scholarly journals Lis Pendens and Legal Certainty of Civil Proceedings in the Russian Federation

Russian judge ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 3-9
Author(s):  
Irina V. Rekhtina ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Enforcement Mechanism ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
Civil Proceedings ◽  
The Russian Federation

The article, based on an analysis of procedural rules and national judicial practice, explores the specifics of the application of the lis pendens rule in the formation of legal certainty in civil proceedings of the Russian Federation. Emphasis is placed on the need to legislate the construction of lis pendens in procedural codes and to expand the application of the lis pendens enforcement mechanism.

scholarly journals The Non Bis In Idem Principle in the Mechanism of Ensuring Legal Certainty of Civil Proceedings in the Russian Federation

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 3-9
Author(s):  
Irina V. Rekhtina ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Enforcement Mechanism ◽  
Civil Proceedings ◽  
The Russian Federation

Based on the analysis of procedural rules and national jurisprudence, the article explores the specifics of the application of the non bis in idem rule in the formation of legal certainty in civil proceedings of the Russian Federation. Emphasis is placed on the need to legislate the non bis in idem design in procedural codes and to expand the application of the non bis in idem enforcement mechanism.

MULTIVARIANT LEGAL STATUS OF A CITIZEN AND ITS ROLE IN DEFINING THE COMPETENCE OF ARBITRATION COURTS

2018 ◽  
pp. 48-60
Author(s):  
Aleksandr Nikolayevich Ermakov
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Economic Activity ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
Natural Person ◽  
Legal Nature ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Debt Collection

This study is devoted to the question of qualification of the legal status of a citizen in a dispute arising in the field of economic activity, and its impact on the determination of the jurisdiction of the arbitration court. On the example of cases on debt collection from the guarantor-citizen it is noted that the latter can participate in the disputed legal relations as an natural person, as an self-employed entrepreneur or as the founder of a legal body. It is the legal status of a person, as established judicial practice shows, that is the key argument in determining the legal within jurisdiction of the case. It seems that this circumstance in itself cannot determine the nature of the dispute, which previously drew the attention of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation It is important to take into account the specific legal nature of material legal relations, as well as the nature of the interest of its participants. It is concluded that it is necessary to take into account the abovementioned aspects in the aggregate when determining the jurisdiction of arbitration courts of the cases of the analyzed category. In order to ensure the legal certainty and effectiveness of the protection of the rights of persons in the field of business and economic activity, proposed a technical and legal solution to this problem.

scholarly journals UNREASONABLE AS A BASIS FOR CHANGING OR CANCELING A JUDICIAL NOT ENDED IN LEGAL FORCE

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 111-116
Author(s):  
N.M. Kostrova ◽  
◽  
N.Sh. Gadzhialieva ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Judicial Decision ◽  
Judicial Decisions ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
Civil Proceedings ◽  
Practical Research ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Points Of View ◽  
Legal Force

The article analyzes the content of the concept of groundlessness of a judicial act in the context of the grounds for canceling and changing judicial decisions that have not entered into legal force in civil proceedings. Based on the analysis of normative sources, the author reveals the content of the validity of the judicial act in conjunction with proving the circumstances necessary for the adoption of a particular procedural decision. After analyzing the points of view of various scientists, the author shows the presence of various approaches in determining the unfoundedness of a judicial act, shows his vision of the issue under study. Attention is drawn to the fact that the degree of validity of the judicial act depends on a combination of certain factors and circumstances that are disclosed by the author based on judicial practice. In conclusion, the author reveals what elements make up the content of the concept of unfoundedness of a judicial act, concludes that the unfoundedness of a judicial decision as a legal category needs further comprehensive scientific and practical research. The author proposes to correct the list of grounds for cancellation, formulated in Part 1 of Art. 330 of the Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation in order to improve the procedural mechanism for revising judicial acts.

A criminal profiling of persons convicted for narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances illicit trafficking

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (3) ◽  
pp. 118-122
Author(s):  
Elizaveta Pavlik ◽  
Elena Ketenchieva
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Leningrad Region ◽  
Public Interests ◽  
Drug Offenders ◽  
Psychotropic Substances ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Profile ◽  
Illicit Trafficking ◽  
Narcotic Drugs

This article provides a classification and characteristics of persons convicted for crimes in the field of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances illicit trafficking. The article deals with the statistics in this sphere over the past five years. Based on the collected empirical evidence the authors analyzed the qualitative indicators of convicted drug offenders. The examination of statistical data from investigative and judicial practice on crimes in the field of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances illicit trafficking made it possible to sketch a criminal profile of a person sentenced to imprisonment: a citizen of the Russian Federation, a male between 18 to 39 years, having a secondary general or vocational education. Moreover, the personality of a convicted person is characterized by his internal criteria deformation devaluing the norms and rules that express and consolidate public interests. The authors also conducted a comparative analysis of offenders convicted both in the Russian Federation and in such federal subjects as Saint-Petersburg and Leningrad region. The choice of St. Petersburg as one of the objects of this research is justified by the fact that it has been among the leaders of the regions with the largest number of recorded drug-related crimes for several years.

Features of Judicial Practice in the Russia as the Basis of Precedent

2020 ◽  
pp. 98-106
Author(s):  
V. V. Levin
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Armed Forces ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Law Making

The article is devoted to the analysis of judicial practice as the basis of law-making activity in the Russian Federation, on the basis of which it is possible to create a precedent. Case law in Russia is Advisory in nature and is not mandatory for law enforcement practice. Courts use the signs of case law in their decisions in the reasoned part. Signs of case law is a ruling of the constitutional court of the Russian Federation and regulations of the armed forces of the Russian Federation.

Compensation for Infringement of Copyright and Related Rights: Essence and Primary Functions

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 34-40
Author(s):  
N. V. Buzova ◽  
◽  
R. L. Lukyanov ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Comparative Law ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
Legal Remedy ◽  
Legal Nature ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Judicial Protection ◽  
Exclusive Right

The Civil Code of the Russian Federation provides an opportunity to the rightholder in case of infringement of his exclusive copyright and related rights to demand in court instead of compensation for damages incurred by him to pay compensation. In most cases, when the rightholder applies for judicial protection of his violated rights, he requires the recovery of compensation. This article discusses the legal nature of compensation as a legal remedy of an exclusive right and its primary functions. When writing an article, a comparative law research method is used. As a result of the analysis of russian and foreign legislation, as well as judicial practice, it was found that compensation, in addition to restorative, also has a preventive function and can be considered an analogue of statutory damages.

Theft and Fraud Committed Using Electronic Payment Systems (Regional Judicial and Investigative Practice)

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 66-79
Author(s):  
S. L. Morozov ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Legal Analysis ◽  
Payment Systems ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
Electronic Payments ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Russian Federation

The advent of the electronic currency and the effecting of electronic payments has caused new forms of thefts and types of acquisitive crimes. The judicial investigative practice of criminal cases of embezzlement committed using bank cards and other types of electronic payments has encountered problems with the qualification of such acts. The author identifies the most common enforcement problemsand their causesby a retrospective study of judicial practice, the changing norms of the criminal law. At the same time, a ten-year period of work of the judicial investigating authorities was studied. On the basis of traditional general scientific methods of cognition, as a result of a system-legal analysis of the considered set of specific situations, the author gives an author's view of the complex of causes that cause a lack of uniformity in judicial investigative practice. Using the hermeneutic approach, the author paid special attention to the application by the courts of the interpretation of the criminal law by the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation in different years. In conclusion, ways of resolving contentious issues of qualification of thefts and fraud in the field of electronic means of payment are proposed. It has been ascertained that high-quality and uniform law enforcement can provide additional clarification on the delimitation of related and competing theft from the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. It is concluded that in general, the current concept of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation does not contain contradictions with the novels of the criminal law, but can be improved. The rationale and edition of possible additions to the relevant decision of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation are given.

On the Problems of Acts Qualification as Violations of Antimonopoly Legislation in Administrative and Judicial Practice

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 62-69
Author(s):  
К. А. Pisenkо ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
Illegal Acts ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Definition Of

The article is devoted to defining the main approaches to classifying acts as violations of аntimonopoly legislation. On administrative and judicial practice discusses current issues and problems of definition of illegal acts, both from the point of view of antimonopoly regulation, and the delineation of antimonopoly violations and violations of other mandatory requirements established by the legislation of the Russian Federation.

Types of Criminal Acts

2021 ◽  
pp. 255-260
Author(s):  
Alexander V. Shesler ◽  
◽  
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Essential Feature ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Forced Labor ◽  
Drug Addicts ◽  
Federal Republic Of Germany ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
A Minor

The article examines criminal acts, with which the law associates certain criminal legal consequences. The aim of the article is to substantiate the identification of various criminal acts and show their specificity in comparison with crimes. The research is based on the domestic criminal legislation, materials of judicial practice and the legislation of the Federal Republic of Germany. The research methods are: the method of comparative law, which allowed comparing the provisions about criminal offenses in the 1960 Criminal Code of the RSFSR and in the 1996 Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, in the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and the Criminal Code of Germany; the method of document analysis, which made it possible to analyze the judicial practice and proposals of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation on the introduction of provisions on criminal offences in the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation; the formal-logical method that made it possible to analyze the content of the norms of the Criminal Code about criminal acts. The article concludes that, in addition to crimes, criminal acts should include: a criminal offence, which entails criminal liability in the form of replacing punishment with a more severe one (fine, compulsory labor, correctional labor, restriction of freedom as the main type of punishment, forced labor) or criminal liability in the form of the cancellation of any type of probation (suspended sentence, parole, deferred sentence, deferred sentence for drug addicts); a minor act; socially dangerous behavior of persons who are not subjects of a crime due to their minor age or insanity; innocent infliction of harm. The article shows the specificity of a misdemeanour, consisting in the fact that this act is not socially dangerous, does not contain signs of a crime, violates the liability of the convicted person to be subject to limitations arising from the court-appointed punishment or type of probation (suspended sentence, parole, deferred sentence, deferred sentence for drug addicts). It is substantiated that a minor act should be referred to circumstances that exclude the criminality of an act due to the absence of public danger, an essential feature of a crime. It is argued that acts, provided for by the Special Part of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, committed in a state of insanity and entailing compulsory medical measures, should not be subject to criminal law. The article criticizes the judicial practice of a broad interpretation of the commission of a crime by a group of persons, according to which it is not only a co-execution, but also any execution of the objective side of the crime by several persons, of which only one can be the perpetrator. It is argued that causing harm due to the non-compliance of the psychophysiological qualities of a person with the requirements of an extreme situation does not apply to innocent infliction of harm.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document