scholarly journals Field calibration of DFM capacitance probes for continuous soil moisture monitoring

Water SA ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 47 (1 January) ◽  
Author(s):  
L Myeni ◽  
ME Moeletsi ◽  
AD Clulow
Keyword(s):  
Soil Moisture ◽  
Soil Depth ◽  
Regression Function ◽  
Linear Functions ◽  
Soil Types ◽  
Coefficient Of Determination ◽  
Site Specific ◽  
Calibration Equations ◽  
Soil Moisture Monitoring

This study was undertaken to derive textural and lumped site-specific calibration equations for Dirk Friedhelm Mercker (DFM) capacitance probes and evaluate the accuracy levels of the developed calibration equations for continuous soil moisture monitoring in three selected soil types. At each site, 9 probes (3 per plot) were installed in 2 m2 plots, for continuous soil moisture measurements at 5 different depths (viz. 10, 20, 30, 40 and 60 cm) under dry, moist and wet field conditions. Textural site-specific calibration equations were derived by grouping the same soil textural classes of each site regardless of soil depth, while lumped site-specific calibration equations were derived by grouping all datasets from each site, regardless of soil depth and textural classes. Sensor readings were plotted against gravimetrically measured volumetric soil moisture (θv) for different textural classes as a reference. The coefficient of determination (r2) was used to select the best fit of the regression function. The developed calibration equations were evaluated using an independent dataset. The results indicated that all developed textural and lumped site-specific calibration equations were linear functions, withr2 values ranging from 0.96 to 0.99. Relationships between the measured and estimated θv from calibration equations were reasonable at all sites, with r2 values greater than 0.91 and root mean square error (RMSE) values ranging from 0.010 to 0.020 m3∙m-3. The results also indicated that textural site-specific calibration equations (RMSE < 0.018 m3∙m-3) should be given preference over lumped site-specific calibrations (RMSE < 0.020 m3∙m-3) to attain more accurate θv measurements. The findings of this study suggest that once DFM capacitance probes are calibrated per site, they can be reliably used for accurate in-situ soil moisture measurements. The developed calibration equations can be applied with caution in other sites with similar soil types to attained reliable in-situ soil moisture measurements.

Evaluation of Various Soil Moisture Sensors in Four Different Soil Types

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 963-971 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tonny José Araújo da Silva ◽  
Edna Maria Bonfim-Silva ◽  
Adriano Bicioni Pacheco ◽  
Thiago Franco Duarte ◽  
Helon Hébano de Freitas Sousa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soil Moisture ◽  
Moisture Content ◽  
Soil Moisture Content ◽  
Soil Samples ◽  
Soil Types ◽  
Coefficient Of Determination ◽  
Regression Analyses ◽  
Drying Method ◽  
Soil Moisture Sensors ◽  
Calibration Equations

Abstract.Accurate measurements of soil moisture content can contribute to resource conservation in irrigated systems. The objective of this study was to evaluate various soil moisture sensors (a porous cup tensiometer, Diviner 2000, PR2, XH300, PM100, and ML3; the mention of model names does not constitute an implied endorsement) used in four different soil types. The experiment was conducted inside a greenhouse using a specially constructed box that contained the soil samples. The soil samples were first saturated and subsequently drained before starting the measurements. The soil moisture content was determined by the oven-drying method. Using the standard deviation of the sensor readings, regression analyses were performed, resulting in calibration equations and coefficient of determination (R2) values for each sensor and soil type combination. The porous cup tensiometer, Diviner 2000, PR2, and ML3 measurements resulted in excellent R2 values that exceeded 0.95 for the four soils. However, measurements with the XH300 and PM100 sensors resulted in R2 values of 0.37 to 0.86 and 0.61 to 0.94, respectively, limiting their scientific applicability for the studied soils. Therefore, the porous cup tensiometer, Diviner 2000, PR2, and ML3 estimated the soil moisture content with greater confidence than did the other sensors and with an error of less than 5%. Keywords: Calibration, Tensiometer, Volumetric water content.

scholarly journals Modified Richards’ Equation to Improve Estimates of Soil Moisture in Two-Layered Soils after Infiltration

Water ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 1174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Honglin Zhu ◽  
Tingxi Liu ◽  
Baolin Xue ◽  
Yinglan A. ◽  
Guoqiang Wang
Keyword(s):  
Soil Moisture ◽  
Overland Flow ◽  
Hydrological Cycle ◽  
Soil Depth ◽  
Controlling Factors ◽  
Moisture Distribution ◽  
Richards Equation ◽  
Infiltration Process ◽  
Soil Moisture Distribution

Soil moisture distribution plays a significant role in soil erosion, evapotranspiration, and overland flow. Infiltration is a main component of the hydrological cycle, and simulations of soil moisture can improve infiltration process modeling. Different environmental factors affect soil moisture distribution in different soil layers. Soil moisture distribution is influenced mainly by soil properties (e.g., porosity) in the upper layer (10 cm), but by gravity-related factors (e.g., slope) in the deeper layer (50 cm). Richards’ equation is a widely used infiltration equation in hydrological models, but its homogeneous assumptions simplify the pattern of soil moisture distribution, leading to overestimates. Here, we present a modified Richards’ equation to predict soil moisture distribution in different layers along vertical infiltration. Two formulae considering different controlling factors were used to estimate soil moisture distribution at a given time and depth. Data for factors including slope, soil depth, porosity, and hydraulic conductivity were obtained from the literature and in situ measurements and used as prior information. Simulations were compared between the modified and the original Richards’ equations and with measurements taken at different times and depths. Comparisons with soil moisture data measured in situ indicated that the modified Richards’ equation still had limitations in terms of reproducing soil moisture in different slope positions and rainfall periods. However, compared with the original Richards’ equation, the modified equation estimated soil moisture with spatial diversity in the infiltration process more accurately. The equation may benefit from further solutions that consider various controlling factors in layers. Our results show that the proposed modified Richards’ equation provides a more effective approach to predict soil moisture in the vertical infiltration process.

Effect of Soil Depth on the Quantification of Soil Moisture Content Value Estimated from NOAA Satellite Images

2014 ◽  
Vol 567 ◽  
pp. 705-710
Author(s):  
Abdalhaleem A. Hassaballa ◽  
Abdul Nasir Matori ◽  
Helmi Z.M. Shafri
Keyword(s):  
Soil Moisture ◽  
Critical Parameter ◽  
Satellite Images ◽  
Soil Moisture Content ◽  
Soil Depth ◽  
Vegetation Indices ◽  
Field Measurements ◽  
Spatial Estimation ◽  
Optical Images

Soil moisture (MC) is considered as the most significant boundary conditions controlling most of the hydrological cycle’s processes especially over humid areas. However, MC is very critical parameter to measure because of its variability in both space and time. The fluctuation of MC along the soil depth in turn, makes it so difficult to assess from optical satellite techniques. The study aims to produce a rectified satellite’s surface temperature (Ts) in order to enhance the spatial estimation of MC. The study also aims to produce MC estimates from three variable depths of the soil using optical images from NOAA 17 in order to examine the potential of satellite techniques in assessing the MC along the soil depths. The universal triangle (UT) algorithm was used for MC assessment based on Ts, vegetation Indices (VI) and field measurements of MC; which were conducted at variable depths. The study area was divided into three classes according to the nature of surface cover. The resultant MC extracted from the UT method with rectified Ts, produced accuracies of MC ranging from 0.65 to 0.89 when validated with in-situ measured MC at depths 5cm and 10 cm respectively.

scholarly journals Investigating temporal field sampling strategies for site-specific calibration of three soil moisture–neutron intensity parameterisation methods

2015 ◽  
Vol 19 (7) ◽  
pp. 3203-3216 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Iwema ◽  
R. Rosolem ◽  
R. Baatz ◽  
T. Wagener ◽  
H. R. Bogena
Keyword(s):  
Remote Sensing ◽  
Soil Moisture ◽  
Satellite Remote Sensing ◽  
Cosmic Ray ◽  
Sampling Strategies ◽  
Site Specific ◽  
Neutron Intensity ◽  
Soil Wetness ◽  
Semi Arid

Abstract. The Cosmic-Ray Neutron Sensor (CRNS) can provide soil moisture information at scales relevant to hydrometeorological modelling applications. Site-specific calibration is needed to translate CRNS neutron intensities into sensor footprint average soil moisture contents. We investigated temporal sampling strategies for calibration of three CRNS parameterisations (modified N0, HMF, and COSMIC) by assessing the effects of the number of sampling days and soil wetness conditions on the performance of the calibration results while investigating actual neutron intensity measurements, for three sites with distinct climate and land use: a semi-arid site, a temperate grassland, and a temperate forest. When calibrated with 1 year of data, both COSMIC and the modified N0 method performed better than HMF. The performance of COSMIC was remarkably good at the semi-arid site in the USA, while the N0mod performed best at the two temperate sites in Germany. The successful performance of COSMIC at all three sites can be attributed to the benefits of explicitly resolving individual soil layers (which is not accounted for in the other two parameterisations). To better calibrate these parameterisations, we recommend in situ soil sampled to be collected on more than a single day. However, little improvement is observed for sampling on more than 6 days. At the semi-arid site, the N0mod method was calibrated better under site-specific average wetness conditions, whereas HMF and COSMIC were calibrated better under drier conditions. Average soil wetness condition gave better calibration results at the two humid sites. The calibration results for the HMF method were better when calibrated with combinations of days with similar soil wetness conditions, opposed to N0mod and COSMIC, which profited from using days with distinct wetness conditions. Errors in actual neutron intensities were translated to average errors specifically to each site. At the semi-arid site, these errors were below the typical measurement uncertainties from in situ point-scale sensors and satellite remote sensing products. Nevertheless, at the two humid sites, reduction in uncertainty with increasing sampling days only reached typical errors associated with satellite remote sensing products. The outcomes of this study can be used by researchers as a CRNS calibration strategy guideline.

scholarly journals Soil Moisture Estimation Using Citizen Observatory Data, Microwave Satellite Imagery, and Environmental Covariates

Water ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (8) ◽  
pp. 2160
Author(s):  
Daniel Kibirige ◽  
Endre Dobos
Keyword(s):  
Soil Moisture ◽  
Expert Knowledge ◽  
Coefficient Of Determination ◽  
Landsat 8 ◽  
Regression Kriging ◽  
Environmental Covariates ◽  
Observatory Data ◽  
Digital Elevation ◽  
Elevation Model

Soil moisture (SM) is a key variable in the climate system and a key parameter in earth surface processes. This study aimed to test the citizen observatory (CO) data to develop a method to estimate surface SM distribution using Sentinel-1B C-band Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) and Landsat 8 data; acquired between January 2019 and June 2019. An agricultural region of Tard in western Hungary was chosen as the study area. In situ soil moisture measurements in the uppermost 10 cm were carried out in 36 test fields simultaneously with SAR data acquisition. The effects of environmental covariates and the backscattering coefficient on SM were analyzed to perform SM estimation procedures. Three approaches were developed and compared for a continuous four-month period, using multiple regression analysis, regression-kriging and cokriging with the digital elevation model (DEM), and Sentinel-1B C-band and Landsat 8 images. CO data were evaluated over the landscape by expert knowledge and found to be representative of the major SM distribution processes but also presenting some indifferent short-range variability that was difficult to explain at this scale. The proposed models were evaluated using statistical metrics: The coefficient of determination (R2) and root mean square error (RMSE). Multiple linear regression provides more realistic spatial patterns over the landscape, even in a data-poor environment. Regression kriging was found to be a potential tool to refine the results, while ordinary cokriging was found to be less effective. The obtained results showed that CO data complemented with Sentinel-1B SAR, Landsat 8, and terrain data has the potential to estimate and map soil moisture content.

scholarly journals Performance Evaluation of the Multiple Quantile Regression Model for Estimating Spatial Soil Moisture after Filtering Soil Moisture Outliers

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (10) ◽  
pp. 1678
Author(s):  
Chunggil Jung ◽  
Yonggwan Lee ◽  
Jiwan Lee ◽  
Seongjoon Kim
Keyword(s):  
Soil Moisture ◽  
Quantile Regression ◽  
Outlier Detection ◽  
Land Surface ◽  
Removal Rate ◽  
Distribution Functions ◽  
Cumulative Distribution ◽  
Soil Types ◽  
Coefficient Of Determination ◽  
Random Errors

The spatial distribution of soil moisture (SM) was estimated by a multiple quantile regression (MQR) model with Terra Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and filtered SM data from 2013 to 2015 in South Korea. For input data, observed precipitation and SM data were collected from the Korea Meteorological Administration and various institutions monitoring SM. To improve the work of a previous study, prior to the estimation of SM, outlier detection using the isolation forest (IF) algorithm was applied to the observed SM data. The original observed SM data resulted in IF_SM data following outlier detection. This study obtained an average data removal rate of 20.1% at 58 stations. For various reasons, such as instrumentation, environment, and random errors, the original observed SM data contained approximately 20% uncertain data. After outlier detection, this study performed a regression analysis by estimating land surface temperature quantiles. The soil characteristics were considered through reclassification into four soil types (clay, loam, silt, and sand), and the five-day antecedent precipitation was considered in order to estimate the regression coefficient of the MQR model. For all soil types, the coefficient of determination (R2) and root mean square error (RMSE) values ranged from 0.25 to 0.77 and 1.86% to 12.21%, respectively. The MQR results showed a much better performance than that of the multiple linear regression (MLR) results, which yielded R2 and RMSE values of 0.20 to 0.66 and 1.08% to 7.23%, respectively. As a further illustration of improvement, the box plots of the MQR SM were closer to those of the observed SM than those of the MLR SM. This result indicates that the cumulative distribution functions (CDF) of MQR SM matched the CDF of the observed SM. Thus, the MQR algorithm with outlier detection can overcome the limitations of the MLR algorithm by reducing both the bias and variance.

Estimation of soil moisture content using Citizen observatory data -lessons learnt from GROW Observatory project

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Endre Dobos ◽  
Károly Kovács ◽  
Daniel Kibirige ◽  
Péter Vadnai
Keyword(s):  
Soil Moisture ◽  
Monitoring System ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Technological Development ◽  
Special Focus ◽  
Agricultural Activity ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Horizon 2020 ◽  
Soil Moisture Monitoring

&lt;p&gt;Soil moisture is a crucial factor for agricultural activity, but also an important factor for weather forecast and climate science. Despite of the technological development in soil moisture sensing, no full coverage global or continental or even national scale soil moisture monitoring system exist.&amp;#160; There is a new European initiative to demonstrate the feasibility of a citizen observatory based soil moisture monitoring system.&amp;#160; The aim of this study is to characterize this new monitoring approach and provide provisional results on the interpretation and system performance.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;GROW Observatory is a project funded under the European Union&amp;#8217;s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program. Its aim is to establish a large scale (&gt;20,000 participants), resilient and integrated &amp;#8216;Citizen Observatory&amp;#8217; (CO) and community for environmental monitoring that is self-sustaining beyond the life of the project. This article describes how the initial framework and tools were developed to evolve, bring together and train such a community; raising interest, engaging participants, and educating to support reliable observations, measurements and documentation, and considerations with a special focus on the reliability of the resulting dataset for scientific purposes. The scientific purposes of GROW observatory are to test the data quality and the spatial representativity of a citizen engagement driven spatial distribution as reliably inputs for soil moisture monitoring and&amp;#160;&amp;#160; to create timely series of&amp;#160; gridded soil moisture products based on citizens&amp;#8217; observations using low cost soil moisture (SM) sensors, and to provide an extensive dataset of in-situ soil moisture observations which can serve as a reference to validate satellite-based SM products and support the Copernicus in-situ component. This article aims to showcase the design, tools and the digital soil mapping approaches of the final soil moisture product.&lt;/p&gt;

scholarly journals Triple Collocation Evaluation of In Situ Soil Moisture Observations from 1200+ Stations as part of the U.S. National Soil Moisture Network

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (11) ◽  
pp. 2537-2549
Author(s):  
Trent W. Ford ◽  
Steven M. Quiring ◽  
Chen Zhao ◽  
Zachary T. Leasor ◽  
Christian Landry
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Soil Moisture ◽  
Land Surface ◽  
Surface Model ◽  
National Scale ◽  
Model Soil ◽  
Soil Moisture Data ◽  
Spatial Coverage ◽  
Soil Moisture Monitoring

AbstractSoil moisture is an important variable for numerous scientific disciplines, and therefore provision of accurate and timely soil moisture information is critical. Recent initiatives, such as the National Soil Moisture Network effort, have increased the spatial coverage and quality of soil moisture monitoring infrastructure across the contiguous United States. As a result, the foundation has been laid for a high-resolution, real-time gridded soil moisture product that leverages data from in situ networks, satellite platforms, and land surface models. An important precursor to this development is a comprehensive, national-scale assessment of in situ soil moisture data fidelity. Additionally, evaluation of the United States’s current in situ soil moisture monitoring infrastructure can provide a means toward more informed satellite and model calibration and validation. This study employs a triple collocation approach to evaluate the fidelity of in situ soil moisture observations from over 1200 stations across the contiguous United States. The primary goal of the study is to determine the monitoring stations that are best suited for 1) inclusion in national-scale soil moisture datasets, 2) deriving in situ–informed gridded soil moisture products, and 3) validating and benchmarking satellite and model soil moisture data. We find that 90% of the 1233 stations evaluated exhibit high spatial consistency with satellite remote sensing and land surface model soil moisture datasets. In situ error did not significantly vary by climate, soil type, or sensor technology, but instead was a function of station-specific properties such as land cover and station siting.

scholarly journals Validation of SMAP L2 passive-only soil moisture products using <i>in situ</i> measurements collected in Twente, The Netherlands

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rogier van der Velde ◽  
Andreas Colliander ◽  
Michiel Pezij ◽  
Harm-Jan F. Benninga ◽  
Rajat Bindlish ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soil Moisture ◽  
The Netherlands ◽  
Mean Squared Error ◽  
Single Channel ◽  
Soil Depth ◽  
Soil Freezing ◽  
Horizontal Polarization ◽  
Dual Channel ◽  
Spatially Distributed

Abstract. The Twente region in the east of the Netherlands has a network with twenty soil monitoring stations that has been utilized for validation of the Soil Moisture Active/Passive (SMAP) passive-only soil moisture products. Over the period from April 2015 until December 2018, seven stations covered by the SMAP reference pixels have fairly complete data records. Spatially distributed soil moisture simulations with the Dutch national hydrological model have been utilized for the development of upscaling functions to translate the spatial mean of point measurements to the domain of the SMAP reference pixels. The native and upscaled spatial soil moisture means have been adopted as in situ references to assess the performance of the SMAP i) Single Channel Algorithm at Horizontal Polarization (SCA-H), ii) Single Channel Algorithm at Vertical Polarization (SCA-V), and iii) Dual Channel Algorithm (DCA) soil moisture estimates. In the case of the Twente network it was found that the SCA-V soil moisture retrieved SMAP observations collected in the afternoon had the best agreement with the in situ references leading to an unbiased Root Mean Squared Error (uRMSE) of 0.059 m3 m−3. This is larger than the mission target accuracy of 0.04 m3 m−3, which can be attributed to large over- and underestimation errors (> 0.08 m3 m−3) in particular at the end of dry spells and during freezing, respectively. The strong vertical dielectric gradients associated with rapid soil freezing and wetting causes the disparity in soil depth characterized by SMAP and in situ that leads to the large mismatches. Once filtered for frozen conditions and antecedent rainfall the uRMSE improves to 0.043 m3 m−3.

scholarly journals Intercomparison of Soil Moisture Retrieved from GNSS-R and from Passive L-Band Radiometry at the Valencia Anchor Station

Sensors ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (8) ◽  
pp. 1900
Author(s):  
Cong Yin ◽  
Ernesto Lopez-Baeza ◽  
Manuel Martin-Neira ◽  
Roberto Fernandez-Moran ◽  
Lei Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soil Moisture ◽  
Circular Polarization ◽  
European Space Agency ◽  
In Situ Measurements ◽  
Anchor Station ◽  
L Band ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Band Radiometer ◽  
Soil Moisture Monitoring

In this paper, the SOMOSTA (Soil Moisture Monitoring Station) experiment on the intercomparison of soil moisture monitoring from Global Navigation Satellite System Reflectometry (GNSS-R) signals and passive L-band microwave radiometer observations at the Valencia Anchor Station is introduced. The GNSS-R instrument has an up-looking antenna for receiving direct signals from satellites, and a dual-pol down-looking antenna for receiving LHCP (left-hand circular polarization) and RHCP (right-hand circular polarization) reflected signals from the soil surface. Data were collected from the three different antennas through the two channels of Oceanpal GNSS-R receiver and, in addition, calibration was performed to reduce the impact from the differing channels. Reflectivity was thus measured, and soil moisture could be retrieved. The ESA (European Space Agency)-funded ELBARA-II (ESA L Band Radiometer II) is an L-band radiometer with two channels with 11 MHz bandwidth and respective center frequencies of 1407.5 MHz and 1419.5 MHz. The ELBARAII antenna is a large dual-mode Picket horn that is 1.4 m wide, with a length of 2.7 m with −3 dB full beam width of 12° (±6° around the antenna main direction) and a gain of 23.5 dB. By comparing GNSS-R and ELBARA-II radiometer data, a high correlation was found between the LHCP reflectivity measured by GNSS-R and the horizontal/vertical reflectivity from the radiometer (with correlation coefficients ranging from 0.83 to 0.91). Neural net fitting was used for GNSS-R soil moisture inversion, and the RMSE (Root Mean Square Error) was 0.014 m3/m3. The determination coefficient between the retrieved soil moisture and in situ measurements was R2 = 0.90 for Oceanpal and R2 = 0.65 for Elbara II, and the ubRMSE (Unbiased RMSE) were 0.0128 and 0.0734 respectively. The soil moisture retrievals by both L-band remote sensing methods show good agreement with each other, and their mutual correspondence with in-situ measurements and with rainfall was also good.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document