scholarly journals Comparison of Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing and Biofeedback/Stress Inoculation Training in Treating Test Anxiety

2012 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 62-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosemary Cook-Vienot ◽  
Raymond J. Taylor

Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) and Biofeedback/Stress Inoculation Training (B/SIT) treatment and no treatment (NT) were compared in reducing test anxiety. Thirty college students with high test anxiety were randomly assigned to each condition. Pre-post assessments were conducted using the Test Anxiety Inventory (TAI), State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), Rational Behavior Inventory (RBI), and Autonomic Perception Questionnaire (APQ). Treatment therapists were licensed professionals with at least 2 years experience in their respective modality. Statistical analysis using a two-way analysis of variance with repeated measures found significant interactions between time (pre-post) and treatment conditions for all measures except the RBI. Post hoc Newman–Keuls analyses were conducted on the change scores, indicating that both EMDR and B/SIT significantly reduced test anxiety. EMDR generally outperformed B/SIT.

2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 133E-144E
Author(s):  
Rosemary Cook-Vienot ◽  
Raymond J. Taylor

EMDR und Biofeedback / Stress-Impfungstraining und Nicht-Behandlung (NB) wurden in ihrer Wirkung, Prüfungsangst zu reduzieren, verglichen. Hierzu wurden jeder Kohorte 30 College-Studenten mit hoher Prüfungsangst randomisiert zugewiesen. Prä / Post-Bewertungen wurden unter Verwendung des Test Anxiety Inventory (TAI), State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), Rational Behaviour Inventory (RBI) und Autonomic Perception Questionnaire (APQ) durchgeführt. Behandelnde Therapeuten waren qualifizierte Fachleute mit mindestens zweijähriger Berufserfahrung in ihrem jeweiligen Verfahren. Die statistische Analyse, in der eine wechselseitige Varianzanalyse mit wiederholten Messungen durchgeführt wurde, ergab für alle Meßverfahren außer dem RBI signifikante Zusammenhänge zwischen dem Zeitfaktor (d.h. den Prä- / Post-Messungen) und den eingesetzten Verfahren. Die Veränderungs-Messwerte wurden post hoc Newman-Keuls Analysen unterzogen und zeigten, dass sowohl EMDR als auch B / SIT die Prüfungsangst signifikant reduzierten. Insgesamt erzielte EMDR hierbei bessere Ergebnisse als B / SIT.


1982 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 611-617 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Schuler ◽  
Frank Gilner ◽  
Harvey Austrin ◽  
D. Gene Davenport

This study compared the relative effectiveness of full Stress-inoculation Training, including the education phase, with a procedure which included only the rehearsal and application phases of Stress Inoculation, in treating 18 speech-anxious college students (11 females, 7 males; M = 22 yr.). A repeated-measures analysis of variance and multiple comparisons of two self-report indices of anxiety, a measure of ‘state’ anxiety, behavioral observations and a pulse-rate measure, indicated that by a 4-wk. follow-up, the full stress-inoculation training group improved significantly more than the group receiving stress-inoculation without the education phase, on the behavioral observations and both self-report indices. These findings support the assertion that the initial conceptualization phase is an effective component in this cognitive-learning therapy.


Children ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (7) ◽  
pp. 84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shirley Telles ◽  
Ram Kumar Gupta ◽  
Kumar Gandharva ◽  
Babita Vishwakarma ◽  
Niranjan Kala ◽  
...  

Pre-teen children face stressors related to their transition from childhood to adolescence, with a simultaneous increase in academic pressure. The present study compared the immediate effects of 18 min of (i) high frequency yoga breathing with (ii) yoga-based breath awareness and (iii) sitting quietly, on (a) attention and (b) anxiety, in 61 pre-teen children (aged between 11 and 12 years; 25 girls). Attention was assessed using a six letter cancellation task and Spielberger’s State Trait Anxiety Inventory STAI-S was used to measure anxiety before and after the three practices, practiced on separate days. Repeated measures ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni adjusted post-hoc analyses showed an increase in total attempts and net scores after high frequency yoga breathing (p < 0.05), while wrong attempts increased after yoga based breath awareness (p < 0.05). Anxiety decreased comparably after all three interventions. The 25 girls in the group had the same trend of results as the whole group with respect to the attention-based cancellation task, while boys showed no, how since change. For both girls and boys, anxiety decreased after all three 18min interventions. The results suggest that high frequency yoga breathing could be a short, useful school based practice to improve attention and reduce anxiety.


2013 ◽  
Vol 221 (3) ◽  
pp. 145-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerard J. P. van Breukelen

This paper introduces optimal design of randomized experiments where individuals are nested within organizations, such as schools, health centers, or companies. The focus is on nested designs with two levels (organization, individual) and two treatment conditions (treated, control), with treatment assignment to organizations, or to individuals within organizations. For each type of assignment, a multilevel model is first presented for the analysis of a quantitative dependent variable or outcome. Simple equations are then given for the optimal sample size per level (number of organizations, number of individuals) as a function of the sampling cost and outcome variance at each level, with realistic examples. Next, it is explained how the equations can be applied if the dependent variable is dichotomous, or if there are covariates in the model, or if the effects of two treatment factors are studied in a factorial nested design, or if the dependent variable is repeatedly measured. Designs with three levels of nesting and the optimal number of repeated measures are briefly discussed, and the paper ends with a short discussion of robust design.


2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 842-850 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Jackson ◽  
Matthew R. Baity ◽  
Kailyn Bobb ◽  
Diane Swick ◽  
Jeannette Giorgio

BMC Neurology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dulanji K. Kuruppu ◽  
Joshua Tobin ◽  
Yan Dong ◽  
Sheena K. Aurora ◽  
Laura Yunes-Medina ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Galcanezumab is a calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibody (mAb) indicated for the preventive treatment of migraine. While galcanezumab has demonstrated efficacy in patients who did not respond to prior preventive medications in general, its efficacy in patients who did not benefit from individual, commonly prescribed preventive treatments due to inadequate efficacy or safety/tolerability remains unknown. Methods CONQUER was a 3-month, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3b study that enrolled patients with episodic or chronic migraine who had 2 to 4 migraine preventive medication category failures in the past 10 years. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive placebo (N = 230) or galcanezumab 120 mg/month (240 mg loading dose; N = 232). Post hoc analyses were conducted to determine the efficacy of galcanezumab in patients who had not benefited from six of the most commonly prescribed migraine preventive medications. The mean change from baseline in monthly migraine headache days and ≥ 50 % response rates were assessed over months 1–3. Improvement in Migraine-Specific Questionnaire Role Function-Restrictive (MSQ-RFR) scores were assessed at month 3. The endpoints were estimated via mixed model with repeated measures. Results The most common treatment failures due to inadequate efficacy or safety/tolerability, which at least 20 % of patients reported trying without benefit, included topiramate, amitriptyline, propranolol, valproate or divalproex, onabotulinum toxin A, and metoprolol. Patients who had not previously benefited from these treatments had a greater mean reduction in monthly migraine headache days across months 1–3 in the galcanezumab group compared to placebo (all p < 0.01). More patients treated with galcanezumab experienced a ≥ 50 % reduction from baseline in monthly migraine headache days across months 1–3 compared to placebo (all p < 0.05). Galcanezumab-treated patients had a greater improvement in mean MSQ-RFR scores at month 3 compared to placebo (all p < 0.01). Conclusions In this population, galcanezumab was effective in reducing monthly migraine headache days, improving response rates, and enhancing quality of life in patients who had not previously benefited from topiramate, amitriptyline, propranolol, valproate or divalproex, onabotulinum toxin A, and/or metoprolol due to inadequate efficacy or safety/tolerability. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03559257 (CONQUER).


1980 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 495-501
Author(s):  
Matt E. Jaremko ◽  
Rob Hadfield ◽  
William E. Walker

A study is described in which students anxious about speeches were treated by variations of stress inoculation training. The purpose of the experiment was to evaluate the contribution of an educational phase to the training. Three treatment groups received either the educational phase only, the skills phase only, or both. These were compared with a no-treatment control group. The education-only group was the only group to improve significantly on self-reported anxiety measured before giving a public speech. The education-only and combination group improved on self-reported self-efficacy as a speaker. All groups improved on behavioral ratings of anxiety. Discussion focuses on the apparent potency of using an educational model in the treatment of anxiety. Future research is suggested for delineating the conditions under which education is a powerful ingredient.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document