scholarly journals The Simon/Tanger Outlet Mall Health Impact Assessment: Resulting in Active Transportation through Community Connectivity

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 4-14
Author(s):  
Susan Sutherland
Keyword(s):  
Impact Assessment ◽  
Health Impact Assessment ◽  
Good Health ◽  
Health Impact ◽  
Active Transportation ◽  
Environmental Benefits ◽  
Assessment Model ◽  
Activity Levels ◽  
Potential Health ◽  
Community Connectivity

Background: One of the goals of the Health Impact Assessment (HIA), The Simon/Tanger Outlet Mall Health Impact Assessment was to assess potential health implications in providing opportunities for active transportation to the Simon/Tanger Outlet Mall in Berkshire Township, Delaware County, Ohio by community connectivity. Methods: This case study was conducted by using the Health Impact Assessment model and incorporated community input through survey methodologies, assessment protocols, best practices, and  peer-reviewed literature. Results: Many of the risk factors for chronic diseases can be traced on how communities have been built. Several pathways have been identified in the research linking built environments with travel patterns, physical activity levels, body mass index, and associated health outcomes. Residential density, land use mix, and neighborhood connectivity have all been consistently associated with multiple outcomes related to good health. By making neighborhoods more walkable, we not only can create converging health benefits, but environmental benefits and more equal access to jobs and opportunities. Emerging research on the presence of sidewalks, cycling infrastructure, street design, and building placement and site design have been linked to various health and health-related travel behavior outcomes.[1] Conclusions: Continuing modifications to the built environment provide opportunities, over time, to institute policies and practices that support the provision of more activity-conducive environments, which improve the community’s health. 

scholarly journals Health Impact Assessment and City Council Policy: Identifying Opportunities to Address Local Social Determinants of Health & Place-Health Relationships, 10 Years Later

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan Petteway ◽  
Shannon Cosgrove
Keyword(s):  
Impact Assessment ◽  
Social Determinants ◽  
Health Impact Assessment ◽  
Health Impact ◽  
City Council ◽  
Health Impacts ◽  
Potential Health ◽  
Baltimore City ◽  
Local Public Health ◽  
Health Related

Background: Health Impact Assessment (HIA) can be used to assess any type of policy/program related to social determinants (SDH).  However, local public health departments (LHDs) have been slow to adopt formal use of HIA in efforts to address local SDH, even with growing evidence linking SDH and place-health relationships. Ten years ago we completed a review of Baltimore City Council policies to advance this conversation within the LHD. Our goal here is to revisit this review and, again, outline a process by which LHDs can: a) monitor local policies in regard to SDH and b) identify opportunities for potential HIA use. Methods:  We reviewed all policies introduced into Baltimore City Council in calendar years 2008 and 2009. We reviewed each policy to identify those with potential health impacts. We then categorized these policies as: a) “explicitly health-related” or b) “related to SDH.” We then tabulated the number and sub-types of these policies that were referred for LHD review. Results: We identified and reviewed 597 total policies. 89 policies (15%) were identified as “explicitly health-related,” 34 (38%) of which were referred for LHD review. 208 policies (35%) were identified as “related to SDH,” 13 (6%) of which were reviewed. Overall, 297 (50%) policies were identified as having potential health impacts, 47 (16%) of which were reviewed. Conclusion: This work represents a potentially replicable process to identify HIA opportunities, and potential launch point for health-in-all-policies efforts. In Baltimore, it facilitated dialogue with Baltimore City officials and led to the LHD’s first HIA grant.

Health Impact Assessment of Active Transportation in Children

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
David Rojas-Rueda* ◽  
Mark Nieuwenhuijsen ◽  
Martine Vrijheid
Keyword(s):  
Impact Assessment ◽  
Health Impact Assessment ◽  
Health Impact ◽  
Active Transportation

scholarly journals Methods to Conduct a Health Impact Assessment Learning Collaborative

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Cynthia Stone ◽  
Andrea Bochenek ◽  
Alison Redenz ◽  
Elinor Hansotte
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Impact Assessment ◽  
Health Impact Assessment ◽  
Health Sector ◽  
Health Impact ◽  
Learning Objectives ◽  
Public Health Department ◽  
Learning Collaborative ◽  
Potential Health ◽  
Marion County

Background: Indiana University Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health (IU FSPH) and the Health and Hospital Corporation of Marion County, through the Marion County Public Health Department (MCPHD), created a Health Impact Assessment (HIA) Learning Collaborative. The purpose of the HIA Learning Collaborative was to strengthen the capacity of both the academic and community partners to carry out HIAs. Entities recognize the value of creating a collaborative team to assure personnel are trained and available to provide time and expertise for plan reviews, formal feedback, data reports, literature summaries, and input in potential health/social impacts related to projects, which can ensure these impacts are considered in development work. In addition, the MCPHD and IU FSHP intend to increase HIA capacity in Indiana and remain committed to including health impact data into non-health sector decision making. Methods: The group planned to meet monthly over the year with the following learning objectives. A survey was created in Survey Monkey in order to evaluate the overall HIA Learning Collaborative experience and to assess whether or not the learning objectives were met. The survey consisted of 11 questions: nine were multiple choice and two were open-ended. Results: The majority of the objectives were met. Conclusion: There is interest in conducting HIAs in the future and several ideas were generated.

scholarly journals The Development of a Rapid Health Impact Assessment Model for Songkhla Special Economic Zone (SEZ) Policy in Southern Thailand

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suvapak BENJATANAWAT ◽  
Sang-Arun ISARAMALAI ◽  
Dudsadee MUENHOR
Keyword(s):  
Impact Assessment ◽  
Health Impact Assessment ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Monitoring And Evaluation ◽  
Health Impact ◽  
Steering Committee ◽  
Special Economic Zone ◽  
Assessment Model ◽  
Additional Information ◽  
Economic Zone

Background: Rapid Health Impact Assessment (Rapid HIA) for Special Economic Zone (SEZ) has not been undertaken in Thailand. We aimed to develop a Rapid HIA model for policymaking by using Songkhla SEZ as a study model. Methods: Four-stage of the research and development based on HIA process were used: 1) drafting the model using literature reviews and focus group discussions, 2) collecting additional information from 24 stakeholders, and conducting an in-depth interview with six informants, 3) verifying the model by drawing agreements on the model from 17 related agencies and experts, and 4) confirming the validity of the final model using seven experts. The study were conducted from Jan 2018 to Feb 2019. Content analysis and constant comparison were used to analyze the data. Results: A four-step assessment model was obtained. They included public screening, scoping, assessing, and reviewing and influencing. Public screening is deduced from a meeting with organizations and related personnel. Public scoping is an outcome of literature reviewing and meeting with stakeholders and academics. The assessment step focuses on secondary data from related agencies and a participatory workshop with stakeholders and academics. Finally, a meeting with stakeholders and academics, including internet broadcasting, is the reviewing and influencing process. Conclusion: This Rapid HIA model was specifically developed for SEZ policy. Reviewing and influencing steps were combined, whereas the monitoring and evaluation step was removed for further operations. This model depends on the official appointment of the steering committee. HIA practitioners should be experienced academics from higher educational institutions.

scholarly journals Population Dynamics and Air Pollution: The Impact of Demographics on Health Impact Assessment of Air Pollution

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Esben Meulengracht Flachs ◽  
Jan Sørensen ◽  
Jakob Bønløkke ◽  
Henrik Brønnum-Hansen
Keyword(s):  
Air Pollution ◽  
Impact Assessment ◽  
Health Impact Assessment ◽  
Health Impact ◽  
Assessment Model ◽  
Life Years ◽  
Health Impact Assessments ◽  
Mortality Causes ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Municipal Level

Objective. To explore how three different assumptions on demographics affect the health impact of Danish emitted air pollution in Denmark from 2005 to 2030, with health impact modeled from 2005 to 2050.Methods. Modeled air pollution from Danish sources was used as exposure in a newly developed health impact assessment model, which models four major diseases and mortality causes in addition to all-cause mortality. The modeling was at the municipal level, which divides the approximately 5.5 M residents in Denmark into 99 municipalities. Three sets of demographic assumptions were used: (1) a static year 2005 population, (2) morbidity and mortality fixed at the year 2005 level, or (3) an expected development.Results. The health impact of air pollution was estimated at 672,000, 290,000, and 280,000 lost life years depending on demographic assumptions and the corresponding social costs at 430.4 M€, 317.5 M€, and 261.6 M€ through the modeled years 2005–2050.Conclusion. The modeled health impact of air pollution differed widely with the demographic assumptions, and thus demographics and assumptions on demographics played a key role in making health impact assessments on air pollution.

scholarly journals A health impact assessment on the construction phase of a major hospital redevelopment

2008 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 509 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle Maxwell ◽  
Patrick Harris ◽  
Sharon Peters ◽  
Mark Thornell ◽  
Leah D'Souza
Keyword(s):  
Impact Assessment ◽  
Health Impact Assessment ◽  
Planning Process ◽  
Health Impact ◽  
Added Value ◽  
Health Impacts ◽  
Potential Health ◽  
South Wales ◽  
Major Teaching Hospital ◽  
Major Teaching

A prospective health impact assessment (HIA) was conducted to identify potential health impacts arising from the planned redevelopment of Liverpool Hospital, a major teaching hospital in New South Wales, Australia. A multidisciplinary team of health professionals oversaw the HIA and a core project team led by population health practitioners conducted the HIA using a structured, stepwise process. Methods used to gather data for the identification of impacts were a literature review, development of a population profile and consultation with stakeholders. A range of positive and negative health impacts were identified and an assessment matrix was used to prioritise the health impacts and develop recommendations for the proponents of the redevelopment plan.The HIA added value to the planning process for the hospital redevelopment, increasing capacity to conduct future HIAs.

scholarly journals Evaluation of the Health impact assessment (HIA) deployment process in a French region

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (Supplement_4) ◽  
Author(s):  
F Jabot ◽  
J Romagon ◽  
G Dardier
Keyword(s):  
Impact Assessment ◽  
Success Factors ◽  
Health Impact Assessment ◽  
Local Level ◽  
Health Agency ◽  
Health Impact ◽  
Evaluation Framework ◽  
Added Value ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Potential Health

Abstract Background Health impact assessment is a method aimed at identifying the potential health impacts of policies and projects before their implementation and suggesting proposals in order to mitigate negative impacts and enhance positive ones. HIA is growing in France mainly at the local level. The Pays de la Loire Regional Health Agency (PDL-HRA) took an early interest in HIA and supported three experiments proposed by the town councils. An assessment was performed to judge its added value, identify success factors and draw lessons for the development of the practice. Methods An evaluation framework was built based on standards and literature. Using a qualitative multiple case study design, a cross-sectional analysis of the HIAs was carried out in order to compare the implementation process in their respective contexts, the governance arrangements and the changes introduced as a result of the HIA. Evaluation draws upon HIA reports, workshops, field observation and 40 interviews that were analysed with NVivo. Results While the conduct of HIAs is generally in line with standards of practice, the analysis of the relevance of HIA and impact characterization remain insufficiently documented. Implementation and success factors depend on the political context, the culture of institutions, actors and the purpose of HIA. Recommendations have been taken into account and changes are emerging. The stakeholders indicate their interest in HIA insofar as it is a meeting point between the concerns of institutions regarding health equity and democracy and it provides tools for action. Conclusions Although the approach is unanimously valued, it faces time, resource and competition with other activities. The continuation of the approach depends on the HRA policy specifying the aims, resources, fields of application and positioning with regard to the partners.These findings are consistent with other French work and literature data. French experience coulfd benefit from that of other countries. Key messages Skills of professionals have to be reinforced in order to make appropriate and quality HIAs. Evaluation is useful for understanding the development of an emerging practice and for supporting a decision-making in terms of scaling up, integration, role assigned to the health sector.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document