scholarly journals Is it worth preserving the uterus? unanticipated pathology in hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse (POP)

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (10) ◽  
pp. 4145
Author(s):  
Deeksha Pandey ◽  
Pranadeep Reddy Inukollu ◽  
Jyothi Shetty ◽  
Shripad Hebbar ◽  
Muralidhar V. Pai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pelvic Organ Prolapse ◽  
Surgical Management ◽  
Vaginal Hysterectomy ◽  
Uterine Prolapse ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Pelvic Organ ◽  
Histopathological Diagnosis ◽  
Uterine Preservation ◽  
Pelvic Floor Repair

Background: In recent years concept of uterine conservation has been increasing at the time of surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse (POP). This study was intended to assess the risk of premalignant and malignant uterine/endometrial, and cervical pathology at the time of hysterectomy-based POP procedures, to better understand the risks of uterine conservation in the surgical treatment of POP in Indian setup.Methods: Patients who had undergone vaginal hysterectomy for POP in last five years were identified by medical record tracking using ICD-9 codes. Case records then were reviewed to collect patient characteristics and the final histopathological diagnosis of the hysterectomy specimen. Cases with premalignant or malignant uterine/endometrial or cervical pathology recognized prior to surgery were excluded.Results: A total of 573 women who underwent vaginal hysterectomy and pelvic floor repair for the sole indication of POP were included. On analyzing the histopathological diagnosis of the specimen obtained during surgery in 57.1% of cases the findings were consistent with the changes seen in cases of POP. Only 5.9 % of cases had cervical or endometrial pathologies who would have required treatment/follow up in future if the uterus was left in situ.Conclusions: The risk of missing a malignant and premalignant cervical or uterine pathology in women presenting with uterine prolapse is low if appropriate preoperative workup has been done. Uterine preservation in surgical management of POP could be considered an option.

scholarly journals Long-term outcomes of transvaginal mesh surgery for pelvic organ prolapse: a retrospective cohort study

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaojuan Wang ◽  
Yisong Chen ◽  
Changdong Hu ◽  
Keqin Hua
Keyword(s):  
Pelvic Organ Prolapse ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Pelvic Organ ◽  
Transvaginal Mesh ◽  
Recurrence Rates ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Mesh Surgery ◽  
Patient Global Impression

Abstract Background The objective of this study was to evaluate the overall outcomes and complications of transvaginal mesh (TVM) placement for the management of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) with different meshes with a greater than 10-years of follow-up. Methods We performed a retrospective review of patients with POP who underwent prolapse repair surgery with placement of transvaginal mesh (Prolift kit or self-cut Gynemesh) between January 2005 and December 2010. Baseline of patient characteristics were collected from the patients’ medical records. During follow-up, the anatomical outcomes were evaluated using the POP Quantification system, and the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) was used to assess the response of a condition to therapy. Overall postoperative satisfaction was assessed by the following question: “What is your overall postoperative satisfaction, on a scale from 0 to 10?”. Relapse-free survival was analyzed using Kaplan–Meier curves. Results In total, 134 patients were included. With a median 12-year (range 10–15) follow-up, 52 patients (38.8%) underwent TVM surgery with Prolift, and Gynemesh was used 82 (61.2%). 91% patients felt that POP symptom improved based on the PGI-I scores, and most satisfied after operation. The recurrence rates of anterior, apical and posterior compartment prolapse were 5.2%, 5.2%, and 2.2%, respectively. No significant differences in POP recurrence, mesh-associated complications and urinary incontinence were noted between TVM surgery with Prolift versus Gynemesh. Conclusions Treatment of POP by TVM surgery exhibited long-term effectiveness with acceptable morbidity. The outcomes of the mesh kit were the same as those for self-cutmesh.

scholarly journals Prevalence of voiding and defecatory dysfunction in postmenopausal women with pelvic organ prolapse: a prospective observational study

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 2230
Author(s):  
Nanthini Saravanan ◽  
Emily Divya Ebenezer ◽  
Vaibhav Londhe ◽  
Lilly Varghese ◽  
Aruna N. Kekre ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pelvic Organ Prolapse ◽  
Pelvic Floor ◽  
Vaginal Hysterectomy ◽  
Voiding Dysfunction ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Pelvic Organ ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
P Value ◽  
Pelvic Floor Repair ◽  
Defecatory Dysfunction

Background: Primary objective of this work was to study the prevalence of voiding and defecatory dysfunction in women with pelvic organ prolapse and correlate the stage and compartment of prolapse with voiding and defecatory dysfunction. The secondary objective was to correlate stage of prolapse with flow rate and post void residue and to study the voiding dysfunction in pelvic organ prolapse.Methods: A prospective observational cohort study in 120 post-menopausal women scheduled for vaginal hysterectomy pelvic floor repair. Short form of pelvic floor distress inventory (PFDI-20) and International prostate symptom questionnaire I-PSS score for Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS)was employed.Results: The prevalence of voiding dysfunction in this study was 78% and defecatory dysfunction was 77%. Higher stage of prolapse had significant correlation with voiding dysfunction. (P value was 0.028). Women with posterior compartment defect had more voiding dysfunction with the significant P value (p value was 0.04). Pre-operative voiding dysfunction resolved post operatively in 86%, the p<0.000 which was highly significant.Conclusions: Women with pelvic organ prolapse had high prevalence of voiding and defecatory dysfunction. Stages of prolapse have positive correlation with voiding dysfunction. Pre-operative voiding dysfunction resolved after vaginal hysterectomy and pelvic floor repair.

scholarly journals Surgical interventions for uterine prolapse and for vault prolapse: the two VUE RCTs

2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (13) ◽  
pp. 1-220 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine Hemming ◽  
Lynda Constable ◽  
Beatriz Goulao ◽  
Mary Kilonzo ◽  
Dwayne Boyers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Pelvic Organ Prolapse ◽  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Symptom Score ◽  
Vaginal Hysterectomy ◽  
Pelvic Organ ◽  
Uterine Preservation

Background New surgical approaches for apical prolapse have gradually been introduced, with few prospective randomised controlled trial data to evaluate their safety and efficacy compared with traditional methods. Objective To compare surgical uterine preservation with vaginal hysterectomy in women with uterine prolapse and abdominal procedures with vaginal procedures in women with vault prolapse in terms of clinical effectiveness, adverse events, quality of life and cost-effectiveness. Design Two parallel randomised controlled trials (i.e. Uterine and Vault). Allocation was by remote web-based randomisation (1 : 1 ratio), minimised on the need for concomitant anterior and/or posterior procedure, concomitant incontinence procedure, age and surgeon. Setting UK hospitals. Participants Uterine trial – 563 out of 565 randomised women had uterine prolapse surgery. Vault trial – 208 out of 209 randomised women had vault prolapse surgery. Interventions Uterine trial – uterine preservation or vaginal hysterectomy. Vault trial – abdominal or vaginal vault suspension. Main outcome measures The primary outcome measures were women’s prolapse symptoms (as measured using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score), prolapse-specific quality of life and cost-effectiveness (as assessed by incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year). Results Uterine trial – adjusting for baseline and minimisation covariates, the mean Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score at 12 months for uterine preservation was 4.2 (standard deviation 4.9) versus vaginal hysterectomy with a Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score of 4.2 (standard deviation 5.3) (mean difference –0.05, 95% confidence interval –0.91 to 0.81). Serious adverse event rates were similar between the groups (uterine preservation 5.4% vs. vaginal hysterectomy 5.9%; risk ratio 0.82, 95% confidence interval 0.38 to 1.75). There was no difference in overall prolapse stage. Significantly more women would recommend vaginal hysterectomy to a friend (odds ratio 0.39, 95% confidence interval 0.18 to 0.83). Uterine preservation was £235 (95% confidence interval £6 to £464) more expensive than vaginal hysterectomy and generated non-significantly fewer quality-adjusted life-years (mean difference –0.004, 95% confidence interval –0.026 to 0.019). Vault trial – adjusting for baseline and minimisation covariates, the mean Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score at 12 months for an abdominal procedure was 5.6 (standard deviation 5.4) versus vaginal procedure with a Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score of 5.9 (standard deviation 5.4) (mean difference –0.61, 95% confidence interval –2.08 to 0.86). The serious adverse event rates were similar between the groups (abdominal 5.9% vs. vaginal 6.0%; risk ratio 0.97, 95% confidence interval 0.27 to 3.44). The objective anterior prolapse stage 2b or more was higher in the vaginal group than in the abdominal group (odds ratio 0.38, 95% confidence interval 0.18 to 0.79). There was no difference in the overall prolapse stage. An abdominal procedure was £570 (95% confidence interval £459 to £682) more expensive than a vaginal procedure and generated non-significantly more quality-adjusted life-years (mean difference 0.004, 95% confidence interval –0.031 to 0.041). Conclusions Uterine trial – in terms of efficacy, quality of life or adverse events in the short term, no difference was identified between uterine preservation and vaginal hysterectomy. Vault trial – in terms of efficacy, quality of life or adverse events in the short term, no difference was identified between an abdominal and a vaginal approach. Future work Long-term follow-up for at least 6 years is ongoing to identify recurrence rates, need for further prolapse surgery, adverse events and cost-effectiveness. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN86784244. Funding This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 24, No. 13. See the National Institute for Health Research Journals Library website for further project information.

scholarly journals A New Surgical Method of Suprapubic and Extraperitoneal Approach with Uterine Preservation for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Kurt Extraperitoneal Ligamentopexy

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sefa Kurt ◽  
Mehmet Tunc Canda ◽  
Abdullah Tasyurt
Keyword(s):  
Pelvic Organ Prolapse ◽  
Pelvic Organ ◽  
Vaginal Wall ◽  
Uterine Preservation ◽  
Pop Surgery ◽  
Burch Procedure ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Manchester Procedure ◽  
Rectus Fascia

Objective. To introduce an alternative surgical approach for the optimal treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Methods. Twenty symptomatic women with grades 2–4 POP diagnosis who opted to choose this alternative surgery were retrospectively analyzed. Results. A total of 22 cases were included. The mean age of the patients was 50.6±13.2 years (29–72 years) with a mean gravid and parity of 5.5±2.66 and 3.4±2.06, respectively. The mean body-mass index of the patients was 24.25±2.43. Nine (45%) patients were premenopausal and 11 (55%) patients were postmenopausal. Uterine descensus was present in all patients, and additionally cystorectocele in 9 patients (45%), cystocele in 6 patients (30%), rectocele in 4 patients (20%), and elangatio colli in 6 patients (30%) were diagnosed. In addition to the alternative surgery, Manchester procedure and anteroposterior vaginal wall repair or Burch procedure was performed where necessary. Mean follow-up time was 48.95±42.8 months (6–171 months). No recurrence of POP occurred. Conclusions. Suprapubic, extraperitoneal, and minimally invasive ligamentopexy of the round ligament to the anterior rectus fascia offers an alternative to conventional POP surgery with favorable outcomes without any recurrence.

Surgical management of recurrence of multicompartment pelvic organ prolapse after failure of laparoscopic lateral POP suspension (LLPOPS): initial report of six cases and outcomes at 2 years follow-up

2020 ◽  
Vol 72 (1) ◽  
pp. 225-227
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Loverro ◽  
Gianluca Raffaello Damiani ◽  
Matteo Loverro ◽  
Giuseppe Muzzupapa ◽  
Mario Villa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pelvic Organ Prolapse ◽  
Surgical Management ◽  
Pelvic Organ ◽  
Initial Report

scholarly journals Management of pelvic organ prolapse of ruptured and extruded bladder from a rare complication of vaginal hysterectomy: a case presentation

BMC Surgery ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Piao-Piao Ye ◽  
Xiao-Jian Yan ◽  
Yasmeen Bano ◽  
Hong-Qin Zhao ◽  
Feng-Feng Xie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pelvic Organ Prolapse ◽  
Vaginal Hysterectomy ◽  
Rare Complication ◽  
Emergency Operation ◽  
Pelvic Organ ◽  
Abdominal Pressure ◽  
Case Presentation ◽  
Urinary Drainage ◽  
Significant Mass

Abstract Background The prolapse of a ruptured and extruded bladder after vaginal hysterectomy is rare in clinical practice. We report the case of a significant mass that prolapsed from the vagina after a vaginal hysterectomy in a multiparous postmenopausal woman. Case presentation A 67-year old multiparous postmenopausal Chinese woman was found to have a significant mass extruding from the vagina after a vaginal hysterectomy. The mass was a ruptured and everted bladder, and the diagnosis was confirmed after physical and imaging examinations and urethral catheterization. The patient underwent an emergency operation for mass reduction, bladder repair, and partial colpocleisis under general anesthesia. She recovered without prolapse or urinary drainage complications after 35 months of follow-up. Conclusions The present case serves as a guide for the management of patients with pelvic organ prolapse. The condition of patients should be carefully evaluated before surgery, and individualized operation should be performed. Careful postoperative follow-up is crucial for the timely exclusion of complications, especially in elderly patients with persistently increased abdominal pressure.

scholarly journals The effect of pessary treatment on puborectalis muscle function

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia Manzini ◽  
Frieda van den Noort ◽  
Anique T. M. Grob ◽  
Mariëlla I. J. Withagen ◽  
Carl H. van der Vaart
Keyword(s):  
Pelvic Organ Prolapse ◽  
Uterine Prolapse ◽  
Valsalva Maneuver ◽  
Pelvic Organ ◽  
Relative Difference ◽  
Mean Difference ◽  
Entire Group ◽  
Puborectalis Muscle ◽  
Hiatal Area

Abstract Introduction and hypothesis The objective was to assess if puborectalis muscle (PRM) function changes in women with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) undergoing pessary treatment. Methods This was a prospective cohort study of women with symptomatic POP choosing pessary treatment. An interview, clinical examination and 3D/4D transperineal ultrasound were performed at baseline and at 3-month follow-up. POP was assessed using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system (POPQ). Parameters compared between baseline and follow-up were: hiatal area at rest (HArest), maximal contraction (HActx), and maximal Valsalva maneuver (HAVal), displacement in contraction (DISPL-ctx, i.e., relative difference between HArest and HActx), and displacement in Valsalva (DISPL-Val, i.e., relative difference between and HAVal and HArest). Parameters were compared in women with and those without complete avulsion. Results A total of 162 women were assessed and 34 were included. Mean age was 64 years (SD 11.4), and mean BMI 24 kg/m2 (SD 3.1). Thirty-one women had a cystocele, 8 a uterine prolapse, and 12 had a posterior compartment prolapse. Twenty-one women (61.8%) had a POP stage II, and 13 (38.2%) a POP stage III. Ring pessaries were most frequently used (97%). In the entire group a statistically significant increase in DISPL-ctx was observed (mean difference 2.1%, p = 0.017). In the no avulsion group HArest and DISPL-ctx increased significantly (mean difference 4.1%, p = 0.016 and 2.7%, p = 0.016 respectively) and the increase in DISPL-ctx was higher than in the avulsion group (mean difference 2.7% vs 0.2%, p = 0.056). Conclusion Our results show that PRM function changes in women with POP undergoing pessary treatment and suggest that such change occurs mainly in the absence of complete avulsion.

Outcomes and Postoperative Complications of Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Hysterosacropexy: Initial Experience

2015 ◽  
Vol 95 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Angela Cerruto ◽  
Carolina D'Elia ◽  
Francesca Maria Cavicchioli ◽  
Stefano Cavalleri ◽  
Matteo Balzarro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Uterine Prolapse ◽  
Pelvic Organ ◽  
Consecutive Series ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Early Complications ◽  
Robot Assisted ◽  
Female Patients ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Record Review

Background: Pelvic organ prolapse is a common condition, affecting about 50% of women with children. The aim of our study was to evaluate results and complication rates in a consecutive series of female patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterosacropexy (RALHSP). Materials and Methods: We performed a medical record review of female patients with uterine prolapse who had consecutively undergone RALHSP from February 2010 to 2013 at our department. Results: Fifteen patients were included in the analysis. All patients had uterine prolapse stage ≥II and urodynamic stress urinary incontinence. The mean age was 58.26 years. According to the Clavien-Dindo system, 4 out of 15 patients (26.6%) had grade 1 early complications and 1 patient had a grade 2 complication. At a median follow-up of 36 months, there was a significant prolapse relapse rate of 20% (3/15). Conclusion: In our hands RALHSP is easy to perform, with satisfying mid-term outcomes and a low complication rate.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document