International migrants and refugees International migrant stock (number and percentage) and refugees and others of concern to UNHCR

2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 275-280
Author(s):  
Mustafa Murat Yüceşahin

Yakın zamanlı ve çeşitli tahminler başka ülkelerde yaşayan Türkiye kökenli göçmenlerin kabaca 5 ila 6 milyon kadar ama başka ülkelerden gelip Türkiye’de bulunan göçmenlerin-sığınmacıların 3 ila 4 milyon dolayında bir büyüklüğe eriştiğini gösteriyor.  Bu her iki kaba tahmini bir araya getirdiğimizde Türkiye’yi ilgilendirecek şekilde toplamda 8-10 milyon arasında bir uluslararası göçmen büyüklüğünün oluşumu oldukça dikkat çekici. Elbette bu büyüklük, uluslararası hareketlere katılan Türkiye kökenli veya Türkiye’ye gelip yerleşen göçmenelere ilişkin kesin verilerin üretimi ile netlik kazanacaktır. Ama bunların da ötesinde bu büyüklük, artık Türkiye’nin milyonları yurt dışına göndermekte olduğunu ve başka ülkelerden Türkiye’ye yönelen milyonlarca insanı da barındırdığını söylemeye yetiyor. Bu önemli bilgiyi geçtiğimiz Haziran ayında Çek Cumhuriyeti’nin başkenti Prag’da düzenlenen Türk Göç Konferansı 2015’te sunulan pek çok bildiri de doğruluyor. Bu yazımda, söz konusu konferansın hem bir katılımcısı hem de düzenleme komitesinin bir üyesi olarak; konferansın çeşitli boyutlarına ilişkin gözlemlerimi aktaracak şekilde bir değerlendirme yapmayı ve konferansa özgü önemli çıktılara değinmeyi amaçlıyorum. ENGLISH ABSTRACTConference Report: Turkish Migration Conference 2015, Prague, Czech Republic More recent and other estimations indicate that the number of immigrants who are originally from Turkey is roughly about 5 to 6 millions while those who moved to Turkey from other countries reach about 3 to 4 millions. When these two figures are added together about 8 to 10 million international migrants appear asa striking fact. Of course, these numbers will only be accurate when such data is produced on the number of Turkish origin immigrants and immigrants in Turkey. However, beyond this, Turkey has been sending millions abroad and now receiving millions from other countries too. This has been marked by several papers presented at the Turkish Migration Conference which was held at Prague, the capital of Czech Republic in June 2015. In this paper, I am discussing the outputs, as well as several aspects and features of this conference where I was both a member of the organisation committee and a presenting participant.


2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 158-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Min Zhou ◽  
Xiangyi Li

We consider cross-space consumption as a form of transnational practice among international migrants. In this paper, we develop the idea of the social value of consumption and use it to explain this particular form of transnationalism. We consider the act of consumption to have not only functional value that satisfies material needs but also a set of nonfunctional values, social value included, that confer symbolic meanings and social status. We argue that cross-space consumption enables international migrants to take advantage of differences in economic development, currency exchange rates, and social structures between countries of destination and origin to maximize their expression of social status and to perform or regain social status. Drawing on a multisited ethnographic study of consumption patterns in migrant hometowns in Fuzhou, China, and in-depth interviews with undocumented Chinese immigrants in New York and their left-behind family members, we find that, despite the vulnerabilities and precarious circumstances associated with the lack of citizenship rights in the host society, undocumented immigrants manage to realize the social value of consumption across national borders and do so through conspicuous consumption, reciprocal consumption, and vicarious consumption in their hometowns even without being physically present there. We conclude that, while cross-space consumption benefits individual migrants, left-behind families, and their hometowns, it serves to revive tradition in ways that fuel extravagant rituals, drive up costs of living, reinforce existing social inequality, and create pressure for continual emigration.


Author(s):  
Roy Germano

Remittances sent by international migrants have become an increasingly important source of social welfare in the developing world. This chapter explores what remittances are, why migrants send them, and how poor families use them. I argue in this chapter that remittances are more than just gifts from one relative to another. They play a larger social welfare role that complements funds that governments spend on social welfare programs. This social welfare function has become particularly important in recent decades as developing countries have prioritized austerity and integrated into volatile global markets. I argue that by filling a welfare gap in an age of austerity, remittances help to reduce the suffering and anger that so often trigger political and social instability during times of economic crisis.


Human Affairs ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Olayinka Akanle ◽  
Olanrewau Olutayo

AbstractUnderstanding the selves, situations and actions of Africans can never be comprehended outside kinship. Local and foreign worldviews are first pigeonholed into culture and defined within kinship realities in Nigeria and Africa. There have been studies on kinship in Africa. However, the findings from such studies portrayed the immutability of African kinship. Thus, as an important contribution to the on-going engagement of kinship in the twenty-first century as an interface between the contemporary Diaspora, this article engaged kinship within international migration. This is a major behavioural and socio-economic force in Nigeria. Methodological triangulation was adopted as part of the research design and primary data were collected through in-depth interviews (IDIs), and life histories of international migrants were documented and focus group discussions (FGDs) were held with kin of returnees. The article found and concluded that while returnees continued to appreciate local kinship infrastructures, the infrastructures were liable to reconstruction primarily determined by dominant support situations in the traditional African kinship networks.


Author(s):  
Curren Warf ◽  
Evelyn Eisenstein ◽  
Abdul Karim AlMakadma ◽  
John Howard ◽  
Diana Birch ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document