scholarly journals Lessons Learned from International Research Partnerships

2008 ◽  
pp. 25-30
Author(s):  
Prem Paul ◽  
Charles Wood ◽  
John Yohe
Keyword(s):  
International Research ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Research Partnerships

scholarly journals Building communities of trust: Challenges for disability

2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander M. Phiri
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Civil Society ◽  
International Research ◽  
Research Agenda ◽  
Research Programme ◽  
Development Research ◽  
Research Partnerships ◽  
People With Disability ◽  
The Disabled ◽  
Disability Research

This article asks questions about power and partnership in disability research in Africa. Research has been located too much in one type of organisation or another and not sufficiently in the interaction between a range of legitimate stakeholders. Across Africa and Europe, and government and civil society dialogues, the African development research agenda must be owned by Africans. Fully inclusive national and international research partnerships are crucial, but they must be driven from Africa. European constructions of and interventions concerning people with disability have often been inhumane, seeking to eliminate them from society. African cultures have also stigmatised people with disability. I call for a new African-driven research agenda that promotes the human rights of people with disability, and has people with disability not only participating in this research, but directing it. The Southern African Federation of the Disabled (SAFOD) Research Programme (SRP) is breaking new ground in this regard by allowing ‘the researched’ to become ‘the researcher’.

Ontario, Canada’s LTSP Experience: Forging Lasting Research Partnerships and the Adaptive Management Cycle in Action

2020 ◽  
Vol 118 (3) ◽  
pp. 337-351
Author(s):  
Dave M Morris ◽  
Rob L Fleming ◽  
Paul W Hazlett
Keyword(s):  
Adaptive Management ◽  
Management Practices ◽  
Forest Policy ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Soil Productivity ◽  
Research Partnerships ◽  
Foliar Nutrition ◽  
Individual Tree ◽  
The North

Abstract In this paper, we summarize Ontario’s Long-term Soil Productivity (LTSP) experience focusing on our efforts to forge lasting research partnerships, highlight the approaches we feel were effective in getting emerging science into forest policy within an adaptive management (AM) framework, and describe the future direction of Ontario’s LTSP program as new policy issues are emerging as part of the continuous AM cycle. Fourteen installations were established on nutrient-poor, conifer-dominated sites, considered to be the most sensitive to increased biomass removals. From 1993 to 1995, all sites were clearcut-harvested, with replicated (three reps per site) biomass removal treatments that included: stem only, full-tree, and full-tree + forest floor removal. Routine (every 5 years) measurements have been carried out to track changes in soil carbon and nutrient levels, as well as stand- and individual-tree growth and development metrics and foliar nutrition. The published results from Ontario’s LTSP program, in combination with the North American-wide LTSP synthesis outputs, have suggested that these nutrient-poor, conifer-dominated sites are less sensitive to biomass (nutrient) removals than previously thought. The evidence provided through peer-reviewed publications, conference and workshop presentations, and field tours was substantive and led to a review and revision of the full-tree logging direction within Ontario’s guidelines. We conclude with a set of recommendations (lessons learned) for the successful delivery of any new long-term, interdisciplinary research projects examining the sustainability of forest-management practices.

scholarly journals Exchanging Disaster Science Expertise Between Countries—A Japanese Personal Perspective

2020 ◽  
pp. 233-250
Author(s):  
Osamu Murao
Keyword(s):  
International Research ◽  
Collaborative Research ◽  
Research Collaboration ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Disaster Mitigation ◽  
Personal Perspective ◽  
Broad Array ◽  
International Collaborative ◽  
International Collaborative Research ◽  
Disaster Science

Abstract Having experienced firsthand the catastrophic Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami of 2011, Tohoku University founded the International Research Institute of Disaster Science (IRIDeS) in 2012. IRIDeS staff, with a broad array of relevant specializations, conducts world-class research on disaster science and disaster mitigation in collaboration with organizations from many countries. As a member of IRIDeS, Prof. Osamu Murao, the founder and manager of the International Strategy for Disaster Mitigation Laboratory (ISDM), has conducted several international collaborative research projects. This chapter briefly reports on the activities of the IRIDeS and ISDM and highlights key factors for successful international collaborative research and exchange experiences with other countries. The author recounts his initial collaborative research experience in a long-term project examining Taiwan’s recovery from the impact of the 1999 Chi-Chi Earthquake which was the foundation of the international research collaboration at ISDM. The chapter concludes with a summary of the valuable lessons learned from the author’s participation in this research.

Lessons Learned and Ways Forward

2019 ◽  
pp. 233-248
Author(s):  
Misa Kayama ◽  
Wendy L. Haight ◽  
May-Lee Ku ◽  
Minhae Cho ◽  
Hee Yun Lee
Keyword(s):  
South Korea ◽  
International Research ◽  
Cross Cultural ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Cultural Model ◽  
Research Teams ◽  
Cultural Research ◽  
Cross Cultural Research ◽  
The U.S

Chapter 9 summarizes findings from a decade-long program of cross-cultural research on disability, stigmatization, and children’s developing cultural selves in Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, and the U.S. It articulates implications for a developmental cultural model of disability, methodological approaches, practice, policy, and future research. It also discusses challenges of cross-cultural research including working within international research teams.

scholarly journals Lessons on Patient and Stakeholder Engagement Strategies for Pipeline to Proposal Awards

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (Supp) ◽  
pp. 303-310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashley Wennerstrom ◽  
Benjamin F. Springgate ◽  
Felica Jones ◽  
Diana Meyers ◽  
Norris Henderson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Los Angeles ◽  
Outcomes Research ◽  
Technical Assistance ◽  
African American Men ◽  
Knowledge Exchange ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Research Network ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
Research Partnerships ◽  
New Research

The Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) supports patient-centered clinical comparative effectiveness research (CER) including health disparities and engagement portfolios. In 2013, PCORI launched the Pipeline to Proposal (P2P) mechanism to support development of nov­el patient- and stakeholder-centered part­nerships focused on designing clinical CER funding proposals. By providing a tiered structure of successive small contracts and technical assistance, the P2P mechanism encourages development of new research partnerships among diverse stakeholders. As a comparatively new field, patient-centered outcomes research (PCOR) has few well-delineated methods for engaging patients and other non-scientists in effective teams with academics or clinicians to develop and implement rigorous, scientific research pro­posals. Community partnered participatory research (CPPR) provides a useful frame­work for structuring new partnerships.In this article we highlight the origins, de­velopment, and prospects of three current examples of funded P2P initiatives based in New Orleans and Los Angeles. We outline how these projects – Prisoner to Patient, the NOLA Partnership, and Resilience Among African American Men – use CPPR principles. We also describe how they have collaborated with, and contributed to, a two-way learning and knowledge exchange among members of the PCORI-funded Community and Patient Partnered Research Network. Lessons learned may be ap­plicable to other groups planning to create new partnerships focused on implementing PCOR.Ethn Dis. 2018;28(Suppl 2):303- 310; doi:10.18865/ed.28.S2.303.

Global Social Welfare Academic Research Partnerships: Lessons Learned from Two Studies in Mongolia

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 145-154
Author(s):  
Susan S. Witte ◽  
Denise Burnette ◽  
Toivgoo Aira ◽  
Sugarmaa Myagmarjav
Keyword(s):  
Social Welfare ◽  
Academic Research ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Research Partnerships
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document