scholarly journals Results of transforaminal endoscopic discectomy for lumbosacral disc herniation added by nucleoplasty

2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 243-248
Author(s):  
M.D. Abakirov ◽  
◽  
O.A. Al-Bawareed ◽  
M.A. Panin ◽  
R.M. Nurmukhametov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Status ◽  
Recurrence Rate ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Pain Scale ◽  
Lumbar Spine Surgery ◽  
Group I ◽  
Endoscopic Discectomy ◽  
Group Ii ◽  
Complete Data Analysis

Introduction Herniated disks are very common. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar spine surgery for the lumbar disc herniation facilitates minimalized access ports to the operating site with decreased risk of infection, reduced blood loss and less tissue dissection and muscle trauma. The goal was to compare the results of standard transforaminal endoscopic discectomy for lumbosacral herniation and outcomes of the procedure added by nucleoplasty. Material and methods Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy was performed for 92 patients and added by nucleoplasty in 43 patients of group I. Preoperative and postoperative evaluation was produced with the Visual Analog Pain Scale (VAS), the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire (ODI) and the MacNab clinical outcome score. Complication and recurrence rate was reviewed. Microsoft Office Excell and Statistica 8.0 were used to complete data analysis reports. Results VAS scores decreased from 7.9 to 3.1 showing 2.5-fold decrease (p < 0.05), and ODI scores decreased from 71.09 to 18.58) (p < 0.001) demonstrating fourfold decrease at one-year follow-up. There were no significant differences in VAS and ODI scores between the groups preoperatively and postoperatively (p > 0.05). The majority of patients of group I (41.86 %) rated their health status as excellent on the MacNab scale, and the majority of patients of group II (53.06 %) rated their health status as good. Postoperative complication rate was 11.63% in group I and 12.24% in group II (p > 0.05). There was no recurrence in group I with the recurrence rate of 6.1% (p < 0.001) in group II. Conclusion Endoscopic discectomy for lumbosacral herniation supplemented with nucleoplasty can reduce the recurrence rate.

scholarly journals Fibrin sealants in lumbar annuloplasty after endoscopic discectomy as a method to prevent recurrent lumbar disc herniation

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 325-333
Author(s):  
Pooya Torkian ◽  
Keivan Daneshvar ◽  
Ebrahim Taherian ◽  
Yasaman Rezaeifar ◽  
Shahram Akhlaghpoor
Keyword(s):  
Recurrence Rate ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Fibrin Sealant ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Primary Outcome Measure ◽  
Recurrence Rates ◽  
Fibrin Sealants ◽  
Endoscopic Discectomy ◽  
And Control ◽  
Sealant Group

Fibrin sealant as a promising agent for providing scaffold and efficient hemostasis is widely accepted in several specialties. However, the outcome of Fibrin sealants in lumbar annuloplasty after endoscopic discectomy has not been evaluated in patients with disc herniation. The goal of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, response, and probability of future recurrence rates in herniated nucleus pulposus (HNP) with the use of fibrin sealant in conjunction with endoscopic disc surgery. A total of 35 patients (28 men, 7women) were evaluated, including 18 patients who underwent endoscopic discectomy alone and 17 patients that received fibrin sealant at the site of annulus tear and endoscopic discectomy. All patients were followed through both clinical and imaging methods for an average of 10.5 months. Primary outcome measure was defined as lumbar decompression approved by imaging and symptom alleviation after endoscopic spinal discectomy with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score ≤ 4 (cut-off point). Median size of annular tearing was significantly lower in the endoscopic discectomy group (median, 3) (minimum, 2; maximum, 5); however, the corresponding factor in the endoscopic discectomy plus fibrin sealant group was significantly larger (median, 6) (minimum, 5; maximum, 10), with P <0.001. Only one patient in the endoscopic discectomy group had an HNP recurrence during follow-up compared to two patients in the endoscopic discectomy plus fibrin sealant group. Due to the temporary effects of fibrin sealant in preventing disc herniation and the observed recurrence rate in both the case and control groups, the results of this study suggest a role of fibrin sealants combined with endoscopic discectomy to prevent early HNP recurrence rate.

scholarly journals Fibrin sealants in lumbar annuloplasty after endoscopic discectomy as a method to prevent recurrent lumbar disc herniation

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shahram Akhlaghpoor
Keyword(s):  
Recurrence Rate ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Fibrin Sealant ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Primary Outcome Measure ◽  
Fibrin Sealants ◽  
Endoscopic Discectomy ◽  
And Control ◽  
Sealant Group

 Fibrin sealant as a promising agent for providing scaffold and efficient hemostasis is widely accepted in several specialties. However, the outcome of Fibrin sealants in lumbar annuloplasty after endoscopic discectomy has not been evaluated in patients with disc herniation. The goal of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, response, and probability of future recurrence rate in herniated nucleus pulposus (HNP) with the use of fibrin sealant in conjunction with endoscopic disc surgery. A total of 35 patients (28 men, 7women), including 18 patients who underwent endoscopic discectomy alone and 17 patients that received fibrin sealant at the site of annulus tear and endoscopic discectomy. All patients were followed clinically and by imaging for an average of 10.5 months. Primary outcome measure was defined as lumbar decompression approved by imaging and symptom alleviation after endoscopic spinal discectomy with VAS score ≤ 4 (cut-off point).  Median size of annular tearing was significantly lower in the endoscopic discectomy group (median, 3) (minimum, 2; maximum, 5); however, the corresponding factor in the endoscopic discectomy plus fibrin sealant group was significantly larger (median, 6) (minimum, 5; maximum, 10), with P <0.001. Only one patient in the endoscopic discectomy group had an HNP recurrence during follow-up compared to two patients in the endoscopic discectomy plus fibrin sealant group. Owing to the temporary effects of fibrin sealant in preventing disc herniation and the nearly same observed recurrence rate in both the case and control groups, the results of this study might suggest the role of fibrin sealants combined with endoscopic discectomy to prevent early HNP recurrence rate.

Recurrence Rate of Lumbar Disc Herniation After Standard Discectomy and Microdiscectomy: A 5-Year Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 139-146
Author(s):  
Mladen E. Ovcharov ◽  
Iliya V. Valkov ◽  
Milan N. Mladenovski ◽  
Nikolay V. Vasilev
Keyword(s):  
Recurrence Rate ◽  
Lumbar Disc Herniation ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Reoperation Rate ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Recurrence Rates ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Common Procedure

Summary Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is the most common pathology in young people, as well as people of active age. Despite sophisticated and new minimally invasive surgical techniques and approaches, reoperations for recurrent lumbar disc herniation (rLDH) could not be avoided. LDH recurrence rates, reported in different studies, range from 5 to 25%. The purpose of this study was to estimate the recurrence rates of LDH after standard discectomy (SD) and microdiscectomy (MD), and compare them to those reported in the literature. Retrospectively, operative reports for the period 2012-2017 were reviewed on LDH surgeries performed at the Neurosurgery Clinic of Dr Georgi Stranski University Hospital in Pleven. Five hundred eighty-nine single-level lumbar discectomies were performed by one neurosurgeon. The diagnoses of recurrent disc herniation were based on the development of new symptoms and magnetic resonance/computed tomography (MRI/CT) images showing compatible lesions in the same lumbar level as the primary lumbar discectomies. The recurrence rate was determined by using chi-square tests and directional measures. SD was the most common procedure (498 patients) followed by MD (91 patients). The cumulative reoperation rate for rLDH was 7.5%. From a total number of reoperations, 26 were males (59.1%) and 18 were females (40.9%). Reoperation rates were 7.6% and 6.6% after SD and MD respectively. The recurrence rate was not significantly higher for SD. Our recurrence rate was 7.5%, which makes it comparable with the rates of 5-25% reported in the literature.

scholarly journals Comparison of quality of life between men and women who underwent Transforaminal Percutaneous Endoscopic Discectomy for lumbar disc herniation

10.14444/4028 ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stylianos Kapetanakis ◽  
Grigorios Gkasdaris ◽  
Tryfon Thomaidis ◽  
Georgios Charitoudis ◽  
Konstantinos Kazakos
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Lumbar Disc Herniation ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Men And Women ◽  
Endoscopic Discectomy

RECURRENCE RATE AFTER REPEAT TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION AMONG PATIENTS WITH NEWLY DIAGNOSED T1 BLADDER CANCER

2021 ◽  
pp. 51-54
Author(s):  
Md. Shafiqur Rahman ◽  
Sanjeeb Bhakta Bista ◽  
Md. Sayedul Islam ◽  
A. S. M. Shafiul Azam ◽  
Md. Shamim Hossain ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bladder Cancer ◽  
Recurrence Rate ◽  
Transurethral Resection ◽  
Tumor Recurrence ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Intravesical Therapy ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Group I ◽  
Group Ii

Background: Transurethral resection of the bladder tumor (TURBT) is the cornerstone of diagnosis and TURBT followed by selective adjuvant intravesical chemotherapy or immunotherapy is the gold standard of treatment for the patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Even after complete resection of the tumor there is high risk of residual tumor and subsequent recurrence and progression of the disease. The recurrence of T1 tumor is found to be around 71 % within 5 years and High grade T1 lesions recur in more than 80% of the cases and progress in 50% of the patients within 3 years. Disease status at 3 months after initial resection is an important predictor of subsequent recurrence and progression. To assess the tumor recurrence rat Objective: e among patients with newly diagnosed T1 bladder cancer between repeat transurethral resection group and single TURBT group. Ra Type of study: ndomized controlled trial. Place of study: Department of urology, BSMMU, Dhaka, Bangladesh. This Randomi Materials And Methods: zed Controlled Trial was conducted in urology department of BSMMU, Dhaka, Bangladesh from February 2017 till September 2018. A total of 50 patients, diagnosed as a case of T1 bladder cancer and who fulll the selection criteria were randomly divided in two groups consisting of 25 patients in each group. After informed consent, repeat TUR was done after 4 weeks of the initial TURBT for only 22 patients in group I since 3 of the patients did not show up on the scheduled date of surgery. Whereas, repeat TUR was not done for other 25 patients in group II. All the patients in both the groups were further treated with intravesical therapy according to the histopathological report. The patients in both the groups were followed up at 3 months and 6 months of the initial intervention where detailed history was taken, relevant investigations were done and check cystoscopy was done. TURBT was done for recurrent tumors. Out of 22 patients in group I, 2 patients were excluded for follow up on the basis of repeat TUR ndings. Whereas in group II, 2 patients missed the follow up and one of them missed the normal scheduled dose of intravesical therapy. Hence, 22 patients completed the study in group II. The baseline variables like age and Results: sex were similar in both the groups with higher male predominance. There was no statistical signicant difference in tumor characteristics such as size, number and grade of the tumor between the two groups. Out of 22 patients in group I who underwent repeat TUR at 4 weeks of initial TUR, residual disease was found in 8 (36.36%) patients. One of the patient was found to have T2 disease and 1 patient had CIS during repeat TUR. These 2 patients were not followed up since the treatment strategy changed after the results of repeat TUR. After 6 months of follow up of all the patients, 2 (10%) out of 20 patients in group I were found to have tumor recurrence however, in group II, 9 (40.9%) patients had tumor recurrence. The tumor recurrence rate between the two groups was found to be statistically signicant (p=0.023). In the light of ndings of this Conclusion: study, it can be concluded that performing repeat transurethral resection in patients with newly diagnosed T1 bladder cancer at 4 weeks of initial TURBT, helps to detect signicant number of residual tumor and reduce early recurrence rate of the tumor.

scholarly journals Excision with primary midline closure compared with Limberg flap in the treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease: a randomised clinical trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 101 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Arnous ◽  
H Elgendy ◽  
W Thabet ◽  
SH Emile ◽  
SA Elbaz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Recurrence Rate ◽  
Primary Closure ◽  
Randomised Clinical Trial ◽  
Limberg Flap ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Cosmetic Results ◽  
Group I ◽  
Group Ii

BackgroundAlthough several surgical techniques for treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus (SPND) have been described, there is no consensus on the optimal surgical procedure. In this study we compared excision with primary closure and Limberg flap in the treatment of SPND.MethodsThis was a prospective randomised clinical trial in patients with SPND who were randomly allocated to one of two groups: group I (excision and primary closure) and group II (Limberg flap technique). The primary outcome of the trial was recurrence of SPND whereas postoperative complications, return to work and cosmetic results were the secondary outcomes.ResultsSixty patients were included, with a mean age of 24.1 years and mean body mass index (BMI) of 26.8 kg/m2. Group 1 had significantly shorter operation time than group II. Both groups had similar hospital stay and comparable complication rates (43.3% vs 30%; P = 0.4). Group I had significantly higher recurrence rate (20% vs 0; P < 0.02) and significantly better cosmetic satisfaction score than group II. Being hairy (P = 0.04), positive family history (P = 0.03), diabetes mellitus (P = 0.005) and history of previous surgery for SPND (P = 0.01) were the significant predictors for recurrence.ConclusionsThe Limberg flap is an effective technique for the treatment of SPND with very low recurrence rate and comparable complication rate and hospital stay to excision and primary closure. Excision and primary closure offered the advantages of quicker healing time, earlier resumption of daily activities, better cosmetic results, which may render it more suitable for patients with low risk for recurrence.

scholarly journals LUMBAR DISCECTOMY

2011 ◽  
Vol 18 (04) ◽  
pp. 678-683
Author(s):  
M.SHAHID SMAIJA ◽  
SHEIKH ATIQ-UR-REHMAN ◽  
ASFA KHIZAR
Keyword(s):  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Pain Scale ◽  
Mri Findings ◽  
Disc Disease ◽  
Clinical Difference ◽  
Constant Pain ◽  
Endoscopic Discectomy ◽  
Tissue Dissection ◽  
Straight Leg Raising ◽  
Group B

Background: Discectomy is the standard treatment for lumber disc disease. Fenestration operations involved lot of tissue dissection and so the complications. Instead the endoscopic discectomy involved less tissue dissection but limited exposure. Objectives: The objectives of this study were to compare the outcome of endoscopic discectomy and fenestration discectomy interms of relieve from symptoms and complications. Study Design: Analytic study. Place and duration of study: Neurosurgical unit Bahawal Victoria hospital Bahawalpur, from Feb 2010 to Aug 2010. Patients and Methods: Forty cases fulfilling the inclusion criteria were selected. Efficacy of procedure was determined by improvement in Denis pain scale, Macnab’s criteria and straight leg raising (SLR) improvement. Results: Forty patients divided in two equal groups. Patients of group A underwent fenestration and Group B endoscopic discectomy.60%of patients had left sciatica while 40% of patients had right sciatica. According to Denis pain scale 10% patients had moderate pain, 30% had severe pain and 60% had constant pain. Straight leg raising test showed, 50% patients had less than 30O SLR, 30%patients showed SLR of 31̊ to 40̊ and 20%patients had SLR more than 40O. MRI findings were disc bulging, protrusion and rupture. Considering SLR, Denis pain scale and Mcnabs criteria of pain control there was no clinical difference found between the two operative procedures except in two patients in group B when open discectomy had to be performed. Conclusions: MED is a safe and effective mode of treatment for low back pain in patients with lumbar disc herniation. 

Comparison of Outcomes Postoperation between Straight Leg Raising Test Negative and Positive Patients Who Underwent Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniation

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Feilong Wei ◽  
Haoran Gao ◽  
Yifang Yuan ◽  
Shu Qian ◽  
Quanyou Guo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lumbar Disc Herniation ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Related Factors ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Endoscopic Discectomy ◽  
Straight Leg Raising ◽  
Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy ◽  
Relevant Factors

Abstract Background: Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy is used increasingly in patients with Lumbar Disc Herniation. There is little knowledge on the related factors including SLR test influencing the operation. Therefore, we designed this prospective study to explore the relevant factors influencing postoperative effect of PTED surgery.Methods: Consecutive patients with LDH who came to our hospital from August 2015 to September 2016 and received PTED surgery. 4 kinds of scales including VAS (lumbar/leg), ODI and JOA were measured and reassessed at 1 day, 3 months, 6 months, 12months and 36 months after the PTED to assess their surgical outcomes. Results: All the patients had successful surgery. ODI and VAS (lumbar/leg) decreased in all patients and groups. And there was a statistically significant difference in each postoperative follow-up compared with that before surgery in every visit. In addition, the increase of JOA in postoperation was statistically significant compared with that before surgery. And, there is statistically significant difference between the three subpopulations (patients with SLR Positive (0°-30°), SLR Positive (31°-60°) and SLR Negative (61°-) in the changes of the scores of VAS(leg), ODI and JOA. However, there is no statistically significant difference between the three subpopulations (patients with SLR Positive (0°-30°), SLR Positive (31°-60°) and SLR Negative (61°--RRB- in the changes of the score of VAS(lumbar). Conclusions: PTED showed great effect on treating patients with lumbar disc herniation. And the main scale score such as VAS(leg). ODI and JOA showed that there is a statistically significant difference between the three subpopulations treated by PTED. Patients with SLR negative may get greater benefit from PTED.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document