scholarly journals Quality Assessment in Higher Education

2015 ◽  
Vol 50 ◽  
pp. 162-171
Author(s):  
Farzand Ali Sawand ◽  
Behram Ali Chandio ◽  
Muhammad Bilal ◽  
M. Rizwan Rasheed ◽  
M. Ali Raza ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Quality Assessment ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Global Education ◽  
Educational Process ◽  
Teaching Methodologies ◽  
Ongoing Process ◽  
Assessment In Higher Education

This study aim’s to identify the significance of quality assessment in higher education and how assessment is valuable for the betterment of educational process and student learning. As assessment is ongoing process for setting standards of higher education and measuring the progress toward learning outcomes so this study helps us to determine the new teaching methodologies and which innovations are required in this era of global education competition.

Outcomes-based approach to quality assessment and curriculum improvement in higher education

2014 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 158-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maureen Tam
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Quality Assessment ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Instructional Designers ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Curriculum Improvement ◽  
Improving Student Learning ◽  
Views And Perceptions ◽  
Traditional Structures

Purpose – This paper was written for practitioners in higher education, including academics and instructional designers who are engaged in curriculum revision. It aims to examine the notion of outcomes-based education, survey the literature and provide a critical review of the outcomes-based approach to quality assessment and curriculum improvement in higher education. The outcomes-based approach is completely student-centred, which focuses on what students know and can actually do. Sharpening the focus onto student learning outcomes goes beyond mere tinkering with traditional structures and methods; it really constitutes a paradigm shift in educational philosophy and practice. Design/methodology/approach – This paper begins with a summary of developments in institutional quality assessment and curriculum improvement in higher education in recent decades. Then, it identifies the underlying concepts and principles that characterize the outcomes-based approach for the design and improvement of curriculum and instruction in higher education. Finally, the outcomes-based approach is critically reviewed for its value from the perspectives of both practical and philosophical considerations. Findings – In so doing, it is directed to the heightening of sensitivity as to the manner and situations in which the outcomes-based approach may be employed. Originality/value – A final note is that while learning outcomes approaches are useful, care is needed to take into account the different views and perceptions of those involved in defining learning outcomes and to keep the ultimate goal of improving student learning clearly in mind. Care must also be taken to avoid rigidity and conceptual reification during implementation in curriculum and instructional design.

scholarly journals MONITORING THE QUALITY OF STUDENTS' LEARNING RESULTS IN HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS AS A PROBLEM OF RESEARCH

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (86) ◽  
Author(s):  
Larysa Kovalchuk ◽  
◽  
Tetiana Kravchuk ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Higher Education Institutions ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Technologies ◽  
Educational Process ◽  
Quality Of Higher Education ◽  
Innovative Learning

The article analyzes different approaches to the interpretation of the concept of "monitoring", clarifies the essence of the concept of monitoring the quality of student learning outcomes in higher education institutions. The Ukrainian laws for monitoring the quality of higher education learning outcomes is analyzed. The essence of the concept of "pedagogical factor" from the standpoint of modern scientists is considered, its main types (external and internal) are revealed. Three main pedagogical factors for organizing and conducting monitoring of the quality of student learning outcomes in higher education institutions have been identified and substantiated, namely: readiness of subjects of the educational process to monitor student learning outcomes in higher education institutions; phases monitoring of the quality of student learning outcomes in higher education institutions; development of educational and methodological support for monitoring the quality of student learning outcomes in higher education institutions. The essence and three main types of readiness of the subjects of the educational process to monitor the quality of student learning outcomes in higher education institutions are outlined, namely: psychological, logistical, documentary. Emphasis is placed on three main criteria for the readiness of students to monitor the quality of student learning outcomes in higher education institutions, namely: cognitive, practical-logical, value-motivational. The step-by-step organization of monitoring of the quality of student learning outcomes in higher education institutions by highlighting the main six successive stages of its implementation is revealed. It has been determined who has the right to organize pedagogical monitoring of the quality of students' learning outcomes in higher education institutions. Emphasized the importance of developing educational and methodological support for monitoring the quality of student learning outcomes in higher education institutions, introduction of innovative learning technologies based on the use of modern educational platforms and modification of the educational process by using elements of distance learning during teaching disciplines.

Standardization and modernization of Kazakhstan Higher education

2021 ◽  
pp. 95-101
Author(s):  
Yu.N. Pak ◽  
◽  
Zh.S. Nuguzhinov ◽  
D.Yu. Pak
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Quality Assurance ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Educational Programs ◽  
Educational Process ◽  
Professional Standards ◽  
Educational Standards ◽  
The Republic ◽  
State Educational

Worked out is the analyzes of development of the Kazakhstan system of standardization of higher education on the example of several generations of state educational standards. Their features are examined in structural terms, as well as in terms of the requirements for the compulsory minimum of the educational content, the level of preparedness of graduates and learning outcomes. The dynamics of transformations in the context of expansion of universities academic freedoms, the ratio of compulsory and university components of educational programs is shown. The role of educational and methodological associations of universities of the Republic of Kazakhstan in the development of the regulatory and legal support of the educational process is emphasized. The relevance of introducing the competence-based approach in higher education on the basis of combining educational and professional standards is noted. It is shown that inconsistent and hasty reforms, uncompetitive level of teachers’ remuneration, expanding bureaucratization, underdeveloped quality assurance culture do not contribute to the successful modernization of higher education.

scholarly journals Quality Assessment of Online Learning in Regional Higher Education Systems

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 929-943
Author(s):  
Olga A. Gritsova ◽  
Elena V. Tissen
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Online Learning ◽  
Online Education ◽  
Quality Assessment ◽  
Student Satisfaction ◽  
Educational Process ◽  
Learning Mechanisms ◽  
Education Systems ◽  
Higher Education Systems

The quality of online learning mechanisms, widely implemented due to the COVID-19 pandemic, is a significant issue for regional higher education systems. The research aims to assess student satisfaction with the quality of online education by identifying discrepancies between their requirements and the actual learning process. In order to examine the gaps between students’ expectations and perceptions, a new approach was proposed based on the integrated use of Gap analysis and SERVQUAL methodology, combining qualitative and quantitative aspects. SERVQUAL questionnaires for measuring student satisfaction with online learning include the following criteria: tangibles, reliability, responsiveness, assurance, empathy. Full- and part-time undergraduates of humanitarian and socio-economic departments of two universities participated in the study. Ural Federal University bachelors, learning via Moodle and Microsoft Teams platforms, could directly communicate with their peers and professors, while students of National Research Nuclear University MEPhI were engaged in massive open online courses (MOOC). As a result, all five criteria were analysed in the proposed model for quality assessment of online learning to reveal the gaps between students’ expectations and perceptions of the educational process. Significant discrepancies in the «empathy» and «responsiveness» criteria in both groups demonstrate low student satisfaction with the quality of communication and individualisation of learning. The research findings can be used to construct resource allocation models for implementing educational programmes and developing support measures for regional higher education institutions.

Technology-Based Activities as Formative Assessments in the Higher Education Classroom

2020 ◽  
pp. 233-253
Author(s):  
Diana Tang-En Chang ◽  
Jennie L. Jones ◽  
Danielle E. Hartsfield
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Elementary Education ◽  
Formative Assessment ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Formative Assessments ◽  
Assessment Tools ◽  
Assessment In Higher Education

Instructors across a variety of contexts and levels utilize formative assessments to measure students' progress toward meeting learning outcomes. Formative assessments are how instructors gauge whether their students have mastered content or skills or if they require additional practice and support. The purpose of this chapter is to explain how three elementary education professors utilize technology-based activities as formative assessments within their classrooms. In this chapter, the authors address the importance of using formative assessment in higher education classrooms and provide illustrative examples of how various technologies can be used as assessment tools. These examples will include game-based activities (e.g., Kahoot), presentation platforms (e.g., Nearpod), and organizational tools (e.g., Padlet). The goal of this chapter is to help support instructors in higher education who wish to incorporate technological activities while using them as formative assessments when teaching students.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document