scholarly journals In-Service and Pre-Service Special Education Teachers’ Perception of NCTM Standards: Implications for Professional Development

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 686-694
Author(s):  
Emad M. Alghazo ◽  
Yazan M. Alghazo
Keyword(s):  
Professional Development ◽  
Special Education ◽  
Special Education Teachers ◽  
Nctm Standards

Implementing Project SIED

2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew M. Schmidt ◽  
Meng-Fen Grace Lin ◽  
Seungoh Paek ◽  
Ashley MacSuga-Gage ◽  
Nicholas A. Gage
Keyword(s):  
Professional Development ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Special Education ◽  
Mobile Devices ◽  
Special Education Teachers ◽  
Decision Making Process ◽  
Traditional Technology ◽  
Comfort Levels ◽  
Mobile Software ◽  
Future Plans

The worldwide explosion in popularity of mobile devices has created a dramatic increase in mobile software (apps) that are quick and easy to find and install, cheap, disposable, and usually single purpose. Hence, teachers need an equally streamlined and simplified decision-making process to help them identify educational apps—an approach that differs from traditional technology decision-making approaches that are cumbersome and require significant time, resources, and effort. Project Software Identification and Evaluation for Decision-Making (SIED) attempts to fill this gap. In this article, we describe Project SIED, how we designed a series of professional development workshops for in-service special education teachers based on Project SIED, and the evaluation outcomes of the workshops. Results suggest that workshops were successful from in-service special education teachers’ self-reported confidence and comfort levels. Limitations and future plans are discussed.

Leveraging Professional Development to Prepare General and Special Education Teachers to Teach within Response to Intervention Frameworks

2020 ◽  
pp. 143-162
Author(s):  
Amber Elizabeth Benedict ◽  
Mary T. Brownell ◽  
Cynthia C. Griffin ◽  
Jun Wang ◽  
Jonte A Myers
Keyword(s):  
Professional Development ◽  
Special Education ◽  
Response To Intervention ◽  
Special Education Teachers ◽  
Shared Knowledge ◽  
Instructional Systems

This chapter examines the role professional development (PD) plays in preparing teachers to teach within Response to Intervention (RTI) frameworks, and how future PD efforts might be leveraged to strengthen the preparation of general and special education teachers to coordinate instruction and teach more effectively within multi-tiered instructional systems. This chapter highlights two PD approaches that directly address these issues. Prime Online and Project InSync are two PD innovations that have specifically addressed how PD can be designed to support general and special education teachers in deepening their shared knowledge and improving their ability to enact coordinated instruction across instructional tiers within RTI frameworks.

scholarly journals Aufgabenklärung in inklusiven Settings. Zuständigkeiten von allgemeinen und sonderpädagogischen Lehrkräften

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alina Quante ◽  
Claudia Urbanek
Keyword(s):  
Professional Development ◽  
Special Education ◽  
Inclusive Education ◽  
Special Education Teachers ◽  
Theoretical Foundation ◽  
Work Teams ◽  
Professional Work ◽  
Eine Analyse ◽  
Inclusive Settings ◽  
Inklusive Bildung

Die Umsetzung schulischer Inklusion erfordert eine (multi-)professionelle Kooperation. Welche konkreten Aufgaben allgemeine und sonderpädagogische Lehrkräfte im inklusiven Setting übernehmen (sollen), gilt als Kern der Kooperationsproblematik. Die Klärung dieser Frage liegt in der Verantwortung der Lehrkräfte. Ausgehend von der Notwendigkeit der Professionalisierung von pädagogischem Fachpersonal für inklusive Bildung und Kooperation wird auf ein Fortbildungskonzept zur Kooperation im inklusiven Setting verwiesen. Dazu werden die theoretische Fundierung, die konzeptionelle Verankerung sowie die wesentlichen Inhalte der Fortbildung zusammenfassend dargestellt. Die explizite Aushandlung der Aufgabenzuständigkeiten wird mithilfe eines Reflexionsbogens unterstützt. Zudem erfolgt eine Analyse der Daten aus der Begleituntersuchung zur Frage nach den gegenwärtigen und gewünschten Zuständigkeiten für inklusionsspezifische Aufgaben aus Sicht der Lehrkräfte.   Abstract (Multi-)professional work teams are needed to meet the requirements of inclusive education. It is unclear which tasks collaborating teachers (should) fulfil, wherefore task clarification is considered the problematic core of collaboration. Regular and special education teachers are mostly left to clarify these uncertainties on their own. Following the need for professionalization in inclusive settings a professional development measure, especially designed for pairs of collaborating teachers in inclusive settings, is depicted. The theoretical foundation, the concept and essential contents will be described. A sheet for reflection is used as one part of professional development, to encourage the task clarification among teachers. The research project, accompanying the professional development, poses the question which tasks are considered as whose responsibility and if this classification is in line with the teachers’ expectations.

scholarly journals PROFESSIONAL READINESS OF FUTURE SPECIAL EDUCATION TEACHERS FOR INCLUSIVE EDUCATION IN UKRAINE

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 159-172
Author(s):  
Olena Мartynchuk ◽  
Tatiana Skrypnyk ◽  
Mariia Maksymchuk ◽  
Nataliia Babych ◽  
Karina Biriukova
Keyword(s):  
Professional Development ◽  
Special Education ◽  
Inclusive Education ◽  
Special Education Teachers ◽  
Professional Training ◽  
Educational Environment ◽  
International Standards ◽  
Practical Training ◽  
Special Educational Needs ◽  
Leading Role

The article is devoted to the problem of compliance of special education teachers training in Ukraine with the implementation of inclusive education in accordance with international standards. It was found that despite many years of inclusive policy experience in Ukraine, inclusive practice is not implemented properly. The assumptions about gaps in the staffing of inclusive education are made. The level of professional readiness among future special education teachers for practice in inclusive educational environment is investigated and analyzed in the article. The comprehensive questionnaire developed by the authors was used as a diagnostic tool in current study. The questionnaire was designed in accordance with the content of such educational guidelines as the “Professional Development Tool for Improving the Quality of Work of Primary School Teachers” and the “Profile of Inclusive Teachers”. The main professional readiness criteria for practice in inclusive educational environment among future teachers are defined: Interactions; Family and Community; Inclusion, Diversity, and Values of Democracy; Assessment and Planning; Teaching Strategies; Learning Environment; Professional Development. The developed questionnaire is aimed to identify the level of development of different professional readiness components, such as: theoretical-cognitive and practical-active. The results showed low and medium levels of professional readiness for practice in inclusive educational environment among future special education teachers, that is insufficient to meet the social demand for training specialists to work in the new professional conditions of inclusive education.Correlation analysis revealed the leading role of the practical-active component in the system of professional training, which require increased attention to its practical component, based on both university practical training centers and pedagogical internship. The current study concludes on the necessity of transformation of professional training content for future special education teachers in accordance with international scientific achievements in the field of providing quality services to children with special educational needs. 

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document