scholarly journals Models of Legal Regulation of Smart Contract: Generalities and Specifics

2021 ◽  
pp. 126-147
Author(s):  
Evgenya Zainutdinova
Keyword(s):  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Smart Contract

scholarly journals Advantages and disadvantages of smart-contracts as the basis for the emergence of ownership

2021 ◽  
pp. 101-105
Author(s):  
K. Nekit
Keyword(s):  
Property Rights ◽  
Legal Aspect ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Smart Contracts ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Technical Errors ◽  
Smart Contract ◽  
Legal Nature ◽  
Definition Of

The article examines the concepts, legal nature of smart contracts, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of smart contracts as a basis for ownership. The technical and legal aspect of the concept of smart contract is considered. Models of using smart contracts are described. Approaches to determining the legal nature of smart contracts are presented. It is concluded that two models must be considered when using smart contracts. The first model is external, when the program code does not replace the agreement, but only automates its execution. The second model is internal, when the code completely or partially replaces the terms of the agreement. Among the advantages of smart contracts as grounds for the emergence of property rights can be identified, first of all, the inability to change the terms of the contract and interference in its work. However, at the same time, this feature is a disadvantage of the smart contract, as it does not allow to take into account the objective circumstances that may affect the implementation of the agreement. The problem of oracles when using smart contracts is also considered. It is noted that the use of oracles actually means the involvement of a third party in the transaction with all the risks that arise from it. The problem of involving notaries and state registrars in transactions on acquisition of property rights on the basis of a smart contract is analyzed. The problems of lack of legal regulation of smart contracts, in particular, related to its transnational nature, is investigated. The problem of protection of the rights of the parties to the smart contract is analyzed, in particular, related to technical errors and outside interference. Temporary solutions regarding the use of smart contracts and general recommendations on the legislative definition of smart contracts are proposed.

scholarly journals Smart Contract: The Concept, Legal Nature, Features of Conclusion and Execution

Legal Concept ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. 54-60
Author(s):  
Nizami Safarli
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Smart Contracts ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Blockchain Technology ◽  
Smart Contract ◽  
Legal Nature ◽  
Domestic Legislation ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Statutory Regulation

Introduction: the paper is devoted to a new phenomenon in business activity in the conditions of IT development that contribute to the creation of secure contractual relations on the Internet on the basis of transactions executed through smart contracts. The author notes that the need for amendments that could fill the loopholes in the current legislation is obvious. And, first of all, it concerns Blockchain technology – the algorithm that mediates the safe development, conclusion and execution of smart contracts. Blockchain technology is considered in the paper as one of the safest means for concluding and executing smart contracts. The author argues that the study of the concept, legal nature and essence of smart contracts is relevant in the light of spreading their share in the total array of transactions in the world economy in conjunction with the changing domestic legislation governing the relevant sphere, as well as the international integration processes affecting the intensification of foreign economic activity of the Russian Federation. The smart contract concepts formulated by the Russian legislator in the process of upgrading the array of statutory regulation under conditions of economy digitalization are studied and compared. The features of conclusion and protection of the smart contract in the civil legislation of the Russian Federation are analyzed. In order to fully articulate the concept of the smart contract, reflecting its essence, functional purpose and legal nature, it is proposed to create a special law that would focus on the conclusion and implementation of “the smart contract” and the specification of the general norms of the civil code. At the same time, the norms of other special laws would supplement and correct the provisions fixed by this act depending on the sphere of managing and the legal regulation branch. The concept of the smart contract is formulated; its value for economic and contractual activity, and also the advantages and disadvantages of its application are established. The possible classifications of smart contracts are given.

scholarly journals Issues of Regulation of the Use of Cryptocurrency in the Russian Federation

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 267
Author(s):  
Verzhevsky P. A.
Keyword(s):  
Key Words ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Financial System ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Financial Risks ◽  
Economic Mechanism ◽  
Blockchain Technology ◽  
Smart Contract ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Ideal

The paper is devoted to the analysis of issues of regulation of use of cryptocurrency in the Russian Federation and offers the possible measures to solve them. The conclusion is made that the ideal desired result would be the creation of such a controlled financial and economic mechanism based on blockchain technology that would become more attractive for its potential participants than the "usual" cryptocurrencies and smart contract systems. Key words: cryptocurrency, legal regulation, financial system, transactions, financial risks, financial mechanism.

scholarly journals Regulation of the Smart Contract in (Romanian) Civil Law

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 95-111
Author(s):  
Raluca Onufreiciuc ◽  
Lorena-Elena Stănescu
Keyword(s):  
Civil Law ◽  
Computer Code ◽  
Computer Programs ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Contract Law ◽  
Use Case ◽  
Smart Contracts ◽  
Crucial Question ◽  
Smart Contract ◽  
The Subject

The research aims to organize, examine, and analyze the provisions on smart contracts available in Romanian civil law. “Smart contracts” are not smart, and are not necessarily contracts, although they can be. As self-executing computer programs, smart contracts are operational on the blockchain and unlike traditional legal contracts, once the agreement has been concluded and the smart contract is set in motion, no party can intervene and it will be executed without interruption, modification, or breach. The crucial question in the final contract law topic is what happens when the smart contract's outcomes deviate from those required by law. To answer this issue, we must first understand that whether a smart contract becomes legally enforceable is determined by several circumstances, together with the unique use case, the type of smart contract employed, and the existing legislation. The paper addresses the subject of determining and regulating smart contracts under Romanian current laws. Particular emphasis is placed on two ambiguous definitions of smart contracts: as computer code and as a civil-law contract. The authors conclude that the concept of smart contracts requires more legal regulation, particularly in terms of managing their meaning and comprehension.

scholarly journals SMART CONTRACT AS A FORM OF CIVIL CONTRACT

2019 ◽  
pp. 15-20
Author(s):  
V. Varavka
Keyword(s):  
Information Technologies ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Smart Contracts ◽  
Electronic Signature ◽  
Mathematical Algorithm ◽  
Blockchain Technology ◽  
Smart Contract ◽  
Civil Contract ◽  
Legal Force

Development of information technologies, cryptocurrencies and technology of distributed networks has caused the appearance of smart con- tracts as new types of civil contract. They have been widely used in recent years in such areas as initial coins offering (ICO), financial sector, inter- national trade and public services. At the same time the legal status and legal regulation of smart contracts are uncertain. These uncertainties cause many legal risks of smart-contractsutilization. The purpose of this article is to find out the conception of smart contract as a form of civil contract, to research its legal status and legal regula- tion issues and to develop proposals for the improvement of legal regulation of smart contracts and cryptocurrencies in Ukraine. By its legal nature a smart contract is a digital form of a civil contract realized in programming code automatically executed in a distributed network. Like a civil contract, smart contract has such elements as parties, subject and essential terms of the contract. The legal force of a smart contract depends on whether it includes the fundamental features of a civil contact, such as evidence that parties have intention to create legal relations, understandabil- ity of contract conditions and possibility to perform the terms of the contract under duress. The main advantages of a smart contract are its ability to significantly accelerate and reduce costs of the transaction and guarantee the fulfillment of contract terms regardless of the contractual parties' and third parties' will. The main risks of a smart contract are uncertainty of legal status of a smart contract and cryptocurrencies as a means of payment, complexity of expressing the contact terms in a mathematical algorithm, risk of software bugs and hacking attack. To solve the problems of legal regulation of smart contracts in Ukraine it is necessary to change the legislation in order to settle the legal status of cryptocurrencies and recognize a smart contract as a form of a civil contract. It is necessary to identify parties of the smart contract, confirm their agreement on the terms of the smart contract by using digital electronic signature. A smart contract should be supplemented by text application containing the es- sential terms of the contract which will have legal force in trail. It is necessary to implement blockchain technology in the state registers and pro- vide legal ability to make adjustments in the registers automatically for the performance of smartcontracts.

SMART CONTRACT: CONCEPT, LEGAL REGULATION, ASPECTS OF CONSUMER PROTECTION

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 236-247
Author(s):  
IRINA VIKTOROVNA ERMAKOVA ◽  
◽  
◽  
Keyword(s):  
Social Relations ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Fundamental Rights ◽  
Smart Contracts ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Legal Relationship ◽  
Smart Contract ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Definition Of

The subject of the research is legal norms aimed at regulating by law relations in the field of concluding and executing smart contracts, including issues of protecting the rights of the parties to such contracts, including consumers. The object of the research is social relations arising in the process of creating, concluding and executing of smart contracts. Particular attention is paid to the theoretical and practical aspects of the definition of the concept of “smart contract” and its essence, as well as its legal status. In addition, the article considers approaches to defining the essence of institutions that are closely related to the category of “smart contract”, such as “cryptocurrency”, “digital ruble”, “mining”. The aspects of the protection of fundamental rights of the parties involved in the considered legal relationship, including consumers, are also analyzed. Examples of court decisions regarding the corresponding category of cases are given. The novelty of the research lies in determining the current approaches in relation to the essence, concept and legal status of smart contracts, including the current position of law enforcement practice in relation to this issue. In addition, the novelty of the study lies in considering the practical aspects of the conclusion and execution of smart contracts, including, indicating examples of blockchain platforms on the basis of which smart contracts can function. Ultimately, the study led to the development by the author of some proposals in order to improve the relevant legislation. In particular, the author proposed to consolidate at the legislative level the legal definition of the concept of “smart contract”, indicating the appropriate wording.

scholarly journals Regulation of Consumer Risks when Concluding and Executing a Smart Contract

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (11) ◽  
pp. 180-189
Author(s):  
A. V. Chirkov
Keyword(s):  
Legal Status ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Operational Risks ◽  
Smart Contract ◽  
Consumer Rights ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Potential Losses ◽  
Transaction Price ◽  
Oriented Approach

The paper analyzes the legal status of the consumer when concluding and executing a smart contract. The author proves the existence of special risks for citizens associated with the conclusion and execution of a smart contract. In particular, the author considers the risk of a consumer’s misunderstanding of the terms of a smart contract, the risk of a difference between the terms of a smart contract and the terms of a contract set forth in the natural language, the risk of including in a smart contract conditions that infringe on consumer rights (unfair contractual terms), as well as special manifestations of regulatory and operational risks in relation to a smart contract. Currently, in the Russian Federation, as in most foreign jurisdictions, there are no special legal mechanisms aimed at protecting consumer rights from these risks. The “general” mechanisms of consumer protection existing in the Russian jurisdiction are insufficient. Considering this, the author proposes mechanisms for each risk aimed at minimizing its implementation and negative impact on the citizen. The following risk-oriented approach to regulating relations when concluding a smart contract with the participation of a consumer is proposed. A citizen can conclude transactions using a smart contract subject to legislative limitation of his potential losses under a transaction (limiting the transaction price) and the introduction of the proposed legal regulation aimed at minimizing the risks discussed in the paper.

scholarly journals Legal Regulation of Cryptocurrencies and Blockchain Technologies in Germany and Italy

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. 197-206
Author(s):  
V. M. Kamalyan
Keyword(s):  
National Level ◽  
Public Life ◽  
Digital Technologies ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Unified Approach ◽  
Public Interests ◽  
Smart Contract ◽  
Points Of View ◽  
Effective Use ◽  
Scientific Doctrine

In the paper, the author analyzes the legislation of Germany and Italy, which regulates financial technologies, and highlights the official positions of the state bodies of these countries regarding digitalization and its elements. The trends in the development of legislation in the digital sphere and its prospects are identified. In addition, the German and Italian scientific doctrine is being studied, which, as noted, does not offer a unified approach to financial technologies, in particular to a smart contract, but contains conflicting positions and points of view. Based on the study, it is concluded that there is a need for legislative regulation of financial technologies not only at the national level, but also at the international level. It is emphasized that legislation must find a compromise between public interests, economic needs and technological capabilities in order to make the most effective use of digital technologies in various spheres of public life.

scholarly journals Smart-Contracts in the digital economy: Contractual regulation and dispute resolution

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 40-50
Author(s):  
S. A. Sinitsyn ◽  
M. O. Diakonova ◽  
T. I. Chursina
Keyword(s):  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Self Control ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Physical Contact ◽  
Smart Contracts ◽  
Digital Platforms ◽  
Blockchain Technology ◽  
Smart Contract ◽  
Materials Used ◽  
Automatic Code

This article has been prepared for the research purpose of identifying, disclosing, and justifying certain trends in the development of civil law and procedures in the context of the spread of smart contract practices and the expansion of their spheres of application. At the moment, there is no uniform approach to choosing an optimal form for the legal regulation of smart contracts within the system of contract law in modern legal systems or international law; meanwhile, globalization and the digitalization of the economy imply the growth of cross-border transactions. The emergence of smart contracts is due to the development of e-commerce, in which the parties’ interactions are carried out electronically instead of in physical exchanges or direct physical contact. Smart contracts gaining popularity in circulation are based on two interrelated elements: firstly, they eliminate a person’s direct participation in some or all cases of executing the agreement using an automated code designed for execution without reference to the intentions of the contracting parties after publication; secondly, they make use of decentralized blockchain technology, and also provide automatic code execution without any party’s potential intervention, so as to eliminate or reduce the self-control and third-party control of the commitment.This study examines the content, conclusion, validity, protection of rights and legitimate interests of the parties, interpretation, and legal nature of smart contracts. The research materials used foreign experience in resolving disputes from smart contracts on digital platforms (Kleros, JUR, Aragon Network Justice, OpenCourt, OpenBazaar), as well as domestic and foreign literature on smart contracts. This research has been prepared based on general (deduction, dialectical analysis, intersectoral relations of objects) and specialized (comparative-legal, economic-legal) methods of scientific experimentation.The authors conclude that there are no grounds for considering a smart contract as a new classification element of the system of contractual regulation (type or kind of contract). In addition, the analysis shows that the resolution of smart contract disputes through digital platforms remains radically uncertain, and currently is not creating obvious advantages in comparison with traditional judicial proceedings.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document