Experimental and Therapeutic Trials of Amygdalin

ObjectiveNeurofilament light chain (NfL) is a promising biomarker in genetic frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). We evaluated plasma neurofilament light chain (pNfL) levels in controls, and their longitudinal trajectories in C9orf72 and GRN cohorts from presymptomatic to clinical stages.MethodsWe analysed pNfL using Single Molecule Array (SiMoA) in 668 samples (352 baseline and 316 follow-up) of C9orf72 and GRN patients, presymptomatic carriers (PS) and controls aged between 21 and 83. They were longitudinally evaluated over a period of >2 years, during which four PS became prodromal/symptomatic. Associations between pNfL and clinical–genetic variables, and longitudinal NfL changes, were investigated using generalised and linear mixed-effects models. Optimal cut-offs were determined using the Youden Index.ResultspNfL levels increased with age in controls, from ~5 to~18 pg/mL (p<0.0001), progressing over time (mean annualised rate of change (ARC): +3.9%/year, p<0.0001). Patients displayed higher levels and greater longitudinal progression (ARC: +26.7%, p<0.0001), with gene-specific trajectories. GRN patients had higher levels than C9orf72 (86.21 vs 39.49 pg/mL, p=0.014), and greater progression rates (ARC:+29.3% vs +24.7%; p=0.016). In C9orf72 patients, levels were associated with the phenotype (ALS: 71.76 pg/mL, FTD: 37.16, psychiatric: 15.3; p=0.003) and remarkably lower in slowly progressive patients (24.11, ARC: +2.5%; p=0.05). Mean ARC was +3.2% in PS and +7.3% in prodromal carriers. We proposed gene-specific cut-offs differentiating patients from controls by decades.ConclusionsThis study highlights the importance of gene-specific and age-specific references for clinical and therapeutic trials in genetic FTD/ALS. It supports the usefulness of repeating pNfL measurements and considering ARC as a prognostic marker of disease progression.Trial registration numbersNCT02590276 and NCT04014673.

Download Full-text

Therapeutic clinical trials to combat COVID-19 pandemic in India: analysis from trial registry

Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology ◽

10.1515/jbcpp-2020-0208 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 0 (0) ◽

Author(s):

Angelika Batta ◽

Raj Khirasaria ◽

Vinod Kapoor ◽

Deepansh Varshney

Keyword(s):

Clinical Trials ◽

De Novo ◽

Treatment Options ◽

Drug Repurposing ◽

Trial Registry ◽

Therapeutic Treatment ◽

Clinical Trial Registry ◽

Clear Cut ◽

Therapeutic Trials ◽

Microsoft Office

AbstractObjectivesWith the emergence of Novel corona virus, hunt for finding a preventive and therapeutic treatment options has already begun at a rapid pace with faster clinical development programs. The present study was carried out to give an insight of therapeutic interventional trials registered under clinical trial registry of India (CTRI) for COVID-19 pandemic.MethodsAll trials registered under CTRI were evaluated using keyword “COVID” from its inception till 9th June 2020. Out of which, therapeutic interventional studies were chosen for further analysis. Following information was collected for each trial: type of therapeutic intervention (preventive/therapeutic), treatment given, no. of centers (single center/multicentric), type of institution (government/private), study design (randomized/single-blinded/double-blinded) and sponsors (Government/private). Microsoft Office Excel 2007 was used for tabulation and analysis.ResultsThe search yielded total of 205 trials, out of which, 127 (62%) trials were interventional trials. Out of these, 71 (56%) were AYUSH interventions, 36 (28.3%) tested drugs, 9 (7%) tested a nondrug intervention, rest were nutraceuticals and vaccines. About 66 (56%) were therapeutic trials. Majority were single-centered trials, i.e. 87 (73.7%). Trials were government funded in 57 (48.3%) studies. Majority were randomized controlled trials, i.e. 67 (56.8%). AYUSH preparations included AYUSH-64, Arsenic Album, SamshamaniVati etc.ConclusionsThe number of therapeutic interventional clinical trials was fair in India. A clear-cut need exists for an increase in both quantity and quality of clinical trials for COVID-19. Drug repurposing approach in all systems of medicine can facilitate prompt clinical decisions at lower costs than de novo drug development.

Download Full-text

Clinical care and therapeutic trials in PLS

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Degeneration ◽

10.1080/21678421.2020.1837180 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 21 (sup1) ◽

pp. 67-73 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Mary Kay Floeter ◽

Deborah Warden ◽

Dale Lange ◽

James Wymer ◽

Sabrina Paganoni ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clinical Care ◽

Therapeutic Trials

Download Full-text

Cerebrospinal Fluid Chitinases as Biomarkers for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Diagnostics ◽

10.3390/diagnostics11071210 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 11 (7) ◽

pp. 1210

Author(s):

Júlia Costa ◽

Marta Gromicho ◽

Ana Pronto-Laborinho ◽

Conceição Almeida ◽

Ricardo A. Gomes ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ◽

Cerebrospinal Fluid ◽

Motor Neurons ◽

Neurological Diseases ◽

Disease Diagnosis ◽

Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay ◽

Progression Rate ◽

Therapeutic Trials ◽

Als Patients ◽

Lateral Sclerosis

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a neurodegenerative neuromuscular disease that affects motor neurons controlling voluntary muscles. Survival is usually 2–5 years after onset, and death occurs due to respiratory failure. The identification of biomarkers would be very useful to help in disease diagnosis and for patient stratification based on, e.g., progression rate, with implications in therapeutic trials. Neurofilaments constitute already-promising markers for ALS and, recently, chitinases have emerged as novel marker targets for the disease. Here, we investigated cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) chitinases as potential markers for ALS. Chitotriosidase (CHIT1), chitinase-3-like protein 1 (CHI3L1), chitinase-3-like protein 2 (CHI3L2) and the benchmark marker phosphoneurofilament heavy chain (pNFH) were quantified by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) from the CSF of 34 ALS patients and 24 control patients with other neurological diseases. CSF was also analyzed by UHPLC-mass spectrometry. All three chitinases, as well as pNFH, were found to correlate with disease progression rate. Furthermore, CHIT1 was elevated in ALS patients with high diagnostic performance, as was pNFH. On the other hand, CHIT1 correlated with forced vital capacity (FVC). The three chitinases correlated with pNFH, indicating a relation between degeneration and neuroinflammation. In conclusion, our results supported the value of CHIT1 as a diagnostic and progression rate biomarker, and its potential as respiratory function marker. The results opened novel perspectives to explore chitinases as biomarkers and their functional relevance in ALS.

Download Full-text

Instruments for Outcome Evaluation of Specific Domains in Primary Sjögren’s Syndrome

Biomolecules ◽

10.3390/biom11070953 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 11 (7) ◽

pp. 953

Author(s):

Nicoletta Del Papa ◽

Antonina Minniti ◽

Wanda Maglione ◽

Francesca Pignataro ◽

Roberto Caporali ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Sjögren’S Syndrome ◽

Outcome Measures ◽

Sjögren's Syndrome ◽

Sjogren’S Syndrome ◽

Sjogren's Syndrome ◽

Primary Sjögren’S Syndrome ◽

Primary Sjogren’S Syndrome ◽

Primary Sjögren's Syndrome ◽

Therapeutic Trials ◽

Sjögren‘S Syndrome

Primary Sjögren’s syndrome (pSS) is a systemic autoimmune disorder characterized by very heterogeneous features. The spectrum of this disorder may vary from benign but disabling symptoms such as dryness, due to lachrymal and salivary involvement, pain and fatigue, to systemic, potentially severe, manifestations that may involve any organ. In recent decades, the arrival of biotechnological therapy has offered new opportunities for the treatment of this—until now—orphan disease. Currently, the possible use of these new drugs in therapeutic trials has made it necessary to have reliable outcome measures to evaluate their efficacy in this disease. A great effort has been made in multicenter, often multinational, studies to develop and validate instruments capable of assessing the different disease-related features. The adoption in therapeutic trials of the newly developed outcome measures aimed at assessing systemic features and patient reported symptoms has often yielded disappointing results. These negative data have been ascribed, on the one hand, to the trial design not being completely appropriate, and, on the other hand, to the fact that a single instrument may be not sufficient to cover the great clinical heterogeneity of the disease features. There is now growing belief that composite end points that include instruments that are able to assess the various aspects of the disease may be more properly and successfully used in future therapeutic trials.

Download Full-text

Patients with Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma Not Eligible for Clinical Trials: Prognostic Factors, Treatment and Outcome

Cancers ◽

10.3390/cancers13122934 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 13 (12) ◽

pp. 2934

Author(s):

Sabine Seidel ◽

Michelle Margold ◽

Thomas Kowalski ◽

Alexander Baraniskin ◽

Roland Schroers ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Central Nervous System ◽

Clinical Trials ◽

Nervous System ◽

Prognostic Factors ◽

Central Nervous System Lymphoma ◽

Initial Response ◽

Early Response ◽

Multicenter Trial ◽

High Dose ◽

Therapeutic Trials

Patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) not fulfilling inclusion criteria for clinical trials represent an underreported population. Thirty-four consecutive PCNSL patients seen at our center between 2005 and 2019 with exclusion criteria for therapeutic trials were analyzed (non-study patients) and compared with patients from the G-PCNSL-SG-1 (German PCNSL Study Group 1) study (study patients), the largest prospective multicenter trial on PCNSL, comprising 551 patients. Median follow up was 68 months (range 1–141) in non-study patients and 51 months (1–105) in study patients. Twenty-seven/34 (79.4%) non-study patients received high dose methotrexate (HDMTX), while seven/34 (20.6%) with a glomerular filtration rate (GFR) < 50 mL/min did not. Median overall survival (OS) was six months (95% confidence interval [CI] 0–21 months) in those 34 non-study patients. The 27 non-study patients treated with HDMTX were compared with 526/551 G-PCNSL-SG-1 study patients who had received HDMTX as well. Median OS was 20 months (95% CI 0–45)/21 months (95% CI 18–25) in 27 non-study/526 study patients (p = 0.766). Favorable prognostic factors in non-study patients were young age, application of HDMTX and early response on magnet resonance imaging (MRI). If HDMTX-based chemotherapy can be applied, long-term disease control is possible even in patients not qualifying for clinical trials. Initial response on early MRI might be useful for decision on treatment continuation.

Download Full-text