scholarly journals EFFICACY OF NARROWBAND ULTRAVIOLET B 311 NM PLUS AN INHIBITOR OF PHOSPHODIESTERASE 4 (PDE4) COMBINED THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH MODERATE TO SEVERE PLAQUE PSORIASIS

2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 149-155
Author(s):  
Olga Yu. Olisova ◽  
E. V Grekova ◽  
D. A Svistunova

Objective. to determine the effectiveness and tolerability of narrowband ultraviolet (UV) B (311 nm) plus an inhibitor of phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) combined therapy in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Material and methods. the first group consisted of 30 patients (18 women and 12 men) who were treated with UVB 311 nm and inhibitor of phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4). The second (control) group was treated with UVB 311 nm and methotrexate (n = 30; 15 women and 15 men). The study participants were aged 32 to 67 (43.8 ± 4.34). Results. it was determined greater efficiency (PASI 100 43.3% of patients and PASI 90 46.7%) of the treatment plaque moderate to severe psoriasis patients with UVB 311 nm plus an inhibitor of PDE4 compared to UVB 311 nm plus methotrexate (PASI 100 10% of patients and PASI 90 40%). The treatment was well-tolerated. The side effects in both groups were mild, did not require the cancellation of the prescribed treatment regimen, and were often stopped on their own or with minimal corrective therapy.

2019 ◽  
Vol 74 (5) ◽  
pp. 292-298
Author(s):  
Alexey A. Kubanov ◽  
Olga G. Artamonova ◽  
Arfenya E. Karamova

Background: Data on the possible combinations of apremilast with other types of psoriasis therapy is limited. Description of clinical cases: We present the data on the efficacy and safety of combination therapy of the selective phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor and dihydrofolatereductase inhibitor (methotrexate) for the treatment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis and active psoriatic arthritis with lack of efficacy of methotrexate in the anamnesis. The selective phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor (apremilast) was administered according to the prescription. The severity psoriatic arthritis of was estimated by PASI. The effectiveness of therapy was evaluated at week 14. Due to the lack of effect, methotrexate was added subcutaneously at week 14. The effectiveness of combination therapy was assessed at week 26. In both cases, the significant clinical improvement was reached (patients reached PASI 75 and PASI 90), a decrease of the psoriatic arthritis activity according to the DAS28 and DAPSA. Conclusion: These clinical cases demonstrate the efficacy and safety of combined therapy with methotrexate and apremilast inpatients with active psoriatic arthritis and moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hongyu Zhong ◽  
Xiang Li ◽  
Wanqi Zhang ◽  
Xiaoxiao Shen ◽  
Yuangang Lu ◽  
...  

Background: Acne is a chronic disorder that affects almost 80% of adolescents and young adults, causing psychological and emotional distress. However, the current treatments for acne are either ineffective or have many side effects. This study was designed to confirm and objectively quantify the effect of a new non-drug combined therapy on acne.Methods: This study innovatively utilized ultrasound, which enhanced the absorption of aloe vera gel, and soft mask to make a purely physical method without any drugs. In both the treatment group and control group, the number of papules/pustules and the area of hyperpigmented lesions were counted, and a smart mirror intelligent face system was used before and after the combined therapy. Alterations in the skin functional index were recorded and analyzed statistically.Results: In the treatment group, the combined therapy significantly reduced the number of papules and the area of hyperpigmented lesions and improved skin roughness and local blood circulation. In the control group, there was no obvious improvement over 2 months.Conclusion: This study suggests that the new non-drug combined therapy significantly improved acne, which provided experimental evidence and treatment guidance for patients with mild to severe acne, especially patients with moderate acne. This new therapy may possibly be an appropriate method for patients who seek topical treatments with mild side effects and low antibiotic resistance rates.


2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 567-576 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wayne P. Gulliver ◽  
Shane Randell ◽  
Susanne Gulliver ◽  
Valerie Gregory ◽  
Sean Nagle ◽  
...  

Plaque psoriasis affects approximately 2% to 3% of the global population, with psoriatic arthritis observed in approximately 20% to 30% of these individuals. Upon advances in research pathophysiology and treatment over the past decade, biologic therapies have been used more to treat moderate to severe psoriasis. In Canada, reimbursement bodies have defined prior authorization criteria to determine patient eligibility for funding of biologic treatments in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Generally, patients will have been treated with conventional therapies such as topical steroids, phototherapy, or systemic treatments such as methotrexate and cyclosporine before starting a biologic therapy. In difficult cases or severe flares in otherwise controlled disease, practitioners may augment the regimen with one or more conventional treatments. The objective of this observational report was to identify treatment pathways for psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis patients in Canada by examining initial biologic treatment and subsequent treatment optimization patterns for informed reimbursement discussions and decisions. A retrospective chart review was conducted at Newlab Clinical Research using medical records of patients who received at least 1 of 4 biologic agents approved at that time of the survey in Canada for the treatment of plaque psoriasis (adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab, ustekinumab). The study population consisted of patients who had moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, diagnosed by a dermatologist, for at least 6 months before the study index date and who attended Newlab Clinical Research between 2008 and 2013. All current and previous agents prescribed for the treatment of psoriasis were captured. A total of 248 patients with psoriasis treated with biologics were identified, of whom 27 (10.9%) were also diagnosed with psoriatic arthritis. Prior to initiating treatment with a biologic, most patients (72.1%) were treated with (or contraindicated to) methotrexate/cyclosporine. Treatment was supplemented with topical agents (70.6%) and/or followed by a course of ultraviolet light phototherapy (51.6%). Only 2.4% of patients were treated with a biologic first. Of 248 patients treated with biologics, almost half (47.6%) needed add-on therapy, whereas 16.5% of patients had an increase in dose or dosing interval. Furthermore, 14.1% of patients added a topical agent, 10.5% a topical steroid, or 6.5% a course of phototherapy while continuing biologic therapies. Finally, 30.4% of patients switched to another biologic treatment. Adalimumab was the most common agent used as a second-line agent (37.2%), and patients who started on adalimumab mainly switched to ustekinumab as a second-line agent (73.9%). Infliximab was the agent least often used as second-line therapy.


2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 81-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Cameron ◽  
C. Druchok ◽  
B. Hutton ◽  
S. McElligott ◽  
S. Nair ◽  
...  

Background: Guselkumab is an interleukin-23 inhibitor indicated for treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Objective: The objective was to determine the relative efficacy and safety of guselkumab compared to other biologics. Methods: A systematic review was performed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Bayesian network meta-analyses (NMAs) were conducted using meta-regression analyses that adjusted for cross-trial differences and risk differences. The primary outcome was Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 90 response. Other efficacy and safety outcomes were considered. Several meta-regressions were performed to account for variations in patient and study characteristics: baseline risk adjustment (ie, control group response), prior biologic use, duration of psoriasis, weight, age, race, and baseline PASI/dermatology life quality index scores. The best-fitting model using predefined criteria was selected. Results: Forty-five RCTs were identified. Patient and study characteristics differed between RCTs as reflected in variations in control group response. Both the baseline risk-adjusted NMA and the risk-difference NMA fit the data best and suggested guselkumab has one of the highest PASI 90 responses. Pairwise comparisons from the baseline risk-adjusted PASI 90 NMA suggested guselkumab has comparable efficacy with ixekizumab (relative risk [RR]: 0.999, 95% credible intervals [CrIs]: 0.89-1.13) and brodalumab (RR: 1.04, 95% CrIs: 0.91-1.17) and superior efficacy versus all other treatments in the network (RR range, 1.20 to 43.22). Guselkumab was superior or comparable to other therapies for other efficacy outcomes and had a more favorable safety profile than most. Conclusions: Guselkumab has one of the highest PASI 90 responses among psoriasis treatments; similar findings were observed for other efficacy outcomes. Guselkumab has a favorable benefit–risk balance compared to moderate-to-severe psoriasis therapies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document