS: The majority of patients (83.72%) received tailored discharge instructions. However, a great number of patients (72.08%) reported discharge instructions were not given by nurses. Almost a half of patients (48.84%) reported that discharge instructions were given by their physicians. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study provide insights to improve the educational process of new nurses and their preparation to provide effective discharge instructions. There is also a need to design and implement a hospital discharge process that promotes the participation of interdisciplinary health care providers who are involved in patient clinical care. This discharge process might be an effective way to change health care providers' attitude toward discharge instructions.

Health Care Services in Shopping Centers: A Routine Mass-Gathering Event

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 669-675
Author(s):  
Mehmet Ali Ceyhan ◽  
Gültekin Günhan Demir
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Medical Care ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Health Care Services ◽  
Shopping Centers ◽  
Medical Conditions ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Care Services ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Number Of Customers

AbstractBackground:Shopping centers (SCs) are social areas with a group of commercial establishments which attract customers of numerous people every day. However, analysis of urgent health conditions and provided health care in SCs has not been performed so far.Objective:The aim of the study was to perform a comparative analysis of clients visiting SCs and demographics, complaints, and health care of patients admitted to Emergency Medical Intervention Units (EMIU) located in grand SCs in Ankara, Turkey.Methods:Customer and health care records of nine grand SCs in Ankara from January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 were evaluated retrospectively. Health care services in EMIUs of SCs were provided by employed medical staff. Data including demographic characteristics, complaints, treatment protocols, discharge, and referral to hospital of the patients were retrospectively analyzed from medical registration forms.Results:Medical records of nine grand SCs were analyzed. Number of customers could not be obtained in three SCs due to privacy issues and were not included in patient presentation rate (PPR) and transport-to-hospital rate (TTHR) calculation. Total number of customers in the remaining six SCs were 53,277,239. The total number of patients seeking medical care was 6,749. The number of patients seeking health care in six SCs with known number of customers was 4,498 and PPR ranged from 0.018 to 0.381 patients per 1,000 attendants. The median age of the recorded 4,065 patients (60.2%) was 28 (interquartile range [IQR]: 38-21), and 3,611 (53.5%) of the patients admitted to EMIUs were female. The number of patients treated in the SC was 4,634 (68.6%) and 189 patients (2.8%) were transferred-to-hospital by ambulance for further evaluation and treatment. Transportation to hospital was required in 125 patients who sought medical care in six SCs which provided total number of customers, and TTHR ranged from 0.000 to 0.005 patients per 1,000 attendants. No sudden cardiac death was seen. Medical conditions were the primary reasons for seeking health care. The most frequent causes of presentation were laceration and abrasions (639 patients, 9.4%).Conclusion:The PPR and TTHR in SCs are low. The most common causes of presentation are minor conditions and injuries. Majority of urgent medical conditions in SCs can be managed by health care providers in EMIUs.

Why Do Patients Choose Chemotherapy Near the End of Life? A Review of the Perspective of Those Facing Death From Cancer

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (21) ◽  
pp. 3490-3496 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robin Matsuyama ◽  
Sashidhar Reddy ◽  
Thomas J. Smith
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Decision Aids ◽  
Good Choice ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Small Benefit ◽  
Realistic Information

Purpose The number of patients receiving chemotherapy near the end of life is increasing, as are concerns about goals of treatment, toxicity, and costs. We sought to determine the available sources of knowledge, the choices, and concerns of actual patients, and how patients balanced competing issues. Methods We used a literature search from 1980 to present. Results Available patient sources provide little information about prognosis, choices, alternatives, consequences, or how to choose. Many patients would choose chemotherapy for a small benefit in health outcomes, and for a smaller benefit than perceived by their health care providers for their own treatment. Adverse effects are less a concern for patients than for their well health care providers. There are no decision aids to assist patients with metastatic disease in making their choices, such as there are for adjuvant breast therapy. Conclusion The perspective of the patient is different from that of a well person. Patients are willing to undergo treatments that have small benefits with major toxicity. Receiving realistic information about the different options of care and the likelihood of successful treatment or adverse effects is difficult. These factors may explain some of the increased use of chemotherapy near the end of life. Decision aids and honest, unbiased sources to inform patients of their prognosis, choices, consequences, typical outcomes, and ways to make decisions are needed. More prospective information about how patients make their choices, and what they would consider a good choice, would assist informed decision making.

scholarly journals Number needed to treat: A primer for neurointerventionalists

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 613-618 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Carlos Martinez-Gutierrez ◽  
Thabele Leslie-Mazwi ◽  
Ronil V Chandra ◽  
Kevin L Ong ◽  
Raul G Nogueira ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Clinical Trial Data ◽  
Number Needed To Treat ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Key Stakeholders ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Statin Drugs

Background The number needed to treat is a commonly used statistical term in modern neurointerventional practice. It represents the number of patients that need to be treated for one patient to benefit from an intervention. Given its growing popularity in reflecting study results, understanding the basics behind this statistic is of practical value to the neurointerventionalist. Methods Here, we review the basic theory and calculation of the number needed to treat, its application to stroke interventions, and its limitations. In addition, we demonstrate several simple methods of calculating the number needed to treat utilizing recent thrombectomy trial results. By presenting the number needed to treat as a universal metric, we provide a comprehensive comparative of the number needed to treat for key stroke therapies, including mechanical thrombectomy, tissue plasminogen activator, carotid endarterectomy, and prevention with antiplatelet and statin drugs. Conclusions In comparison with available stroke therapies, mechanical thrombectomy stands out as the most effective acute intervention in patients with emergent large-vessel occlusions. Understanding how the number needed to treat is derived and its implications helps provide perspective to clinical trial data, identify health-care resource priorities, and improve communication with patients, health-care providers, and additional key stakeholders.

scholarly journals Trustworthy Augmented Intelligence in Health Care

2022 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elliott Crigger ◽  
Karen Reinbold ◽  
Chelsea Hanson ◽  
Audiey Kao ◽  
Kathleen Blake ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Medical Community ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Innovative Technologies ◽  
Quadruple Aim ◽  
Regulatory Systems ◽  
Starting Point ◽  
Reducing Costs

AbstractAugmented Intelligence (AI) systems have the power to transform health care and bring us closer to the quadruple aim: enhancing patient experience, improving population health, reducing costs, and improving the work life of health care providers. Earning physicians' trust is critical for accelerating adoption of AI into patient care. As technology evolves, the medical community will need to develop standards for these innovative technologies and re-visit current regulatory systems that physicians and patients rely on to ensure that health care AI is responsible, evidence-based, free from bias, and designed and deployed to promote equity. To develop actionable guidance for trustworthy AI in health care, the AMA reviewed literature on the challenges health care AI poses and reflected on existing guidance as a starting point for addressing those challenges (including models for regulating the introduction of innovative technologies into clinical care).

scholarly journals Evaluating usability, effectiveness, and usage of telehealth technologies

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Mirna Becevic
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Access To Care ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
New Technologies ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Traditional Approach ◽  
Additional Stress ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Medical Specialties ◽  
Number Of Patients

Affordable Care Act (ACA) has allowed more patients that did not previously have health care insurance to have coverage and access to care. This increase in the number of patients seeking medical care will only add additional stress to the existing disproportion of supply and demand for health care providers. In addition, rising health care costs have major effect on how, where, and even if consumers will get needed care. This study examined three different telehealth platforms in three different medical specialties in order to evaluate the perception that they would be appropriate vehicles for increasing access to care. I also wanted to find out what the users' perceptions of these technologies are, as that can be a driving factor in adoption of new technologies. The first study examined the usability and acceptance of new mobile application in teledermatology clinic. The second study focused on usability and acceptance of ICU Robots in a medical ICU. Finally, the third study evaluated if children and youth currently using telepsychiatry as a care delivery method would have other in-person options if telehealth was not available. The results of these three studies point at the complexity and richness of telehealth. The adoption and acceptance of mHealth was very fast and streamlined. In the same fashion, children might not have other appropriate options for care if telepsychiatry was not available in rural Missouri. Interestingly, though, the provider acceptance of ICU Robots was slow, with some provider disengagements observed. This research contributes to the field of health informatics and medical informatics by evaluating adoption and usability of technologies from the provider perspective, vs. the more traditional approach of examining patient satisfaction, or even provider satisfaction without fully understanding the implications of attitudes on the adoption itself. This study has focused purposefully on different groups of providers using different types of telehealth technologies so we could try to see the bigger picture of how telehealth actually contributes to the health care organizational structure.

scholarly journals COVID-19 Infection Rate among Dental Health Care Workers

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Guy Tobias
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Dental Treatment ◽  
Dental Health ◽  
Health Maintenance Organization ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Waiting Room ◽  
Health Maintenance ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Public Clinics

Background: First infections of COVID-19 pandemic occurred in December 2019 in China and then spread rapidly all over the world. In February 2020, the first Corona case was diagnosed in Israel, since then, three national lockdowns have been imposed. Israeli Ministry of health published guidelines for dental treatment during times of social distancing which include: 1) Questioning patients prior to admittance. 2) Increasing intervals between appointments. 3) Restricting number of people permitted in the waiting room to prevent crowds. 4) Wearing masks at all times. 5) Wearing long sleeve waterproof surgical gowns, goggles / face shield. Methods: Data from 54 dental clinics (MaccabiDent health maintenance organization) were collected between March and October 2020 regarding: 1) Number of treatments performed. 2) Number of health care providers participating in the procedures. 3) Number of patients with positive COVID-19 results. 4) Number of healthcare workers positive for COVID-19. 5) Number of paramedical and administrative staff positive for COVID-19. 6) Number of patients treated by dentists who later turned out to be infected by the virus. Results: 1,079 dentists and 354 dental hygienists worked during the study period, and performed 1.29 million procedures of these, seventy eight dentists treated 99 verified COVID-19 patients. 17 dentists (1.58%) tested positive for the virus. Conclusion: By following guidelines, the risk of transmission of coronavirus is minimal in the dental setting. Practical Implications: This article reinforces the evidence regarding the importance of education and following guidelines regarding infection control for dental professionals employed in public clinics.

scholarly journals Identifying the know-do gap in evidence-based neonatal care practices among informal health care providers—A cross-sectional study from Ujjain, India

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isaac Gikandi Mungai ◽  
Sumit Singh Baghel ◽  
Suchi Soni ◽  
Shailja Vagela ◽  
Megha Sharma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Service Providers ◽  
Neonatal Resuscitation ◽  
Neonatal Care ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Evidence Based Practices ◽  
Number Of Patients

Abstract Background More than a quarter of global neonatal deaths are reported from India, and a large proportion of these deaths are preventable. However, in the absence of robust public health care systems in several states in India, informal health care providers (IHCPs) with no formal medical education are the first contact service providers. The aim of this study was to assess the knowledge of IHCPs in basic evidence-based practices in neonatal care in Ujjain district and investigated factors associated with differences in levels of knowledge. Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted using a questionnaire with multiple-choice questions covering the basic elements of neonatal care. The collective score per question among the respondents was calculated. The score achieved by each respondent was calculated, grouped into either “fair” or “low”, and then checked for association with the practitioners’ age and years of experience, number of patients examined per day, and whether they attended children in their practice. Results Of the 945 IHCPs approached, 830 (88%) participated in the study. Of the potential 39,840 points, only an average of 18,483 (46%) were achieved, indicating a knowledge gap. Although these providers could identify key tenets of enhancing survival chances of neonates, they scored low on the specifics of cord care, breastfeeding, vitamin K use to prevent neonatal hemorrhage, and identification and care of low-birth-weight babies. The practitioners particularly lacked knowledge about neonatal resuscitation, and only a small proportion reported following up on immunizations in children they attended. Fair knowledge of IHCPs was significantly associated with attending more than 10 but less than 50 patients per day and of being aged between 35 and 45 years. Offering pediatric consultations was not significantly associated with achieving a fair score. Conclusions The present study highlighted that know-do gap exists in evidence-based practices for all key areas of neonatal care tested among the IHCPs. The study provides the evidence that educational interventions targeting IHCPs can improve neonatal care services and is an innovative way to reach a large rural population in the study setting.

Medicine, Spirituality, Religion, and Psychology

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelly M. Trevino ◽  
Kenneth I. Pargament
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Large Body ◽  
Spiritual Needs ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Religion And Psychology ◽  
And Coping ◽  
The Relationship

The current chapter examines the relationship between religion/spirituality (R/S) and medicine through the psychological lens of a religious coping framework. This relationship is considered at the theoretical, patient, caregiver, and care team levels. The R/S beliefs, practices, and coping strategies of patients, informal caregivers, and health care providers in the context of illness is then discussed. A large body of research demonstrates the important role of R/S in how patients and caregivers understand and cope with illness. Similarly, many health care providers view illness and their clinical care through a R/S lens and believe that attending to patients’ spiritual needs is part of their professional role. The chapter concludes with a brief review of psycho-spiritual interventions in medical populations.

scholarly journals Dietary Supplements: Knowledge and Adverse Event Reporting Practices of Department of Defense Health Care Providers

2020 ◽  
Vol 185 (11-12) ◽  
pp. 2076-2081
Author(s):  
Melissa Rittenhouse ◽  
Jonathan Scott ◽  
Patricia Deuster
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Adverse Event ◽  
Dietary Supplements ◽  
Drug Administration ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Department Of Defense ◽  
Food And Drug Administration ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Reporting Practices

Abstract Introduction The purpose of the study was to assess the knowledge of dietary supplements (DS) and adverse event (AE) reporting practices of the Department of Defense health care providers. AEs related to use of DS are not uncommon. However, it is estimated that less than 2% of AEs are reported. This is problematic given the Food and Drug Administration relies on AE reports to identify and ultimately remove unsafe products from the market. Inadequate reporting of AE puts all DS users at risk. Materials and Methods Cross-sectional design was used. Electronic surveys were sent to the Department of Defense health care professionals (HCPs) and Emergency Medicine (EM) physicians asking questions about practices regarding DS and AE knowledge and reporting behaviors. The surveys were open for 5 months. During this period of time, HCPs received three email reminders following the initial email to enhance participation. The computer package IBM SPSS version 25 software (IBM Corp. Released 2017. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 21.0, Armonk, New York) was used for statistical analysis. Frequency distributions of the responses were analyzed. Results Of the 1,700 surveyed, 270 HCPs and 68 EM physicians completed the surveys. At least 39% of HCPs reported never receiving formal DS training. Seventy-two percent of HCPs reported asking their patients about the use of DS. However, when asked if they knew where to report an AE, only 40% of HCPs knew where to report an AE and only 38% knew how to report an AE. Of the EM physicians, only 38% asked their patients about DS. However, a majority (78%) reported that they had encountered an AE. EM physicians also reported they lacked knowledge regarding where (87%) and how (87%) to report AE. Conclusions It is clear that physician and nonphysician HCPs would benefit from additional training about DS and how and where to report suspected AE. Providing regular training on risks, common AE, and how and where to report an AE would help fill the knowledge gap in the ever-changing DS industry. Addressing these issues and coming up with a solution to integrating AE reporting into clinical care could improve health care practices and increase AE reporting to the Food and Drug Administration, which would have a beneficial impact on patient care, public safety, and mission readiness.

scholarly journals Use of Standardized Patients in Endocrinology Fellowship Programs to Teach Competent Transgender Care

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary O Stevenson ◽  
R Craig Sineath ◽  
J Sonya Haw ◽  
Vin Tangpricha
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Medical Knowledge ◽  
Standardized Patients ◽  
Standardized Patient ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Patient Encounter ◽  
Self Assessment

Abstract Purpose Transgender and gender-nonconforming individuals have unique health care needs and have difficulty accessing health care services because of a lack of qualified health care providers, insurance coverage, mistreatment, and bias by the medical community. Medical trainees and physicians report a lack of education in, and exposure to, the clinical care and unique aspects of this field. We assessed the use of a standardized patient as a tool to evaluate 4 core medical competencies (patient care, medical knowledge, professionalism, and interpersonal communication) of endocrinology fellows at a single training program. Methods Endocrine fellows were evaluated by faculty in different aspects of transgender care and completed a self-assessment before and after the exercise. Faculty viewed the fellows during the Objective Clinical Structured Examination. Fellows were provided feedback by a faculty member and the standardized patient after the exercise. Results Deficits were found in patient care and professionalism. Fellows scored well in medical knowledge. Fellows did not report an improvement in comfort and communication skills after the exercise. Interestingly, fellows’ self-assessment scores in several domains declined after the standardized patient encounter, highlighting an occasion for self-reflection and growth within the realms of cultural competency and medical knowledge. Main conclusions We conclude that use of standardized patients to teach medical competencies in transgender medicine may be one approach to improve exposure to, and training in, transgender medicine. Endocrine fellows still had discomfort treating transgender individuals after the standardized patient encounter and require other training activities that may include didactics and clinical case discussions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document