scholarly journals Investigating Relative Permeability Measurements using Unsteady-State Core Flooding Method

Energies ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 626
Author(s):  
Jiyuan Zhang ◽  
Bin Zhang ◽  
Shiqian Xu ◽  
Qihong Feng ◽  
Xianmin Zhang ◽  
...  

The relative permeability of coal to gas and water exerts a profound influence on fluid transport in coal seams in both primary and enhanced coalbed methane (ECBM) recovery processes where multiphase flow occurs. Unsteady-state core-flooding tests interpreted by the Johnson–Bossler–Naumann (JBN) method are commonly used to obtain the relative permeability of coal. However, the JBN method fails to capture multiple gas–water–coal interaction mechanisms, which inevitably results in inaccurate estimations of relative permeability. This paper proposes an improved assisted history matching framework using the Bayesian adaptive direct search (BADS) algorithm to interpret the relative permeability of coal from unsteady-state flooding test data. The validation results show that the BADS algorithm is significantly faster than previous algorithms in terms of convergence speed. The proposed method can accurately reproduce the true relative permeability curves without a presumption of the endpoint saturations given a small end-effect number of <0.56. As a comparison, the routine JBN method produces abnormal interpretation results (with the estimated connate water saturation ≈33% higher than and the endpoint water/gas relative permeability only ≈0.02 of the true value) under comparable conditions. The proposed framework is a promising computationally effective alternative to the JBN method to accurately derive relative permeability relations for gas–water–coal systems with multiple fluid–rock interaction mechanisms.


2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Kumar ◽  
Mariyamni Awang ◽  
Ghulam Abbas ◽  
Khurram Farouque ◽  
Sheraz Ahmed

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian Chin ◽  
Safdar Ali ◽  
Ashish Mathur ◽  
Colton Barnes ◽  
William Von Gonten

Abstract A big challenge in tight conventional and unconventional rock systems is the lack of representative reservoir deliverability models for movement of water, oil and gas through micro-pore and nano-pore networks. Relative permeability is a key input in modelling these rocks; but due to limitations in core analysis techniques, permeability has become a knob or tuning parameter in reservoir simulation. Current relative permeability measurements on conventional core samples rely on density contrast between oil/water or gas/water on CT (Computed Tomography) scans and recording of effluent volumes to determine relative fluid saturations during the core flooding process. However, tight rocks are characterized by low porosities (&lt; 10 %) and ultra-low permeabilities (&lt; 1 micro-Darcy), that make effective and relative permeability measurements very difficult, time-consuming, and prone to high errors associated with low pore volumes and flow rates. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) measurements have been used extensively in the industry to measure fluid porosities, pore size characterization, wettability evaluation, etc. Core NMR scans can provide accurate quantification of pore fluids (oil, gas, water) even in very small quantities, using T2, T1T2 and D-T2 activation sequences. We have developed a novel process to perform experiments that measure effective and relative permeability values on both conventional and tight reservoirs at reservoir conditions while accurately monitoring fluid saturations and fluid fronts in a 12 MHz 3D gradient NMR spectrometer. The experimental process starts by acquiring Micro-CT scans of the cylindrical rock plugs to screen the samples for artifacts or microcracks that may affect permeability measurements. Once the samples are chosen, NMR T2 and T1T2 scans are performed to establish residual fluid saturations in the as-received state. If a liquid effective permeability test is required, the samples are then saturated with the given liquid through a combination of humidification, vacuum-assisted spontaneous imbibition, and saturation under pressure and temperature. After saturation, NMR scans are obtained to verify the volumes of the liquids and determine if the samples have achieved complete saturation. The sample is then loaded into a special core-flooding vessel that is invisible to the NMR spectrometer to minimize interference with the NMR signals from the fluids in the sample. The sample is brought up to reservoir stress and temperature, and the main flowing fluid is injected from one side of the sample while controlling the pressures on the other side of the sample with a back pressure regulator. The saturation front of the injected fluid is continuously monitored using 2D and 3D gradient NMR scans and the volumes of different fluids in the sample are measured using NMR T2 and T1T2 scans. The use of a 12 MHz NMR spectrometer provides very high SNR (signal-to-noise ratio); and clear distinction of water and hydrocarbon signals in the core plug during the entire process. The scanning times are also reduced by orders of magnitude, thereby allowing for more scans to properly capture the saturation front and changes in saturation. Simultaneously, the fluid flowrates and pressures are recorded in order to compute permeability values. The setup is rated to 10,000 psi confining pressures, 9000 psi of pore pressure and a working temperature of up to 100 C. Flowrates as low as 0.00001 cc/min can be recorded. These tests have been done with brine, dead and live crudes, and hydrocarbon gases. The measured relative permeability values have been used successfully in both simulation and production modelling studies in various reservoirs worldwide.


SPE Journal ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (03) ◽  
pp. 0799-0808 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.. Shahverdi ◽  
M.. Sohrabi

Summary Large quantities of oil usually remain in oil reservoirs after conventional waterfloods. A significant part of this remaining oil can still be economically recovered by water-alternating-gas (WAG) injection. WAG injection involves drainage and imbibition processes taking place sequentially; therefore, the numerical simulation of the WAG process requires reliable knowledge of three-phase relative permeability (kr) accounting for cyclic-hysteresis effects. In this study, the results of a series of unsteady-state two-phase displacements and WAG coreflood experiments were used to investigate the behavior of three-phase kr and hysteresis effects in the WAG process. The experiments were performed on two different cores with different characteristics and wettability conditions. An in-house coreflood simulator was developed to obtain three-phase relative permeability values directly from unsteady-state WAG experiments by history matching the measured recovery and differential-pressure profiles. The results show that three-phase gas relative permeability is reduced in consecutive gas-injection cycles and consequently the gas mobility and injectivity drop significantly with successive gas injections during the WAG process, under different rock conditions. The trend of hysteresis in the relative permeabilty of gas (krg) partly contradicts the existing hysteresis models available in the literature. The three-phase water relative permeability (krw) of the water-wet (WW) core does not exhibit considerable hysteresis effect during different water injections, whereas the mixed-wet (MW) core shows slight cyclic hysteresis. This may indicate a slight increase of the water injectivity in the subsequent water injections in the WAG process under MW conditions. Insignificant hysteresis is observed in the oil relative permeability (kro) during different gas-injection cycles for both WW and MW rocks. However, a considerable cyclic-hysteresis effect in kro is observed during water-injection cycles of WAG, which is attributed to the reduction of the residual oil saturation (ROS) during successive water injections. The kro of the WW core exhibits much-more cyclic-hysteresis effect than that of the MW core. No models currently exist in reservoir simulators that can capture the observed cyclic-hysteresis effect in oil relative permeability for the WAG process. Investigation of relative permeability data obtained from these displacement tests at different rock conditions revealed that there is a significant discrepancy between two-phase and three-phase relative permeability of all fluids. This highlights that not only the three-phase relative permeability of the intermediate phase (oil), but also the three-phase kr of the wetting phase (water) and nonwetting phase (gas) are functions of two independent saturations.


1979 ◽  
Vol 19 (01) ◽  
pp. 15-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
P.M. Sigmund ◽  
F.G. McCaffery

Abstract With typical heterogeneous carbonate coresamples, large uncertainties of unknown magnitudecan occur in the relative permeabilities derived using different methods. This situation can beimproved by analyzing the recovery and pressureresponse to two-phase laboratory displacement tests by a nonlinear least-squares procedure. Thesuggested technique fits the finite-differencesolution of the Buckley-Leverett two-phase flowequations(which include capillary pressure) to theobserved recovery and pressure data. The procedureis used to determine relative-permeability curves characterized by two parameters and their standarderrors for heterogeneous cores from two Albertacarbonate reservoirs. Introduction Several recent investigations have recognizedpossible problems when obtaining reliable two-phasedisplacement data from heterogeneous carbonate core samples. Huppler stated that waterfloodresults on cores with significant heterogeneitiescan be sensitive to flooding rate, core length, andwettability, and that these effects should beconsidered before applying the laboratory results atfield flooding rates. Brandner and Slotboomsuggested that realistic displacement results maynot be obtainable when vertically flooding aheterogeneous core with a nonwetting phase becauseof the fluid's inability to maintain a properdistribution when the sample length is less than the height of capillary rise. Ehrlich noted thatstandard relative-permeability measurement methodsusing core plugs cannot be applied when the media are heterogeneous. Archer and Wong reported that application of theconventional Johnson- Bossler - Neumann (JBN)methods for determining relative permeabilities froma waterflood test could give erroneous results forheterogeneous carbonate as well as for relativelyhomogeneous porous media having a mixed wettability (see Refs. 1, 6, and 7). The observedstepwise or humped shape of water relativepermeability curves mainly were attributed to theeffect of water breakthrough ahead of the main floodfront entering into the JBN calculation. Archer andWong suggested that such abnormally shapedrelative-permeability curves do not represent theproperties of the bulk of the core sample, and proposed the use of a reservoir simulator forinterpreting laboratory waterflood data. The work referred to above provides the majorbackground for this study involving the developmentof an improved unsteady-state test method tocharacterize the relative-permeability properties ofheterogeneous carbonate core samples. The methodcan be applied to all porous media, regardless ofthe size and distribution of the heterogeneities.However, the presence of large-scaleheterogeneities, especially in the form of vugs, fractures, and stratification, could cause the derivedrelative-permeability relations to be affected by viscosityratio and displacement rate. Remember also that extrapolation of any core test data to a field scaleis associated with many uncertainties, particularlyfor heterogeneous formations. The inclusion ofcapillary pressure effects permits the interpretationof displacement tests at reservoir rates. The proposed calculation procedure extends theapproach suggested by Archer and Wong in thatthe degree of fit between observed laboratory dataand simulator results is quantified. We suggest thatrelative-permeability curves for a variety of rocktypes can be expressed in terms of two adjustable parameters and their standard error estimates.To illustrate the method, the results of displacementtests performed on cores from Swan Hills Beaverhill Lake limestone oil reservoir and Rainbow F KegRiver dolomite oil reservoir are interpreted. SPEJ P. 15^


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document