scholarly journals A Survey of University Students’ Knowledge of Vocabulary Learning Strategies and Influential Factors in Middle East

2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 646 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amin Rasti Behbahani
Keyword(s):  
International Students ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Vocabulary Learning ◽  
Metacognitive Strategies ◽  
T Test ◽  
Influential Factor ◽  
Personal Factors ◽  
Proficiency Level ◽  
Vocabulary Learning Strategies

In this study, the most and the least common vocabulary learning strategies was explored among Eastern Mediterranean University international students. Besides, the role of personal factors such as gender and English proficiency level of students were considered. After distributing the questionnaire, the data were analyzed applying t-test and ANOVA. It was revealed that the level of importance of vocabulary learning strategy use was moderate for the EMU international students. Furthermore, it was found that metacognitive strategies and social strategies are the most and the least common vocabulary learning strategies respectively utilized by EMU international students for learning vocabulary. Regarding the role of gender and proficiency level, the t-test and ANOVA results indicated that gender was an effective factor; whereas, proficiency was not an influential factor in preference of students for using vocabulary learning strategies. Male students preferred detrimental strategies but females preferred metacognitive strategies.

scholarly journals An Overview of Preferred Vocabulary Learning Strategies by Learners

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (10) ◽  
pp. 174
Author(s):  
Kanthimathi Letchumanan ◽  
Paramasivam Muthusam ◽  
Potchelvi Govindasamy ◽  
Atieh Farashaiyan
Keyword(s):  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Vocabulary Learning ◽  
Metacognitive Strategies ◽  
Multiple Use ◽  
Vocabulary Learning Strategies

<p>This article aimed at examining the various vocabulary learning strategies used by learners to learn a word. Data from the study showed that learners do use certain vocabulary learning strategies and that strategy has become their preferred vocabulary learning strategies. The study also showed that learners use more than one strategy to learn a vocabulary. Thus, the study confirmed that multiple use of vocabulary learning strategies are preferred by learners especially the cognitive, determination and metacognitive strategies.</p>

scholarly journals THE EMPLOYMENT OF LEARNING STRATEGIES IN LEARNING ENGINEERING TERMINOLOGY AMONG ENGINEERING UNDERGRADUATES

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 128-130
Author(s):  
Amri Muaz Azmimurad ◽  
Najah Osman
Keyword(s):  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Learning Theory ◽  
Mixed Method ◽  
Vocabulary Learning ◽  
Mixed Method Study ◽  
Word Meanings ◽  
Proficiency Level ◽  
Vocabulary Learning Strategies ◽  
Technical Vocabulary ◽  
Cognitive And Metacognitive Strategies

This research reports on a mixed method study with the aim to discover the employment of vocabulary learning strategies by students majoring in engineering course in learning technical vocabulary which is in this context, the engineering terminologies. This research adopted Explicit Vocabulary Learning Theory by Ellis (1994) which proposed that there are usage of learning strategies in the process of learning word meanings. Five vocabulary learning strategies taxonomies were employed in this study which were developed by Schmitt (1994) which are determination, social, memory, cognitive and metacognitive strategies. Each taxonomy has a few strategies that are developed specifically according to the type of strategies used. All five taxonomies of vocabulary learning strategies were compared to the students’ field of study, year of study and English proficiency level. Previous studies highlighted that there were differences found in the use of strategies among learners in comparison to their characteristics.

scholarly journals Students’ Vocabulary Learning Strategies of Discovery and Consolidation in Malaysian Primary School English Language Classrooms

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharon Fung-Chien Kho ◽  
Joseph Ramanair ◽  
Ambigapathy Pandian
Keyword(s):  
Primary School ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
English Language ◽  
Social Cognitive ◽  
Vocabulary Learning ◽  
Metacognitive Strategies ◽  
Vocabulary Knowledge ◽  
Social Strategies ◽  
Vocabulary Learning Strategies ◽  
Cognitive Memory

A good grasp of vocabulary enables language learners to articulate, comprehend and communicate ideas and concepts effectively. For learners whose first language is not English, mastering vocabulary knowledge in terms of the breadth and depth is challenging and needs to start at a young age through the use of various strategies. The lack of English language vocabulary knowledge would demotivate learners and even result in abandoning efforts to learn the language. Therefore, it is important that learners know and are able to use five strategies, which include determination, social, cognitive, memory, and metacognitive strategies to learn vocabulary. Determination and social strategies are in the discovery category, while social cognitive, memory, and metacognitive strategies are in the consolidation category. This study aims to determine the vocabulary learning strategies used by 132 Year Five primary school English language students in two urban National Type Chinese schools in Sarawak. It investigated the strategies these learners used, how frequently they used them, and their reasons for preferring particular strategies. Data were collected from two classrooms at each school through the use of questionnaire and individual interview. Questionnaire results were analysed descriptively in terms of mean scores and standard deviation while interview responses were coded, categorised and analysed using thematic analysis. The findings suggest that while the students employed moderate use of all the five strategies, cognitive strategies which involved mechanical approaches were the most used while social strategies were not used by all students.

scholarly journals THE VOCABULARY LEARNING STRATEGIES USED BY UUM STUDENTS IN RELATION TO THEIR PROFICIENCY LEVELS

2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 92
Author(s):  
Noraziah Mohd Amin
Keyword(s):  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Undergraduate Students ◽  
Vocabulary Learning ◽  
Proficiency Levels ◽  
Proficiency Level ◽  
Frequency Of Use ◽  
Vocabulary Learning Strategies ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Universiti Utara Malaysia

AbstrakTulisan ini berfokus pada strategi pembelajaran kosakata yang digunakan oleh Band 1 dan Band 4 mahasiswa sarjana Universitas Utara Malaysia (UUM). Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mensurvei penggunaan strategi pembelajaran kosakata yang digunakan oleh responden dan untuk menentukan sejauh mana penggunaan strategi dipengaruhi oleh tingkat kemampuan mereka. Instrumen yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah kuesioner yang dikembangkan oleh Lachini (2007) berdasarkan klasifikasi Cottrell tentang strategi pembelajaran yang terdiri dari lima kategori strategi belajar kosakata: kreatif, reflektif, efektif, aktif dan motivasi. Respon dari 100 responden dari masing masing kelompok, Band 1 dan Band 4, hasil kuesioner diperiksa pada frekuensi penggunaan strategi pembelajaran kosakata. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tidak ada perbedaan yang signifikan dalam hal frekuensi penggunaan antara Band 1 dan Band 4 peserta sebagai mayoritas kedua kelompok digunakan sebagian besar strategi baik 'sedikit' atau 'sering'. Temuan penelitian mungkin bisa membantu instruktur untuk memfasilitasi pembelajaran kosakata bahasa Inggris oleh mahasiswa UUM dan mahasiswa lain pada umumnya.                        Kata-kata kunci: Strategi pembelajaran kosakata, tingkatan kemampuan berbahasaAbstract This thesis is concerned with the vocabulary learning strategies used by Band 1 and Band 4 undergraduate students of Universiti Utara Malaysia (UUM).  The objectives of this descriptive study were to survey the vocabulary learning strategies used by the respondents and to determine to what extent their use of the strategies was influenced by their proficiency level. The instrument employed in the study was a questionnaire developed by Lachini (2007) based on Cottrell’s classification of learning strategies. It consists of five categories of vocabulary learning strategies: creative, reflective, effective, active and motivated. The responses of 100 Band 1 and 100 Band 4 students to the questionnaire were examined on the frequency of their use of the vocabulary learning strategies. The results indicated that there was no significant difference in terms of the frequency of use between Band 1 and Band 4 participants as  the majority of both groups employed most of the strategies either ‘a little’ or ‘often’. The findings of the study perhaps could help instructors to facilitate the learning of English vocabulary by UUM students and other students at large.    Keywords: The vocabulary learning strategies, proficiency levels

scholarly journals A descriptive study on ESL learners’ vocabulary knowledge through cognitive and metacognitive strategies

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 142
Author(s):  
Aravind B R ◽  
Rajasekaran V
Keyword(s):  
Learning Strategies ◽  
English Language ◽  
Vocabulary Learning ◽  
Metacognitive Strategies ◽  
Vocabulary Knowledge ◽  
English Language Teaching ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Vocabulary Learning Strategies ◽  
Esl Learners ◽  
Cognitive And Metacognitive Strategies

The present research was carried out to study the cognitive and metacognitive vocabulary learning strategies of 36 ESL learners’. Schmitt’s Vocabulary Learning Strategies questionnaire was used to conduct the study. The study revealed the subsequent array of cognitive and metacognitive strategies employed by ESL learners. Additionally, semi-structured interviews were also conducted with 10 ESL learners’ who completed the questionnaire to get more reliable information about learners’ strategies with vocabulary learning. The findings indicated that ‘Using English Language Media’, ‘Verbal repetition’, ‘Take notes in class’ were the most popular strategies, whereas ‘Skip or pass new word’ and ‘Put English labels on physical objects’ were least used. The results of this paper provide many implications for English language teaching. Detailed explanations of the participants’ cognitive and metacognitive strategies were given in the discussion.

How and how much?

2019 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 93-121
Author(s):  
Chiara Romagnoli ◽  
Sergio Conti
Keyword(s):  
Foreign Language ◽  
Language Learning ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Vocabulary Learning ◽  
Foreign Language Learning ◽  
Vocabulary Size ◽  
Proficiency Level ◽  
Vocabulary Learning Strategies ◽  
Chinese Learners ◽  
The Relationship

Abstract Vocabulary plays a crucial role in foreign language learning, and vocabulary mastery proves to be challenging at different competence levels. Compared to other areas of research into Chinese as a foreign language, vocabulary acquisition and vocabulary teaching have rarely been investigated. The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between vocabulary learning strategies and vocabulary size and to verify whether vocabulary size is positively correlated to proficiency level. A total of 95 Italian undergraduate Chinese learners, from elementary to intermediate levels, participated in this study. The participants were first given a vocabulary learning questionnaire and then a vocabulary size test. Statistical and qualitative analyses of the data revealed two trends: a poor variety of vocabulary learning strategies and a positive correlation between vocabulary size and proficiency level.

scholarly journals Investigating English Students` Vocabulary Learning Strategies at Raden Intan State Islamic University

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 167-186
Author(s):  
Iwan Kurniawan ◽  
Melinda Roza ◽  
Juhana Juhana
Keyword(s):  
Learning Strategies ◽  
English Education ◽  
Vocabulary Learning ◽  
Metacognitive Strategies ◽  
Female Students ◽  
Male Students ◽  
Learning Problems ◽  
Average Score ◽  
Vocabulary Learning Strategies ◽  
English Students

The purpose of this study was to determine the types of Vocabulary Learning Strategies (VLS), the most and least frequently used VLSs by female and male students, and the types of VLSs chosen to address vocabulary learning problems. This study employed a survey technique. The population for this study was drawn from Lampung State Islamic University's English Education Department, which consisted of three classes and had a total enrollment of approximately 75 students. Female students totaled 64, while male students totaled 11. The sample consisted of fourth-semester students. The instrument used in this study was a questionnaire that Gu and Johnson proposed in 1996. Interviews were also used as a tool. All English department students at Lampung State Islamic University used one of four vocabulary learning strategies. Among the four categories of Vocabulary Learning Strategies, students in the three classes favoured metacognitive strategies the most, as indicated by the mean score (2.90). On the other hand, the least frequently used strategy was memory/repetition, as indicated by the lowest mean score (2.22). Female students tended to use metacognitive strategies, as indicated by their highest mean score (2.87), while male students tended to use memories/repetition strategies, as indicated by their average score (2.2). Additionally, the most frequently used strategy by male students was metacognitive strategy with a mean score of (2.93), while the least frequently used strategy was activation with a mean score of (2.93). (2.31). To overcome the problem of vocabulary acquisition, the students used the strategies of consulting a dictionary first, followed by learning grammar and asking other people second. The final strategies used were word practise and internet surfing. 

scholarly journals The Use of Vocabulary Learning Strategies by EFL and EAP Undergraduate University Learners’ in the Iraqi Context

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohanad Al-Omairi
Keyword(s):  
Language Learning ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Learning Strategy ◽  
Vocabulary Learning ◽  
Structured Interview ◽  
English For Academic Purposes ◽  
Vocabulary Learning Strategies ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Common Strategy

Vocabulary learning is an essential part of foreign or second language learning. This study aims at identifying the most and least common strategies that are used by Iraqi English as a foreign language (EFL) majors and English for academic purposes (EAP) learners. Also, determine the differences that are in EFL and EAP students’ vocabulary learning strategy (VLS) use as well as exploring EFL and EAP students’ views and difficulties. The study samples were 100 undergraduate learners (50 EAP learners and 50 EFL majors studying at Al-iraqia University, Iraq). There were two methods adopted; a validated Likert-scale questionnaire based on a developed version of Schmitt (1997) and further selected four of them for a follow-up semi-structured interview. The results of the survey indicated that EFL and EAP learners’ most common strategy was determination strategy, whereas, the least common strategy was metacognitive. The finding of the independent sample t-test of the five identified categories: metacognitive, determination, cognitive, memory as well as social, indicated that there was no significant difference between EFL and EAP learners’ in the frequency of the use of VLS. The results of the interview indicated that the majority of EFL and EAP learners’ valued the significance role of VLS.

scholarly journals Comparing the efficacy of digital flashcards versus paper flashcards to improve receptive and productive L2 vocabulary

2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gilbert Dizon ◽  
Daniel Tang
Keyword(s):  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Vocabulary Learning ◽  
Vocabulary Development ◽  
T Test ◽  
Vocabulary Learning Strategies ◽  
Efl Students ◽  
The Difference ◽  
L2 Vocabulary ◽  
Experimental Group ◽  
Paired T Test

<p><span>Several researchers have compared the efficacy of digital flashcards (DFs) versus paper flashcards (PFs) to improve L2 vocabulary and have concluded that using DFs is more effective (Azabdaftari &amp; Mozaheb, 2012; Başoğlu &amp; Akdemir, 2010; Kiliçkaya &amp; Krajka, 2010). However, these studies did not utilize vocabulary learning strategies (VLSs) as a way to support the vocabulary development of those using PFs. This is significant because DFs often offer a range of features to promote vocabulary development, whereas PFs are much more basic; thus, learners who study via paper materials are at a disadvantage compared with those who use DFs. Given the success that VLSs have had in fostering L2 vocabulary enhancement (e.g., Mizumoto &amp; Takeuchi, 2009), their incorporation could have influenced the previous studies. Therefore, one of the primary aims of this study was to find if there were significant differences in receptive and productive L2 vocabulary improvements between students who used PFs in conjunction with 3 VLSs – dropping, association, and oral rehearsal – and those who used the DF tools Quizlet and Cram. Additionally, the researchers examined the learners’ opinions to see if there was a preference for either study method. A total of 52 EFL students at two Japanese universities participated in the 12-week study. Pre- and post-tests were administered to measure the vocabulary gains in the PF group (n = 26) and the DF group (n = 26). Results from a paired t-test revealed that both groups made significant improvements in receptive and productive vocabulary. However, the difference between the gains was not significant, which contrasts with past comparison studies of DFs and PFs and highlights the importance of VLSs. A 10-item survey with closed and Likert-scale questions was also administered to determine the participants’ opinions towards the study methods. Higher levels of agreement were found in the experimental group, indicating that the students viewed DFs more favorably than PFs.</span></p>

Vocabulary Learning Strategies of English for Specific Purposes Students at Agricultural University of Georgia

2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tamar Tskhvitava
Keyword(s):  
Language Learning ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Vocabulary Learning ◽  
English For Specific Purposes ◽  
Language Learning Strategies ◽  
Teaching English ◽  
University Of Georgia ◽  
Vocabulary Learning Strategies ◽  
Teaching Learning

The importance of teaching ESP to students not majoring in English is discussed. The role of vocabulary learning inESP is emphasized. The article attempts to add an insight to Georgian experience of teaching English to studentsof Agriculture to the existing studies on the use of vocabulary learning strategies in ESP. The students shouldbecome aware of the importance of language learning strategies and get trained to use them appropriately. Thepurpose of this study was to investigate the attitude of students towards vocabulary learning methods offered bythe textbook and the teacher, as well as the awareness of and the preferred vocabulary teaching /learning strategiesamong Agriculture University students while they were taking an English for Specific Purpose (ESP) course.Respondents comprised 107 students at Agriculture University of Georgia students. An ESP vocabulary learningquestionnaire was administered to the randomly selected students who enrolled in the English for Agriculture as arequirement. It revealed that students are not sufficiently satisfied with the existing state of teaching ESP vocabulary.A conclusion has been made that vocabulary learning strategies have to be purposefully taught, to improve theexisting situation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document