ENGLISH LANGUAGE HISTORIOGRAPHY ON POLITICAL TRANSFORMATIONS IN THE RUSSIAN FAR EAST IN THE 1990S – EARLY 2000S

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (3/1) ◽  
pp. 114-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. N. CHERNOLUTSKAIA

The modern political history of the Russian Far East is poorly covered  in English language historiography. Of the last 30 years,  Western experts subjected to a certain analysis the period of the  1990searly 2000s, when the Russian society underwent rapid  transformations. Their scientific comprehension practically went in  real time, that imposed restrictions on the formulation of problems,  the depth of their analysis, the sources used. The issue of the power  transformation in the Far East is considered mainly within the  framework of the concept of center-peripheral relations. The works  of R. Valliant, F. Chang, S. Davis, and others reveals Moscow's policy  to control the region and tactics of regional leaders  trying to reduce this control. The authors describe such relations in  close connection with the development of federalism in the RF and its “asymmetry”. The publications reflect the evolution of the  regional political elite, the change of types of governors – from  “humanitarians” to “industrialists” and representatives of political  parties, describe the political portraits of the Far Eastern governors,  much attention is paid to the criminalization of power (R. Orttung,  etc.). A special type of regional power is highlighted by experts in  connection with the victory of three “resource oligarchs” in the 2000  gubernatorial elections, including R. Abramovich in Chukotka, that is  estimated in the publications as an “administrative revolution”, the  transition to corporate governance, in which all branches of power in  the region are concentrated in the hands of representatives of a  large resource corporation (N. Thompson, D. Anderson).


2017 ◽  
Vol 45 (5) ◽  
pp. 798-814
Author(s):  
Ivan Sablin ◽  
Alexander Kuchinsky

Exploring the history of Koreans in the Russian Far East from the perspective of New Imperial History, the article demonstrates that political activism of Koreans and policies of the Russian (Soviet), Korean, and Japanese governments resulted in consolidation of two visions of their future. The first vision implied unity between the Koreans living in the Russian Far East with those who stayed in Korea, moved to Japan, or emigrated elsewhere and corresponded to the agenda of building a Korean nation. The second vision implied that the bilingual or Russified Koreans aspired to stay in the Russian Far East permanently, ensuring their own livelihood in the new regional frontier. The two currents interlaced in the project of Korean autonomy in a post-imperial state, first the Far Eastern Republic and later the Union of the Soviet Socialist Republics. The project involved inclusion of Koreans into the global spread of revolution through the Communist International and left open the issue of the duration of Korean presence in the Russian Far East. Its ultimate failure in 1926 left the Koreans partly excluded from the Soviet system without the institutional benefits of national autonomy.



Federalism ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 207-218
Author(s):  
A. I. Baksheev

This year marks exactly 100 years since the creation of a kind of state formation on part of the territory of our country – the FER. The article analyzes one of the little-studied pages of the history of the Russian Far East – the prerequisites for the creation, the struggle for independence and the loss of independence of the Far Eastern republic that existed in the period 1920-1922. The article uses the methods of the principle of objective historicism; synchronous method, the method of historical modeling, the features of the Civil War in the Far East, the foreign policy grounds for the creation of the FER, the reasons for the creation of the FER, the struggle of the armed forces of the FER with the White Guards and interventionists, the relationship between Soviet Russia and the FER, the reasons for the loss of independence of the FER are analyzed. In conclusion, the author comes to the conclusion that the Far Eastern republic was a buffer, which, having protected Soviet Russia from Japanese aggression, was doomed to disappear from the political map of the world.



2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 216-242
Author(s):  
V.A. Yakimova ◽  
A.A. Orekhova

Subject. The article addresses the tax liabilities of taxpayers registered in the subjects of the Far Eastern Federal District, which should be paid to the consolidated budget of the Russian Federation, as well as the factors of the said debt growth. Objectives. Our aim is to assess the level of tax debt of regions of the Russian Far East and identify the correlation between the factors and the amount of tax debt. Methods. The study rests on methods of analysis, generalization, grouping, systematization, and the correlation and regression analysis. Results. We analyzed the level of tax debt for the entire Far Eastern Federal District and by region, identified factors affecting the growth of tax debt therein. The paper assesses the structure of tax debt by type of taxes and activity of debtors. The unveiled factors may help control changes in the size of tax debt in the Russian Far East and develop effective measures to improve the debt collection. Conclusions. The study shows that there is an increase in the tax debt in the regions of the Russian Far East, in the VAT in particular. The factor analysis revealed that the volume of sales of wholesale enterprises, investment in fixed capital, the consumer price index have the largest impact on the amount of tax debt.



2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ol'ga Nikolaychuk

The monograph presents the search for solutions to the problems of the Far Eastern region. The proximity of China and the remoteness from the center of Russia make us look for effective measures to overcome the problems of settling the Far East in the context of sustainable economic development of modern Russia. The paper analyzes the problems of the Far East: in industry, agriculture, forestry, energy problems, environmental problems, and provides recommendations for their solution. Considerable attention is paid to migration problems. The experience of China is studied through the prism of bilateral cooperation with Russia. It is intended for students, masters, postgraduates, researchers dealing with issues of macroeconomic regulation and forecasting.



2009 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 207-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Melvin Aikens ◽  
Irina S. Zhushchikhovskaya ◽  
Song Nai Rhee


2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 902-916
Author(s):  
Yury D. Shmidt ◽  
Natalya V. Ivashina

The present paper analyses migration policy measures implemented in the Russian Far East, namely, State Programme to Assist the Voluntary Resettlement of Compatriots Living Abroad to the Russian Federation, the Far-Eastern Hectare Programme, establishment of Priority Development Areas (PDAs) and territories with a special regime of economic activity. The synthetic control method was applied to quantitatively assess how the adopted measures affect the migration outflow from regions of the Far Eastern Federal District. According to this method and relevant statistics, constituent entities of the Far Eastern Federal District were compared with control regions of the Siberian Federal District, where these policy tools have not been introduced. Comparable areas had similar socio-economic development trends and migration flows in the period preceding the implementation of the state programmes. To analyse the impact of migration policy changes in 2011–2018, the difference between outflow values of the Far Eastern and synthetic control regions was calculated. The results showed that the average estimated values are negative and significantly different from zero. This indicates a positive effect of new migration mitigation measures on reducing the outflow from the Russian Far East. Future research will separately assess the effectiveness of each migration policy tool implemented in the Far Eastern Federal District.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document