THE PROBLEM OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN THE CONTEXT OF ARTICLES 116 AND 116.1 OF THE CRIMINAL CODE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION

2021 ◽  
pp. 36-41
Author(s):  
K. K. Novikova ◽  
◽  
D. D. Khmelnitskaya ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Domestic Violence ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
The Public ◽  
The World Bank ◽  
The Family ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Law ◽  
Definition Of

Currently, the problem of domestic violence is quite urgent due to the annually increasing number of victims. Besides the increased attention from the legislation to this issue, the public itself is anxious about the existing situation: victims of domestic violence are treated disrespectfully as they either excessively draw attention to the situation that has arisen, or they are blamed for a late appeal to the law enforcement authorities. The paper defines the concept of domestic violence, specifies character traits of a person committing domestic violence as well as of a potential victim. Based on the analysis of litigation practice, the authors conclude on the absence of a unified approach to the definition of crime and the existence of gaps when punishing the third episode of a committed socially dangerous act. The analysis of data of the World Bank annual research “Women, Business and the Law” and the RF Ministry of Internal Affairs on domestic violence in the Russian Federation confirmed the existence of an acute problem, which remains unsolved on the legislative level for the rather long period. Within the current research, the authors propose introducing a new domestic violence body of evidence to the RF Criminal Code, whereby domestic violence should be considered willful damage for the life and health of a person being in the family, personal, or household relations. Specified innovations will allow significantly facilitating the work of law enforcement authorities and courts when classifying the acts and imposing a just punishment through the introduction of classified types of domestic violence when implementing the protection of rights of victims.

scholarly journals Local Self-Government in the Public Government System: A New Constitutional Dimension

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 23-26
Author(s):  
Oleg A. Kozhevnikov ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Public Power ◽  
The Public ◽  
System A ◽  
International Obligations ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Law

The article analyzes certain provisions of the Law of the Russian Federation on the amendment to the Constitution of the Russian Federation of March 14, 2020 No. 1-FKZ “On improving the regulation of certain issues of the organization and functioning of public power” in terms of regulatory regulation of local self-government. According to the analysis the author comes to the conclusion that with the entry into effect of the mentioned legal act the content of individual elements of the constitutional-legal bases of local self-government will change, but the nature and scope of modifications in many respects will depend on the provisions of the rules of sectoral legislation aimed at implementing the relevant provisions of the Constitution. In this regard, the Federal legislator has a huge responsibility to create an “updated” legal framework for the implementation of the constitutional foundations of local self-government, taking into account the already established law enforcement practice, the positions of the constitutional court of the Russian Federation, as well as the state's international obligations under the European Charter on local self-government.

scholarly journals Leniency programmesfor cartel: mature reforms

2018 ◽  
pp. 24-33
Author(s):  
K. N. Aleshin ◽  
S. V. Maksimov
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Main Factors ◽  
The Law ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
The Right

The problems of interpretation of criminal law and administrative law institutes of active repentance (“leniency programmes”) in relation to cartels are considered.The definition of the effectiveness of the institution of active repentance is given as the ability of this institution to achieve the goals stipulated by law (in the aggregate or in a particular combination): 1) termination of the committed offense (crime) (“surrender”),2) assistance in investigating the relevant administrative offense (crime), 3) compensation for the harm caused by his offense (crime), 4) refusal to commit such offenses (crimes) in the future.The condition of the quadunity of these goals is investigated. It is noted that among the main factors reducing the effectiveness of administrative law and criminal law institutions of active repentance (“leniency programmes”) in relation to a cartel is the legal inconsistency of these institutions.Proposals are being made to amend par. 3 of the Notes to Art. 178 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and Note 1 to Art. 14.32 of the Code of the Russian Federation Code of Administrative Offenses iin order to bring together the relevant institutions of active repentance.The necessity of legislative consolidation of general procedural rules for the implementation of the person who participated in the conclusion of the cartel, the law granted him the right to active repentance is substantiated.

scholarly journals Some Aspects of Prevention and Investigation of Damage to the Railway Telecommunications Facilities

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 358-365
Author(s):  
Igor Ozerov ◽  
Olga Katayeva ◽  
Denis Rudov ◽  
Elena Cherkasova ◽  
Anastasia Volchenko ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Expert Knowledge ◽  
Preliminary Investigation ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Customs Union ◽  
Telecommunications Infrastructure ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Law

The authors study the issues of preventing the damage to the railway telecommunications infrastructure by analyzing the current criminal procedure legislation, criminal legislation and criminalistics views on the methods and means of counteracting crimes under Art. 215.2 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. They present the algorithm of actions of the law enforcement employees and the specialists servicing the railway facilities when such offences take place. The authors analyze the procedural investigative activities regarding the employees of the organizations that service the railway infrastructure. The investigation of crimes under Art. 215.2 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation requires expert knowledge in the sphere of servicing railway transport. The authors specifically examine some evidence acquired during the preliminary investigation and the methodology of some investigative actions (interrogation of witnesses, representatives of the aggrieved party, inspection of the crime scene). They analyze the procedure of evaluating the damage inflicted on sophisticated telecommunication facilities. They also single out a number of special characteristics of the investigative methodology for crimes under Art. 215.2 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation when specialists in servicing complex telecommunications facilities are called to give testimony. It is noted that countries bordering on the Russian Federation and members of the Customs Union are gradually harmonizing their criminal and criminal procedure legislation with the legislation of the Russian Federation. The paper states that today the Russian Federation has sufficient legislative base to form a system of preventing crimes against railway telecommunications infrastructure. In conclusion the authors present a number of measures to counteract crimes under Art. 215.2 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, offer their brief description and the recommendations for using them. They stress the necessity of cooperation between the owners of the railway facilities, the law enforcement bodies and the mass media.

scholarly journals The Concept of Freedom of Enterprise Through the Prism of Criminal Law Characteristics of Fraud

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 291-299
Author(s):  
Yekaterina Yakimova
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Negative Results ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Law ◽  
Entrepreneurial Activities

The research of issues connected with the analysis of business risks is relevant because of the problem of qualifying the actions of entrepreneurs under the fraud-related Articles of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Besides, the development of technologies increases the number of frauds in the digital environment, which makes it necessary to determine key features of fraudulent actions connected with the changes in the economic organization of the society connected with the digital transformation of some branches of the world economy in general and Russian economy in particular, of the social sphere, and of the specifics of public administration of some areas of life. The responsiveness of lawmakers manifested in amending a group of Articles in the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation regarding the legal characteristics of fraud, shows that there are some problems in the legislative regulation of this sphere. The author believes that they are caused by an attempt to assess the degree of freedom of enterprise and the degree of involvement of each side of legal relations in the risk of investment. The analysis of legislation, the law enforcement practice, statistical data give reason to believe that most of the problems of legislative understanding of fraud in entrepreneurship are not connected with contradictions in the legal regulation, but rather with the drawbacks of the law enforcement practice, the prevalence of repressive methodology in classifying the actions of entrepreneurs and the inner conviction of the law enforcement employees that entrepreneurs intentionally strive to obtain negative results in any, and primarily entrepreneurial, activities. The author argues that further improvement of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation will not yield any tangible results, which testifies to a considerable transformation of the fraud-related Articles in the last 15 years. Changes in the practice of enforcement of the criminal law’s articles regarding fraud are only possible after the principles of such work are worked out by the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, who at present pays much attention to this issue, although some clauses of the Plenary Session of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation require further analysis and improvement.

scholarly journals Responsibility for Bribery or Coercion to Testify or Avoidance of Giving Testimony or Misinterpreting (Art. 309 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation): Legislative Structure and Implementation Practices

2019 ◽  
pp. 102-108
Author(s):  
S. M. Kochoi
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Text Analysis ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Legal Proceedings ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Law ◽  
Implementation Practices ◽  
Legislative Structure ◽  
Different Parts

The text analysis of Art. 309 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation revealed a number of shortcomings in the legislative structure of the component elements of a crime provided for therein. It is concluded that a different degree of danger of bribery and coercion of the participants in the legal proceedings underlying the design of their basic structures (parts 1 and 2 of Art. 309 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation) must be sustained in their qualified compositions (part 4 of Art. 309 of the Criminal Code RF). That is, bribery committed by an organized group and coercion committed by an organized group should be provided not in one but in different parts of Art. 309 of the Criminal Code, containing various sanctions. In Art. 309 of the Criminal Code, the use of violence that is not dangerous to life or health is a qualifying element of coercion of participants in legal proceedings (part 3). Consequently, the use of violence dangerous to life or health can only be an element of coercion of these persons. Further differentiation of responsibility is required under Part 2 of Art. 309 of the Criminal Code, since coercion to action is objectively more dangerous than coercion to inaction. Other gaps in the legislative structure of Art. 309 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation were identified in the course of a study of the judicial investigative practice of its application. It is concluded that formally forcing the victim to avoid reporting the crime (or bribing him for this purpose) is not tantamount to forcing him to avoid giving testimony, since reporting a crime with the law enforcement authorities cannot be considered a testimony. In this sense, it should be recognized that the disposition of the norm contained in Part 2 of Art. 309 of the Criminal Code, contains a gap that must be addressed by pointing to coercion to avoid reporting a crime.

scholarly journals PECULIARITIES OF THE LAW ENFORCEMENT PRACTICE IN THE QUALIFICATION AND INVESTIGATION OF CRIMES STIPULATED BY ARTICLE 145.1 OF THE CRIMINAL CODE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 31-34
Author(s):  
Maksim E. Guschev ◽  
◽  
Ekaterina A. Zagryadskaya ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Law

The paper examines the problematic points that investigators face in the qualification and investigation of acts related to non-payment of wages and other established payments, analyzes the errors of law enforcement practice, and suggests ways to solve these problems.

scholarly journals On the Need and Possible Options for Changing the Rules for Determining Forms of Guilt

Lex Russica ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 87-102
Author(s):  
D. A. Kokotova
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Responsibility ◽  
Effective Means ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Current Version ◽  
Enforcement Officer ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Law Enforcement Officer ◽  
The Law

The current version of part 2 of article 24 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, which appeared because of changes made to the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation in 1998, is rightly criticized for uncertainty. In the literature, various proposals are made to change the rules for determining the forms of guilt. The existing regulation needs adjusting, since it does not ensure the achievement of the initial goal of improving law enforcement, which was originally intended in part 2 of article 24, and does not comply with the principles of equality and legal certainty. The need to ensure compliance with these principles and achieve the original goal of the rule under consideration requires rejecting proposals to "legalize" the discretion of the law enforcement officer, the possibility of which arose due to the uncertainty of the current version of part 2 of article 24. Due to this uncertainty, compliance with the provisions of the Special part will not solve the existing problems. Unifying negligent crimes into a separate chapter, dividing the crimes in the existing chapters by paragraphs, depending on the form of guilt, is too difficult a way if we are talking about improving the current Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Clear automatic consolidation of the possibility of both forms of guilt does not provide the required differentiation of punishment.Restoring the original version of part 2 of article 24 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation is an acceptable and easiest way, but there is a reason to believe that the rule changed in this way will fail to ensure that the law enforcement officer follows it. The inclusion of a form of guilt clause in the description of each body of a crime might be an effective means of limiting the discretion of the law enforcement officer, but this method is difficult to implement. It combines the features of these two methods of fixing the rule in the form of a list of crimes involving a particular form of guilt, by analogy with how the age at which criminal responsibility begins is now established.

THE PROBLEM OF CORRELATION OF ARTICLES 275 AND 276 OF THE CRIMINAL CODE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Sergeevna Alexandrova ◽  
◽  
Roman Vladimirovich Vasilyev ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Law ◽  
Criminal Legislation

the article is devoted to the problem of the correlation of crimes provided for in Articles 275 and 276 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation ("High treason" and "Espionage"). Some inaccuracies were identified when distinguishing the components of these criminal acts. The law enforcement practice was also studied. Proposals were made to introduce some changes to the current criminal legislation of the Russian Federation.

On the issue of the public order concept in the context of criminal law qualification and differentiation of crimes from administrative offenses

2020 ◽  
pp. 122-134
Author(s):  
Vladimir Kokorev
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Public Order ◽  
Normal Functioning ◽  
Public Places ◽  
The Public ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Points Of View ◽  
Definition Of

We consider the concept of "public order". We emphasize that the protection of public order is reflected in a number of provisions of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation. Based on doctrinal points of view, a list of acts that infringe on public order is established, since not all the norms of these Codes specify that they are aimed at protecting public order from unlawful infringements. At the same time, the legislator does not propose its interpretation, although a number of regulatory legal acts regulating the protection of public order are adopted. Therefore, based on doctrinal points of view, we propose the definition of this concept: public order is expressed in the observance by individuals of the norms of laws, morality in public places, ensuring public peace, the inviolability of the person and the normal functioning of government bodies and local self-government, the activities of public organizations and legal entities. In addition, in the scientific literature there is a position that any crime violates public order (consequently, this also applies to administrative offenses), but based on judicial practice, we conclude that when committing other crimes and offenses that are not related to violation of public order, they do not indicate a violation of public order, and applicable to the analyzed acts there is not always any specification – what exactly is expressed in violation of public order.

Problems of a Regulation of Norm on a Serving Sentence Delay to the Persons Having Juvenile Children

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 45-49
Author(s):  
D. B. Laptev ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Social Nature ◽  
Legal Nature ◽  
The Family ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Definition Of

Article is devoted to a research of some problematic issues of a regulation of standard of Article 82 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Doctrinal approaches to definition of the legal nature of a delay of serving sentence are considered and the conclusion is drawn that it is other measure of criminal character which represents a special type of test at which potential execution of a sentence is put into dependence on observance by the convict in the period of a delay of duties of the family and legal or medico-social nature. Suggestions for improvement of standard of Article 82 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation regarding failure to provide a delay by the convict who committed crimes in the conditions of dangerous or especially dangerous recurrence, updating of the list of corpora delicti of terrorist orientation at which commission the delay of serving sentence is not granted, etc. are proved.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document