scholarly journals Analysis of treatment outcomes in patients with progressive locally advanced non-resectable and disseminated medullary thyroid cancer receiving vandetanib outside of clinical trials (Russian experience)

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 46-53
Author(s):  
I. S. Romanov ◽  
А. М. Mudunov ◽  
S. О. Podvyaznikov ◽  
А. V. Ignatova ◽  
Yu. V. Alymov
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Thyroid Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Treatment Outcomes ◽  
Medullary Thyroid Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Medullary Thyroid

The study objective is to perform retrospective analysis of the efficacy and safety of vandetanib for metastatic and non-resectable medullary thyroid cancer in routine clinical practice. Materials and methods. We analyzed treatment outcomes in 46 patients treated with vandetanib. We also evaluated progression-free survival, overall survival, time to progression, and frequency of adverse events. Results. At a median follow-up time of 27.4 months (range: 2.5–106.5 months) and median duration of vandetanib therapy of 21 months, disease progression was registered in 32.6 % of cases, whereas stable disease was observed in 28.3 % of cases and 8.7 % of study participants demonstrated partial response. One patient had complete response to treatment. Almost one-third of patients (28.2 %) died, including 2 individuals whose death was not associated with cancer. The one-year and three-year progression-free survival rates were 67.3 % and 33.3 %, respectively; the two-year and five-year overall survival rates were 82.4 % and 29.4 %, respectively. The efficacy of therapy was confirmed by a 79.4 % decrease in the serum level of calcitonin after treatment initiation. Side effects were observed in 33.9 % of patients (primarily skin and gastrointestinal toxic reactions) and were easily managed in most of the cases. Eight individuals (17.4 %) required cessation of vandetanib due to adverse events. Conclusion. Our findings suggest high efficacy and acceptable safety profile of vandetanib in the treatment of progressive locally advanced non-resectable and disseminated medullary thyroid cancer

Role of modern neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced thymic epithelial neoplasms

2020 ◽  
pp. 030089162096798
Author(s):  
Yirui Zhai ◽  
Dazhi Chen ◽  
Yushun Gao ◽  
Zhouguang Hui ◽  
Liyan Xue ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Thymic Carcinoma ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Epithelial Neoplasms

Purpose: To improve resectability in patients with stage III–IVA thymic epithelial neoplasms, neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy are considered. This retrospective study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant therapies using modern techniques in thymic epithelial neoplasms. Methods: We included 32 patients with Masaoka stage III–IV disease treated at our institution from January 2010 to December 2017. Data regarding clinicopathologic characteristics, treatment protocols, toxicities, and survival were collected. Response was evaluated according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours 1.1. Survival was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Adverse events were graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. Results: Neoadjuvant radiotherapy alone, chemotherapy alone, sequence chemoradiotherapy, and concurrent chemoradiotherapy were administered to 10 (31.3%), 9 (28.1%), 3 (9.4%), and 10 (31.3%) patients, respectively. Twenty-nine patients (90.6%) underwent R0 resection. The median follow-up time was 38.0 months (3.3–109.5 months). After neoadjuvant therapy, 18 patients (56.3%) achieved partial response and 14 (43.8%) had stable disease. Pathologic complete response was achieved in 6 patients (18.8%), all of whom had thymic carcinoma. The 5-year overall and progression-free survival rates were 90.9% and 67.5%, respectively. For patients with thymic carcinoma, the 5-year overall and progression-free survival rates were 80.0% and 66.2%, respectively. Grade 3 toxicities were observed in only 1 patient (leukopenia). Conclusions: For patients with primary unresectable thymic neoplasms, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is an efficient and safe choice, with favorable response and survival and moderate toxicities. Patients with thymic carcinoma might benefit more from neoadjuvant therapies.

Long-Term Survival Results of a Randomized Trial Comparing Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin, With Methotrexate, Vinblastine, Doxorubicin, Plus Cisplatin in Patients With Bladder Cancer

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (21) ◽  
pp. 4602-4608 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans von der Maase ◽  
Lisa Sengelov ◽  
James T. Roberts ◽  
Sergio Ricci ◽  
Luigi Dogliotti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Visceral Metastases ◽  
Overall Survival Rates

Purpose To compare long-term survival in patients with locally advanced or metastatic transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the urothelium treated with gemcitabine/cisplatin (GC) or methotrexate/vinblastine/doxorubicin/cisplatin (MVAC). Patients and Methods Efficacy data from a large randomized phase III study of GC versus MVAC were updated. Time-to-event analyses were performed on the observed distributions of overall and progression-free survival. Results A total of 405 patients were randomly assigned: 203 to the GC arm and 202 to the MVAC arm. At the time of analysis, 347 patients had died (GC arm, 176 patients; MVAC arm, 171 patients). Overall survival was similar in both arms (hazard ratio [HR], 1.09; 95% CI, 0.88 to 1.34; P = .66) with a median survival of 14.0 months for GC and 15.2 months for MVAC. The 5-year overall survival rates were 13.0% and 15.3%, respectively (P = .53). The median progression-free survival was 7.7 months for GC and 8.3 months for MVAC, with an HR of 1.09. The 5-year progression-free survival rates were 9.8% and 11.3%, respectively (P = .63). Significant prognostic factors favoring overall survival included performance score (> 70), TNM staging (M0 v M1), low/normal alkaline phosphatase level, number of disease sites (≤ three), and the absence of visceral metastases. By adjusting for these prognostic factors, the HR was 0.99 for overall survival and 1.01 for progression-free survival. The 5-year overall survival rates for patients with and without visceral metastases were 6.8% and 20.9%, respectively. Conclusion Long-term overall and progression-free survival after treatment with GC or MVAC are similar. These results strengthen the role of GC as a standard of care in patients with locally advanced or metastatic TCC.

Procalcitonin levels predict clinical course and progression-free survival in patients with medullary thyroid cancer

Cancer ◽  
2009 ◽  
pp. NA-NA ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin A. Walter ◽  
Christian Meier ◽  
Tanja Radimerski ◽  
Fabienne Iten ◽  
Marius Kränzlin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Thyroid Cancer ◽  
Medullary Thyroid Cancer ◽  
Clinical Course ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Medullary Thyroid

Phase II Study of Safety and Efficacy of Motesanib in Patients With Progressive or Symptomatic, Advanced or Metastatic Medullary Thyroid Cancer

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (23) ◽  
pp. 3794-3801 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin J. Schlumberger ◽  
Rossella Elisei ◽  
Lars Bastholt ◽  
Lori J. Wirth ◽  
Renato G. Martins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Thyroid Cancer ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Medullary Thyroid Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Medullary Thyroid ◽  
Duration Of Response

PurposeThis phase II study investigated the efficacy and tolerability of motesanib, an investigational, highly selective inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors 1, 2, and 3; platelet-derived growth factor receptor; and Kit in advanced medullary thyroid cancer (MTC).Patients and MethodsPatients with locally advanced or metastatic, progressive or symptomatic MTC received motesanib 125 mg/d orally for up to 48 weeks or until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. The primary end point was objective response by independent review. Other end points included duration of response, progression-free survival, safety, pharmacokinetics, and changes in tumor markers.ResultsOf 91 enrolled patients who received motesanib, two (2%) achieved objective response (95% CI, 0.3% to 7.7%); their duration of response was 32 weeks (censored) and 21 weeks (disease progressed). Eighty-one percent of patients had stable disease (48% had durable stable disease ≥ 24 weeks), 8% had disease progression as best response, and 9% were not evaluated; 76% experienced a decrease from baseline in target lesion measurement. Median progression-free survival was 48 weeks (95% CI, 43 to 56 weeks). Among patients with tumor marker analysis, 69 (83%) of 83 and 63 (75%) of 84 had decreased serum calcitonin and carcinoembryonic antigen during treatment, respectively, compared with baseline. The most common treatment-related adverse events were diarrhea (41%), fatigue (41%), hypothyroidism (29%), hypertension (27%), and anorexia (27%). In pharmacokinetic analyses, motesanib trough concentrations were lower compared with differentiated thyroid cancer patients from the same study.ConclusionAlthough the objective response rate was low, a significant proportion of MTC patients (81%) achieved stable disease while receiving motesanib.

scholarly journals Cabozantinib in Progressive Medullary Thyroid Cancer

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (29) ◽  
pp. 3639-3646 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rossella Elisei ◽  
Martin J. Schlumberger ◽  
Stefan P. Müller ◽  
Patrick Schöffski ◽  
Marcia S. Brose ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Thyroid Cancer ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Medullary Thyroid Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Mutation Status ◽  
Medullary Thyroid ◽  
Ret Mutation

PurposeCabozantinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) of hepatocyte growth factor receptor (MET), vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2, and rearranged during transfection (RET), demonstrated clinical activity in patients with medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) in phase I.Patients and MethodsWe conducted a double-blind, phase III trial comparing cabozantinib with placebo in 330 patients with documented radiographic progression of metastatic MTC. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to cabozantinib (140 mg per day) or placebo. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Additional outcome measures included tumor response rate, overall survival, and safety.ResultsThe estimated median PFS was 11.2 months for cabozantinib versus 4.0 months for placebo (hazard ratio, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.19 to 0.40; P < .001). Prolonged PFS with cabozantinib was observed across all subgroups including by age, prior TKI treatment, and RET mutation status (hereditary or sporadic). Response rate was 28% for cabozantinib and 0% for placebo; responses were seen regardless of RET mutation status. Kaplan-Meier estimates of patients alive and progression-free at 1 year are 47.3% for cabozantinib and 7.2% for placebo. Common cabozantinib-associated adverse events included diarrhea, palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia, decreased weight and appetite, nausea, and fatigue and resulted in dose reductions in 79% and holds in 65% of patients. Adverse events led to treatment discontinuation in 16% of cabozantinib-treated patients and in 8% of placebo-treated patients.ConclusionCabozantinib (140 mg per day) achieved a statistically significant improvement of PFS in patients with progressive metastatic MTC and represents an important new treatment option for patients with this rare disease. This dose of cabozantinib was associated with significant but manageable toxicity.

637 Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) may indicate a favorable prognosis in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI)

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A672-A673
Author(s):  
Dylan Martini ◽  
Sean Evans ◽  
Subir Goyal ◽  
Yuan Liu ◽  
T Anders Olsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Emory University

BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have become an increasingly utilized treatment in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Although they have a favorable toxicity profile, immune-related adverse events (irAEs) can have a significant impact on patients‘ quality of life. It is not well understood whether irAEs are associated with improved clinical outcomes. We investigated the relationship between irAEs and clinical outcomes in mRCC patients treated with ICI.MethodsWe performed a retrospective study of 200 patients with mRCC who received ICI at Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University from 2015–2020. Clinical outcomes were measured by overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and clinical benefit (CB). OS and PFS were calculated from ICI-initiation to date of death and radiographic or clinical progression, respectively. CB was defined as a best radiographic response of complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) for >6 months per response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. Toxicity data was collected from clinic notes and laboratory values. The association with OS and PFS was modeled by Cox proportional hazards model. Kaplan-Meier curves were created for survival estimates.ResultsMost patients were males (71%), and 78% had clear-cell RCC (ccRCC). Most patients (58%) received anti-PD-1 monotherapy. The majority were international mRCC database consortium (IMDC) intermediate (57%) or poor-risk (26%). Anti-PD-1 monotherapy was the most common (58%) treatment regimen and most patients received ICI as first (38%) or second-line (42%) treatment. One-third of patients (33%) experienced an irAE, with the most common being endocrine (13%), gastrointestinal (11%), and dermatologic (10%). Patients who experienced irAEs had significantly longer OS (HR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.32–0.87, p=0.013), higher chance of CB (OR: 2.10, 95% CI: 1.11–4.00, p=0.023) and showed a trend towards longer PFS (HR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.49–1.02, p=0.065) in MVA (table 1). Patients who had thyroid irAEs had significantly longer OS, PFS, and higher chance of CB in MVA (table 1). The objective response rate was higher for patients who experienced irAEs (34% vs. 18%). Patients who experienced irAEs had significantly longer median OS (44.5 vs. 18.2 months, p=0.005) and PFS (7.5 vs 3.6 months, p=0.0028) compared to patients who did not (figure 1).Abstract 637 Table 1MVA* of association between irAEs and clinical outcomesAbstract 637 Figure 1Kaplan-Meier curves of association between immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and overall survival (OS, top panel) and progression-free survival (PFS, bottom panel)ConclusionsWe showed that mRCC patients who experienced irAEs, particularly thyroid irAEs, had improved clinical outcomes. This suggests that irAEs may be prognostic of favorable outcomes in mRCC patients treated with ICI. Larger, prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.AcknowledgementsResearch reported in this publication was supported in part by the Breen Foundation and the Biostatistics Shared Resource of Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University and NIH/NCI under award number P30CA138292. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.Trial RegistrationNot applicableEthics ApprovalThis retrospective study was approved by the Emory University Institutional Review Board.ConsentNot applicableReferencesNot applicable

A Phase 2, Randomized, Open-Label Study of Irosustat Versus Megestrol Acetate in Advanced Endometrial Cancer

2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 258-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia Pautier ◽  
Ignace Vergote ◽  
Florence Joly ◽  
Bohuslav Melichar ◽  
Elzbieta Kutarska ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Megestrol Acetate ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Recurrent Endometrial Cancer

ObjectiveAdvanced/metastatic or recurrent endometrial cancer has a poor prognosis. Malignant endometrial tissue has high steroid sulphatase (STS) activity. The aim of this study was to evaluate STS as a therapeutic target in patients with endometrial cancer.MethodsThis was a phase 2, multicenter, international, open-label, randomized (1:1), 2-arm study of the STS inhibitor oral irosustat 40 mg/d versus oral megestrol acetate 160 mg/d in women with advanced/metastatic or recurrent estrogen receptor–positive endometrial cancer. The primary end point was the proportion of patients without progression or death 6 months after start of treatment. Secondary end points included progression-free survival, time to progression, overall survival, and safety.ResultsSeventy-one patients were treated (36 with irosustat, 35 with megestrol acetate). The study was prematurely stopped after futility analysis. Overall, 36.1% and 54.1% of patients receiving irosustat or megestrol acetate had not progressed or died at 6 months, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between irosustat and megestrol acetate in response and overall survival rates. Irosustat patients had a median progression-free survival of 16 weeks (90% confidence interval, 9.0–31.4) versus 40 weeks (90% confidence interval, 16.3–64.0) in megestrol acetate patients. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 20 (55.6%) and 13 (37.1%) patients receiving irosustat or megestrol, respectively. Most adverse events in both groups were grade 1 or 2.ConclusionsAlthough irosustat monotherapy did not attain a level of activity sufficient for further development in patients with advanced/recurrent endometrial cancer, this study confirms the activity of hormonal treatment (megestrol acetate) for this indication.

scholarly journals Clinical outcome and side effects of concomitant chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced inoperable non-small cell lung cancer: Our experiences

2021 ◽  
pp. 38-38
Author(s):  
Bojan Radojicic ◽  
Marija Radojicic ◽  
Miroslav Misovic ◽  
Dejan Kostic
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Concomitant Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Free Survival

Background/Aim. About 1.8 million new lung cancer cases are diagnosed in the world every year, and about 1.6 million cases are with fatal outcome. Despite improvements in treatment in previous decades, the survival of patients with lung cancer is still poor. The five-year survival rate is about 50% for patients with localized disease, 20% for patients with regionally advanced disease, 2% for patients with metastatic disease, and about 14% for all stages. The median survival of patients with untreated NSCLC in the advanced stage is four to five months and the annual survival rate is only 10%. The main goal of the research is to obtain and analyze the results of treatment with concomitant chemotherapy in terms of its efficacy and toxicity in selected patients with locally advanced inoperable non-small cell lung cancer. Methods. The study included data analysis of 31 patients of both sexes who were diagnosed and pathohistologically verified with NSCLC in inoperable stage III and were referred by the Council for Malignant Lung Diseases to the Radiotherapy Department of the Military Medical Academy for concomitant chemoradiotherapy treatment. Upon expiry of the three-month period from the performed radiation treatment, the tumor resonance was assessed on the basis of MSCT examination of the chest and upper abdomen according to RECIST 1.1 criteria (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors). According to the same criteria, progression-free survival (PFS) was also assessed every three months during the first two years, then every 6 months or until the onset of disease symptoms, as well as overall survival (OS). Result. The median progression-free survival is 13 months, and the median overall survival is 20 months. During and immediately after RT, 9 (29%) patients had a grade 2 or higher adverse event. Conclusion. The use of concomitant chemoradiotherapy in patients in the third stage of locally advanced inoperable non-small cell lung cancer provides a good opportunity for a favorable therapeutic outcome, with an acceptable degree of acute and late toxicity, and represents the standard therapeutic approach for selected patients in this stage of the disease.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document