scholarly journals Is Transfusion in Coronary Artery Surgery a Predictor or a Cause of Reduced Long-Term Survival?

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Manché ◽  
Liberato Camilleri
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Revascularization ◽  
Small Body ◽  
Baseline Risk ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Original Cohort ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival ◽  
Log Rank Test

Background: Transfusion is common after coronary bypass surgery. Transfused patients present with higher operative risk and increased hazard ratio for curtailed long-term survival. There is debate as to whether transfusion itself may further exacerbate late mortality. Methods: Long-term survival was studied in 2550 survivors following coronary revascularization in this retrospective, observational study. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were constructed to compare all transfused and non-transfused patients, as well as survival in propensity-matched transfused and non-transfused patients. Results: Operative mortality was 1.05% (original cohort 2577). Maximum follow-up was 23 years (mean 11.8, median 12.4 years). 34.7% of patients received a transfusion (mean 2 units pack red blood cells). Baseline risk characteristics (age, female gender, small body habitus, risk stratification scoring, diabetes, hypertension and reduced stroke volume) operative parameters (urgency and no internal thoracic graft) as well as post-operative parameters (intensive care, hospital stay and ventilation time) and complications (haemorrhage, intra-aortic balloon, ventricular arrhythmias, prolonged inotropic support, atrial fibrillation, dialysis, doubling of creatinine and resternotomy) were higher in the transfused patients. The long-term survival of these patients was significantly reduced when compared with that of non-transfused patients (log rank test p<0.001). When analyzed as a sole risk factor, transfusion was associated with reduced long-term survival (log rank test p<0.001) but when analyzed collectively with other risk factors, transfusion failed to demonstrate a causative effect (p=0.953). When propensity matched groups were compared (612 transfused versus 1222 non-transfused patients) long-term survival was similar (log rank test p=0.554). Conclusions: Transfusion was required in higher risk patients undergoing coronary revascularization. Long-term survival was curtailed in this group but this was due to preoperative risk and not directly to transfusion. Transfusion was a predictor but not a cause of reduced long-term survival.

scholarly journals Assessing Long-Term Survival Benefits of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Using the Net Survival Benefit

2019 ◽  
Vol 111 (11) ◽  
pp. 1186-1191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julien Péron ◽  
Alexandre Lambert ◽  
Stephane Munier ◽  
Brice Ozenne ◽  
Joris Giai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Effect ◽  
Survival Benefit ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Cure Rate ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival ◽  
Delayed Treatment ◽  
Net Survival ◽  
Log Rank Test

Abstract Background The treatment effect in survival analysis is commonly quantified as the hazard ratio, and tested statistically using the standard log-rank test. Modern anticancer immunotherapies are successful in a proportion of patients who remain alive even after a long-term follow-up. This new phenomenon induces a nonproportionality of the underlying hazards of death. Methods The properties of the net survival benefit were illustrated using the dataset from a trial evaluating ipilimumab in metastatic melanoma. The net survival benefit was then investigated through simulated datasets under typical scenarios of proportional hazards, delayed treatment effect, and cure rate. The net survival benefit test was computed according to the value of the minimal survival difference considered clinically relevant. As comparators, the standard and the weighted log-rank tests were also performed. Results In the illustrative dataset, the net survival benefit favored ipilimumab [Δ(0) = 15.8%, 95% confidence interval = 4.6% to 27.3%, P = .006]. This favorable effect was maintained when the analysis was focused on long-term survival differences (eg, >12 months, Δ(12) = 12.5% (95% confidence interval = 4.4% to 20.6%, P = .002). Under the scenarios of a delayed treatment effect and cure rate, the power of the net survival benefit test compared favorably to the standard log-rank test power and was comparable to the power of the weighted log-rank test for large values of the threshold of clinical relevance. Conclusion The net long-term survival benefit is a measure of treatment effect that is meaningful whether or not hazards are proportional. The associated statistical test is more powerful than the standard log-rank test when a delayed treatment effect is anticipated.

The St. Jude Toronto stentless bioprosthesis: Up to 20 years follow-up in younger patients

2015 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Torsten Christ ◽  
Benjamin Claus ◽  
Robin Borck ◽  
Wolfgang Konertz ◽  
Herko Grubitzsch
Keyword(s):  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Artery Bypass ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Younger Patients ◽  
Long Term Survival ◽  
Stentless Bioprosthesis ◽  
Log Rank Test

<p><strong>Background:</strong>A retrospective long-term evaluation of the St. Jude Toronto stentless bioprosthesis in patients aged 60 years or younger.</p><p><strong>Methods:</strong>From 1994 to 1997, 50 patients underwent aortic valve replacement with the prosthesis. Patients mean age at surgery was 54.5±6.3 years. Follow-up data were acquired by patient file research and telephone interviews. Morbidity and mortality were evaluated with time-to-event analyses using the Kaplan-Meier-method. The log-rank test was used to determine influencing factors for long-term survival and reoperation.</p><p><strong>Results:</strong>Mean follow-up was 13.5±6.3 years with a total follow-up of 661.8 patient-years and a maximum of 20.0 years. Follow-up was 97.8% complete. Associated procedures were performed in 12 patients (24%), including coronary artery bypass grafting, mitral valve replacement and replacement of the ascending aorta. Freedom from reoperation at 10 and 15 years was 76.0±6.7% and 44.1±8.9%, respectively. Reoperations (n=26) started 4.4 years after implantation and were necessary due to: valve degeneration with regurgitation in 79.2% and stenosis in 12.5%, endocarditis in 4.2% and sinus valsalva aneurysm in 4.2% of the cases. The log-rank test revealed that only body-mass-index&gt;25 lowered freedom-from-reoperation, while renal dysfunction, diabetes mellitus and arterial hypertension were not. Overall long-term survival at 10 and 20 years was 82.3±5.7% and 49.9±8.9%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion:</strong>In younger patients the Toronto-bioprosthesis provided reliable long-term survival despite limited durability.</p>

Immediate Postoperative Coagulopathy Predicts the Long-term Survival of Traumatic Brain Injury Patients: a Retrospective Cohort Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenxing Cui ◽  
Tian Li ◽  
Yingwu Shi ◽  
Chen Yang ◽  
Shunnan Ge ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Proportional Hazard ◽  
Proportional Hazard Model ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazard ◽  
Log Rank Test

Abstract Objective: To assess the association between immediate postoperative coagulopathy and the long-term survival of traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients undergoing surgery, as well as to explore predisposing risk factors of immediate postoperative coagulopathy.Methods: This retrospective study included 352 TBI patients from January 1, 2015, to April 25, 2019. The log-rank test and a Cox proportional hazard model were conducted to assess the relationship between immediate postoperative coagulopathy and the long-term survival of TBI patients. Furthermore, a multivariate logistic regression model was performed to identify the underlying risk factors for postoperative coagulopathy.Results: Of the 352 patients analyzed, the median age was 50 (41,60) years, and 82 (23%) patients were female. By May 26, 2019, 117 (33.24%) patients had died, 195 (55.40%) had survived, and 40 (11.36%) had been lost to follow-up. The median follow-up time was 773 days. In the log-rank test, immediate postoperative coagulopathy was significantly associated with the survival of TBI patients (P = 0.002). A Cox proportional hazard model identified immediate postoperative coagulopathy (HR, 1.471; 95% CI, 1.011-2.141; P = 0.044) as an independent risk factor for survival following TBI. According to multivariate logistic regression analysis, abnormal ALT and RBC at admission, intraoperative infusion of crystalloid solution > 2900 mL, infusion of colloidal solution > 1100 mL and intraoperative bleeding > 950 mL were identified as independent risk factors for immediate postoperative coagulopathy.Conclusions: Those who suffered from immediate postoperative coagulopathy due to TBI were at higher risk of poor prognosis than those who did not.

scholarly journals Management trends for anaplastic meningioma with adjuvant radiotherapy and predictors of long-term survival

2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (6) ◽  
pp. E4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmad Alhourani ◽  
Zaid Aljuboori ◽  
Mehran Yusuf ◽  
Shiao Y. Woo ◽  
Eyas M. Hattab ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Median Survival ◽  
Adjuvant Radiotherapy ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Outcome Analysis ◽  
Adjuvant Radiation ◽  
Survival Curves ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival ◽  
Log Rank Test

OBJECTIVEThe purpose of this study was to describe effects of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) for anaplastic meningiomas (AMs) on long-term survival, and to analyze patient and RT characteristics associated with long-term survival.METHODSThe authors queried a retrospective cohort of patients with AM from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) diagnosed between 2004 and 2015 to describe treatment trends. For outcome analysis, patients with at least 10 years of follow-up were included, and they were stratified based on adjuvant RT status and propensity matched to controls for covariates. Survival curves were compared. A data-driven approach was used to find a biologically effective dose (BED) of RT with the largest difference between survival curves. Factors associated with long-term survival were quantified.RESULTSThe authors identified 2170 cases of AM in the NCDB between 2004 and 2015. They observed increased use of adjuvant RT in patients treated with higher doses. A total of 178 cases met the inclusion criteria for outcome analysis. Forty-five percent (n = 80) received adjuvant RT. Patients received a BED of 80.23 ± 16.6 Gy (mean ± IQR). The median survival time was not significantly different (32.8 months for adjuvant RT vs 38.5 months for no RT; p = 0.57, log-rank test). Dichotomizing the patients at a BED of 81 Gy showed maximal difference in survival distribution with a decrease in median survival in favor of no adjuvant RT (31.2 months for adjuvant RT vs 49.7 months for no RT; p = 0.03, log-rank test), but this difference was not significant after false discovery rate correction. Age was a significant predictor for long-term survival.CONCLUSIONSAMs are aggressive tumors that carry a poor prognosis. Conventional adjuvant RT improves local control. However, the effect of adjuvant radiation on overall survival is unclear. Further investigation into this area is warranted.

scholarly journals Improved Long-Term Survival with Edaravone Therapy in Patients with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Retrospective Single-Center Study in Japan

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (8) ◽  
pp. 705
Author(s):  
Hideki Houzen ◽  
Takahiro Kano ◽  
Kazuhiro Horiuchi ◽  
Masahiro Wakita ◽  
Azusa Nagai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Positive Pressure ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Lateral Sclerosis

Reports on the long-term survival effect of edaravone, which was approved for the treatment of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) in 2015 in Japan, are rare. Herein, we report our retrospective analysis of 45 consecutive patients with ALS who initially visited our hospital between 2013 and 2018. Of these, 22 patients were treated with edaravone for an average duration of 26.6 (range, 2–64) months, whereas the remaining patients were not treated with edaravone and comprised the control group. There were no differences in baseline demographics between the two groups. The primary endpoint was tracheostomy positive-pressure ventilation (TPPV) or death, and the follow-up period ended in December 2020. The survival rate was significantly better in the edaravone group than in the control group based on the Kaplan–Meier analysis, which revealed that the median survival durations were 49 (9–88) and 25 (8–41) months in the edaravone and control groups, respectively (p = 0.001, log-rank test). There were no serious edaravone-associated adverse effects during the study period. Overall, the findings of this single-center retrospective study suggest that edaravone might prolong survival in patients with ALS.

scholarly journals The relationship of the prolonged PR interval with the long-term survival in patients with heart failure undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy

2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-38
Author(s):  
A. M. Soldatova ◽  
V. A. Kuznetsov ◽  
T. P. Gizatulina ◽  
L. M. Malishevsky ◽  
S. M. Dyachkov
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Log Rank Test ◽  
Group I ◽  
Pr Interval ◽  
Qrs Duration ◽  
Group Ii ◽  
The Relationship

Aim. To assess the relationship between the prolonged PR interval (≥200 ms) and the long-term survival of patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).Material and methods. A total of 85 patients (mean age — 55,1Ѓ}9,9 years; men — 81,2%) with NYHA class II-IV heart failure (HF) were examined. The mean follow-up was 34,0Ѓ}21,2 months. Patients with PR<200 ms (n=52) made up group I, with PR≥200 ms (n=33) — group II. Then the patients were divided into subgroups depending on the QRS duration: ≥150 ms (n=33 in group I and n=14 in group II, respectively) <150 ms (n=19 in group I and n=19 in group II, respectively).Results. In patients of group II, a history of myocardial infarction (MI) was more often registered (p=0,005), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was lower (p=0,032). In a multivariate analysis, MI (OR 3,217; CI 95% 1,188-8,712; p=0,022) and LVEF value (OR 0,869; CI 95% 0,780-0,968; p=0,011) had a significant relationship with the PR interval prolongation (≥200 ms). The survival of patients of group I was 59,6%, group II — 18,2% (Log-rank test p<0,001). According to Cox regression model, the initial left ventricle end-systolic volume (OR 1,012; 95% CI 1,006-1,017; p<0,001), inferior wall MI (OR 1,690; 95% CI 1,131-2,527; p=0,011) and PR interval ≥200 ms (OR 2,179; 95% CI 1,213–3,915; p=0,009) were associated with long-term mortality. In patients with PR≥200 ms, survival rate was low, regardless of the QRS duration (21,4% in patients with QRS≥150 ms, 15,8% in patients with QRS<150 ms; Log-rank test p=0,698) In patients with PR<200 ms, the survival rate of patients with QRS≥150 ms was 72,7%, and for patients with QRS<150 ms — 36,8% (Log-rank test p=0,031).Conclusion. In HF patients, PR interval prolongation (≥200 ms) is associated with long-term mortality increase. The highest survival rates were observed in patients with PR<200 ms and QRS≥150 ms. In patients with QRS≥150 ms, the presence of PR≥200 ms should be considered as an additional criterion for CRT.

scholarly journals Preoperative Thallium Scanning, Selective Coronary Revascularization, and Long-Term Survival After Carotid Endarterectomy

Stroke ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 29 (12) ◽  
pp. 2541-2548 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giora Landesberg ◽  
Yehuda Wolf ◽  
David Schechter ◽  
Morris Mosseri ◽  
Charles Weissman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carotid Endarterectomy ◽  
Coronary Revascularization ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival

Sleeve lobectomy an affidable lung sparing procedure

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 17159-17159
Author(s):  
G. Cavallesco ◽  
P. Maniscalco ◽  
F. Quarantotto ◽  
F. Acerbis ◽  
M. Santini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Main Bronchus ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Sleeve Lobectomy ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Average Hospital ◽  
Long Term Survival ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Similar Survival

17159 Background: Sleeve Lobectomy (Sl) is generally considered a surgical alternative of choice to Pneumonectomy (Pn) for the treatment of central NSCLC. The aim of this study is to value if the Sl could be really a Lung saving procedure that warrants right survivals, according to stage of disease, with acceptable perioperative risks. Methods: In 165 patients (67 Sl and 98 Pn) operated from 1995 to 2003 for NSCLC of main bronchus we have analyzed the hospital stay, morbidity and mortality within 30 days, long term survival. In 39 Sl and 46 Pn we compared spyrometric volume’s changes at a distance of 6–24 months from operation. Sl was performed where it was technically possible. Long term survivals had been separated and comparated according to pathologic stadium (TNM 1997) and lymphonodal involvement: all these data were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method and log rank test. All statistical data underwent SPSS elaboration and significant assumption for p < 0.05. Results: In our population of study we didn’t check any statistically significant’s differences comparing age, sex or preoperative Fev1. Complications occurred in 28% of cases where Sl was performed and in 36.7% after Pn with a mortality rate of 2.9% vs 5.1%. Average hospital staying was longer in patients underwent to Pneumonectomy. Long term survival (5 years) in Sl group is 36% and 24% in Pn group with a statistically significant difference P = 0.016, but this difference is not evident from the comparison between the two group’s survivals based on pathological stadium or lymphonodal involvement. Spyrometric values showed a global Fev1 reduction of 245 ml (−10%) after Sl procedure and 884ml (36.3%) after Pn with a significant difference of p = 0.0042. Conclusions: In this study Sl got similar survival results if not better, with those obtained after Pn. Moreover, Sl showed to be a lung sparing procedure with an acceptable operative risk. These data confirmed that SL is the gold standard surgical procedure in the treatment of central tumors where if technically possible. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Patterns of mortality after prolonged follow-up of a randomized trial using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to maintain chemotherapy dose intensity in non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL)

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7590-7590
Author(s):  
A. R. Clamp ◽  
S. Bhattacharya ◽  
D. W. Ryder ◽  
R. Pettengell ◽  
J. A. Radford
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Trial ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Second Malignancies ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Log Rank Test ◽  
Chemotherapy Dose ◽  
Chemotherapy Dose Intensity

7590 Background: Recombinant G-CSF is commonly used to maintain chemotherapy dose intensity and reduce the incidence of infective complications in the management of NHL. The possible impact of this effect on mortality patterns after prolonged follow-up is worthy of investigation. We investigated the long-term survival and incidence of second malignancies in the first randomized trial utilising recombinant G-CSF in NHL (Pettengell R et al Blood 1992, 80: 1430–1436). Methods: Data on overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), freedom from progression (FFP) and the incidence of second malignancies were extracted from medical records and cancer registry databases for 80 patients with aggressive subtypes of NHL, who had previously been randomised to receive either VAPEC-B chemotherapy alone (39 patients) or VAPEC-B with G-CSF (41 patients). 10 year survival figures were extracted and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were drawn for the above parameters and compared between treatment groups using the log-rank test. Results: Median follow-up was 11.8 years for surviving patients (range 7.8–13.1 yrs). Patients receiving G-CSF achieved a 12% higher median dose intensity of chemotherapy. No significant differences were found in PFS or OS but 10 year FFP appeared to be better in the G-CSF arm (60.8%) compared with the control arm (45.6%) (log-rank test p=0.12). Eleven deaths from non-NHL causes occurred in the G-CSF arm compared with three in the control arm (log- rank test p=0.06). Five second malignancies were detected on long-term follow-up in the G-CSF arm compared with two in the control arm. Conclusions: The demonstration of different mortality patterns in the two arms may be related to the greater dose intensity of chemotherapy received in the G-CSF arm. Although, our study has insufficient statistical power to draw definite conclusions, this finding warrants further investigation. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Randomized trial of amifostine in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients receiving chemotherapy and hyperfractionated radiation (HRT): Long-term survival results of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 9801

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7529-7529
Author(s):  
B. Movsas ◽  
J. Moughan ◽  
C. Langer ◽  
M. Werner-Wasik ◽  
N. Nicolaou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Radiation Therapy Oncology Group ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Nsclc Patients

7529 Purpose: This analysis was conducted to address the potential antitumor effect of amifostine (AM) in NSCLC patients enrolled on RTOG-9801. The long-term survival results of RTOG-9801 are presented here. Methods: 243 patients (pts) with stage II/IIIAB NSCLC received induction paclitaxel (P) 225 mg/m2IV days 1, 22 and carboplatin (C) AUC 6 days 1, 22 and then concurrent weekly P (50 mg/m2) and C (AUC 2) and HRT (69.6 Gy at 1.2 Gy BID). Pts were randomly assigned to AM 500 mg IV 4x/week or no-AM during chemoradiation. Treatment differences for overall and disease-free survival (OS & DFS) were analyzed with the log-rank test; Gray's test was used for time to progression (TTP). Results: 118 pts were randomly assigned to receive AM and 121 to no-AM (4 pts were ineligible). The median follow-up for pts still alive is 52.3 months (mo) for the AM-arm and 58.3 mo for the no-AM arm (16.6 vs 17.9 for all pts). There are no significant differences in OS, DFS or TTP between arms. The median survival, 3-yr, and 5-yr OS are 17.1 mo, 27% and 17% (AM-arm) vs 18.4 mo, 28% and 16% (no-AM arm) (p=0.97). Grade 3/4/5 late-RT toxicities are similar (11%/3%/2% AM-arm vs 14%/4%/2% no-AM arm). Conclusion: While an earlier publication reported that amifostine did not reduce objective measures of severe esophagitis in RTOG-9801, patient-reported outcome analyses suggested a possible advantage to AM with decreased pain and swallowing symptoms (J Clin Oncol 23:2145–2154, 2005). This long-term follow-up analysis on survival shows no evidence of tumor radioprotection due to amifostine. The promising 5-yr OS suggests that induction paclitaxel/carboplatin (P/C) followed by concurrent RT and weekly low-dose P/C is comparable to other regimens using cisplatin doublets at higher dosages every 3–4 weeks. Research supported by NCI and Medimmune Oncology. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document