The Impact of Financial Advice Certification on Investment Choices

2017 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 129-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael A. Guillemette ◽  
Jesse B. Jurgenson
Keyword(s):  
Low Income ◽  
Consumer Choice ◽  
Choice Behavior ◽  
Investment Decision ◽  
Investment Decisions ◽  
Expected Value ◽  
Investment Decision Making ◽  
Investment Advice ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Investment Choices

The purpose of this study is to investigate whether a professional designation affects consumer choice behavior within the area of investment decision making. Forty-six participants were endowed with real money and received hypothetical investment advice from a certified financial planner (CFP) Professional and a stockbroker. Among low-income households, advice from a CFP altered investor choice behavior within hypothetical education and retirement savings accounts. When participants made investment decisions using education funds and received advice from a CFP, the mean expected value of their investment choices was $43,913, compared to $25,870 given advice from a stockbroker. When investment decisions were made using retirement funds, the average expected value given advice from a CFP and a stockbroker was $53,424 and $33,207, respectively. If an investor was risk-neutral or risk-seeking, investment choices were improved when advice was rendered by a CFP relative to a stockbroker.

scholarly journals Impact of Heuristics on Investment Decisions: The Moderating Role of Locus of Control

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Jeetendra Dangol ◽  
Rashmita Manandhar
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Locus Of Control ◽  
Investment Decision ◽  
Investment Decisions ◽  
Sampling Procedure ◽  
Moderating Effect ◽  
Moderation Effect ◽  
Investment Decision Making ◽  
Overconfidence Bias ◽  
The Impact

This paper aims to assess the impact of heuristics on the investment decision by analysing the effect of four heuristic biases, i.e., representativeness, availability, anchoring and adjustment, and overconfidence bias on rationality of Nepalese investor's investment decision-making and also examines the moderating effect of the internal locus of control in between. The study used 391 respondents based on a convenient sampling procedure, and structured questionnaire survey. The study result indicates that there is a significant relationship between irrationality in investment decision-making and all four heuristic biases. In addition, the study also concludes that locus of control has significant moderating effect in the relationship between investment decisions and three heuristic biases, i.e., availability, representative and anchoring bias. However, the study documents no moderation effect in case of relationship with overconfidence bias.

scholarly journals An Analysis of Behavioral Biases in Investment Decision-Making

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geetika Madaan ◽  
Sanjeet Singh
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Investment Decision ◽  
Investment Decisions ◽  
Individual Investors ◽  
Behavioral Biases ◽  
Investment Decision Making ◽  
Survey Responses ◽  
The Impact

Individual investor’s behavior is extensively influenced by various biases that highlighted in the growing discipline of behavior finance. Therefore, this study is also one of another effort to assess the impact of behavioral biases in investment decision-making in National Stock Exchange. A questionnaire is designed and through survey responses collected from 243 investors. The present research has applied inferential statistics and descriptive statistics. In the existing study, four behavioral biases have been reviewed namely, overconfidence, anchoring, disposition effect and herding behavior. The results show that overconfidence and herding bias have significant positive impact on investment decision. Overall results conclude that individual investors have limited knowledge and more prone towards making psychological errors. The findings of the study also indicate the existence of these four behavioral biases on individual investment decisions. This study will be helpful to financial intermediaries to advice their clients. Further, study can be elaborated to study other behavioral biases on investment decisions.

scholarly journals How do emotional intelligence and behavioral biases of investors determine their investment decisions?

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-47
Author(s):  
Saloni Raheja ◽  
Babli Dhiman
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Investment Decision ◽  
Sample Selection ◽  
Investment Decisions ◽  
Risk Tolerance ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Behavioral Biases ◽  
Investment Decision Making ◽  
The Impact

Purpose In earlier studies, research has shown that EI is the only element, which influences the ways in which people develop in their lives, jobs and social skills control their emotions and get along with other people. It is EI that dictates the way people deal with one another and understand emotions. The research gap is to explore the impact of behavioral factors and investors psychology on their investment decision-making. Design/methodology/approach The information was gathered from 500 financial specialists. The region of research was the financial specialists who contribute through LSC Securities Ltd. in Punjab State. The purposive testing system was used in this examination. Findings The investigation found that the positive connection between the conduct predispositions of the financial specialists and venture choices of the speculators and positive connection between enthusiastic insight of the financial specialists and their venture choices. Yet, the authors found that the enthusiastic insight better foresees the venture choices of the financial specialists than the conduct predispositions of the speculators. Among the different elements of conduct inclinations of the speculator’s lament and carelessness are identified with the financial specialist’s venture choices. Among the various estimations of eager understanding – care, dealing with emotions, motivation, empathy and social aptitudes are related to the hypothesis decisions of the monetary pros. Research limitations/implications The sample selection was based on purposive sampling, rather than a random probability sample. The sample was area specific, restricted only to Ludhiana Stock Exchange in Punjab state. Therefore, the results of the study cannot be generalized with certainty to all the investors investing through other exchanges in other states. The inferences are based on the assumption that the data provided by the investors are true and correct. The findings may be relevant for other stock exchanges as that of the Ludhiana Stock Exchange. However, the authors do not claim the generalization of the results. Practical implications This study also helps to understand the relationship between investment decision-making and risk tolerance of investors. It will helpful for the financial advisors to know the behavioral biases of investors while making an investment decision, and therefore, they can advise investors properly to mitigate such biases. It may help the investors in understanding the subjective part of their behavior and control their emotions while taking decisions for their investment in stock market options. Social implications This research will help investment advisors and finance professionals to judge investors’ attitudes toward risk in a better way, which leads to better investment decisions. Originality/value This study is my own study and it is original and has not been published anywhere.

scholarly journals EFFECT OF EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND FINANCIAL LITERACY ON INVESTMENT DECISION MAKING WITH A MEDIATING ROLE OF RISK PERCEPTION

2014 ◽  
Vol 02 (02) ◽  
pp. 12-20
Author(s):  
Sahar Parvez ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Emotional Intelligence ◽  
Risk Perception ◽  
Financial Literacy ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Investment Decision ◽  
Investment Decisions ◽  
Mediating Role ◽  
Investment Decision Making ◽  
The Impact

This research paper examines the impact of emotional intelligence and financial literacy on investment decision with a mediating role of risk perception. The data is collected by using questionnaire, from a sample of 152 investors, from stock exchange and banks. The results support that to make adequate investment decisions, investors should be financially literate and have control on their emotions. However, risk perception of investors does not mediate this relationship.

scholarly journals The Role of Tax Incentives in Capital Investment and R&D Decisions

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 241-256 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francis Chittenden ◽  
Mohsen Derregia
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Capital Investment ◽  
Investment Decision ◽  
Investment Decisions ◽  
Tax Incentives ◽  
Business Owners ◽  
Business Plans ◽  
Investment Decision Making ◽  
Potential Benefits ◽  
The Impact

In this paper we present the results from a study of the role that tax incentives play in business owners' decisions on capital investment and research and development (R&D) expenditure. We use semistructured interviews with fifteen business owners and directors and five financial advisers to establish the extent to which tax incentives are considered in capital and R&D investment decisions, and to identify obstacles that might prevent UK capital allowances and R&D tax policies from achieving their goals. First, we investigate whether incentives are sufficient to encourage investment and whether the costs of accessing the incentives faced by similar firms limit the potential benefits of the policy. Second, we explore the stage in the process of investment decision making at which tax issues are considered and the degree of importance attached to tax incentives. For example, is the tax treatment integral to the decision-making process or only a ‘final consideration’ at the end? Third, we investigate the impact of uncertainty on the tax incentives, since this can be an important aspect of investment decisions, and may diminish the effectiveness of policy. It is not clear whether the incentives offered are effective in generating additional investment and in helping financially constrained firms. Under uncertainty the incentives need to be substantial to influence the decision to invest. Effective policy should assist firms who would otherwise struggle to realise their business plans.

scholarly journals Impact of Behavioral Factors in Making Investment Decisions and Performance: Evidence from Pakistan Stock Exchange

Market Forces ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 22
Author(s):  
Muhammad Rehan ◽  
Jahanzaib Alvi ◽  
Lubna Javed ◽  
Baber Saleem
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Behavioral Finance ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Investment Decision ◽  
Investment Decisions ◽  
Individual Investors ◽  
Behavioral Factors ◽  
Factors Affecting ◽  
Investment Decision Making ◽  
The Impact

Market irregularities and irrational behavior triggered investor’s changes in the stock market, and this has led to an investigation into the impact of various behavioral biases and factors affecting decision-making for individual investors. The quality of individual investor behavior in making stock investment decisions is very important to be understood as a reference of the movement of the capital market. This study investigated the role of behavioral finance and investor psychology in investment decision-making at the Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSE). Using a sample of 147 individual investors, the study established that behavioral factors such as Herding, Heuristic, Market and Prospect that affected the decisions of the investors operating at the Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSE). As there are a few studies in Pakistan related to behavioral finance, so this study mainly contributes to the field of behavioral finance in Pakistan. This study focusses on existing theories of behavioral finance which led to develop the hypothesis. The result of the analysis is that the four variables have greatly influenced the investment decision and return on investment. All behavioral variables have a significant impact on the decision-making process of investors, which led to the acceptance of all assumptions regarding the level of influence of behavioral factors in decision making for individual investors

scholarly journals DIVERSITY OF THE EXECUTIVE BOARD, INVESTMENT DECISIONS, AND FIRM VALUE: IS GENDER IMPORTANT IN INDONESIA?

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 387
Author(s):  
Indah Yuliana ◽  
Kholilah Kholilah
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Firm Value ◽  
Investment Decision ◽  
Gender Diversity ◽  
Investment Decisions ◽  
Working Environment ◽  
Executive Board ◽  
Fair Competition ◽  
Investment Decision Making ◽  
The Impact

The purposes of this research are to determine the effect of executive board gender diversity on firm value. Gender diversity shows that companies do not discriminate while evaluating employee performance. This diversity affects the fair competition conducted by employees to show the best performance so they can occupy the highest positions in the company. Gender diversity has the impact of a difference in the level of optimism, confidence, and risk preferences. The feminine nature of women influences the quality of investment decision making, which has an impact on increasing company value. The signalling theory is used to describe the stakeholders perceived on investment decision making by female CEOs. Research using PLS in LQ45 registered companies in Indonesian Stock Exchange for the years 2014-2017. The results showed that investment decisions affect the value of the firm. Besides, the composition of the female CEO can moderate the relationship between investment decisions and firm value. The results of the research have implications for the support of increasing gender diversity in companies because the patriarchal culture adopted in Indonesia causes male domination in decision making both in the family, community or the working environment.

ACTANTS INFLUENCING THE SUCCESSFUL COMPILATION OF ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY STUDIES: THE DEVELOPERS’ PERSPECTIVE

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rolien Terblanche ◽  
David Stanton Root ◽  
Ria Vosloo
Keyword(s):  
Literature Review ◽  
Investment Decision ◽  
Investment Decisions ◽  
Feasibility Studies ◽  
Actor Network Theory ◽  
Analytical Framework ◽  
Economic Feasibility ◽  
Investment Decision Making ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Property Developers

The purpose of this study is to identify and model actants that influence the successful compilation and usage of economic feasibility studies. This study investigates the elements in the feasibility process and the expectations thereof, from the perspectives of property developers. These feasibilities were found to be inconsistent in content, neglected, lack standards, and creates confusion in practice, leading to unsustainable investment decisions. A systematic literature review was conducted in addition to 23 interviews with property developers in South Africa. The literature review maps an understanding of the components in the feasibility process and the nature and occurrence of feasibilities. Using the Actor-Network Theory (ANT) as an analytical framework along with the data from the review and interviews, this study found ten main categories of actants that influence the successful compilation and usage of these feasibilities: knowledge and level of expertise; external uncertainties; the developers’ perception of a successful feasibility; dependencies; various usages; the underlying meaning of feasibility studies to developers; the developers’ relationship with the QS and professional consulting team; the developer’s expectation of feasibility indicators; the impact the feasibility has on investment-decisions; and the process. Some of these categories are further unboxed. Feasibilities involves various actants that influence the success of the document, investment decision and construction project. With a deepening understanding of the actants in the feasibility process, the compilation and usage of economic feasibility studies, for private commercial developments where profitability is key, could be enhanced globally by: improved understanding, careful compilation and successful investment decision-making.

scholarly journals A Descriptive Analysis on Effect of Corporate Governance on Investor’s Decision

2022 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Dsouza Prima Frederick
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Selection Process ◽  
Investment Decision ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Investment Decisions ◽  
Internal Factors ◽  
Secondary Sources ◽  
Investment Decision Making ◽  
Conceptual Paper ◽  
The Impact

Purpose: The article studies the impact of internal factors and external factors influencing an investor’s investment decision. Design/Methodology: The information for the study was obtained from secondary sources like journal papers, magazines and books. Findings: Human psychology has an internal role in investing choice, whereas corporate governance is an external influence. Corporate governance plays a major role in the investment decision-making process by revealing all elements of business information, but investors understand the information according to their own assessments and assumptions based on their psychology. As a result, a firm’s transparency hardly impacts in investment decisions, and it only works to a limited extent; the rest of the investment selection process is dominated by human behaviour. However, the firm is transparent, there is no guarantee that the investor will always act rationally when making a choice for investment. Originality/Value: Every investor should make rational decisions about their investments. Therefore, it is an investor’s responsibility to follow the information provided by the firm, although some investors fail to do so. As a result of investor psychology, investors’ investment decisions are beyond the reach of business transparency. The study implies that a behavioural survey will be useful in determining the factor influencing investors’ investing decisions. Type of Paper: Conceptual Paper

Is the investment decision affected by the independence and competence of the audit committee? A comparative study between Bahrain and Indonesia

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-48
Author(s):  
Abdullah Hamza Al-Hadrami ◽  
Ahmad Rafiki ◽  
Adel Sarea ◽  
Muhammad Dharma Tuah Putra Nasution
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Internal Control ◽  
Audit Committee ◽  
Investment Decision ◽  
Investment Decisions ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Investment Decision Making ◽  
The Impact

Purpose This study aims to investigate the impact of the audit committee’s (AC’s) independence and competence in the company’s investment decision-making in Bahraini- and Indonesian-listed firms, then to compare the two results Design/methodology/approach A quantitative method is used and cross-sectional data are collected through a self-administered questionnaire survey. A stratified random sample technique is adopted with a total of 409 respondents from 39 listed companies in Bahrain and 303 respondents from 27 companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX). A descriptive analysis is used to identify the characteristics of the respondents, while a correlation analysis, linear regression and t-test analyses are used to test the model, explain the relationships among variables and compare the two studies (Bahrain vs Indonesia). Findings It is found that the AC independence and AC competence have a positive and significant influence on investment decision-making for both the Bahrain and the Indonesia studies Practical implications The current study’s results have implications for the process of appointing and nominating the AC members, since this would affect an investor’s investment decision. Investors’ perception of the independence and competence of ACs will make a difference in their investment decisions. Originality/value AC independence and competence are importantly crucial for the decision-makers in improving the quality of financial reporting, internal control, and audit. This may lead to an increase in investors’ trust in financial reports and their ability to make favorable investment decisions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document