SOME QUESTIONS ABOUT CHILD ADOPTION

2021 ◽  
pp. 162-171
Author(s):  
Aleksandra E. Kasantseva ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Parental Care ◽  
Adoptive Parents ◽  
Adoptive Parent ◽  
Court Order ◽  
Adopted Child ◽  
Adoptive Family ◽  
Rights Of The Child ◽  
Legal Provisions ◽  
Legal Relationship ◽  
Legal Fact

Adoption is the preferred form of placement of a child without parental care in a family. The advantage of this form of placement is its permanent nature. In addition, the legal rela-tionship arising between the adoptive parent and his or her ancestors and the adopted child and his or her descendants is equivalent to a parental relationship. Like parental legal relation-ships, the legal relationship between adoptive parents and adoptees is presumed to be perpetual. Unlike other entities raising a child without parental care, adoptive parents may give the adopted child a new name and change the date and place of birth. The legal composition giving rise to a family legal relationship between the adoptive parent and his or her ancestors and the adopted child and his or her descendants is the consent of a number of persons. An enforceable court order for the adoption of a child is a confirming legal fact. It con-firms that the consent of all persons and authorities has been obtained and the child has been placed in the adoptive family. The question arises regarding the consent of the child's parents to his adoption. The con-sent to the adoption is equal to their renunciation of the child, which does not contradict the Convention on the Rights of the Child. Nevertheless, the rules of the Family Code on adop-tion should not initiate a parent's renunciation of his/her child. A child has the right to live and be brought up in his or her own family and to know his or her parents. If a parent relinquishes his or her child, the parental rights should first be removed and then the child should be put up for adoption without his or her consent. The current legal provisions on adoption have other inaccuracies, which are discussed in this article.

The Role of the Pediatrician in Adoption With Reference to "The Right To Know"

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1977 ◽  
Vol 60 (3) ◽  
pp. 378-379
Author(s):  
◽  
Donald Lewis ◽  
George C. Cypress ◽  
Joseph H. Davis ◽  
Ruth C. Harris ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Birth Certificate ◽  
Adoptive Parents ◽  
Adoption Process ◽  
Court Order ◽  
Adoptive Family ◽  
Just Cause ◽  
The Right To Know ◽  
Original Record ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
The Right

The adoption process in our country traditionally has been designed to safeguard the rights of adoptive parents, insure the solidarity of the adoptive family, and preserve the anonymity of the natural parents. To accomplish this, when adoptions are finalized, the original birth certificate is "sealed" and a new certificate is issued in the name of the adoptive parents. Once sealed, the laws of most states specify that the original record can be opened only by court order and for "just cause." A few states have provisions for opening of the records on demand of the adoptee when that person becomes an adult. This provision often turns out to be true in theory but not in practice, and the definition of "just cause" has varied greatly from court to court. Most adoptive parents have warm and loving relationships with their adoptive children. Most try to pass on to them, at appropriate times, as much of the birth information as they know and are able to provide. Most adoptees have a warm and loving and truly bonded relationship with their adoptive parents. In spite of this, and regardless of their attachment to the adoptive parents, some adoptees, as they reach maturity, have a compelling desire to learn of their natural parent or parents. Many adult adoptees and adoption specialists see this search as essential to the establishment of a sense of identity. Most reports of reunions indicate that adoptees have been pleased with the meeting and that their ties to their adoptive parents have been strengthened thereby.

Temporary Marriages, Mahramiyat, and the Rights of the Child in Shiʿi Adoption

Hawwa ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 103-123
Author(s):  
Ladan Rahbari
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Relationships ◽  
The State ◽  
Adopted Child ◽  
Adoptive Family ◽  
The Past ◽  
Rights Of The Child ◽  
Child Adoption ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Temporary Marriage

Abstract Iran accepts temporary marriage to facilitate and sanctify sexual relationships. The concession of temporary marriage has, however, been the subject of controversy in the past four decades. One significant refutation of temporary marriage is related to its attempted usage in the case of child-adoption, sanctioned by both the state and some Shiʿi mujtahids. The explicated rationale is that an adopted child does not benefit from mahramiyat and is, therefore, non-mahram to members of the adoptive family after reaching puberty. To establish mahramiyat, Shiʿi jurisprudence allows for temporary marriage between the adoptee and a member of the adoptive family. By performing a temporary marriage, new familial ties are established, and mahramiyat limitations are lifted. This proposed solution, however, can lead to other significant legal and social complications. This paper investigates Shiʿi jurisprudence allowing temporary marriage in child-adoption scenarios in contemporary Twelver Shiʿa by exploring relevant fiqh/ijtihad and legal perspectives in Iran.

Anak Angkat Sebagai Penghalang Penetapan Ahli Warits Perspektif Maqasid Syariah ( Analisis Terhadap Putusan Hakim Pengadilan Agama Pekanbaru Klas 1 No. 181/Pdt.P/2020/PA.Pbr )

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 169-188
Author(s):  
Muh Rizki
Keyword(s):  
Secondary Data ◽  
Adoptive Parents ◽  
Best Interests ◽  
Court Order ◽  
Adopted Child ◽  
Library Research ◽  
Child Adoption ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Right

Abstrak. Di Indonesia pengangkatan anak/adopsi diatur dalam Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 23 tahun 2020 perihal pengangkatan anak, di dalam pasal 39 poin 1 dijelaskan, dalam hal ini pengangkatan anak hanya dapat dilakukan berdasarkan kepentingan yang terbaik bagi anak dan dapat dilakukan dengan ketentuan adat setempat dan ketentuan peraturan yang berlaku. Hal ini agar pengangkatan anak tidak terjadi kesalah fahaman atau pertikaian di belakang hari, terlebih-lebih apabila orang tua angkatnya meninggal dunia lebih dulu. Sebagaimana dalam putusan hakim Pengadilan Agama Pekanbaru klas 1A Nomor. 181/Pdt.P/2020/PA.Pbr, tentang penetapan ahli warits.  Majelis Hakim Pengadilan Agama Pekanbaru menolak penetapan ahli warits disebabkan adanya anak angkat, meskipun tidak ada bukti yang menunjukkan adanya penetapan pengadilan atau secara adat tentang pengangkatan anak tersebut. Berdasarkan uraian ini, maka penulis merasa perlu menganalisis dari asfek yuridis dan filososfis untuk menemukan jawaban mengapa permohonan penetapan ahli warits ini ditolak, dan apa dasar hukum hakim yang digunakan serta bagaimana putusan ini jika dianalisis dengan konsep maqasid syariah. Jenis penelitian dalam tulisan ini adalah penelitian pustaka (library reseach), yaitu penelitian hukum yang dilakukan dengan cara meneliti bahan pustaka atau data sekunder belaka dengan menggunakan pendekatan hukum normatif dan pilosofis. Adapun kesimpulannya, bahwa anak angkat sangat punya kepentingan terhadap harta tirkah dari alamarhumah, karena para pemohon tidak memasukkan anak angkat sebagai orang yang berhak sebagai pihak dalam perkara aquo, majelis hakim berpendapat permohonan para Pemohon kurang pihak. Maka pertimbangan majelis hakim dengan menggunakan kaedah “Menolak mafsadah didahulukan daripada mengambil kemaslahatan”. Apabila dianalisis perkara ini dengan pisau analisis maqasid syariah  yang sesuai dengan prinsip maqasid syariah dan terhimpun dalam empat kulliyatul khams sekaligus, yakni memelihara agama (hifz ad-din), memelihara jiwa (hifz an-nafs), memelihar akal (hifz al-aql dan memelihara harta (hifz al-mal). Abstract. In Indonesia, adoption/adoption is regulated in the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 23 of 2020 regarding child adoption, in article 39 point 1 it is explained, in this case the adoption can only be carried out based on the best interests of the child and can be carried out with local customary provisions and applicable regulations. This is so that the adoption of a child does not cause misunderstandings or disputes later in life, especially if the adoptive parents die first. As in the decision of the Pekanbaru Religious Court class 1A No. 181/Pdt.P/2020/PA.Pbr, regarding the determination of heirs. The Pekanbaru Religious Court Panel of Judges rejected the determination of heirs due to the presence of an adopted child, although there is no evidence to show that there was a court order or custom regarding the adoption of the child. Based on this description, the author feels the need to analyze from the juridical and philosophical aspects to find answers to why the application for the determination of heirs was rejected, and what is the legal basis of the judge used and how this decision is analyzed with the concept of maqasid sharia. The type of research in this paper is library research, namely legal research carried out by examining library materials or secondary data using normative and philosophical legal approaches. As for the conclusion, that the adopted child is very interested in the tirkah property of the alamarhumah, because the petitioners do not include the adopted child as a person who has the right as a party in the aquo case, the panel of judges is of the opinion that the petition of the petitioners is lacking in parties. Then the consideration of the panel of judges using the method "Rejecting mafsadah takes precedence over taking benefit". When analyzed this case with a maqasid sharia analysis knife which is in accordance with the principles of maqasid sharia and is compiled in four kulliyatul khams at once, namely maintaining religion (hifz ad-din), preserving soul (hifz an-nafs), preserving reason (hifz al-aql and maintain property (hifz al-mal).

The Role of the Pediatrician in Adoption with Reference to ‘The Right to Know’: An Update

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1981 ◽  
Vol 67 (2) ◽  
pp. 305-306
Author(s):  
S. Norman Sherry ◽  
Richard Baum ◽  
Agnes D. Lattimer ◽  
William C. Rieke ◽  
Burton Sokoloff ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Birth Certificate ◽  
Adoptive Parents ◽  
Adoption Process ◽  
Court Order ◽  
Adoptive Family ◽  
Just Cause ◽  
Birth Parent ◽  
Original Record ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
The Right

The adoption process in our country traditionally has been designed to safeguard the rights of the adoptive parents, ensure the solidarity of the adoptive family, and preserve the anonymity of the birth parents. When adoption is finalized, the original birth certificate is "sealed" and a new certificate is issued in the name of the adoptive parents. Once sealed, the laws of most states specify that the original record can be opened only by court order and for "just cause." A few states have provisions for opening of the records on demand of the adoptees when they become adults. This provision frequently is true in theory but not in practice, and the definition of "just cause" has varied considerably from court to court. Most adoptive parents have warm and loving relationships with their adoptive children. Most try to pass on to them, at appropriate times, as much of the birth information as they know and are able to provide. Most adoptees have a warm and loving and truly bonded relationship with their adoptive parents. In spite of this, and regardless of their attachment to the adoptive parents, some adoptees have a compelling desire and/or need to learn of their birth parent or parents. Many adult adoptees and adoption specialists see this search as essential to the establishment of a sense of identity. Most reports of reunions indicate that adoptees have been pleased with the meeting and that their ties to their adoptive parents have been strengthened thereby. In addition, there is the growing body of law that has spoken to the right of people to know the content of various personal records.

scholarly journals Child-evoked maternal negativity from 9 to 27 months: Evidence of gene–environment correlation and its moderation by marital distress

2014 ◽  
Vol 27 (4pt1) ◽  
pp. 1251-1265 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. M. Pasco Fearon ◽  
David Reiss ◽  
Leslie D. Leve ◽  
Daniel S. Shaw ◽  
Laura V. Scaramella ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Early Development ◽  
Family Environment ◽  
Genetic Risk ◽  
Adoptive Parents ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Adoptive Parent ◽  
Birth Mother ◽  
Adoptive Family ◽  
Gene Environment ◽  
Maternal Negativity

AbstractPast research has documented pervasive genetic influences on emotional and behavioral disturbance across the life span and on liability to adult psychiatric disorder. Increasingly, interest is turning to mechanisms of gene–environment interplay in attempting to understand the earliest manifestations of genetic risk. We report findings from a prospective adoption study, which aimed to test the role of evocative gene–environment correlation in early development. Included in the study were 561 infants adopted at birth and studied between 9 and 27 months, along with their adoptive parents and birth mothers. Birth mother psychiatric diagnoses and symptoms scales were used as indicators of genetic influence, and multiple self-report measures were used to index adoptive mother parental negativity. We hypothesized that birth mother psychopathology would be associated with greater adoptive parent negativity and that such evocative effects would be amplified under conditions of high adoptive family adversity. The findings suggested that genetic factors associated with birth mother externalizing psychopathology may evoke negative reactions in adoptive mothers in the first year of life, but only when the adoptive family environment is characterized by marital problems. Maternal negativity mediated the effects of genetic risk on child adjustment at 27 months. The results underscore the importance of genetically influenced evocative processes in early development.

scholarly journals Peran Notaris Dalam Pembagian Waris Berdasarkan Hak Waris Barat Dengan Peran Pengadilan Agama Dalam Pembagian Waris Berdasarkan Hak Waris Islam

Jurnal Akta ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 117
Author(s):  
Setya Qodar Al-Haolandi ◽  
Sukarmi Sukarmi
Keyword(s):  
Adoptive Parents ◽  
Adoptive Parent ◽  
Adopted Children ◽  
Analysis Method ◽  
Adopted Child ◽  
Library Research ◽  
The Will ◽  
The Law ◽  
Religious Courts

ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui Peran Notaris dalam Pembagian Waris Barat dengan Peran Pengadilan Agama Dalam Pembagian Waris Islam. Untuk mengetahui kewenangan notaris dalam pembagian Waris berdasarkan Hukum Waris Barat dan Hukum Waris Barat. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah yuridis empiris, sedangkann metode pengumpulann data yang digunakan adalah library research dengan mengumpulkan bahan-bahan hukum yang ada dilapangan dan wawancara. Metode analisa data dilakukan secara kualitatif kemudian disajikan secara deskriptif.Penelitian ini menghasilkan pada pokoknya Kewenangan Pertanggung jawaban notaris dalam pembuatan akta wasiat wajibah atas bagian anak angkat tetap mengikuti ketentuan dalam pasal 16 UUJN Undang-Undang No 2 Tahun 2014 Tentang Jabatan Notaris. Pasal 16 UUJN ini membuat ketentuan tentang syarat-syarat bagi notaris dalam membentuk suatu akta, jika salah satu syarat sebagaimana dimaksud tidak dipenuhi, akta yang bersangkutan hanya mempunyai kekuatan pembuktian sebagai akta dibawah tangan. Notaris yang melanggar ketentuan tersebut dapat dikenai sanksi berupa peringatan tertulis, pemberhentian dengan tidak hormat. Selain dikenai sanksi tersebut pihak yang menderita kerugian untuk menuntut penggantian biaya, ganti rugi, dan jika terbukti notaris melakukan pelanggaran terhadap UUJN seperti memalsukan identitas para pihak, memalsukan tandatangan, maka notaris dapat dimintai pertanggung jawaban secara pidana. Anak angkat akan dapat memperoleh harta dari orangtua angkatnya berdasarkan wasiat yang besarnya tidak boleh melebihi 1/3 (sepertiga) harta orang tua angkatnya yang telah meninggal dunia, bila orang tua angkatnya tidak meninggalkan wasiat maka dapat diberi berdasarkan wasiat wajibah, dan pemberi wasiat wajibah tidak boleh merugikan hak-hak dari ahli waris. Kalau anak angkat mendapatkan bagian wasiat wajibah yang melebihi 1/3 bagian, maka wasiat wajibah tidak batal demi hukum, melainkan harus dibatalkan dengan putusan pengadilan. Notaris memiliki kewenangan dalam pembagian waris islam tetapi menurut Notaris Sri Rochayati yang memiliki kewenangan penuh untuk menetapkan pengakuan secara hukum adalah pengadilan. Notaris dalam pembagian warisan berperan dalam pembuatan Akta Pernyataan Waris dan Surat Keterangan Hak Waris. Apabila terjadi sengketa, Notaris dapat membuatkan akta-akta perdamaian dan/atau perjanjian pelepasan hak tuntutan. Kewenangan notaris dalam pembagian waris hanya terbatas pada waris barat (BW) dan mengapa pembagian waris islam tidak ditugaskan kepada notaris. Notaris memiliki kewenangan dalam pembagian waris islam tetapi menurut Notaris Sri Rochayati yang memiliki kewenangan penuh untuk menetapkan pengakuan dan pemutusan secara hukum adalah pengadilan. Notaris dalam pembagian warisan berperan dalam pembuatan Akta Pernyataan Waris dan Surat Keterangan Hak Waris. Apabila terjadi sengketa, Notaris dapat membuatkan akta-akta perdamaian dan/atau perjanjian pelepasan hak tuntutan.Kata kunci : Pembagian Waris , UUJN (Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris), Kewenangan Notaris. ABSTRACT This study aims to determine the Role of Notaries in the Division of Western Heritage by the Role of Religious Courts in the Division of Islamic Inheritance. To know the authority of a notary in the division of Inheritance under the Law of the Western Heritage and the Law of the Western Heritage. The research method used in this study is empirical juridical, while the method of collecting data used is library research by collecting the existing legal materials in the field and interview. Data analysis method is done qualitatively then presented descriptively.This research resulted essentially Notary Accountability Authority in making deed of mandatory testament on the part of adopted children still follow the provisions in article 16 UUJN Act No. 2 Year 2014 About Notary's Position. Article 16 of the UUJN makes provisions on the terms of the notary in forming a deed, if one of the conditions referred to is not fulfilled, the deed concerned only has the evidentiary power as a deed under the hand. Notary who violates such provision may be subject to sanctions in the form of a written warning, dismissal of disrespect. In addition to the sanction, the party suffering losses to claim reimbursement of costs, compensation, and if the notary proves a violation of the UUJN such as falsifying the identity of the parties, falsifying the signature, the notary can be held criminally liable. The adopted child shall be able to obtain the property of his adoptive parent by a testament not exceeding 1/3 (one third) of his adoptive parents' estate, if his adoptive parents have not left a will, then they may be given a mandatory will, and the donor shall not may harm the rights of the heirs. If the adopted child receives a mandatory part of the will exceeding 1/3 of the part, the will is not void by law, but must be annulled by a court ruling. Notary has the authority in dividing the inheritance of Islam but according to Notary Sri Rochayati who has full authority to determine legal recognition is the court. Notaries in the distribution of inheritance play a role in the making of Deed of Inheritance Statement and Certificate of Rights of Inheritance. In the event of a dispute, a Notary may produce peace deeds and / or an agreement on the disposal of a claim. The authority of a notary in the division of inheritance is limited to the western heir (BW) and why the division of inheritance of Islam is not assigned to a notary. Notary has the authority in dividing the inheritance of Islam but according to Notary Sri Rochayati who has full authority to determine the recognition and termination legally is the court. Notaries in the distribution of inheritance play a role in the making of Deed of Inheritance Statement and Certificate of Rights of Inheritance. In the event of a dispute, a Notary may produce peace deeds and / or an agreement on the disposal of a claim.Keywords: Division of Inheritance, UUJN (Position Notice Act), Notary Publicity

scholarly journals STUDI HUKUM ISLAM TENTANG PENGANGKATAN ANAK (ADOPSI) DI UNIT PELAKSANA TEKNIS PERLINDUNGAN DAN PELAYANAN SOSIAL ASUHAN BALITA KOTA SIDOARJO

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 61-87
Author(s):  
Laily Mas'udah
Keyword(s):  
Child Care ◽  
Social Services ◽  
Social Service ◽  
Child Protection ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Adoptive Parents ◽  
Adoptive Parent ◽  
Adopted Children ◽  
Adopted Child ◽  
Feasibility Test

Implementation of Adoption in the Technical Implementation Unit for the Protection and Social Service of Sidoarjo City Toddler Child Care goes through 9 stages: prospective adoptive parents make an application letter for adoption of a child and written who the prospective adopted child is, filing the adoption administration filing stage, the adoption eligibility test stage with the holding of home visit I, submission of prospective adopted children to Prospective Adoptive Parents, the second step of the feasibility test of adoptive parents, the Recommendation Phase of the Social Service, the consideration phase by KEMENSOS in the PIPA Team session, certificate of granting permission for adoption of the child, finally the court's decision to determine the Court. The rights of children in the Technical Implementation Unit for the Protection and Social Services of Sidoarjo City Toddler Child Care have fulfilled the provisions contained in articles 4 through article 18 of Law Number 23 Year 2002 concerning Child Protection. In Islamic law, adoption of a child may not break the text between the child and his biological parents because it will have legal consequences for the child in terms of inheritance and marriage. In inheritance, adopted children are not included in the category of factors that cause someone to inherit each other, so that the adopted child has no right to inherit from his adopted father. If the adoptive parent wishes to give property to the adopted child it can be distributed by means of a grant while he is still alive or by will.

scholarly journals THE GREAT MOVE TOWARDS OPENNESS IN ADOPTION

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
N Da Rocha
Keyword(s):  
South Africa ◽  
South African ◽  
Adoptive Parents ◽  
Adoptive Parent ◽  
Adoption Process ◽  
Adopted Child ◽  
Major Step ◽  
Birth Parents ◽  
New Concepts ◽  
The Right

Many noteworthy changes have occurred in South African adoption law in the recent past: With the enactment of the Children’s Act, various new concepts have been provided for. A post-adoption agreement is one such concept. This provision allows the Children’s Court to grant an order confirming an agreement whereby the biological parent/s or guardian/s of a child would have the benefit of either communication or contact with the adopted child, or the right to be provided with certain information concerning such child. An application for judicial approval of a post-adoption agreement is brought before the court simultaneously alongside the adoption order. This is a major step towards the concept widely known in the international community as ‘openness’ in the adoption process, and away from the secrecy which dominated adoptions in the past. Currently in South Africa, adoption may be described as an ‘... order [which] has the effect of creating a legal relationship between the adoptive parent and the adopted child in the interests of the child.’ This involves the severing of legal ties between the birth parents and their child, relinquishing all parental rights and responsibilities and handing them over to the adoptive parents. Therefore in the eyes of the law, the adopted child is, for all purposes, the child of the adoptive parent/s. Due to the fact that this is the first time the South African legislature has sought to provide for and regulate post-adoption contact, this article serves as an exploration into the new possibilities and struggles South Africa may face in this regard.

scholarly journals About the initiating the provision of legal assistance by a russian lawyer in the process of international adoption

2021 ◽  
pp. 234-238
Author(s):  
A. V. Chernykh
Keyword(s):  
Parental Care ◽  
International Adoption ◽  
Legal Education ◽  
Adoptive Parents ◽  
Legal Assistance ◽  
Legal Representative ◽  
Adopted Child ◽  
The Law ◽  
A Minor

This article raises the question of the initiative to appeal to a lawyer in the process of international adoption of Russian children in order to monitor compliance with their interests and protect their rights. The author substantiates the need to allow minors over the age of fourteen to conclude independently an agreement on the provision of legal assistance with a lawyer on his own behalf without the consent of the legal representative in order to accompany the latter the process of international adoption of such a minor. In case of minors under the age of fourteen, the author proposes to impose the obligation of conclusion an agreement with a lawyer on the legal representative of the minor. The main arguments, given by the author in defense of his position, are: the ability of a lawyer to be a guarantor of protection the interests of the adopted child, the legality of actions in relation to the child and potential adoptive parents; gratuitousness of the provision of legal assistance by a lawyer in this category of cases by virtue of the law. The author also discusses the feasibility of lowering the age, which takes into account the child’s opinion, regarding his right to live and be raised in a family, and legal education measures for orphans and children left without parental care in order to exclude the possibility of abuse by legal representatives, in particular, by the guardianship authorities, their rights and (or) powers.

Legal nature of individual proceedings in cases of granting the right to marriage

2021 ◽  
pp. 88-93
Author(s):  
T.M. Balyuk
Keyword(s):  
Family Law ◽  
Adoptive Parent ◽  
Intangible Asset ◽  
Scientific Article ◽  
Adopted Child ◽  
Legitimate Interest ◽  
Civil Proceedings ◽  
Legal Nature ◽  
Specific Material ◽  
The Right

The scientific article is devoted to the study of the legal nature of separate proceedings in cases of granting the right to marry.It is established that a separate proceeding as a type of non-litigious civil proceedings is characterized by: 1) the absence of a dispute about the right, which, at the same time, does not exclude the existence of a dispute about the fact; 2) a special object of judicial protection – a legally protected (legitimate) interest, which is the needs and aspi-rations to use a specific material and (or) intangible asset, which may or may not be mediated by a certain subjective right. Protection of legally protected (legal) interest is carried out by the court by deciding on the presence or absence of legal facts relevant to the protection of rights, freedoms and interests of a person or creating conditions for the exercise of personal non-property or property rights or confirmation of the presence or absence of undisputed rights.It is determined that a separate proceeding in cases of granting the right to marry is a type of non-litigious civil proceedings for consideration of applications for confirmation of the presence or absence of legal facts that are im-portant for creating conditions for a person’s right to marry. It is substantiated that the legal nature of separate proceedings in cases of granting the right to marry is a set of substantive grounds for granting the right to marry and features of the procedural form of consideration by the court of relevant applications that mediate changes in family law. The court, establishing the presence or absence of legal facts, decides to grant a person the right to marry, thereby expanding the family law capacity of such a person due to the ability to exercise the right to marry before reaching marriageable age or marry between the adopter’s adopted child and the adopted child, as well as between children who have been adopted by an adoptive parent.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document