scholarly journals Comparative study of duration of analgesia with epidural bupivacaine and bupivacaine with tramadol in lower limb surgeries

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 2003
Author(s):  
Dipti Saxena ◽  
Sadhana Sanwatsarkar ◽  
Atul Dixit ◽  
Bipin Arya
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Total Duration ◽  
Onset Of Action ◽  
Group I ◽  
Epidural Bupivacaine ◽  
Group B ◽  
High Level ◽  
A Prospective Study

Background: The administration of local anaesthetic and opioid mixture via epidural route is excellent for post-operative pain during lower limb surgeries. This combination provides better quality of analgesia, lower side effects and high level of patient satisfaction. Therefore, this study was taken up to evaluate the efficacy safety, tolerance and side effects for the combination of tramadol and bupivacaine in the management of post-operative pain.Methods: This was a prospective study where a total of 40 patients; 20 each in group I and II were selected. Patients who were admitted for lower limb surgeries   in age range of 18-50yrs and belonged to ASA grade I &II.  Group A was given epidural bupivacaine 0.5% and group B was given epidural bupivacaine 0.5% with tramadol 50mg. The parameters studied were onset of action, quality of anesthesia, degree of motor blockade, duration of analgesia, hemodynamic alterations, intraoperative and postoperative complications. Pain was evaluated with verbal score. Results were evaluated statistically.Results: The mean duration of analgesia was significantly longer in patients with tramadol. The quality of analgesia and pain scores were better in patients who were administered tramadol.  The number of drug doses required was significantly reduced by addition of tramadol.Conclusions: Tramadol is a safe and effective adjuvant to epidural bupivacaine for prolongation of total duration of analgesia in lower limb surgeries.

scholarly journals Epidural butorphanol for post operative analgesia in lower limb surgeries: A comparative study with epidural tramadol

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 26-32
Author(s):  
G P Deo ◽  
S K Shrestha ◽  
I N Shrestha
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Analgesic Efficacy ◽  
Epidural Injection ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Duration Of Action ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Group B

To compare the efficacy of epidural butorphanol and tramadol for post operative analgesia in lower limb surgeries. Randomized, controlled, double blind, prospective study conducted at Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Chitwan Medical College from September 1st 2015 to August 31st 2016. 60 patients of ASA Grade I and II of either sex, aged between 18-65 years willing for epidural analgesia for post operative analgesia were included in the study. They were divided into two groups: Group B- Butorphanol group and Group T- Tramadol group. Subjects of Group B received 2mg of Butorphanol and 0.25% Bupivacaine making a total volume of 10 ml and that of Group T received 100mg of Tramadol and 0.25% Bupivacaine also making a total volume of 10 ml. Analgesic efficacy was assessed by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The onset and duration of analgesia along with side effects were also assessed. The quality of analgesia was studied using time to independent mobilization and overall patient satisfaction. Total number of patients was 60, of ASA Grade I and II, aged between 18-65 years. The mean age of patients in Group B was 42.6±11.7 years and 46.1±11.2 years in Group T. Time of onset of analgesia after epidural injection was 7.4±0.9 minutes in Group B and 12.7±1.5 minutes in Group T and the difference was found to be statistically significant. Duration of analgesia was 317.1±99.1 minutes and 438.8±136.6 minutes in Butorphanol and Tramadol groups respectively which was also statistically significant. Sedation was significantly higher in butorphanol group whereas nausea and vomiting was higher in tramadol group. Quality of analgesia in terms of patient satisfaction was better with epidural butorphanol. Both epidural tramadol and butorphanol were effective in relieving post operative pain however butorphanol had lesser side effects and greater patient satisfaction compared to tramadol but the duration of action was relatively short.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Dexmedetomidine Co-Administered with Neostigmine and Bupivacaine for Postoperative Epidural Analgesia in Lower Limb Orthopaedic Surgeries – A Study from Maharashtra, India

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (32) ◽  
pp. 2634-2639
Author(s):  
Parag Yashawant Dongre ◽  
Aruna Vijay Chandak ◽  
Amol P. Singam
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Epidural Analgesia ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Rescue Analgesia ◽  
Post Surgery ◽  
Group I ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
Key Words Epidural ◽  
Spinal Epidural

BACKGROUND Addition of adjuvants to the neuro axial blocked helps prolongate the duration and quality of analgesia and anaesthesia. The safety and efficacy of drugs dexmedetomidine and neostigmine have been less commonly studied. We wanted to compare post-operative analgesia, haemodynamics, and side effects if any in this study. METHODS Combined spinal - epidural anaesthesia was performed in 60 patients who underwent lower limb surgeries of less than 2 hrs. The patients were given the drug epidurally post-surgery. Group I, II and III were given 10 ml of 0.25 % bupivacaine alone, with 1 microgram per kg of neostigmine and with 0.5 milligram per kg of dexmedetomidine and 1 microgram per kg of neostigmine, respectively. 50 mg tramadol intravenous was kept as rescue analgesic. Parameters which predict haemodynamics, assessment of pain, period of analgesia, demand for rescue analgesia and the chances of side effects were noted over the next ten hrs. RESULTS To conclude, epidural analgesia is the most preferred analgesia these days in management of lower limb orthopaedic surgery’s post-operative pain. When bupivacaine was combined with neostigmine and dexmedetomidine as a neuraxial adjuvant, it prolonged the post-operative analgesia significantly without increasing the side effects of those drugs. The combination of two drugs proved better than the use of single drug alone. CONCLUSIONS Combination of neostigmine and dexmedetomidine when used as a neuraxial adjuvant, significantly prolonged the duration of post-operative analgesia by 274.13 4.539 in lower limb orthopaedic cases compared to neostigmine alone that was 176.23 ± 3.441. KEY WORDS Epidural, Neostigmine, Dexmedetomidine, Orthopaedic Surgeries, Post-Operative Analgesia

scholarly journals A PROSPECTIVE STUDY TO ANALYSE THE SIDE EFFECTS OF OLMESARTAN MEDOXOMIL AND ENALAPRIL IN HYPERTENSIVE SUBJECTS

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 258
Author(s):  
Parminderpal Singh ◽  
Kiranjit Kiranjit
Keyword(s):  
Drug Therapy ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Postural Hypotension ◽  
Olmesartan Medoxomil ◽  
National Commission ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Taste Alteration ◽  
A Prospective Study

Objective: The present study was aimed to analyze the side effects of olmesartan medoxomil and enalapril in hypertensive subjects.Methods: The study consisted of newly diagnosed hypertension categorized according to 7th report of Joint National Commission on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure. The subjects were divided into two groups. The Group A subjects received olmesartan, and Group B subjects received enalapril. Pressure was recorded both in supine and sitting positions. The appearance of side effects was observed in the follow-up, i.e., dry cough, headache, postural hypotension, angioedema, dizziness, skin rashes, taste alterations, and urticaria. A statistical data were prepared on the basis of information obtained and analyzed thoroughly for antihypertensive effects and side effects of olmesartan and enalapril. SPSS software was used for analysis.Results: There was observed an increase in the incidence of taste alteration with drug therapy in Group B (Enalapril). There was observed an increase in the incidence of postural hypotension with drug therapy in both groups. In Group A (Olmesartan), the incidence of postural hypotension at the beginning of trial, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks was 0%, 2%, and 2%, respectively. In Group A (Olmesartan), there was no incidence of a headache at the beginning of trial, at 4 weeks and 8 weeks.Conclusion: From the study, it can be concluded that both olmesartan and enalapril are effective in Stage I and Stage II hypertension, but olmesartan is tolerated well with lesser side effects.

scholarly journals BIOBRAN MGN-3

2012 ◽  
Vol 20 (01) ◽  
pp. 13-16
Author(s):  
Ahmad Ijaz Masood ◽  
RABEETA SHEIKH ◽  
RANA ATIQUE ANWER
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Hair Loss ◽  
White Blood Cells ◽  
Food Supplement ◽  
Severe Nausea ◽  
Treatment Side Effects ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Objective: The aim of study was to assess the effect of Biobran in reducing of chemotherapy induced side effects in termsof tiredness, anorexia, vomiting and hair loss and quality of life in terms of weight loss. Setting: Radiotherapy Department, NishtarHospital Multan. Material and Methods: Fifty patients of breast cancer were enrolled randomly in two groups. Group-A patients weregiven 3 gram dose of Biobran MGN-3 per day one week before and one week after chemotherapy. Group-B patient were givenchemotherapy alone. Total six cycles of chemotherapy were given. No multivitamin or food supplements were given during this study.Chemotherapy induced side effects (tiredness, anorexia, and vomiting, hair loss) were assessed by questionnaire to the patients beforestart of each cycle. Weight was checked before each cycle to assess weight gain or loss. White blood cells were checked by completeblood count just before and one week after chemotherapy. Results: Between six months, 50 patients were enrolled in RadiotherapyDepartment, Nishtar Hospital Multan. There was a significant reduction in tiredness and anorexia in group-A patients. 20 (80%) patients ofgroup-A felt increase in their diet and no tiredness without any appetizer or multivitamin. But group-B patients demanded for appetizer dueto severe anorexia after chemotherapy except 3 (12%) patients who didn’t use any appetizer or food supplement. In group-A, 15 (60%)patients didn’t need any anti-emetic as compared to group-B all patient (100%) experienced severe nausea during and afterchemotherapy. Group-A patients experienced less hair fall 7 (28%) patients as compared to other group which is 25 (100%) patients.Conclusions: The study showed that, by helping to optimize the immune system, Biobran MGN-3 can not only help maximize treatmentsuccess, but also minimize treatment side effects and improve quality of life during treatment and in recovery.

scholarly journals A Comparison of Oral Gabapentin and Oral Pregabalin as Preemptive Analgesia for Orthopedic Surgery Under Spinal Anaesthesia

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 74-78
Author(s):  
Neena Jain ◽  
Rahul Bankapur ◽  
Preeti Lamba ◽  
saurav Singh
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Spinal Anaesthesia ◽  
Orthopedic Surgery ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Analgesic Efficacy ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background and Aims: Gabapentin and pregabalin, by decreasing noxious stimulus induced excitatory neurotransmitter release at central nervous system, may attenuate central sensitization and eventually decrease development of postoperative pain. We evaluated preemptive analgesic efficacy of single dose of oral gabapentin 600 mg and pregabalin 75mg for postoperative pain in patients undergoing lower limb orthopedic surgery under spinal anesthesia. Material and methods: A prospective, randomized, double blind study was conducted on 70 patients aged between 18 to 60 years with ASA grade 1 and 2 posted for lower limb surgeries under spinal anaesthesia. Patients were allocated into Group A and Group B receiving oral gabapentin(600mg) and oral pregabalin (75mg) respectively 1.5 hours before surgery. Primary objective was assessing duration and quality of analgesia by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score at 2,4,6,8,10,12,16,20 and 24 hours.Secondary objective was to assess total dose of rescue analgesic in first 24 hours, perioperative hemodynamic change and various side effects. Statistical Analysis used: Categorical data was compared using Chi- square test. Quantitative parametric data was analysed using unpaired student t-test. P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Mean duration of analgesia in Group A (10.53 ± 2.686 hours) was longer than Group B (7.943±3.199hr) (P = 0.0006).Mean number of analgesic dosesrequired in first 24 hourswere less in Group A (1.429 ± 0.5021) ascompared to Group B (1.771±0.6897) (P = 0.0202).All patients remained hemodynamically stable with no significant side effects noted in either group. Conclusion: We conclude that preemptive analgesic efficacy of oral gabapentin 600mg is better in comparison to oral pregabalin 75 mg for patients posted for lower limb orthopedic surgeries under spinal anesthesia.

COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN EPIDURAL BUPIVACAINE WITH BUPRENORPHINE AND EPIDURAL BUPIVACAINE FOR POST-OPERATIVE ANALGESIA IN ABDOMINAL AND LOWER LIMB SURGERY

2021 ◽  
pp. 29-31
Author(s):  
Anant Prakash ◽  
Rahul Kumar ◽  
Chandeshwar Choudhary ◽  
Debarshi Jana
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Heart Beat ◽  
Epidural Administration ◽  
Visual Analogue Pain ◽  
Post Operative Period ◽  
Epidural Bupivacaine ◽  
Lower Limb Surgery ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: Epidural administration of various analgesics gained increasing popularity following the discovery of opioid receptors in the spinal cord capable of producing potent analgesia. This effect seems to be greatest when epidural anaesthesia in continued in the post-operative period as epidural analgesia. It is now clear that epidural administration of opioids. Ours was a comparative study between epidural bupivacaine with buprenorphine and epidural bupivacaine for post-operative analgesia in abdominal and lower limb surgery. Methods: 60 patients undergoing lower abdominal and lower limb surgeries of either sex with ASA grade 1 and 2 aged between 20 and 60 years for divided into two groups. After completion of the surgery and when the effect of local anaesthetic wears of and the patients complains of pain the intended study drugs were given when visual analogue pain score touched 5 cm mark. Group – A: Patients received 8ml of 0.25% bupivacaine + 0.15mg of buprenorphine. Group – B: patients received 0.25% of bupivacaine alone. In the post-operative period the following parameters were studied, 1. Onset of analgesia, 2. Duration of analgesia, 3. Vital parameters such as heart beat, blood pressure, respiratory rate, sedation score and visual analogue score were recorded, 4. Side effects like nausea, vomiting, hypotension, respiratory depression, and pruritus allergic reaction were looked for. Results: It is observed that onset of analgesia in Group A (0.25% bupivacaine + 0.15mg buprenorphine) was 7.35 min. When compared to Group B which 15.5 min, which is statically signicant (P<0.05). Duration of analgesia in Group A is 17.23 hrs compared to Group B, which is 5.2 hrs, this is statically signicant (P<0.05). Visual analogue scale was reduced in Group A compared to Group B Conclusions: Addition of buprenorphine to bupivacaine by epidural injection for post-operative analgesia improves the onset, The duration and the quality of analgesia

scholarly journals Comparing the Analgesic Efficacy of Intrathecal Bupivacaine Alone with Intrathecal Bupivacaine Midazolam or Magnesium Sulphate Combination in Patients Undergoing Elective Infraumbilical Surgery

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josef Attia ◽  
Amany Abo Elhussien ◽  
Mostafa Zaki
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Magnesium Sulphate ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Analgesic Efficacy ◽  
Motor Blockade ◽  
Sensory Blockade ◽  
Lower Limb Surgery ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Limited Duration

Background. Spinal anaesthesia, which is one of the techniques for infraumbilical surgeries, is most commonly criticized for limited duration of postoperative analgesia. Aim of the Work. The aim of this study was to decrease bupivacaine dose used in spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing orthopedic lower limb surgery and reduce its possible side effects. Patient and Methods. Sixty adult patients of both sexes, divided into three. Group C received 2.5 mL bupivacaine and 0.5 mL saline 0.9%. Group A received 2.5 mL bupivacaine and 0.5 mL midazolam. Group B received 2.5 mL bupivacaine and 0.5 mL magnesium sulphate. Results. As regards onset of both motor and sensory blockade, there are a significant decrease in group A and a significant increase in group B as compared to group C, with a significant decrease in duration of motor blockade and significant increase in duration of sensory blockade in both group A and group B, respectively, as compared to group C, with a significant decrease in the duration of sensory blockade in group B as compared to group C. Conclusions. These results suggested that intrathecal midazolam as an adjuvant for bupivacaine increases the duration of both sensory and motor blockade more than that of magnesium sulphate.

scholarly journals Comparison of Ketamine and Pentazocine with Fentanyl and Propofol combination for anaesthesia during laparoscopic tubal ligation

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 1525
Author(s):  
Ovais Nazir ◽  
Asif Hussain Bhat ◽  
Hamid Yatoo ◽  
Sanjeevni Gupta ◽  
Rajesh Misra
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Recovery Time ◽  
Postoperative Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Rapid Onset ◽  
Tubal Ligation ◽  
Onset Of Action ◽  
Anaesthetic Agents ◽  
Minimally Invasive Surgical ◽  
Group I ◽  
Group Ii

Background: Laparoscopic tubal ligation have advantages of minimally invasive surgical technique, without risk of major haemorrhage, early postoperative ambulation and alimentation, making it suitable for ambulatory surgery. The choice of aneasthesia for laparoscopic ligation hence should consider the anaesthetic agents with a rapid onset of action and fast recovery time, with minimal problems for intraoperative control of haemodynamic, airway and pain relief as well as take consideration of the safety, quality, efficacy, and utilization of resources available to the given situation.Methods: A total of 100 patients aged from 18 to 45 years who were scheduled to undergo laparoscopic tubal ligation  were divided into Group I-  Ketamine plus pentazocine group (n=50), Group II- Propofol plus fentanyl group (n=50) and studied  for the intraoperative parameters (hemodynamic and respiratory profile), recovery time, postoperative side effects and discharge time.Results: Intraoperatively MAP and HR were consistently higher in group I as compared to group II. Incidence of apnea and need for bag and mask ventilation was significantly more in Group II than in Group I as was the incidence of Bradycardia. Postoperative nausea and vomiting, psychomimetic effects were significantly more in Group I than in Group II. The time to reach modified PADSS ≥9 (discharge time) was significantly longer in group I (140.3±12.82 min than in group II 102.2±9.2 min), P<0.01.Conclusions: Combination of ketamine and pentazocine gives good anaesthetic conditions during procedure with less incidence of airway and haemodynamic complications intraoperatively but more incidence of postoperative side effects like nausea, vomiting, psycomimetic effects, and time to meet discharge criteria, compared to propofol plus fentanyl.

A Prospective Study in Detection of Lower-Limb Lymphedema and Evaluation of Quality of Life After Vulvar Cancer Surgery

2012 ◽  
Vol 67 (12) ◽  
pp. 781-783
Author(s):  
Marta Novackova ◽  
Michael J. Halaska ◽  
Helena Robova ◽  
Ivana Mala ◽  
Marek Pluta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Prospective Study ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Vulvar Cancer ◽  
Cancer Surgery ◽  
A Prospective Study

scholarly journals Cisplatin combined with capecitabine-induced chemotherapy for local nasopharyngeal carcinoma can improve the quality of life and reduce toxic and side effects

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying Gao ◽  
Zhe Liu ◽  
Yiting Liu
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Intravenous Drip ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
First Time ◽  
Better Than

Abstract Background This study was designed to probe into the effect of cisplatin combined with capecitabine on nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Methods A total of 136 NPC patients treated for the first time in our hospital from January 2016 to March 2017 were collected and divided into two groups: A and B. Among them, 66 in group A were treated with cisplatin intravenous drip, while 70 in group B were treated with capecitabine on the basis of group A. The efficacy, toxic and side effects, and quality of life of the two groups were observed. Results The short-term efficacy of group B was better than that of group A (p<0.05). The toxic and side effects of group B were lower than that of group A (p<0.05). The quality of life in group B was higher than that in group A (p<0.05). Conclusions Cisplatin combined with capecitabine-induced chemotherapy for local NPC can improve the quality of life and reduce the toxic and side effects.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document