scholarly journals Permohonan Tanah Ulayat di Minangkabau Menjadi Tanah Hak Milik

Lentera Hukum ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 392
Author(s):  
Siti Raga Fatmi

Communal land is an asset owned by customary law communities and jointly managed by members of customary law communities. Customary land in Minangkabau has been recognized in Indonesian law as mentioned in Article 3 of the Basic Agrarian Law Number 5 of 1960 (BAL) as long as it still exists and corresponding to the development. In fact, although a communal land in Minangkabau is administered collectively, the later development shows that such a communal land has been converted to the proprietary right by customary law communities due to the demand for legal recognition. BAL states that property rights are hereditary, strongest, and fulfilled rights owned by a person on a piece of land. Since there are no regulations governing the transfer of communal land to land ownership, the customary elders and regional apparatus make procedures for the transfer of communal land with certain conditions so that not everyone can submit an application for ownership of customary land into land owned. Keywords: Customary Land, Proprietary Rights, Land Registration

Jurnal Akta ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 297
Author(s):  
Dwi Pratiwi Markus ◽  
Amin Purnawan

This research aims (1) To know and analyze how the process of registration of customary land (2) To know and analyze the position of customary law and the role of Notary-PPAT in the process of land registration in Sorong City West Papua reviewed: According to the Principal Agrarian Law. This research uses a juridical-empirical approach. Yudiris is used to analyze rules relating to customary law and land, while empirical is used to analyze laws based on the behavior of people who always interact in daily life. The result of this research are (1) Government of Indonesia recognition of the existence of land and customary law is set forth in UUPA and PP. 24 of 1997 on Land Registration, so that in the process of registration of customary land in Sorong city is not much different from the registration of land in general. Only the registration of customary land in Sorong must be proven by several conditions that specify in local customary law and has been arranged also in the PP. No. 24 of 1997 (2) UUPA itself is a national agrarian law whose presence is based on indigenous laws of Indonesia known as customary law, so to conduct registration of land in Sorong City must use letters of customary release from the local customary chief, in this process the role of Notary-PPAT is needed in making the declaration of customary release and the role of PPAT in helping people who do not understand the rules of local custom in the process of registration of customary land as long as it does not violate the rules related to PPAT authority set by PerKaBPN No. 8 Year 2013.Keywords: Land, Customary Law, Notary-PPAT


2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 154
Author(s):  
Bayu Sagita

Abstract : In the process of buying and selling land as the basis for the transition of land rights from the seller to buyers in the area of Bolaang Mongondow, especially in Lolak Village District Lolak is done in two ways, namely the process of buying and selling as in general the sale and purchase of land ownership is a unity of land and buildings and plants above it and the process of buying and selling of land is not a unity between the land and buildings and plants above it or the sale and purchase by using the principle of separation horizontal is separate sale and purchase. However, in the development of the practice of the process of buying and selling land that is considered as part of the process of buying and selling property rights on customary land or customary law, it raises legal problems, the process of buying and selling property rights on land that can not provide legal protection of the status of property in full for the buyer in the land and enjoy the benefits and functions of the land itself.


2017 ◽  
pp. 154-166
Author(s):  
Bayu Sagita Damopolii Bayu Sagita Damopolii ◽  
Imam Koeswahyono Imam Koeswahyono ◽  
Moh. Fadli Moh. Fadli

In the process of buying and selling land as the basis for the transition of land rights from the seller to buyers in the area of Bolaang Mongondow, especially in Lolak Village District Lolak is done in two ways, namely the process of buying and selling as in general the sale and purchase of land ownership is a unity of land and buildings and plants above it and the process of buying and selling of land is not a unity between the land and buildings and plants above it or the sale and purchase by using the principle of separation horizontal is separate sale and purchase. However, in the development of the practice of the process of buying and selling land that is considered as part of the process of buying and selling property rights on customary land or customary law, it raises legal problems, the process of buying and selling property rights on land that can not provide legal protection of the status of property in full for the buyer in the land and enjoy the benefits and functions of the land itself.


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1013
Author(s):  
Stella . ◽  
Hasni .

Since of Agrarian Law in Indonesia, western right land and communal right land have been converted into land right according to Agrarian Law so the state is obliged to provide legal assurance through land registration, with the end product is certificate as a proof of title. Proof is an important part of law society as it is the legal standing of land ownership. A strong proof of title is defined in the Agrarian Law and Government Regulation as the implementing regulation, however Indonesian society especially low-economy society still the old proof of title. The main issue is how Customary Title Status relates to the proof of land right in the national land law and judge of Supreme Court made in consideration in resolving civil dispute number 2459K/Pdt/2014 on use of customary land title no.87 land parcel 157 West Cengkareng urban village. Based on the research outcome, that the existence of customary land title is still recognized to this date only as one of the requirements in the land registration process to prove the old title and conversion of communal land so that decision of Supreme Court is correctly made that customary land title is not a form of land ownership since there is no agency except National Land Agency can issue proof of title that is certificate. As of the result of this, certificate is a strong proof of land title. So should, there is an importance common understanding of customary land title from fiscal cadaster rather than legal cadaster.


SASI ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 111
Author(s):  
Desy Kosita Hallauw ◽  
Jenny Kristiana Matuankotta ◽  
Novyta Uktolseja

Relinquishment of land rights is the relinquishment of legal relations between the holders of land rights and the land under their control by providing compensation on the basis of deliberation. Letter of Waiver of rights is evidence that is made with the aim of releasing land rights. A letter of release of customary land rights (dati) is applied in the same way as the release of land rights in general, as enforced in accordance with Government Regulation No. 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration. The process of registering customary land rights (dati) is based on the release of customary rights (dati) issued by the customary land owner (dati) as the basis for rights. So based on the release of land rights, it can be registered at the Ambon City Land Office to obtain proof of land ownership or certificates. The letter of release of customary land rights (dati) issued by the customary State Government in Ambon City is binding as long as it is carried out based on applicable customary law and can be proven the basis of ownership rights to customary land (dati) from the customary land owner (dati) that issues the release letter the land rights. However, as long as it cannot be proven valid, the letter of release of land rights does not have binding power, thus the release of the customary land rights (dati) becomes invalid and the certificate can be canceled.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 121
Author(s):  
Inggir Deviandari ◽  
Kurnia Warman ◽  
Zefrizal Nurdin

Ulayat rights are the rights that owned by a legal alliance, where the citizens of the community have the right to control the land. The Regional Regulation of West Sumatra Province, Article 2 paragraph (1) Number 6 of 2008 concerning Communal Land and Its Utilization states that the main principle of customary land is permanent based on the Minangkabau traditional philosophy “jua ndak makan bali, gadai ndak makan sando” (shall not bargaining; may not be pawned). The provisions of the regulation state that ulayat land may not be traded and may not be pawned, its ownership status may not change, except for importunate situation and condition, namely maik tabujua dalam rumah (for the death of family member), gadih gadang ndak balaki (wedding), rumah gadang katirisan (misfortune), mambangkik Batang tarandam (efforts to enforce). Land acquisition for the construction of subsidized housing is not a land acquisition according to Law Number 2 of 2012 concerning Land Procurement for Public Interest. The formulation of the problems discussed are first, the process of acquiring communal land for the construction of subsidized housing in Harau District, Lima Puluh Kota Regency, secondly the land registration process after the acquisition of customary land occurs, thirdly the legal consequences of acquiring customary land used for the construction of subsidized housing in Harau District, Lima Regency. Dozens of Cities againts customary law communities. This study uses an empirical juridical approach with the aim of finding out whether the law in the book is in accordance with the law in action. The results of the research study indicate that the process of acquiring communal land for the construction of subsidized housing is carried out by buying and selling. The construction of subsidized housing is managed by a legal entity in the form of a Limited Liability Company. The status of land ownership is just as the user of the facility that called with Hak Guna Bangunan


2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 175
Author(s):  
Mustafa Bola

Prove of land ownership by customary land is generally unwritten, just a confession of the surrounding communities with nature sign boundaries. If land ownership cannot be supported by strong evidence, the land may be registered by someone else who has getting physically for 20 years or more in consecutively and qualified on Government Regulation No. 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration. Proof of old rights derived from the customary land law is rationally difficult to prove because there are no written documents. Customary land law does not know written ownership, only physical possession continually so it is very prone to conflict or dispute. In order to develop land administration in Indonesia, the values of customary land law contained in its principles is expected to be reflected in the land administration so it can reduce land conflict in the community. The role of customary land law has a large portion of the national land law. The role of government or ruling is very important to create a conducive condition in the land sector. A land is not allowed for personal or group interests, its use must be adjusted with the condition and the characteristic of their rights so useful, both for the prosperity and helpful to community and state.


Tunas Agraria ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-69
Author(s):  
Ardi Saputra Sinaga ◽  
Julius Sembiring ◽  
Sukayadi Sukayadi

Abstract: Environment and Forestry Ministry established the reserve incense forest of the Pan-dumaan-Sipituhuta Customary Law Community as a customary forest. But in reality, it has not been guaranteed legal certainty regarding the existence and recognition of the rights of the Pan-dumaan-Sipituhuta Customary Law Community. The objective of this research is to know the le-gal status of Indigenous Peoples forest in Pandumaan-Sipituhuta Customary Law at this time, strategy of the land registration of communal right settlement, and constraint and effort done in the land registration of communal right settlement of Pandumaan-Sipituhuta Customary Law Community. This research uses qualitative research method with empirical juridical research form. Based on the results of the study showed that the legal status of the Indigenous Forests of Pandumaan-Sipituhuta Customary Law Society is currently reserved as customary forest of Pan-dumaan-Sipituhuta Customary Law Community. Strategy for resolving communal rights land registration in the incense forest of the Pandumaan-Sipituhuta Customary Law Community through four stages. First, recognition of the existence of the Pandumaan-Sipituhuta Customary Law Community. Secondly, the establishment of customary forests of the Pandumaan-Sipituhuta Customary Law Community by Environment and Forestry Ministry. Third, the Settlement of Land Control in Forest Areas is carried out in accordance with Presidential Regulation Number 88 of 2017 by issuing customary forests of the Pandumaan-Sipituhuta Customary Law Community from forest areas. Fourth, registration of communal land rights of Pandumaan-Sipituhuta Custom-ary Law Community.Keywords: strategy, communal rights, customary forestsIntisari: Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan (KLHK) menetapkan pencadangan hutan kemenyan Masyarakat Hukum Adat Pandumaan-Sipituhuta sebagai hutan adat. Tetapi kenyataannya, keadaan tersebut hingga saat ini dinilai belum menjamin kepastian hukum akan keberadaan dan pengakuan hak Masyarakat Hukum Adat Pandumaan-Sipituhuta. Tujuan dari penelitian ini untuk menjelaskan bagaimana strategi penyelesaian pendaftaran tanah hak komunal hutan kemenyan Masyarakat Hukum Adat Pandumaan-Sipituhuta. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian kualitatif dengan pendekatan yuridis empiris. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa status hukum hutan kemenyan Masyarakat Hukum Adat Pandumaan-Sipituhuta saat ini dicadangkan sebagai hutan adat. Strategi penyelesaian pendaftaran tanah hak komunal hutan kemenyan Masyarakat Hukum Adat Pandumaan-Sipituhuta melalui empat tahapan. Pertama, pengakuan keberadaan Masyarakat Hukum Adat Pandumaan-Sipituhuta. Kedua, penetapan hutan adat Masyarakat Hukum Adat Pandumaan-Sipituhuta oleh KLHK. Ketiga, dilakukan Penyelesaian Penguasaan Tanah dalam Kawasan Hutan sesuai dengan Peraturan Presiden Nomor 88 Tahun 2017dengan cara mengeluarkan hutan adat Masyarakat Hukum Adat Pandumaan-Sipituhuta dari kawasan hutan. Keempat, pendaftaran tanah hak komunal Masyarakat Hukum Adat Pandumaan-Sipituhuta.Kata Kunci : strategi, hak komunal, hutan adat


Land ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. 416
Author(s):  
David Asante Edwin ◽  
Evam Kofi Glover ◽  
Edinam K. Glover

Development practice over recent years in much of Africa prioritized formalization of land policies deemed to enhance better handling and use of land as an asset for social development. Following this trend, land reform policy in Ghana was based on a pluralistic legal system in which both the customary land tenure system and the statutory system of land ownership and control co-exist by law. The primary research question for this study was the following: What implications emerge when customary land tenure system and the statutory system of land ownership and control co-exist in law? The study discussed the prospects and challenges of land title registration and the meaning of the new organizing concept in land ownership and administration among the people of Dagbon in the northern region of Ghana. The principal aim of the study was to assess the challenges of the implementation of a modern land registration system over a deeply traditional one. A qualitative research methodology was used and included qualitative descriptive analysis. This descriptive-analytical study was carried out to investigate opinions on the implications of the merger and preferred options for redress of any systemic challenges. It employed Focused Group Discussions (FGDs) to supplement in-depth interviews. Interviews were conducted among 40 key participants within formal and informal institutions including officials from both the Land Commission and Town and Country Planning Departments. Purposeful sampling was employed, and an interview guide was developed and used for collecting the data. Data were analyzed using a thematic approach. The results showed that in this structural reform, the ‘allodial title’ holder was much more trusted for tenure security because of the traditional legitimacy of the King as the sole owner and controller of land. The title registration system therefore principally served the secondary purpose as additional security. The findings indicate that in the circumstance where the law was seen as pliable, the policy engendered blurred and confusing effects that deepened the sense of ambiguity and outcomes were sometimes contradictory. We argued that the crossroads presented challenges that were novel and engendered innovative thinking for more appropriate solutions. The study revealed that policy reforms must be tailor-made to the physical, social, cultural and economic settings.


2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (01) ◽  
pp. 69-81
Author(s):  
Nur Hairul Hari Yanto ◽  
Muhammad Nasarudin

In the agrarian system, Article 21 paragraph 1 of the Basic Agrarian Law states that only Indonesian citizens have property rights. One of the examples of ownership rights is the right to land ownership or those that may have a relationship with the earth and space without differentiating between men and women as well as fellow Indonesian citizens, both native and descendants.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document