scholarly journals Progress and Future Challenges of Human Induced Pluripotents Stem Cell in Regenerative Medicine

2011 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 76
Author(s):  
Anna Meiliana ◽  
Andi Wijaya
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Somatic Cell ◽  
Expression Profiles ◽  
Human Fibroblasts ◽  
Embryonic Stem ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Differentiation Potential ◽  
Human Ipscs

BACKGROUND: Less than a decade ago the prospect for reprogramming the human somatic cell looked bleak at best. It seemed that the only methods at our disposal for the generation of human isogenic pluripotent cells would have to involve somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT). Shinya Yamanaka in August 2006 in his publication (Cell) promised to change everything by showing that it was apparently very simple to revert the phenotype of a differentiated cell to a pluripotent one by overexpressing four transcription factors in murine fibroblasts.CONTENT: Mouse and human somatic cells can be genetically reprogrammed into induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) by the expression of a defined set of factors (Oct4, Sox2, c-Myc, and Klf4, as well as Nanog and LIN28). iPSCs could be generated from mouse and human fibroblasts as well as from mouse liver, stomach, pancreatic, neural stem cells, and keratinocytes. Similarity of iPSCs and embryonic stem cells (ESCs) has been demonstrated in their morphology, global expression profiles, epigenetic status, as well as in vitro and in vivo differentiation potential for both mouse and human cells. Many techniques for human iPSCs (hiPSCs) derivation have been developed in recent years, utilizing different starting cell types, vector delivery systems, and culture conditions. A refined or perfected combination of these techniques might prove to be the key to generating clinically applicable hiPSCs.SUMMARY: iPSCs are a revolutionary tool for generating in vitro models of human diseases and may help us to understand the molecular basis of epigenetic reprogramming. Progress of the last four years has been truly amazing, almost verging on science fiction, but if we can learn to produce such cells cheaply and easily, and control their differentiation, our efforts to understand and fight disease will become more accessible, controllable and tailored. Ability to safely and efficiently derive hiPSCs may be of decisive importance to the future of regenerative medicine.KEYWORDS: iPSCs, ESC, reprogramming factor, reprogramming efficiency, somatic cell

scholarly journals Defining totipotency using criteria of increasing stringency

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eszter Posfai ◽  
John Paul Schell ◽  
Adrian Janiszewski ◽  
Isidora Rovic ◽  
Alexander Murray ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Embryonic Stem Cells ◽  
Single Cell ◽  
Pluripotent Stem Cells ◽  
Embryonic Stem ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Differentiated Cells ◽  
Totipotent Cell

AbstractTotipotency is the ability of a single cell to give rise to all the differentiated cells that build the conceptus, yet how to capture this property in vitro remains incompletely understood. Defining totipotency relies upon a variety of assays of variable stringency. Here we describe criteria to define totipotency. We illustrate how distinct criteria of increasing stringency can be used to judge totipotency by evaluating candidate totipotent cell types in the mouse, including early blastomeres and expanded or extended pluripotent stem cells. Our data challenge the notion that expanded or extended pluripotent states harbor increased totipotent potential relative to conventional embryonic stem cells under in vivo conditions.

Reversine: A Synthetic Purine with a Dual Activity as a Cell Dedifferentiating Agent and a Selective Anticancer Drug

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (21) ◽  
pp. 3448-3462
Author(s):  
Marco Piccoli ◽  
Andrea Ghiroldi ◽  
Michelle M. Monasky ◽  
Federica Cirillo ◽  
Giuseppe Ciconte ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Embryonic Stem ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Cancer Drug ◽  
Anti Cancer ◽  
Adult Cell ◽  
Induced Pluripotent

The development of new therapeutic applications for adult and embryonic stem cells has dominated regenerative medicine and tissue engineering for several decades. However, since 2006, induced Pluripotent Stem Cells (iPSCs) have taken center stage in the field, as they promised to overcome several limitations of the other stem cell types. Nonetheless, other promising approaches for adult cell reprogramming have been attempted over the years, even before the generation of iPSCs. In particular, two years before the discovery of iPSCs, the possibility of synthesizing libraries of large organic compounds, as well as the development of high-throughput screenings to quickly test their biological activity, enabled the identification of a 2,6-disubstituted purine, named reversine, which was shown to be able to reprogram adult cells to a progenitor-like state. Since its discovery, the effect of reversine has been confirmed on different cell types, and several studies on its mechanism of action have revealed its central role in inhibitory activity on several kinases implicated in cell cycle regulation and cytokinesis. These key features, together with its chemical nature, suggested a possible use of the molecule as an anti-cancer drug. Remarkably, reversine exhibited potent cytotoxic activity against several tumor cell lines in vitro and a significant effect in decreasing tumor progression and metastatization in vivo. Thus, 15 years since its discovery, this review aims at critically summarizing the current knowledge to clarify the dual role of reversine as a dedifferentiating agent and anti-cancer drug.

Partial Reprogramming As An Emerging Strategy for Safe Induced Cell Generation and Rejuvenation

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 248-254
Author(s):  
Marianne Lehmann ◽  
Martina Canatelli-Mallat ◽  
Priscila Chiavellini ◽  
Gloria M. Cónsole ◽  
Maria D. Gallardo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Somatic Cell ◽  
Fluorescent Protein ◽  
Somatic Cells ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Cell Reprogramming ◽  
Green Fluorescent ◽  
Original Cell

Background: Conventional cell reprogramming involves converting a somatic cell line into induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC), which subsequently can be re-differentiated to specific somatic cell types. Alternatively, partial cell reprogramming converts somatic cells into other somatic cell types by transient expression of pluripotency genes thus generating intermediates that retain their original cell identity, but are responsive to appropriate cocktails of specific differentiation factors. Additionally, biological rejuvenation by partial cell reprogramming is an emerging avenue of research. Objective: Here, we will briefly review the emerging information pointing to partial reprogramming as a suitable strategy to achieve cell reprogramming and rejuvenation, bypassing cell dedifferentiation. Methods: In this context, regulatable pluripotency gene expression systems are the most widely used at present to implement partial cell reprogramming. For instance, we have constructed a regulatable bidirectional adenovector expressing Green Fluorescent Protein and oct4, sox2, klf4 and c-myc genes (known as the Yamanaka genes or OSKM). Results: Partial cell reprogramming has been used to reprogram fibroblasts to cardiomyocytes, neural progenitors and neural stem cells. Rejuvenation by cyclic partial reprogramming has been achieved both in vivo and in cell culture using transgenic mice and cells expressing the OSKM genes, respectively, controlled by a regulatable promoter. Conclusion: Partial reprogramming emerges as a powerful tool for the genesis of iPSC-free induced somatic cells of therapeutic value and for the implementation of in vitro and in vivo rejuvenation keeping cell type identity unchanged.

scholarly journals Human X chromosome inactivation and reactivation: implications for cell reprogramming and disease

2017 ◽  
Vol 372 (1733) ◽  
pp. 20160358 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irene Cantone ◽  
Amanda G. Fisher
Keyword(s):  
Cell Fusion ◽  
X Chromosome ◽  
Expression Profiles ◽  
Es Cells ◽  
Human Fibroblasts ◽  
Embryonic Stem ◽  
X Chromosome Inactivation ◽  
Chromosome Inactivation

X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) is an exemplar of epigenetic regulation that is set up as pluripotent cells differentiate. Once established, XCI is stably propagated, but can be reversed in vivo or by pluripotent reprogramming in vitro . Although reprogramming provides a useful model for inactive X (Xi) reactivation in mouse, the relative instability and heterogeneity of human embryonic stem (ES) cells and induced pluripotent stem cells hampers comparable progress in human. Here we review studies aimed at reactivating the human Xi using different reprogramming strategies. We outline our recent results using mouse ES cells to reprogramme female human fibroblasts by cell–cell fusion. We show that pluripotent reprogramming induces widespread and rapid chromatin remodelling in which the human Xi loses XIST and H3K27m3 enrichment and selected Xi genes become reactivated, ahead of mitotic division. Using RNA sequencing to map the extent of human Xi reactivation, and chromatin-modifying drugs to potentiate reactivation, we outline how this approach could be used to better design strategies to re-express human X-linked loci. As cell fusion induces the expression of human pluripotency genes that represent both the ‘primed’ and ‘naive’ states, this approach may also offer a fresh opportunity to segregate human pluripotent states with distinct Xi expression profiles, using single-cell-based approaches. This article is part of the themed issue ‘X-chromosome inactivation: a tribute to Mary Lyon’.

scholarly journals In vivo and in vitro differentiation of uniparental embryonic stem cells into hematopoietic and neural cell types

Organogenesis ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sigrid Eckardt ◽  
Timo C. Dinger ◽  
Satoshi Kurosaka ◽  
N. Adrian Leu ◽  
Albrecht M. Müller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Embryonic Stem Cells ◽  
Embryonic Stem ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Neural Cell ◽  
In Vitro Differentiation

scholarly journals Embryonic Stem Cells Derived from In Vivo or In Vitro-Generated Murine Blastocysts Display Similar Transcriptome and Differentiation Potential

PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. e0117422
Author(s):  
Rhodel K. Simbulan ◽  
Marlea Di Santo ◽  
Xiaowei Liu ◽  
Wingka Lin ◽  
Annemarie Donjacour ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Embryonic Stem Cells ◽  
Embryonic Stem ◽  
Differentiation Potential

scholarly journals Organoids: a promising new in vitro platform in livestock and veterinary research

2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Soumya K. Kar ◽  
Jerry M. Wells ◽  
Esther D. Ellen ◽  
Marinus F. W. te Pas ◽  
Ole Madsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Adult Stem Cells ◽  
Animal Species ◽  
Companion Animals ◽  
Embryonic Stem ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Ongoing Research ◽  
Veterinary Research

AbstractOrganoids are self-organizing, self-renewing three-dimensional cellular structures that resemble organs in structure and function. They can be derived from adult stem cells, embryonic stem cells, or induced pluripotent stem cells. They contain most of the relevant cell types with a topology and cell-to-cell interactions resembling that of the in vivo tissue. The widespread and increasing adoption of organoid-based technologies in human biomedical research is testament to their enormous potential in basic, translational- and applied-research. In a similar fashion there appear to be ample possibilities for research applications of organoids from livestock and companion animals. Furthermore, organoids as in vitro models offer a great possibility to reduce the use of experimental animals. Here, we provide an overview of studies on organoids in livestock and companion animal species, with focus on the methods developed for organoids from a variety of tissues/organs from various animal species and on the applications in veterinary research. Current limitations, and ongoing research to address these limitations, are discussed. Further, we elaborate on a number of fields of research in animal nutrition, host-microbe interactions, animal breeding and genomics, and animal biotechnology, in which organoids may have great potential as an in vitro research tool.

Potential benefits of cell cloning for human medicine

1998 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 121 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Trounson ◽  
M. Pera
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Embryonic Stem Cells ◽  
Somatic Cell ◽  
Human Embryonic Stem Cells ◽  
Embryonic Stem ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Specific Cell ◽  
Somatic Cell Nucleus ◽  
Potential Benefits

The successful cloning of a mammal from an adult somatic cell nucleus opens new avenues for major advances in reproductive medicine, biotechnology and cellular-based transplantation therapies for degenerative diseases. At the same time, this breakthrough has generated much heated discussion concerning the ethics of cloning. Twinning is a form of cloning, and there are instances in clinical assisted reproduction in which the deliberate formation of twins by embryo dissection would seem ethically acceptable. Nuclear transfer technology might facilitate the derivation of human embryonic stem cells, capable of differentiation into a wide variety of somatic cell lineages. Directed differentiation of human embryonic stem cells into specific cell types in vitro could provide a universal source of cells for transplantation therapy. The potential benefits of therapeutics based on cloning technologies are considerable, and hasty legislation to ban all such procedures could block progress in critical arenas of biomedical research

scholarly journals Self-Assembling Scaffolds Supported Long-Term Growth of Human Primed Embryonic Stem Cells and Upregulated Core and Naïve Pluripotent Markers

Cells ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. 1650 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina McKee ◽  
Christina Brown ◽  
G. Rasul Chaudhry
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Embryonic Stem Cells ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Embryonic Stem ◽  
Extended Period ◽  
Culture Conditions ◽  
Differentiation Potential ◽  
Self Assembling

The maintenance and expansion of human embryonic stem cells (ESCs) in two-dimensional (2-D) culture is technically challenging, requiring routine manipulation and passaging. We developed three-dimensional (3-D) scaffolds to mimic the in vivo microenvironment for stem cell proliferation. The scaffolds were made of two 8-arm polyethylene glycol (PEG) polymers functionalized with thiol (PEG-8-SH) and acrylate (PEG-8-Acr) end groups, which self-assembled via a Michael addition reaction. When primed ESCs (H9 cells) were mixed with PEG polymers, they were encapsulated and grew for an extended period, while maintaining their viability, self-renewal, and differentiation potential both in vitro and in vivo. Three-dimensional (3-D) self-assembling scaffold-grown cells displayed an upregulation of core pluripotency genes, OCT4, NANOG, and SOX2. In addition, the expression of primed markers decreased, while the expression of naïve markers substantially increased. Interestingly, the expression of mechanosensitive genes, YAP and TAZ, was also upregulated. YAP inhibition by Verteporfin abrogated the increased expression of YAP/TAZ as well as core and naïve pluripotent markers. Evidently, the 3-D culture conditions induced the upregulation of makers associated with a naïve state of pluripotency in the primed cells. Overall, our 3-D culture system supported the expansion of a homogenous population of ESCs and should be helpful in advancing their use for cell therapy and regenerative medicine.

scholarly journals GASC1 Promotes Stemness of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma via NOTCH1 Promoter Demethylation

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruinuo Jia ◽  
Li Yang ◽  
Xiang Yuan ◽  
Jinyu Kong ◽  
Yiwen Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Lentiviral Vector ◽  
Embryonic Stem ◽  
Differentiation Potential

The highest incidence of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) occurs in China. Cancer stem cells play key roles for tumor progression. Gene amplified in squamous cell carcinoma 1 (GASC1) is essential to maintain self-renewal and differentiation potential of embryonic stem cells. This study aimed to reveal the effect and mechanism of GASC1 on ESCC stemness. The biological function of GASC1 in ESCC was evaluated both in vitro and in vivo. ChIP assay was performed to determine the molecular mechanism of GASC1 in epigenetic regulation of NOTCH1. We found that GASC1 expression was increased in poor differentiated ESCC cells and tissues. ESCC patients with a high level of GASC1 presented a significantly worse survival rate. GASC1 expression in purified ALDH+ ESCC cells was significantly higher than that in ALDH- cells. The stemness of ESCC was dramatically decreased after GASC1 blockade. Furthermore, blockade of GASC1 decreased NOTCH1 expression via increase of NOTCH1 promoter H3K9me2 and H3K9me3. Moreover, the impaired stemness after blockade of GASC1 could be reversed after transfection of NOTCH1 overexpression lentiviral vector. GASC1 promoted stemness in ESCC cells via NOTCH1 promoter demethylation. Therefore, GASC1/NOTCH1 signaling might be a potential therapeutic target for the treatment of ESCC patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document